References
Murray, A.T., M. Goycoolea, and A. Weintraub. (2004). “Incorporating Average and Maximum area Restrictions in Harvest Scheduling Models.” Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 34, 456–464.
Andalaft, N., P. Andalaft, M. Guignard, M. Adrian, W. Alexis, and W. Andrés. (2003). “A Problem of Forest Harvesting and Road Building Solved Through Model Strengthening and Lagrangean Relaxation.” Operations Research, 51(4), 613–628.
Barahona, F., A. Weintaub, and R. Epstein. (1992). “Habitat Dispersion in Forest Planning and the Stable Set Problem.” Operations Research, 40(1).
Barrett, T.M. and J.K. Gilless. (2000). “Even-Aged Restrictions with Sub-Graph Adjacency.” Annals of Operations Research, 95, 159–175.
Boston, K. and P. Bettinger. (2002). “Combining Tabu Search and Genetic Algorithm Heuristic Techniques to Solve Spatial Harvest Scheduling Problems.” Forest Science, 48, 35–58.
Clark, M.M., Meller, and T.P. McDonald. (2000). “A Three-Stage Heuristic for Harvest Scheduling with Access Road Network Development.” Forest Science, 46, 204–218.
Caro, F., M. Constantino, I. Martins, and A. Weintraub. (2003). “A 2 Opt. Tabu Search Procedure for the Multi-Period Forest Harvesting Problem with Adjacency, Green-up, Old Growth and Even Flow Constraints.” Forest Science, 49(5), 738–751.
Diaz, A., J. Ferland, C. Ribeiro, J. Vera, and A. Weintraub. (2005). “A Tabu Search Approach for Solfing a Difficult Forest Harvesting Machine Location Problem.” In Review process in European Journal of Operational Research.
Epstein, R., R. Morales, J. Serón, and A. Weintraub. (1999). “Use of OR Systems in the Chilean Forest Industries.” Interfaces, 29, 7–29.
Epstein, R. and A. Weintraub. (2005). A Mixed Integer Programming Approach for Solving Machinery Location and Road Design in Forestry Planning", submitted to Operations Research.
Epstein, R., L. Henríquez, J. Catalán, G. Weintraub, and C. Martínez. (2002). “A Combinatorial Auction Improves School Meals in Chile.” Interfaces, 32(6), 1–14.
Goycoolea, M., A. Murray, F. Barahona, R. Epstein, and A. Weintraub. (2005). “Harvest Scheduling Subject to Maximum Area Restrictions Exploring Exact Approaches.” To appear in Operations Research.
Hogason, H.M. and J.G. Borges. (1998). “Using Dynamic Programming and Overlapping Sub Problems to Address Adjacency in Large Harvest Scheduling Problems.” Forest Science, 44, 526–538.
Jones, J.G., J.F.C. Hyde III, and M.L. Meacham. (1986). “Four Analytical Approaches for Integrating Land Management and Transportation Planning on Forest Lands.” Research Paper INT—361, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, p. 33.
Kirby, M.W., W. Hager, and P. Wong. (1986). “Simultaneous Planning of Wildland Transportation Alternatives.” In TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences, Vol. 21, New York, Elsevier Science Publishers, pp. 371–387.
McDill, M.E., S.A. Rabin, and J. Braze. (2002). “Harvest Scheduling with Area-Based Adjacency Constraints.” Forest Science, 48, 631–642.
Murray, A.T. (1999). “Spatial Restrictions in Harvest Scheduling.” Forest Science, 45, 1–8.
Murray, A.T. and R.L. Church. (1996). “Analyzing Cliques for Imposing Adjacency Restrictions in Forest Models.” Forest Science, 42, 166–175.
Murray, A.T. and A. Weintraub. (2002). “Scale and Unit Specificaton Influences in Harvest Scheduling with Maximum Area Restrictions.” Forest Science, 48, 779–789.
Murray, A.T., M. Goycoolea, and A. Weintraub. (2004). “Incorporating Average and Maximum Area Restrictions in Harvest Scheduling Models.” Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 34, 456–464.
Navon, D.I. (1971). “Timber RAM... A Long-Range Planning Method for Commercial Timber Lands Under Multiple-Use Management.” USDA Forest Service, Research Paper PSW—70, Berkeley, California, 22.
Richards, E.W. and E.A. Gunn. (2000). “A Model and Tabu Search Method to Optimize Sand Harvest and Road Construction Schedules.” Forest Science, 46, 188–203.
Vera, J., A. Weintraub, M. Koenig, G. Bravo, M., Guignard, and F. Barahona. (2003). “A Lagrangean Relaxation Approach for a Machinery Location Problem in Forest Harvesting.” Journal of the Brazilian OR Society, 23, 111–128.
Vielma, J., A. Murray, D. Ryan, and A. Weintraub. (2004). “Improving Computational Capabilities for Addressing Volume Constraints in Forest Harvest Scheduling Problems”. In Review European Journal of Operations Research.
Weintraub, A. and D. Navon. (1976). “A Forest Management Planning Model Integrating Silvicultural and Transportation Activities.” Management Sciences, 22(12), 1299–1309.
Weintraub, A., G. Jones, A. Magendzo, M. Meacham, and M. Kirby. (1994). “Heuristic System to Solve Mixed Integer Forest Planning Models.” Operations Research, 42(6), 1010–1024.
Weintraub, A., G. Jones, M. Meacham, M. Magendzo, A. Magendzo, and D. Malchuk. (1995). “Procedures for Solving Mixed-Integer Harvest Scheduling Transportation Planning Models.” Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 25, 1618–1626.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weintraub P., A. Integer programming in forestry. Ann Oper Res 149, 209–216 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-006-0105-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-006-0105-9