Skip to main content
Log in

Investment decisions in mobile telecommunications networks applying real options

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a real options model for valuing the option to delay mobile telecommunications network investment decisions and a method for calculating the real options’ impact on mobile service costs. Ranges of option value multiples are calculated for the decisions to invest in a number of network elements, each representing a different part of the mobile network, subject to different demand and technological uncertainties. The value of the option to invest in each network element, net of future replacement options, is modeled as a function of the element’s total variable profit and the cost of investment in the element. The model and method are then applied to estimate the real options’ impact on mobile termination costs using real cost and volume data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. LRIC has been widely recognized as the costing method that best mirrors the costs faced by a hypothetical efficient replacement firm.

  2. The percentage split of MSC costs assigned to these two network elements depends on the breakdown of costs associated with setting up/tearing down the call (MSC/Call) and costs associated with maintaining the call (MSC/Dur), assuming that joint/common costs are negligible. See for example BTGroup (2010) for a description on how to deconstruct network equipment into two (or more) network elements, each with its single cost driver.

  3. To keep the notation simple, the index \(i\) has been omitted when no confusion arises.

  4. This assumption has been adopted for traffic sensitive network elements because it allows an analytical solution to the problem of finding the option value multiple and time series data on telecommunications traffic do not provide evidence against it (see Appendix 1). Other choices of stochastic processes may be appropriate for subscriber sensitive network elements (e.g., as markets become saturated, the number of active mobile subscribers may be partially driven by a mean reversion component).

  5. See, for example, Krouse (2000).

  6. This assumption is consistent with cost-volume relationship curves that are straight lines passing through the origin. Economies of scale and modularity effects can be introduced at the cost of making the algebra messier.

  7. The network element’s annualized capital cost used in the LRIC calculation should be consistent with the estimate of depreciation rate used in the real options model. Economic depreciation is considered the optimal method to annualize costs in a LRIC model. For practical reason, however, several alternative methods for deriving annualized capital costs are typically used, such as linear depreciation, accelerated depreciation and annuity methods.

  8. MOU is the acronym for the minutes of usage and ARPU is the acronym for the average revenue per user: the former is used to measure the average communication time per month on a per user basis; and the latter is used to measure the average monthly revenues attributable to designated services on a per user basis.

  9. See ITU (2007) for details.

  10. The time-series data on number of active mobile subscribers, average communication time per user, and average voice and data revenue per user were kindly provided by Teleco (http://www.teleco.com.br).

  11. See EPT (2007) for the price indices until 2007.

  12. See, for example, WikiWealth (2013).

  13. Oftel’s submission to the Monopolies and Mergers Commission inquiry into the prices of calls to mobile phones (Oftel 1998) produced the estimates of 49.4 milliseconds (ms) for switch processing time for inbound calls and 19 ms for outbound calls (a ratio of 2.6:1), which implied the MSC/Call routing factors of 2.60, 1.00 and 3.60, respectively for mobile call termination, off-net mobile call and on-net mobile call. Oftel has been superseded as the British telecommunications regulator by Ofcom (the Office of Communications).

  14. See Appendix 2 for details.

  15. See, for example, Ingersoll and Ross (1992).

References

  • Alleman, J., & Noam, E. (1999). The new investment theory of real options and its implications for telecommunications economics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alleman, J., & Rappoport, P. (2002). Modelling regulatory distortions with real options. The Engineering Economist, 47(4), 390–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angelou, G. N., & Economides, A. A. (2009). A multi-criteria game theory and real-options model for irreversible ICT investment decisions. Telecommunications Policy, 33(10–11), 686–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baecker, P. N., Grass, G., & Hommel, U. (2009). Business value and risk in the presence of price controls: An option-based analysis of margin squeeze rules in the telecommunications industry. In Annals of Operations Research, 176, 311–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, F., & Scholes, M. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 637–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, M., & Schwartz, E. (1985). Evaluating natural resource investments. Journal of Business, 58(2), 135–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BTGroup (2010). Long Run Incremental Cost Model Relationship and Parameters. (2010). Retrieved from http://www.btplc.com/thegroup/regulatoryandpublicaffairs/financialstatements/2010/longrunincrementalcostmodel.pdf. Consulted 20 Mar 2014

  • Dixit, A. X., & Pindyck, R. S. (1994). Investment under uncertainty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPT. (2007). EPT Luxembourg: Current cost accounting. Retrieved from http://www.pt.lu/webdav/site/portailEPT/groups/DT_operators_redacteurs/public/Regulatory/Costing%20Model/EPT_CCA_calculation_methodology_20071023.pdf. Consulted 01 Aug 2013

  • Franklin, S. L, Jr, & Diallo, M. (2012). Valuing real options for network investment decisions and cost-based access pricing. The Engineering Economist, 57(4), 223–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, S. L, Jr., & Diallo, M. (2013). Model and methodology. Telecommunications policy: Real options and cost-based access pricing.

  • Harmantzis, F., & Tanguturi, V. P. (2007). Investment decisions in the wireless industry applying real options. Telecommunications Policy, 31(2), 107–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, J. (1999). The effect of sunk costs in telecommunications. In J. Alleman & E. Noam (Eds.), The new investment theory of real options and its implications for telecommunications economics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, J. E, Jr, & Ross, S. A. (1992). Waiting to invest: Investment and uncertainty. Journal of Business, 65(1), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ITU. (2007). International Telecommunications Union’s report on world mobile telecoms market forecast. Retrieved from http://www.itu.int/pub/R-REP-M.2072. Consulted 01 Aug 2013

  • Krouse, C. G. (2000). LRIC pricing, dynamically competitive markets and incentives to invest in telecommunications. The Antitrust Bulletin, 45(4), 921–934.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R., & Siegel, D. (1986). The value of waiting to invest. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101(4), 707–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. (1973). The theory of rational option pricing. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 4(1), 141–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ofcom. (2010). Ofcom’s review for wholesale mobile call termination and LRIC model files. Retrieved from http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/consultations/wmctr/. Consulted 01 Aug 2013

  • Oftel. (1998). Oftel’s submission to the Monopolies and Mergers Commission inquiry into the prices of calls to mobile phones. Retrieved from: http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/archive/oftel/publications/1995_98/pricing/mmc0598.htm#Chapt.1. Consulted 01 Aug 2013

  • Pindyck, R. S. (2005). Pricing capital under mandatory unbundling and facilities sharing. NBER Working Paper 11225. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w11225. Consulted 05 Jan 2013

  • Pindyck, R. S. (2007). Mandatory unbundling and irreversible investment in telecom networks. Review of Network Economics, 6(3), 274–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tourinho, O. (1979). The valuation of reserves of natural resources: An option pricing approach. Ph.D Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.

  • Trigeorgis, L. (1996). Real options: Managerial flexibility and strategy in resource allocation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • WikiWealth. (2013). Telecom industry WACC. Retrieved from http://www.wikiwealth.com/wacc. Consulted 01 Aug 2013.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergio Luis Franklin Jr..

Appendices

Appendix 1: Dickey–Fuller test and procedure for estimating the volatility parameters

If \(Y_{t}\) follows geometric Brownian motion with drift and volatility parameters respectively given by \(\alpha _{Y}\) and \(\sigma _{Y}\), then \(\ln {\left( Y_{t}\right) } = \left( \alpha _{Y} - \frac{\sigma _{Y}^{2}}{2}\right) t + \ln {\left( Y_{0}\right) } + \sigma _{Y}N\left( 0, 1\right) \sqrt{t}\).

Writing the above equation for discrete intervals of time of length \({\triangle }t = \frac{1}{N}\) year(s):

$$\begin{aligned} \ln {\left( \frac{Y_{i}}{Y_{i - 1}}\right) } = \frac{a_{Y}}{N} + \frac{\sigma _{Y}}{\sqrt{N}}\varepsilon _{t}, \text { where } a_{Y} = \left( \alpha _{Y} - \frac{\sigma _{Y}^{2}}{2}\right) \text { and } \varepsilon _{t} \sim N\left( 0, 1\right) . \end{aligned}$$

The Dickey–Fuller test was performed running the linear regression model on \(\ln {\left( \frac{Y_{i}}{Y_{i - 1}}\right) } = \frac{a_{Y}}{N} + \left( b_{Y} - 1\right) \ln {\left( Y_{i - 1}\right) } + \frac{\sigma _{Y}}{\sqrt{N}}\varepsilon _{t}\) and testing the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: \left( b_{Y} - 1\right) = 0\). The alternative hypothesis was \(H_{A}: \left( b_{Y} - 1\right) < 0\). The regression was based on monthly time-series data on mobile voice traffic and quarterly time-series data on mobile data traffic, respectively over the periods of six and eight years.

The tests showed that there is not enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis (i.e., the assumption that the stochastic variables follow geometric Brownian motion).

The backward-looking estimate of \(\hat{\sigma }_{Y}\) was derived from the equation \(\hat{\sigma }_{Y}^{2} = N\{\) sample variance of \(\ln {\left( \frac{Y_{i}}{Y_{i - 1}}\right) }\}\).

Appendix 2: Actual cost and volume data

The cost and volume information used in this paper is based on the actual cost study of a mobile telecommunications operator for the project to build a mobile network in a small metropolitan area. The network was dimensioned to meet the forecast demand for the next six years, reaching a total of 40,000 mobile subscribers by 2020. A single MSC was assumed to serve a maximum of 125,000 subscribers. The number of BSCs was determined by the number of sites, since each BSC was assumed to serve a maximum of 20 sites. The geographic area was split into six dense, six medium and six rural sites. Each BTS was assumed to be connected to a single BSC. Table 6 shows the cost and volume information of all network elements used by the mobile call termination service, suitably modified to preserve the carrier’s anonymity.

Table 6 Network elements’ cost and volume information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Franklin, S.L. Investment decisions in mobile telecommunications networks applying real options. Ann Oper Res 226, 201–220 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-014-1672-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-014-1672-9

Keywords

Navigation