Skip to main content
Log in

LP models for pricing diffuse nitrate discharge permits

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nitrate discharges from diffuse agricultural sources significantly contribute to groundwater and surface water pollution. Tradable permit programs have been proposed as a means of controlling nitrate emissions efficiently, but trading is complicated by the dispersed and delayed effects of the diffuse pollution. Hence, markets in nitrate discharge permits should be carefully designed to account for the underlying spatial and temporal interactions. Nitrate permit markets can be designed similar to the modern electricity markets which use LPs to find the equilibrium prices because the two trading problems have close analogy.

In this paper, we propose alternative LP models to find efficient permit prices for year-ahead markets. The model structure varies depending on the catchment hydro-geology and long-term goals of the community. We show how the market price structures are driven by the constraint structure under different environmental conditions. We discuss the physical and economic conditions required to assure consistent prices, the modeling of essential and optional constraints in an LP, and the problem of balancing resource allocation over time among delayed-response discharge units. We then extend the LP model to balance resource allocation over time and to improve the market performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, R. B., Smith, R., Schwarz, G., Boyer, E., Nolan, J., & Brakebill, J. (2008). Differences in phosphorus and nitrogen delivery to the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi River basin. Environmental Science & Technology, 42, 822–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvey, T., Goodwin, D., Xingwang, M., Streiffert, D., & Sun, D. (1998). A security-constrained bid-clearing system for the NZ wholesale electricity market. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 13(2), 340–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjørndala, M., & Jörnsten, K. (2008). Equilibrium prices supported by dual price functions in markets with non-convexities. European Journal of Operational Research, 190(3), 768–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beukes, P., Palliser, C., Prewer, W., Serra, V., Lancaster, J., Levy, G., Folkers, C., Neal, M., Thorrold, B., & Wastney, M. (2005). Use of a whole farm model for exploring management decisions in dairying. In Proceedings of MODSIM 2005. Modelling and simulation society of Australia and New Zealand (pp. 170–176), December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao, H., Peck, S., Oren, S., & Wilson, R. (2000). Flow-based transmission rights and congestion management. The Electricity Journal, 13(8), 38–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conan, C., Bouraoui, F., Turpin, N., Marsily, G. D., & Bidoglio, G. (2003). Modeling flow and nitrate fate at catchment scale in Brittany. Journal of Environmental Quality, 32, 2026–2032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contreras, J., Candiles, O., Fuente, J. I. D. L., & Gomez, T. (2001). Auction design in day-ahead electricity markets. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 16(3), 409–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ermoliev, Y., Michalevich, M., & Nentjes, A. (2000). Markets for tradable emission and ambient permits: a dynamic approach. Environmental & Resource Economics, 15(1), 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faeth, P. (2000). Fertile ground: nutrient trading’s potential to cost effectively improve water quality. Online publication, World Resources Institute.

  • Gorelick, S., & Remson, I. (1982). Optimal dynamic management of groundwater pollutant sources. Water Resources Research, 18(1), 71–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, W. W. (1992). Contract networks for electric power transmission. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 4(3), 211–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, W. W., Read, E. G., & Ring, B. J. (1996). Using mathematical programming for electricity spot pricing. International Transactions in Operations Research, 3(3–4), 243–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. L., Adams, R. M., & Perry, G. M. (1991). The on-farm costs of reducing groundwater pollution. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73(4), 1063–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leston, D. (1992). Point/nonpoint source pollution reduction trading: an interpretative survey. Natural Resources Journal, 32(2), 219–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lock, K., & Kerr, S. (2008). Nutrient trading in Lake Rotorua: overview of a prototype system. Working paper 08-02, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.

  • McCabe, K. A., Rassenti, S. J., & Smith, V. L. (1991). Smart computer-assisted markets. Science, 254(5031), 534–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGartland, A. (1988). A comparison of two marketable discharge permit systems. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 15, 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed, A. A., Sharifil, M. A., & Keulenz, H. V. (2000). An integrated agro-economic and agro-ecological methodology for land use planning and policy analysis. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation (Online), 2(1), 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, W. D., (1972). Markets in licenses and efficient pollution control programs. Journal of Economic Theory, 5(3), 395–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. S., & Everett, R. (2005). Application of simulation-optimization methods for management of nitrate loading to groundwater from decentralized wastewater treatment systems near La Pine, Oregon. A report prepared for the National Decentralized Water Resources Capacity Development Project by USGS, Oregon Water Science Centre.

  • Morgan, C. L., Coggins, J. S., & Eidman, V. R. (2000). Tradable permits for controlling nitrates in groundwater at the farm level: a conceptual model. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 32(2), 249–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenstern, U. (2008). Lake Taupo catchment groundwater age distribution and implications for future land-use impacts. Technical report 2007/49, Environment Waikato.

  • Neitsch, S. L., Arnold, J. G., Kiniry, J. R., & Williams, J. R. (2005). Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation: version 2005. Temple: Grassland, Soil & Water Research Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service.

  • Ongley, E. D. (1996). Control of water pollution from agriculture. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • OCED (2008). Environmental performance of agriculture in OECD countries since 1990. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oren, S. S., & Ross, A. M. (2005). Can we prevent the gaming of ramp constraints? Decision Support Systems, 40, 461–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oren, S. S., Spiller, P. T., Varaiya, P., & Wu, F. (1995). Nodal prices and transmission rights: a critical appraisal. Electricity Journal, 8(3), 24–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petch, T., Young, J., Thorrold, B., & Vant, B. (2003). Protecting and managing sources of diffuce nutrient inflow to Lake Taupo, New Zealand. In Diffuse pollution and basin management 7th international specialised IWA conference, Dublin, Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prabodanie, R. A. R. (2011). A market mechanism for the optimal control of groundwater and surface water pollution from nitrates. Ph.D. thesis, University of Canterbury.

  • Prabodanie, R. A. R., & Raffensperger, J. F. (2009). Can markets in agricultural discharge permits be competitive. In Proceedings of the 44th ORSNZ conference, Christchurch, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prabodanie, R. A. R., Raffensperger, J. F., & Milke, M. W. (2009). Simulation-optimisation approach for trading point and non-point source nutrient permits. In Proceedings of 18th world IMACS congress and MODSIM09 conference, Cairns, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, P. S. C., Basu, N. B., Zanardo, S., Botter, G., & Rinaldo, A. (2009). Contaminant load-discharge relationships across scales in engineered catchments: order out of complexity. In Proceedings of 18th world IMACS congress and MODSIM09 conference, Cairns, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raffensperger, J. F. (2011). Matching users’ rights to available groundwater. Ecological Economics, 70(6), 1041–1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read, E. G., Ring, B. J., Starkey, S. R., & Pepper, W. (2011, to appear). An LP formulation for a natural gas market. In P. M. Pardalos, M. V. F. Pereira, & A. Sorokin (Eds.) Handbook of Networks in Power. Berlin: Springer.

  • Ribaudo, M. O., Horan, R. D., & Smith, M. E. (1999). Economics of water quality protection from nonpoint sources: theory and practice. Agricultural economic report No. 782, US Department of Agriculture.

  • Wiederholt, R., & Johnson, B. (2005). Unintended impacts of fertilizer and manure mismanagement of natural resources. Report no. NM-1281, Fargo, North Dakota, North Dakota State University.

  • Zheng, C. (1990). MT3D—a modular three-dimensional transport model for simulation of advection, dispersion and chemical reaction of contaminants in groundwater systems. Ada: US EPA—Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John F. Raffensperger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ranga Prabodanie, R.A., Raffensperger, J.F., Read, E.G. et al. LP models for pricing diffuse nitrate discharge permits. Ann Oper Res 220, 87–109 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-011-0941-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-011-0941-0

Keywords

Navigation