Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

“Optimization of aircraft maintenance/support infrastructure using genetic algorithms—level of repair analysis”

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Level of repair analysis (LORA) is an approach used during the design stage of complex equipment for analysis of the cost effectiveness of competing maintenance strategies. LORA is carried as a part of the life cycle cost and cost of ownership analysis and plays a significant role in minimizing the life cycle cost and cost of ownership of the capital equipment. Since many purchasing decisions of complex equipment are based on cost of ownership, it has become essential to carry out LORA to compete in the market. In this paper, we develop a mathematical model for LORA and propose a solution methodology based on genetic algorithms. The concept is illustrated using a hypothetical aircraft engine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asiedu, Y. and P. Gu. (1998). “Product Life Cycle Cost Analysis: State of the Art Review.” International Journal of Production Economics 36(4), 883–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barros, L. and M. Riley. (2001). “A Combinatorial Approach to Level of Repair Analysis.” European Journal of Operational Research 129, 242–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barros, L. (1998). “The Optimisation of Repair Decisions Using Life Cycle Cost Parameters.” Institute for Mathematics and Its Applications Journal, 9(4), 403–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, B. S. and W. J. Fabrycky. (1991). Systems Engineering and Analysis. Prentice Hall.

  • Blanchard, B. S., Dinesh V., and E. L. Peterson. (2000). Maintainability—A Key Effective Serviceability and Maintenance Management, John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degraeve, Z. and F. Roodhooft. (1999). “Improving the Efficiency of the Purchasing Process Using Total Cost of Ownership: The Case of Heating Electrodes at Cockerill Sambre S.” A. European Journal of Operational Research 112, 42–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinesh Kumar et al. (2000). Reliability, Maintenance and Logistic Support—A Life Cycle Approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Ebling, C. E. (1997). An Introduction to Reliability and Maintainability Engineering. McGraw Hill.

  • Haupt, R. and S. E. Haupt. (1998). Practical Genetic Algorithms. John Wiley / Sons.

  • Hatch, M. L. and R. D. Badinelli. (1999). “Concurrent Optimization in Designing for Logistic Support.” European Journal of Operational Research, 115, 77–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. H. (1975). “Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems.” University of Michigan Press.

  • Jayabalan, V. and D. Chaudhuri. (1992). “Cost Optimization of Maintenance Scheduling for a System with Assured Reliability.” IEEE Transactions on Reliability. 41, 21–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knezevic, J. (1997). Systems Maintainability—Analysis, Engineering and Management. Chapman / Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makis, V. A. and K. S. Jardine. (1993). “A Note on Optimal Replacement Policy Under General Repair.” European Journal of Operational Research, 69, 75–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, P. S. (1979). “Optimal Number of Minimal Repairs Before Replacement.” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 28, 137–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plank, E. R. and B. G. Ferrin. (2002). “How Manufacturers Value Purchase Offerings An Exploratory Study.” Industrial Marketing Management 31, 457–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, S. Y. and W. J. Kolarik. (1981). Life Cycle Costing: Concept and Practice. Omega, 9 (3), 287–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherbrooke, C. C. (1992). Optimal Inventory Modelling of Systems. John Wiley, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spears, W. M. and K. A. De Jong. (1991). “An Analysis of Multi-Point Crossover.” In Foundations of Genetic Algorithms (Ed.) G J E Rawlins, Morgan Kauffmann.

  • Taylor, W. B. (1981). “The Use of Life Cycle Costing in Acquiring Physical Assets.” Long Range Planning, 14(6), 32–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waeyenbergh. G. and L. Pintelon. (2002). “A Framework for Maintenance Concept Development.” International Journal of Maintenance Concept Development, 77, 299–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, D. G. (1997). “Life Cycle Costing – Theory, Information, Acquisition and Application.” International Journal of Project Management 15, No. 6, 335–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhand Z. G. and C. E. Love. (2000). “A Simple Recursive Markov Chain Model to Determine the Optimal Replacement Policies Under General Repairs.” Computers / Operations Research 27, 321–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L. S., D. D. Estrin, S. Shenker, and D. Zappala. (1993). “RSVP: A Resource ReSerVation Protocol.” IEEE Network Magazine.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haritha Saranga.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saranga, H., Kumar, U.D. “Optimization of aircraft maintenance/support infrastructure using genetic algorithms—level of repair analysis”. Ann Oper Res 143, 91–106 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-006-7374-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-006-7374-1

Keywords

Navigation