Abstract
We illustrate how data envelopment analysis (DEA) can be used as a forward-looking method to flag bank holding companies (BHCs) likely to become distressed. Various financial performance models are tested in the period leading up to the recent global financial crisis. Results generally support DEA’s discriminatory and predictive power, suggesting that it can identify distressed banks up to 2 years in advance. Robustness tests reveal that DEA has a stable efficient frontier and its discriminatory and predictive powers prevail even after data perturbations. DEA can be used as a preliminary off-site screening tool by regulators, by business managers to ascertain their standing among competitors, and by investors. Attention by regulators can be further directed at potentially distressed banks as some of them would be candidates for closer monitoring. In conclusion, DEA may be useful in making economic decisions because there is an identifiable link between inefficiency and financial distress. To the best of our knowledge, application of DEA to predict financial distress among BHCs prior to a major crisis has not been published.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.Notes
For an overview of various traditional bank behavior models see discussion in Avkiran (2006, p. 284–287).
The unavailability of credit ratings was confirmed after consulting BankScope IT Support staff. In addition, the Compustat database was checked. Consistent with BankScope, Compustat provides no additional credit ratings. Finally, a manual search for credit ratings was conducted on S&P’s, Moody’s and Fitch’s official websites, equally to no avail.
References
Abrams, B. A., & Huang, C. J. (1987). Predicting bank failures—The role of structure in affecting recent failure experiences in the USA. Applied Economics, 19(10), 1291–1302.
Altman, E. I. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. Journal of Finance, 23, 589–609.
Altman, E. I., Haldeman, R. G., & Narayanan, P. (1977). ZETATM analysis: A new model to identify bankruptcy risk of corporations. Journal of Banking & Finance, 1(1), 29–54.
Avkiran, N. K. (1999). The evidence on efficiency gains: The role of mergers and the benefits to the public. Journal of Banking & Finance, 23(7), 991–1013.
Avkiran, N. K. (2006). Developing foreign bank efficiency models for DEA grounded in finance theory. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 40(4), 275–296.
Avkiran, N. K. (2007). Stability and integrity tests in data envelopment analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 41(3), 224–234.
Avkiran, N. K. (2011). Association of DEA super-efficiency estimates with financial ratios: Investigating the case for Chinese banks. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 39(3), 323–334.
Avkiran, N. K., & Morita, H. (2010). Predicting Japanese bank stock performance with a composite relative efficiency metric: A new investment tool. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 18(3), 254–271.
Ayadi, O. F., Adebayo, A. O., & Omolehinwa, E. (1998). Bank performance measurement in a developing economy: An application of data envelopment analysis. Managerial Finance, 24(7), 5–16.
Bank for International Settlements. (2011, June). Basel III: A global regulatory framework for more resilient banks and banking systems Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.
Banker, R. D., & Chang, H. H. (2006). The super-efficiency procedure for outlier identification, not for ranking efficient units. European Journal of Operational Research, 175(2), 1311–1320.
Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092.
Barr, R. S., Durchholz, M. L., & Seiford, L. (1994). Peeling the DEA onion: Layering and rank-ordering units using tiered DEA. Southern Methodist University Technical Report, 5, 1–24.
Barr, R. S., Seiford, L. M., & Siems, T. F. (1993). An envelopment-analysis approach to measuring the managerial efficiency of banks. Annals of Operations Research, 45(1), 1–19.
Bhattacharyya, A., Lovell, C. A. K., & Sahay, P. (1997). The impact of liberalization on the productive efficiency of Indian commercial banks. European Journal of Operational Research, 98(2), 332–345.
Boyacıoğlu, M. A., Kara, Y., & Baykan, O. K. (2009). Predicting bank financial failures using neural networks, support vector machines and multivariate statistical methods: A comparative analysis in the sample of savings deposit insurance fund (SDIF) transferred banks in Turkey. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 3355–3366.
Brockett, P. L., Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Huang, Z. M., & Sun, D. B. (1997). Data transformations in DEA cone ratio envelopment approaches for monitoring bank performances. European Journal of Operational Research, 98(2), 250–268.
Buehler, K., Samandari, H., & Mazingo, C. (2009). Capital ratios and financial distress: lessons from the crisis. McKinsey working papers on risk No.15 (pp. 1–15). Retrieved August 17, 2011 from http://www.mckinsey.com/client_service/risk/latest_thinking/working_papers_on_risk.
Casu, B., & Molyneux, P. (2003). A comparative study of efficiency in European banking. Applied Economics, 35(17), 1865–1876.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.
Chiu, Y. H., Ma, C. M., & Sun, M. Y. (2010). Efficiency and credit rating in Taiwan banking: Data envelopment analysis estimation. Applied Economics, 42(20), 2587–2600.
Clare, A., & Priestley, R. (2002). Calculating the probability of failure of the Norwegian banking sector. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 12(1), 21–40.
Cole, R. A., & Gunther, J. W. (1995). Separating the likelihood and timing of bank failure. Journal of Banking & Finance, 19(6), 1073–1089.
Cook, W. D., Tone, K., & Zhu, J. (2014). Data envelopment analysis: Prior to choosing a model. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 44, 1–4.
Curry, T. J., Elmer, P. J., & Fissel, G. S. (2003). Using market information to help identify distressed institutions: A regulatory perspective. FDIC Banking Review, 15(3), 1.
Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Detragiache, E. (2000). Monitoring banking sector fragility: A multivariate logit approach. World Bank Economic Review, 14(2), 287–307.
Demyanyk, Y., & Hasan, I. (2010). Financial crises and bank failures: A review of prediction methods. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 38, 315–324.
DeYoung, R. (1998). Management quality and X-inefficiency in national banks. Journal of Financial Services Research, 13(1), 5–22.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. (2011). Off-site Surveillance Systems. Retrieved June 10, 2011 from http://www.fdic.gov/.
Flannery, M. J. (1998). Using market information in prudential bank supervision: A review of the us empirical evidence. Journal of Money Credit & Banking, 30(3), 273–305.
Hartman, T. E., Storbeck, J. E., & Byrnes, P. (2001). Allocative efficiency in branch banking. European Journal of Operational Research, 134(2), 232–242.
Hillegeist, S. A., Keating, E. K., Cram, D. P., & Lundstedt, K. G. (2004). Assessing the probability of bankruptcy. Review of Accounting Studies, 9(1), 5–34.
Jin, J. Y., Kanagaretnam, K., & Lobo, G. J. (2011). Ability of accounting and audit quality variables to predict bank failure during the financial crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(11), 2811–2819.
Kato, P., & Hagendorff, J. (2010). Distance to default, subordinated debt, and distress indicators in the banking industry. Accounting and Finance, 50(4), 853–870.
Klecka, W. R. (1982). Discriminant Analysis. Beverley Hills: Sage Publications.
Kolari, J., Glennon, D., Shin, H., & Caputo, M. (2002). Predicting large US commercial bank failures. Journal of Economics and Business, 54(4), 361–387.
Kumar, P. R., & Ravi, V. (2007). Bankruptcy prediction in banks and firms via statistical and intelligent techniques—A review. European Journal of Operational Research, 180(1), 1–28.
Lanine, G., & Vennet, R. V. (2006). Failure prediction in the Russian bank sector with logit and trait recognition models. Expert Systems with Applications, 30(3), 463–478.
Leightner, J. E., & Lovell, C. A. K. (1998). The impact of financial liberalization on the performance of Thai banks. Journal of Economics and Business, 50(2), 115–131.
Mannasoo, K., & Mayes, D. G. (2009). Explaining bank distress in Eastern European transition economies. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(2), 244–253.
McWilliams, A., Siegel, D., & Van Fleet, D. D. (2005). Scholarly journals as producers of knowledge: Theory and empirical evidence based on data envelopment analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 8(2), 185–201.
Miller, S. M., & Noulas, A. G. (1996). The technical efficiency of large bank production. Journal of Banking & Finance, 20(3), 495–509.
Oshinsky, R., & Olin, V. (2006). Troubled banks: Why don’t they all fail? FDIC Banking Review, 18(1), 23.
Paradi, J. C., Asmild, M., & Simak, P. C. (2004). Using DEA and worst practice DEA in credit risk evaluation. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 21(2), 153–165.
Partnership for Progress. (2011). Bank Holding Companies. Retrieved July 7, 2011 from http://www.fedpartneship.gov/.
Pille, P., & Paradi, J. C. (2002). Financial performance analysis of Ontario (Canada) Credit Unions: An application of DEA in the regulatory environment. European Journal of Operational Research, 139(2), 339–350.
Poghosyan, T., & Čihák, M. (2011). Determinants of bank distress in Europe: Evidence from a new data set. Journal of Financial Services Research, 40(3), 163–184.
Premachandra, I. M., Bhabra, G. S., & Sueyoshi, T. (2009). DEA as a tool for bankruptcy assessment: A comparative study with logistic regression technique. European Journal of Operational Research, 193(2), 412–424.
Ravisankar, P., & Ravi, V. (2010). Financial distress prediction in banks using Group Method of Data Handling neural network, counter propagation neural network and fuzzy ARTMAP. Knowledge-Based Systems, 23(8), 823–831.
Sathye, M. (2001). X-efficiency in Australian banking: An empirical investigation. Journal of Banking & Finance, 25(3), 613–630.
Siems, T. F. (1992). Quantifying management’s role in bank survival. Economic Review—Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, 29–41.
Sorkin, A. R. (2009). Too big to fail. New York: Viking, Penguin Group.
Strafford (2011). Bank holding and financial holding companies: Evaluating the legal and business implications. Retrieved October 1, 2011 from http://www.straffordpub.com/products/bank-holding-and-financial-holding-companies-evaluating-the-legal-and-business-implications-2009-01-22.
Sturm, J. E., & Williams, B. (2004). Foreign bank entry, deregulation and bank efficiency: Lessons from the Australian experience. Journal of Banking & Finance, 28(7), 1775–1799.
Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(3), 498–509.
Tone, K. (2002). A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 143(1), 32–41.
Wheelock, D. C., & Wilson, P. W. (2000). Why do banks disappear? The determinants of US bank failures and acquisitions. Review of Economics and Statistics, 82(1), 127–138.
Acknowledgments
We would like to express our gratitude to Stephen McKinney and Jay Shen for their generous assistance in arranging the delivery of BankScope discs from the Singapore office in a timely manner. Constructive comments by Robert Faff, the delegates at the New Zealand Finance Colloquium 2012, and the audience at the seminar at the University of Auckland Business School are equally appreciated. Our special thanks to Barry Oliver and Roger Zhu for critically reading the pre-submission copy of the paper. Finally, the suggestions made by the three anonymous reviewers, and Professor Ali Emrouznejad and Ms Gayathri Balasubramanian’s efforts to organize review of the paper are also appreciated.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix 1: Primary formulae for the super slacks-based measure (super-SBM)
Appendix 1: Primary formulae for the super slacks-based measure (super-SBM)
(See Tone 2002 for a more detailed exposition)
where x is the input, m the number of inputs, y the output, s the number of outputs, and n is the number of decision-making units.
In the fractional program depicted above, delta is the product of two dimensionless indices, one that captures the distance in the input space, and the other that captures the distance in the output space. Solving the optimal objective function δ *generates the super-SBM estimate. This estimate is units-invariant because it is independent of the units of measure as long as these units are the same for all the decision-making units.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Avkiran, N.K., Cai, L. Identifying distress among banks prior to a major crisis using non-oriented super-SBM. Ann Oper Res 217, 31–53 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-014-1568-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-014-1568-8