Abstract
Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) models with undesirable inputs and outputs have been frequently discussed in DEA literature, e.g., via data transformation. These studies were scatted in the literature, and often confined to some particular applications. In this paper we present a systematic investigation on model building of DEA without transferring undesirable data. We first describe the disposability assumptions and a number of different performance measures in the presence of undesirable inputs and outputs, and then discuss different combinations of the disposability assumptions and the metrics. This approach leads to a unified presentation of several classes of DEA models with undesirable inputs and/or outputs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ali, A., & Seiford, L. M. (1990). Translation invariance in data envelopment analysis. Operations Research Letters, 10, 403–405.
Banker, R. D. (1984). Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 17, 35–44.
Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30, 1078–1092.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Golany, B., Seiford, L., & Stutz, J. (1985). Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions. Journal of Econometrics, 30, 91–107.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Wei, Q. L., & Huhng, Z. M. (1989). Cone ratio data envelopment analysis and multi-objective programming. International Journal of Systems Science, 20, 1099–1118.
Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., Thanassaulis, E., & Zanakis, S. H. (2004). DEA and its uses in different countries. European Journal of Operational Research, 154, 337–344.
Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (2004). Modelling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation: comments. European Journal of Operational Research, 157, 242–245.
Färe, R., & Lovell, C. A. (1978). Measuring the technical efficiency of production. Journal of Economic Theory, 19, 150–162.
Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lovell, C. A. K., & Pasurka, C. (1989). Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: a nonparametric approach. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71, 90–98.
Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (General), 120, 253–290.
Golany, B., & Roll, Y. (1989). An application procedure for DEA. Omega: The International Journal of Management Science, 17, 237–250.
Koopmans, T. C. (1951). Analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. In T. C. Koopmans (Ed.), Activity analysis of production and allocation, Cowles Commission (pp. 33–97). New York: Wiley.
Liu, W. B., & Sharp, J. (1999). DEA models via goal programming. In G. Westerman (Ed.), Data envelopment analysis in the public and private sector. Deutscher Universitats-Verlag.
Liu, W. B., Sharp, J., & Wu, Z. M. (2006). Preference, production and performance in data envelopment analysis. Annals of Operational Research, 145, 105–127.
Lovell, C. A. K., Pastor, J. T., & Turner, J. A. (1995). Measuring macroeconomic performance in the OECD: a comparison of European and non-European countries. European Journal of Operational Research, 87, 507–518.
Meng, W., Zhu, Z. H., & Liu, W. B. (2006). Efficiency evaluation of basic research in China. Scientometrics, 69, 85–101.
Pastor, J. T. (1996). Translation invariance in data envelopment analysis. Annals of Operations Research, 66, 93–102.
Ray, S. C. (2004). Data envelopment analysis: theory and techniques for economics and operations research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Scheel, H. (1998). Negative data and undesirable outputs in DEA. Working paper in EURO Summer Institute.
Scheel, H. (2001). Undesirable outputs in efficiency evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 132, 400–410.
Seiford, L. M. (1996). Date envelopment analysis: evolution of the state-of-the-art (1978–1998). Journal of Productivity Analysis, 7, 99–137.
Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (2002). Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 142, 16–20.
Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (2005). A response to comments on modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 161, 579–581.
Sharp, J., Meng, W., & Liu, W. B. (2006). A modified slacks based measure model for data envelopment analysis with natural negative outputs and inputs. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58, 1672–1677.
Shephard, R. W. (1970). Theory of cost and production functions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Silva Portela, M. C. A., Thanassoulis, E., & Simpson, G. (2004). Negative data in DEA: a directional distance approach applied to bank branches. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55, 1111–1121.
Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130, 498–509.
Tone, K. (2004). Dealing with undesirable outputs in DEA: a Slacks-Based Measure (SBM) approach. Presentation at NAPW III, Toronto.
Yu, M. M. (2004). Measuring physical efficiency of domestic airports in Taiwan with undesirable outputs and environmental factors. Journal of Air Transport Management, 10, 295–303.
Zhang, D. Q., Li, X. X., Meng, W., & Liu, W. B. (2009). Measure the performance of nations at Olympic Games using DEA models with different preferences. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 60, 983–990.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The authors wish to express their sincere thanks to the referees for his or her constructive reviews and suggestions, which lead to significant improvements of this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, W.B., Meng, W., Li, X.X. et al. DEA models with undesirable inputs and outputs. Ann Oper Res 173, 177–194 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-009-0587-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-009-0587-3