Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal VaR-based risk management with reinsurance

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is well-known that reinsurance can be an effective risk management solution for financial institutions such as the insurance companies. The optimal reinsurance solution depends on a number of factors including the criterion of optimization and the premium principle adopted by the reinsurer. In this paper, we analyze the Value-at-Risk based optimal risk management solution using reinsurance under a class of premium principles that is monotonic and piecewise. The monotonic piecewise premium principles include not only those which preserve stop-loss ordering, but also the piecewise premium principles which are monotonic and constructed by concatenating a series of premium principles. By adopting the monotonic piecewise premium principle, our proposed optimal reinsurance model has a number of advantages. In particular, our model has the flexibility of allowing the reinsurer to use different risk loading factors for a given premium principle or use entirely different premium principles depending on the layers of risk. Our proposed model can also analyze the optimal reinsurance strategy in the context of multiple reinsurers that may use different premium principles (as attributed to the difference in risk attitude and/or imperfect information). Furthermore, by artfully imposing certain constraints on the ceded loss functions, the resulting model can be used to capture the reinsurer’s willingness and/or capacity to accept risk or to control counterparty risk from the perspective of the insurer. Under some technical assumptions, we derive explicitly the optimal form of the reinsurance strategies in all the above cases. In particular, we show that a truncated stop-loss reinsurance treaty or a limited stop-loss reinsurance treaty can be optimal depending on the constraint imposed on the retained and/or ceded loss functions. Some numerical examples are provided to further compare and contrast our proposed models to the existing models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrow, K. J. (1963). Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. American Economic Review, 53(5), 941–973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J., & Heath, D. (1999). Coherent measures of Risk. Mathematical Finance, 9(3), 203–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asimit, V. A., & Badescu, A. (2013). Optimal risk transfer with multiple reinsurers. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 53(1), 252–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balbás, A., Balbás, B., & Heras, A. (2009). Optimal reinsurance with general risk measures. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 44(3), 374–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, C., & Tian, W. (2009). Optimal reinsurance arrangements under tail risk measures. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 76(3), 709–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borch, K. (1960). An attempt to determine the optimum amount of stop loss reinsurance. In Transactions of the 16th International Congress of Actuaries, vol. I (pp. 597–610). Brussels.

  • Cai, J., & Tan, K. S. (2007). Optimal retention for a stop-Loss reinsurance under the VaR and CTE risk measures. ASTIN Bulletin, 37(1), 93–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, J., Tan, K. S., Weng, C., & Zhang, Y. (2008). Optimal reinsurance under VaR and CTE risk measures. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 43, 185–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, K. C., Sung, K. C. J., & Yam, S. C. P. (2013). Risk-minimizing reinsurance protection for multivariate risks. Journal of Risk and Insurance. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6975.2012.01501.x.

  • Chi, Y., & Meng, H. (2013). Optimal reinsurance arrangements in the presence of two reinsurers. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal.

  • Chi, Y., & Tan, K. S. (2011). Optimal reinsurance under VaR and CVaR risk measures: a simplied approach. ASTIN Bulletin, 41(2), 487–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, Y., & Tan, K. S. (2013). Optimal reinsurance with general premium principles. Insurance:Mathematics and Economics, 52(2), 180–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, Y., & Weng, C. (2013). Optimal reinsurance subject to Vajda condition. Insurance:Mathematics and Economics, 53(1), 179–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhaene, J., Denuit, M., Goovaerts, M. J., Kaas, R., & Vyncke, D. (2002). The concept of comonotonicity in actuarial science and finance: theory. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 31(1), 3–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gajek, L., & Zagrodny, D. (2004a). Optimal reinsurance under general risk measures. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 34(2), 227–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gajek, L., & Zagrodny, D. (2004b). Reinsurance arrangements maximizing insurer’s survival probability. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 71(3), 421–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlimann, W. (1998). On stop-loss order and the distortion pricing principle. ASTIN Bulletin, 28(1), 119–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorion, P. (2006). Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk (3rd ed.): McGraw-Hill.

  • Kahn, P. M. (1961). Some remarks on a recent paper by Borch. ASTIN Bulletin, 1(5), 265–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaluszka, M. (2001). Optimal reinsurance under mean-variance premium principles. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 28(1), 61–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaluszka, M. (2005). Optimal reinsurance under convex principles of premium calculation. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 36(3), 375–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaluszka, M., & Okolewski, A. (2008). An extension of Arrow’s result on optimal reinsurance contract. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 75(2), 275–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolski, T., Schmidli, H., Schmidt, V., & Teugels, J. (1999). Stochastic Processes for Insurance and Finance: John Wiley and Sons.

  • Tan, K. S., Weng, C., & Zhang, Y. (2011). Optimality of general reinsurance contracts under CTE risk measure. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 49(2), 175–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, V. R. (1999). Optimal reinsurance under Wang’s premium principles. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 25(2), 109–122.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Cong thanks the funding support from the Waterloo Research institute in Insurance, Securities and Quantitative finance (WatRISQ). Tan acknowledges research funding from the MOE Project of Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences at Universities(No. 11JJD790004), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Society of Actuaries Centers of Actuarial Excellence Research Grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ken Seng Tan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cong, J., Tan, K.S. Optimal VaR-based risk management with reinsurance. Ann Oper Res 237, 177–202 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-014-1584-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-014-1584-8

Keywords

Navigation