Skip to main content
Log in

Optimizing product service system by franchise fee contracts under information asymmetry

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies the problem of how to effectively provide product service system (PSS) in a service-oriented manufacturing supply chain under asymmetric private demand information. The PSS in the supply chain is operated heterogeneously and complementarily, in which the manufacturer provides the product while the retailer who possesses private demand information is responsible for adding the necessary value-added service on the basic product. We address the issue of how different contracts affect the decisions and profitability of the supply chain members. Three types of contracts are developed to help supply chain partners to make decisions and enhance the supply chain’s efficiency. The first is the franchise fee (FF) contract, under which the manufacturer provides a two-part tariff contract (wholesale price and franchise fee) to influence the retailer’s decision and to detect her private demand information. The second is the franchise fee with service requirement (FFS) contract, under which the manufacturer specifies the service level required in addition to the two-part tariff contract terms. The third is the franchise fee with centralized service requirement (FFCS) contract, which is similar to the FFS contract but that the service level specified by the manufacturer is the system optimal solution. Our analytical results show that all three contracts enable the manufacturer to detect the retailer’s private demand information, with the FFCS contract achieving the greatest channel profit. Finally, numerical examples are presented, and sensitivity analysis of service level and profit are conducted to compare the performance of the three contracts under different settings. The paper provides managerial guidelines for the manufacturer in contract offering under different conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ai, X. Z., Chen, J., & Ma, J. H. (2012). Contracting with demand uncertainty under supply chain competition. Annals of Operations Research, 201(1), 17–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, E. M., Van der Heijden, M. C., & Zijm, W. H. M. (2013). Service differentiation in spare parts supply through dedicated stocks. Annals of Operations Research, 1–21.

  • Baines, T., et al. (2007). State-of-the-art in product service-systems. Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 221(10), 1543–1552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, P., & Mathias, D. (2005). Contract theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brax, S. (2005). A manufacturer becoming service provider-challenges and a paradox. Managing Service Quality, 15(2), 142–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cachon, G. P. (2003). Supply chain coordination with contracts. Handbooks in operations research and management science: supply chain management. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, C. J. (2001). Stochastic inventory systems in a supply chain with asymmetric information: cycle stocks, safety stocks, and consignment stock. Operations Research, 49(4), 487–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desiraju, R., & Moorthy, S. (1997). Managing a distribution channel under asymmetric information with performance requirement. Management Science, 43(12), 1628–1644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goyal, S. K. (1976). An integrated inventory model for a single supplier-single customer problem. International Journal of Production Research, 15(1), 107–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, D. (2008). Flexible carrier-forwarder contracts for air cargo business. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 7, 341–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haresh, G., & Yi, X. (2006). Resale price maintenance contracts with retailer sales effort: effect of flexibility and competition. Naval Research Logistics, 53(5), 448–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heredia, F. J., Rider, M. J., & Corchero, C. (2012). A stochastic programming model for the optimal electricity market bid problem with bilateral contracts for thermal and combined cycle units. Annals of Operations Research, 193(1), 107–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, S., et al. (2011). Optimal service selection and composition for service-oriented manufacturing network. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 24(5), 416–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, P., & Fukuda, S. (2001). TeleRP-an Internet web-based solution for remote rapid prototyping service and maintenance. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 14(1), 83–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, P. Y., et al. (2007). E2-mes: an e-service-driven networked manufacturing platform for extended enterprises. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 20(2–3), 127–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kameshwaran, S., et al. (2009). Analyses for service interaction networks with applications to service delivery. In Proceedings of SIAM international conference on data mining.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmakar, U. (2004). Will you survive the services revolution. Harvard Business Review, 82(6), 100–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, B. (2000). Coordinating an innovation in supply chain management. European Journal of Operational Research, 123(3), 564–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouvelis, P., & Lariviere, M. A. (2000). Decentralized cross-functional decisions: coordination through internal markets. Management Science, 46(8), 1049–1058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurata, H., & Nam, S. H. (2010). After-sales service competition in a supply chain: optimization of customer satisfaction level or profit or both. International Journal of Production Economics, 127(1), 136–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landeros, R., & Lyth, D. M. (1989). Economic-lot-size models for cooperative inter-organizational relationships. Journal of Business Logistics, 10(2), 146–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal, R. (1990). Improving channel coordination through franchising. Marketing Science, 9(4), 299–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lariviere, M. A. (1999). Supply chain contracting and coordination with stochastic demand. In Quantitative models for supply chain management, Norwell: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H., So, K. C., & Tang, C. (2000). The value of information sharing in a two-level supply chain. Management Science, 46(5), 626–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lester, R. K. (1998). The productive edge: how U.S. industries are pointing the way to a new era of economic growth. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z. (2007). Service-oriented manufacturing: the new tool of enterprise competition. Chinese Mechanics Industry, 12, 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifset, R. (2000). Moving from products to services. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 4(1), 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marceau, J., & Martinez, C. (2002). Selling solutions: product-service packages as links between new and old economies. Paper to be presented at the DRUID summer conference on industrial dynamics of the new and old economy—who is embracing whom, Copenhagen/Elsinore.

  • Mont, O. K. (2002). Clarifying the concept of product-service system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10(3), 237–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perakis, G., & Roels, G. (2007). The price of anarchy in supply chains: quantifying the efficiency of price-only contracts. Management Science, 53(8), 1249–1268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roels, C., Karmarkar, U. S., & Carr, S. (2010). Contracting for collaborative services. Management Science, 56(5), 849–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, H., & Tunca, T. I. (2010). Do firms invest in forecasting efficiently? The effect of competition on demand forecast investments and supply chain coordination. Operations Research, 58(6), 1592–1610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, T. A., & Plambeck, E. L. (2007). Simple relational contracts to motivate capacity investment: price only vs. price and quantity. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 9(1), 94–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viswanadham, N., Desai, V., & Gaonkar, R. (2005). Bullwhip effect in integrated manufacturing and service networks. In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whang, S. (1992). Contracting for software development. Management Science, 38(3), 307–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, K. Z., & Jiang, Z. B. (2012). Optimal production control of a service-oriented manufacturing system with customer balking behavior. Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, 1, 1–21. doi:10.1007/s10696-012-9153-4.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71101028, 71371052, 70932004), the Specialized Research Fund for Doctoral Program of Higher Education (20090073110035), the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-13-0733), the Research Fund for Key Scientific and Innovation project of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (09ZZ19), and the Program for Excellent Talents in UIBE. We would like to thank the editor and the anonymous referees for their constructive comments that have helped a lot in improving our paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yingxue Zhao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xie, W., Zhao, Y., Jiang, Z. et al. Optimizing product service system by franchise fee contracts under information asymmetry. Ann Oper Res 240, 709–729 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-013-1505-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-013-1505-2

Keywords

Navigation