Abstract
The augmented-neural-network (AugNN) approach has been applied lately to some NP-Hard combinatorial problems, such as task scheduling, open-shop scheduling and resource-constraint project scheduling. In this approach the problem of search in the solution-space is transformed to a search in a weight-matrix space, much like in a neural-network approach. Some weight adjustment strategies are then used to converge to a good set of weights for a locally optimal solution. While empirical results have demonstrated the effectiveness of the AugNN approach vis-à-vis a few other metaheuristics, little theoretical insights exist which justify this approach and explain the effectiveness thereof. This paper provides some theoretical insights and justification for the AugNN approach through some basic theorems and also describes the algorithm and the formulation with the help of examples.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Agarwal, A., Jacob, V., & Pirkul, H. (2003). Augmented neural networks for task scheduling. European Journal of Operational Research, 151(3), 481–502.
Agarwal, A., Jacob, V., & Pirkul, H. (2006). An improved augmented neural-networks approach for scheduling problems. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 18(1), 119–128.
Birbil, S. I., & Fang, S. C. (2003). An electromagnetism-like mechanism for global optimization. Journal of Global Optimization, 25(3), 263–282.
Cheng, R. W., & Gen, M. (1997). Parallel machine scheduling problems using memetic algorithms. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 33(3–4), 761–764.
Chu, P., & Beasley, J. (1998). A genetic algorithm for the multidimensional knapsack problem. Journal of Heuristics, 4(1), 63–86.
Colak, S., & Agarwal, A. (2005). Non-greedy heuristics and augmented neural networks for the open-shop scheduling problem. Naval Research Logistics, 52(7), 631–644.
Colak, S., Agarwal, A., & Erenguc, S. S. (2006). Resource constrained project scheduling problem: a hybrid neural approach. In: J. Weglarz & J. Jozefowska (Eds.), Topics in modern scheduling (pp. 297–318).
Debels, D., Reyck, B. D., Leus, R., & Vanhoucke, M. (2006). A hybrid scatter search/electromagnetism meta-heuristic for project scheduling. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(2), 638–653.
Díaz, J. A., & Fernández, E. (2006). Scatter search and Path Relinking for the capacitated p-Median problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(2), 570–585.
Dorigo, M., Caro, G. D., & Gambardella, L. M. (1999). Ant algorithms for discrete optimization. Artificial Life, 5(2), 137–172.
Glover, F. (1989). Tabu search—Part I. ORSA Journal on Computing, 1(3), 190–206.
Goldberg, D. E. (1989). Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Helsgaun, K. (2000). An effective implementation of the Lin-Kernighan traveling salesman heuristic. European Journal of Operational Research, 126(1), 106–130.
Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D., & Vecchi, M. P. (1983). Optimization by simulated annealing. Science, 220, 671–680.
Kolisch, R., & Hartmann, S. (2006). Experimental investigation of heuristics for resource-constrained project scheduling: An update. European Journal of Operational Research, 174(1), 23–37.
Lin, S., & Kernighan, B. W. (1973). An effective heuristic algorithm for the traveling salesman problem. Operations Research, 21(2), 498–516.
Martí, R., Laguna, M., & Glover, F. (2006). Principles of scatter search. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(2), 359–372.
Mehrotra, K., Mohan, C. K., & Ranka, S. (1997). Elements of artificial neural networks. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Pacheco, J. A. (2005). A scatter search approach for the minimum sum-of-squares clustering problem. Computers & Operations Research, 32(5), 1325–1335.
Pitsoulis, L. S., & Resende, M. G. C. (2001). Greedy randomized adaptive search procedures. In P. M. Pardalos & M. G. C. Resende (Eds.), Handbook of applied optimization. London: Oxford University Press.
Reeves, C. R., & Yamada, T. (1998). Genetic algorithms, path relinking and the flowshop sequencing problem. Evolutionary Computation, 6(1), 45–60.
Rego, C. (2005). RAMP: A new metaheuristic framework for combinatorial optimization. In C. Rego & B. Alidaee (Eds.), Metaheuristic optimization via memory and evolution: Tabu search and scatter search (pp. 441–460). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Ribeiro, C. C., & Souza, M. C. (2002). Variable neighborhood search for the degree-constrained minimum spanning tree problem. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 118(1–2), 43–54.
Ruiz, R., & Stutzle, T. (2006). A simple and effective iterated greedy algorithm for the permutation flowshop problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 177(3), 2033–2049.
Stutzle, T. (1998). Applying iterated local search to the permutation flowshop problem. Technical Report AIDA–98–04, FG Intellektik, TU Darmstadt.
Valls, V., Ballestin, F., & Quintanilla, M. S. (2005). Justification and RCPSP: a technique that pays. European Journal of Operational Research, 165(2), 375–386.
Wolpert, D. H., & Macready, W. G. (1997). No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 1(1), 67–82.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Agarwal, A. Theoretical insights into the augmented-neural-network approach for combinatorial optimization. Ann Oper Res 168, 101–117 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-008-0364-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-008-0364-8