Skip to main content
Log in

Transshipment service through crossdocks with both soft and hard time windows

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, crossdocking techniques have been successfully applied in responsive supply chain management. However, most researches focused on physical layout of a crossdock, or scheduling operations within a crossdock. In this paper, we study a multi-crossdock transshipment service problem with both soft and hard time windows. The flows from suppliers to customers via the crossdocks are constrained by fixed transportation schedules. Cargos can be delayed and consolidated in crossdocks, and both suppliers and customers have specific hard time windows. In addition to hard time windows, customers also have less-restrictive time windows, called soft time windows. The problem to minimize the total cost of the multi-crossdock distribution network, including transportation cost, inventory handling cost and penalty cost, can be proved to be NP-hard in the strong sense and hence efficient heuristics are desired. We propose two types of meta-heuristic algorithms, called Adaptive Tabu Search and Adaptive Genetic Algorithm, respectively, to solve the problem efficiently. We conduct extensive experiments and the results show that both of them outperform CPLEX solver and provide fairly good solutions within realistic timescales. We also perform sensitivity analysis and obtain a number of managerial insights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balamurugan, R., Ramakrishnan, C. V., & Nidur, S. (2008). Performance evaluation of a two stage adaptive genetic algorithm (TSAGA) in structural topology optimization. Applied Soft Computing. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2007.10.022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bressloff, P. C. (1995). Stochastic dynamics of reinforcement learning. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 6(2), 289–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, P., Guo, Y. S., Lim, A., & Rodriguesd, B. (2006). Multiple crossdocks with inventory and time windows. Computers & Operations Research, 33(1), 43–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consoli, S., Darby-Dowman, K., Mladenović, N., & Moreno Pérez, J.A. (2009). Greedy randomized adaptive search and variable neighbourhood search for the minimum labelling spanning tree problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 196(2), 440–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, H., Johnson, E. L., Ratliff, H. D., & Zhang, M. (1999). Schedule-driven crossdocking networks. Research Report, Georgia Institute of Technology.

  • Fagerholt, K. (2001). Ship scheduling with soft time windows: an optimisation based approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 131(3), 559–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glover, F., & Laguna, M. (1997). Tabu search. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gue, K. R. (1999). The effects of trailer scheduling on the layout of freight terminals. Transportation Science, 33(4), 419–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gendreau, M., Guertin, F., Potvin, J. Y., & Séguin, R. (2006). Neighborhood search heuristics for a dynamic vehicle dispatching problem with pick-ups and deliveries. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 3(14), 157–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, P., Mladenović, N., & Moreno Pérez, J.A. (2010). Variable neighbourhood search: methods and applications. Annals of Operations Research, 175(1), 367–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashimoto, H., Ibaraki, T., Imahori, S., & Yagiura, M. (2006). The vehicle routing problem with flexible time windows and traveling times. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 154(16), 2271–2290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, P., & Mladenovi, N. (2001). Variable neighborhood search: principles and applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 3(130), 449–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannou, G., Kritikos, M., & Prastacos, G. (2003). A problem generator-solver heuristic for vehicle routing with soft time windows. The International Journal of Management Science, Omega, 1(31), 41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keskin, B. B., & Üster, H. (2007). A scatter search-based heuristic to locate capacitated transshipment points. Computers & Operations Research, 34(10), 3112–3125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaelo, P., & Ali, M. M. (2007). Integrated crossover rules in real coded genetic algorithms. European Journal of Operational Research, 176(1), 60–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. J., & Hooker, J. N. (2002). Solving fixed-charge network flow problems with a hybrid optimization and constraint programming approach. Annals of Operations Research, 115(1–4), 95–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. H., Jung, J. W., & Lee, K. M. (2006). Vehicle routing scheduling for cross-docking in the supply chain. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 51(2), 247–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., & Lim, A. (2003). A Metaheuristic for the pickup and delivery problem with time windows. International Journal on Artificial Intelligent Tools, 2(12), 173–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Lim, A., & Rodrigues, B. (2004). Crossdocking: JIT scheduling with time windows. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55(12), 1342–1351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, A., Miao, Z., Rodrigues, B., & Xu, Z. (2005). Transshipment through crossdocks with inventory and time windows. Naval Research Logistics, 52(8), 724–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miao, Z., Lim, A., & Ma, H. (2009a). Truck dock assignment problem with operational time constraint within crossdocks. European Journal of Operational Research, 192(1), 105–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miao, Z., Yang, F., & Fu, K. (2009b). A hybrid two-stage genetic algorithm for the transshipment problem in crossdocking networks. Working paper. School of Management, Xiamen University, P.R. China.

  • Michel, L., Shvartsman, A., & Sonderegger, E. (2010). Optimal deployment of eventually-serializable data services. Annals of Operations Research, doi:10.1007/s10479-010-0684-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mladenović, N., & Hansen, P. (1997). Variable neighborhoodsearch. Computers & Operations Research, 11(24), 1097–1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Najim, K., Pibouleau, L., & Le Lann, M. V. (1990). Optimization technique based on learning automata. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 64(2), 331–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliff, D. H., van de Vate, J., & Zhang, M. (1999). Network design for load-driven cross-docking systems, Research Report, Georgia Institute of Technology.

  • Ross, A., & Jayaraman, V. (2008). An evaluation of new heuristics for the location of cross-docks distribution centers in supply chain network design. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 55(1), 64–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer, B. (1998). Cross docking can increase efficiency. Automatic I.D. News, 14(8), 34–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, B. (2000). Implementing a successful crossdocking operation. Plant Engineering, 54(3), 128–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sung, S., & Song, H. (2003). Integrated service network design for a cross-docking supply chain network. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54(12), 1283–1295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, L., & Chang, C. (1990). A microcomputer based decision support tool for assigning dock doors in freight yards. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 19(1–4), 309–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, L., & Chang, C. (1992). An optimal solution to a dock door assignment problem. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 23(1–4), 283–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vis, I. F. A., & Roodbergen, K. J. (2008). Positioning of goods in a cross-docking environment. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 54(3), 677–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vansteenwegen, P., Souffriau, W., & Sörensen, K. (2009). Solving the mobile mapping van problem: a hybrid metaheuristic for capacitated arc routing with soft time windows. Computer & Operations Research (In Press). Available online, 18 May.

  • Yu, W., & Egbelu, P. J. (2008). Scheduling of inbound and outbound trucks in cross docking systems with temporary storage. European Journal of Operational Research, 184(1), 377–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ke Fu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miao, Z., Yang, F., Fu, K. et al. Transshipment service through crossdocks with both soft and hard time windows. Ann Oper Res 192, 21–47 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-010-0780-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-010-0780-4

Keywords