Abstract
Farzipoor Saen (Ann. Oper. Res. 172(1):177–192, 2009) proposed a method based on Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) for selecting the best supplier in the presence of cardinal and ordinal data, weight restrictions, and non-discriminatory factors. In the present note, we show that the DEA method proposed by Farzipoor Saen (Ann. Oper. Res. 172(1):177–192, 2009) cannot be used for selecting the best supplier in the presence of imprecise data. It is also shown that there are computational errors in calculating the amounts of the preference intensity parameter and the ratio parameter in Farzipoor Saen’s paper.
Notes
Ranking such that 18 = the highest rank, …, 1 = the lowest rank (x 2,18>x 2,16>⋯>x 2,17).
References
Farzipoor Saen, R. (2009). A decision model for ranking suppliers in the presence of cardinal and ordinal data, weight restrictions, and nondiscretionary factors. Annals of Operations Research, 172(1), 177–192. doi:10.1007/s10479-009-0556-x.
Wang, Y.-M., & Elhag, T. M. S. (2006). On the normalization of interval and fuzzy weights. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 157(18), 2456–2471. doi:10.1016/j.fss.2006.06.008.
Wang, Y.-M., Greatbanks, R., & Yang, J.-B. (2005). Interval efficiency assessment using data envelopment analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 153(3), 347–370. doi:10.1016/j.fss.2004.12.011.
Wang, Y.-M., Luo, Y., & Liang, L. (2009). Ranking decision making units by imposing a minimum weight restriction in the data envelopment analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 223(1), 469–484. doi:10.1016/j.cam.2008.01.022.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Azizi, H. A note on “A decision model for ranking suppliers in the presence of cardinal and ordinal data, weight restrictions, and nondiscriminatory factors”. Ann Oper Res 211, 49–54 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-013-1486-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-013-1486-1