Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Water supply and consumption uncertainty: a conflict-equilibrium

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper addresses the economic efficiency of water production and distribution in a vertical supply chain consisting of a water-provider and a consumer (municipality). The inherent conflicts over stocks and supply costs that emerge among the parties in the water supply chain are modeled as a zero-sum stochastic differential game. Consequently, the effects of collaboration and competition are contrasted as well as the application of block pricing and subsidies in overcoming potential conflicts between the water-provider and the municipality subject to political risks of not meeting demands for water. The effect of uncertainty is elaborated as well. In particular, we show that when the supply variance depends on the mean supply, the effect of uncertainty depends on the intensity of the conflict between the municipality and the water-provider.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abu Qdais, H. A., & Al Nassay, H. I. (2001). Effect of pricing on water conservation: a case study. Water Policy, 3, 207–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcamo, J., Henrichs, T., & Rosch, T. (2000). World water in 2025: global modeling and scenario analysis for the World Commission on Water for the 21st Century. Report A0002. Center for Environmental Systems Research, University of Kassel.

  • Bouwer, H. (2000). Integrated water management: emerging issues and challenges. Agricultural. Water Management, 45, 217–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ettouney, H. M., El-Dessouky, H. T., Faibish, R. S., & Gowin, P. J. (2002). Evaluating the economics of desalination. Chemical Enginering Progress, 32–39.

  • Feichtinger, G., & Jorgenson, S. (1983). Differential game models in management science. European Journal of Operational Research, 14, 137–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleick, P. H. (2006). The world’s water: the biennial report on freshwater resources. Pacific Institute for Studies in Development, Environment and Security, Oakland, CA, Island Press.

  • He, X., Prasad, A., Sethi, S. P., & Gutierrez, G. J. (2007). A survey of Stackelberg differential game models in supply and marketing channels. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 16(4), 385–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakimian, H. (2003). Water scarcity and food imports: an empirical investigation of the ‘virtual water’ hypothesis in the MENA region. Review of Middle East Economics and Finance, 1(1), 71–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kloeden, P. E., & Platen, E. (1999). Numerical solution of stochastic differential equations (3rd edn.). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogan, K., & Tapiero, C. S. (2007). Supply chain games: operations management and risk valuation. Boston: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Loehman, E., & Dinar, A. (1994). Cooperative solution of local externality problems: a case of mechanism design applied to irrigation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26(3), 235–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins, R., & Fortunato, A. (2007). Residential water demand under block rates—a Portuguese case study. Water Policy, 9, 217–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Espineira, R. (2003). Estimating water demand under increasing-block tariffs using aggregate data and proportions of users per block. Environmental & Resource Economics, 26, 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olmstead, S. M., Hanemann, W. M., & Stavins, R. N. (2007). Water demand under alternative price structures. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 54, 181–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portnov, B. A., & Meir, I. (2007). Urban water consumption in Israel: convergence or divergence? Environmental Science and Policy.

  • Rogers, P., de Silva, R., & Bhatia, R. (2002). Water is an economic good: How to use prices to promote equity, efficiency, and sustainability. Water Policy, 1.4, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semiat, R. (2000). Desalination: present and future. Water International, 25(1), 54–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiva, V. (2002). Water wars: privatization, pollution, and profit. Cambridge: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stikker, A. (1998). Water today and tomorrow. Futures, 30(1), 43–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swallow, S. K., & Marin, C. M. (1988). Long run price inflexibility and efficiency loss for municipal water supply. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 15(2), 233–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USGS survey: 50 years of water-use information (2000). http://water.usgs.gov/watuse/50years.html.

  • WRI (2001a). Freshwater resources. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.

  • WRI (2001b). Per capita water consumption in residential and non-residential sectors. Water Research Institute, Technion, Haifa.

  • Yaron, D., & Tapiero, C. S. (1980). Operations research in water and agriculture resources. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Y., & Tol, R. S. J. (2005). Evaluating the costs of desalination and water transport. Water Resources Research, 41(3), W03003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Konstantin Kogan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kogan, K., Tapiero, C.S. Water supply and consumption uncertainty: a conflict-equilibrium. Ann Oper Res 181, 199–217 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-010-0724-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-010-0724-z

Keywords

Navigation