Skip to main content
Log in

Retailer’s inventory policies for a one time only manufacturer trade deal of uncertain duration

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper models a retailer’s response to temporary manufacturer’s trade deals characterized by a time interval of random length, but with the ending date known before its occurrence. Uncertainty is handled through a reordering point, which serves as a trigger mechanism for a new special order and is activated at the discount termination date. The model generates ordering policies, applicable to any probability distribution and is shown to yield well-known deterministic optimal policies as a limiting case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ailawadi, K., & Farris, P. (1999). Trade promotion: Essential to selling through retailers. Sloan Management Review, 41, 83–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arcelus, F. J., & Srinivasan, G. (1995). Discount strategies for one-time-only sales. IIE Transactions, 27, 618–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bednar, J. (2005). Like one of the family. Business West, 22(9), 44–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güllü, R., Önol, E., & Erkip, N. (1999). An analysis of an inventory system under supply uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, 59, 377–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gürler, Ü, & Parlar, M. (1997). An inventory problem with two randomly available suppliers. Operations Research, 45, 904–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosken, D., & Reiffen, D. (2004). Patterns of retail price variation. RAND Journal of Economics, 35, 128–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khang, D. B., & Fujiwara, O. (2000). Optimality of myopic ordering policies for inventory models with stochastic supply. Operations Research, 48, 181–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leech, P. (2002). The shaq factor and other problems. Progressive Grocer, 81(11), 27–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev, B., & Weiss, H. A. (1990). Inventory models with cost changes. Operations Research, 38, 53–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matlab (2005). Optimization toolbox: User’s guide. Natick: The Math Works, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neslin, S. A. (2002). Sales promotions. In Weitz B. A. & Wensley R. (Eds.), Handbook of marketing (pp. 310–328). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naddor, E. (1966). Inventory Systems. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parlar, M. (2000). Probabilistic analysis of renewal cycles: An application to a non-Markovian inventory problem with multiple objectives. Operations Research, 48, 243–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver, E. A. (1999). Simple replenishment rules when payment periods (dating deals) are present. Production and Inventory Management Journal, 40, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, E. A., Robb, D. J., & Rahnama, M. N. (1993). Random opportunities for reduced cost replacements. IIE Transactions, 25, 111–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyagi, R. K. (1999). A characterization of retail response to manufacturing trade deals. Journal of Marketing Research, 36, 510–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, D. (2000). Frozen food allowances rise. Frozen Food Age, 48(11), 10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco Arcelus.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arcelus, F., Pakkala, T.P.M. & Srinivasan, G. Retailer’s inventory policies for a one time only manufacturer trade deal of uncertain duration. Ann Oper Res 164, 3–15 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-007-0256-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-007-0256-3

Keywords