Skip to main content
Log in

DEA models with undesirable inputs and outputs

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) models with undesirable inputs and outputs have been frequently discussed in DEA literature, e.g., via data transformation. These studies were scatted in the literature, and often confined to some particular applications. In this paper we present a systematic investigation on model building of DEA without transferring undesirable data. We first describe the disposability assumptions and a number of different performance measures in the presence of undesirable inputs and outputs, and then discuss different combinations of the disposability assumptions and the metrics. This approach leads to a unified presentation of several classes of DEA models with undesirable inputs and/or outputs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ali, A., & Seiford, L. M. (1990). Translation invariance in data envelopment analysis. Operations Research Letters, 10, 403–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D. (1984). Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 17, 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30, 1078–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Golany, B., Seiford, L., & Stutz, J. (1985). Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions. Journal of Econometrics, 30, 91–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Wei, Q. L., & Huhng, Z. M. (1989). Cone ratio data envelopment analysis and multi-objective programming. International Journal of Systems Science, 20, 1099–1118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., Thanassaulis, E., & Zanakis, S. H. (2004). DEA and its uses in different countries. European Journal of Operational Research, 154, 337–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (2004). Modelling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation: comments. European Journal of Operational Research, 157, 242–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., & Lovell, C. A. (1978). Measuring the technical efficiency of production. Journal of Economic Theory, 19, 150–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lovell, C. A. K., & Pasurka, C. (1989). Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: a nonparametric approach. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71, 90–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (General), 120, 253–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golany, B., & Roll, Y. (1989). An application procedure for DEA. Omega: The International Journal of Management Science, 17, 237–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, T. C. (1951). Analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. In T. C. Koopmans (Ed.), Activity analysis of production and allocation, Cowles Commission (pp. 33–97). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W. B., & Sharp, J. (1999). DEA models via goal programming. In G. Westerman (Ed.), Data envelopment analysis in the public and private sector. Deutscher Universitats-Verlag.

  • Liu, W. B., Sharp, J., & Wu, Z. M. (2006). Preference, production and performance in data envelopment analysis. Annals of Operational Research, 145, 105–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovell, C. A. K., Pastor, J. T., & Turner, J. A. (1995). Measuring macroeconomic performance in the OECD: a comparison of European and non-European countries. European Journal of Operational Research, 87, 507–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng, W., Zhu, Z. H., & Liu, W. B. (2006). Efficiency evaluation of basic research in China. Scientometrics, 69, 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor, J. T. (1996). Translation invariance in data envelopment analysis. Annals of Operations Research, 66, 93–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, S. C. (2004). Data envelopment analysis: theory and techniques for economics and operations research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheel, H. (1998). Negative data and undesirable outputs in DEA. Working paper in EURO Summer Institute.

  • Scheel, H. (2001). Undesirable outputs in efficiency evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 132, 400–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiford, L. M. (1996). Date envelopment analysis: evolution of the state-of-the-art (1978–1998). Journal of Productivity Analysis, 7, 99–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (2002). Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 142, 16–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (2005). A response to comments on modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 161, 579–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, J., Meng, W., & Liu, W. B. (2006). A modified slacks based measure model for data envelopment analysis with natural negative outputs and inputs. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58, 1672–1677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shephard, R. W. (1970). Theory of cost and production functions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva Portela, M. C. A., Thanassoulis, E., & Simpson, G. (2004). Negative data in DEA: a directional distance approach applied to bank branches. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55, 1111–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130, 498–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tone, K. (2004). Dealing with undesirable outputs in DEA: a Slacks-Based Measure (SBM) approach. Presentation at NAPW III, Toronto.

  • Yu, M. M. (2004). Measuring physical efficiency of domestic airports in Taiwan with undesirable outputs and environmental factors. Journal of Air Transport Management, 10, 295–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, D. Q., Li, X. X., Meng, W., & Liu, W. B. (2009). Measure the performance of nations at Olympic Games using DEA models with different preferences. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 60, 983–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. B. Liu.

Additional information

The authors wish to express their sincere thanks to the referees for his or her constructive reviews and suggestions, which lead to significant improvements of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, W.B., Meng, W., Li, X.X. et al. DEA models with undesirable inputs and outputs. Ann Oper Res 173, 177–194 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-009-0587-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-009-0587-3

Keywords

Navigation