Skip to main content
Log in

A medical resource allocation model for serving emergency victims with deteriorating health conditions

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Large-scale disasters typically result in a shortage of essential medical resources, and thus it is critical to optimize resource allocation to improve the quality of the relief operations. One important factor that has been largely neglected when optimizing the available medical resources is the deterioration of victims’ health condition in the aftermath of a disaster; e.g., a victim’s health condition could deteriorate from mild to severe if not treated promptly. In this paper, we first present a novel queueing network to model this deterioration in health conditions. Second, we provide both analytical solutions and numerical illustrations for this queueing network. Finally, we formulate two resource allocation models in order to minimize the total expected death rate and total waiting time, respectively. Numerical examples are provided to illustrate the properties of optimal policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altay, N., & Green, W. G. (2006). OR/MS research in disaster operations management. European Journal of Operational Research, 175(1), 475–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argon, N. T., Ding, L., Glazebrook, K. D., & Ziya, S. (2009). Dynamic routing of customers with general delay costs. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences, 23(2), 175–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argon, N. T., & Ziya, S. (2009). Priority assignment under imperfect information on customer type identities. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 11(4), 674–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbarosolu, G., Ozdamar, L., & Ceik, A. (2002). An interactive approach for hierarchical analysis of helicopter logistics in disaster relief operations. European Journal of Operational Research, 140(1), 118–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bostick, N. A., Subbarao, I., Burkle, F. M., Hsu, E. B., Armstrong, J. H., & James, J. J. (2008). Disaster triage systems for large-scale catastrophic events. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 2(Suppl XX—-XX1), S35–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrill, T. B. (1974). Optimal control of a maintenance system with variable service rates. Operations Research, 22(4), 736–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coles, J., Zhuang, J., & Yates, J. (2012). Case study in disaster relief: A descriptive analysis of agency partnerships in the aftermath of the January 12th, 2010 Haitian earthquake. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 46(1), 67–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cookson, R., & Dolan, P. (2000). Principles of justice in health care rationing. Journal of Medical Ethics, 26(5), 323–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, P., & Cookson, R. (2000). A qualitative study of the extent to which health gain matters when choosing between groups of patients. Health Policy, 51(1), 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiedrich, F., Gebauer, F., & Rickers, U. (2000). Optimized resource allocation for emergency response after earthquake disasters. Safety Science, 35(1–3), 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, J. M., & Harrison, M. J. (2001). Dynamic control of a queue with adjustable service rate. Operations Research, 49(5), 720–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glazebrook, K. D., Ansell, P. S., Dunn, R. T., & Lumley, R. R. (2004). On the optimal allocation of service to impatient tasks. Journal of Applied Probability, 41(1), 51–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong, Q., & Batta, R. (2006). A queue-length cutoff model for a preemptive two-priority M/M/1 systems. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 67(1), 99–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong, Q., & R. Batta. 2007. Allocation and reallocation of ambulances to casualty clusters in a disaster relief operation. IIE Transactions 39 27–39(13).

  • Haghani, A., & Oh, S. C. (1996). Formulation and solution of a multi-commodity, multi-modal network flow model for disaster relief operations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 30(3), 231–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausken, K., & Zhuang, J. (2013). The impact of disaster on the interaction between company and government. European Journal of Operational Research, 225(2), 363–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hick, J. L., Barbera, J. A., & Kelen, G. D. (2009). Refining surge capacity: Conventional, contingency, and crisis capacity. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 3(1), S59–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Insua, D., Ruggeri, F., & Wiper, M. (2012). Bayesian analysis of stochastic process models. New York: Wiley.

  • Jenkins, J. L., McCarthy, M. L., Sauer, L. M., Green, G. B., Stuart, S., Thomas, T. L., et al. (2008). Mass-casualty triage: Time for an evidence-based approach. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 23(1), 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, C. A., Schultz, C. H., Miller, K. T., & Anderson, C. L. (2009). Does START triage work? An outcomes assessment after a disaster. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 54(3), 424–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, D., & Glazebrook, K. D. (2010). An approximate dynamic programing approach to the development of heuristics for the scheduling of impatient jobs in a clearing system. Naval Research Logistics, 57(3), 225–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macario, A. (2010). Is it possible to predict how long a surgery will last? Medscape. Jul 14, 2010. http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/724756. Accessed in November 2013

  • Ozdamar, L., Ekinci, E., & Kucukyazici, B. (2004). Emergency logistics planning in natural disasters. Annals of Operations Research, 129(1–4), 217–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perdersen, M. E. H. 2010. Tuning and simplifying heuristical optimization. Ph.D. thesis, University of Southampton, School of Engineering Sciences.

  • Rao, S. S. (2009). Engineering optimization: Theory and practice. Hoboken: Wiley.

  • Sacco, W. J., Navin, D. M., Fiedler, K. E., Waddell, R. K, I. I., Long, W. B., & Buckman, R. F. (2005). Precise formulation and evidence-based application of resource-constrained triage. Academic Emergency Medicine, 12(8), 759–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheu, J. B. (2007). An emergency logistics distribution approach for quick response to urgent relief demand in disasters. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 43(6), 687–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheu, J. B. (2010). Dynamic relief-demand management for emergency logistics operations under large-scale disasters. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 46(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinuff, T., Kahnamoui, K., Cook, D. J., Luce, J. M., & Levy, M. M. (2004). Rationing critical care beds: A systematic review. Critical Care Medicine, 32(7), 1588–1597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Super, G., Groth, S., & Hook, R. (1994). START: Simple triage and rapid treatment plan. Newport Beach, CA: Hoag Memorial Presbyterian Hospital.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R., & Stidham, S. (1987). Optimal control of service rates in networks of queues. Advances in Applied Probability, 19(1), 202–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong, W., & Altiok, T. (2009). An approximation for multi-server queues with deterministic reneging times. Annals of Operations Research, 172(1), 143–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi, W., & Kumar, A. (2007). Ant colony optimization for disaster relief operations. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 43(6), 660–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang, J., & Bier, V. M. (2007). Balancing terrorism and natural disasters–Defensive strategy with endogenous attacker effort. Operations Research, 55(5), 976–991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang, J., G. Saxton, & H. Wu. (2014). Publicity vs. impact: A sequential game with a non-profit organization and N donors. Annals of Operations Research, 221(1), 469–491.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Zhuang.

Additional information

The work of the first author was supported by Chinese Ministry of Education under Grant 11YJC630228, and Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong under Grant S2011040002092. The work of the second author was partially supported by the United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) through the National Center for Risk and Economic Analysis of Terrorism Events (CREATE) under award number 2010-ST-061-RE0001, and by the United States National Science Foundation under award numbers 1200899 and 1334930. However, any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect views of the DHS, CREATE, or NSF.

Appendices

Appendix 1

The solution method used for solving the 2-D Markov process in this paper involves decomposing the 2-D process into a set of 1-D Markov processes. Instead, we can obtain the numerical results by solving the steady-state equations for the 2-D Markov process directly. Table 1 provides the results comparing the decomposition versus the numerical methods in three examples where \(C_1=C_2=4, \lambda _2=1, q_{21}=0.2, q_{10}=0.1\): Example 1 (\(\lambda _1=0.8, \mu _1=1.0, \mu _2=1.5\)), Example 2 (\(\lambda _1=0.5, \mu _1=0.5, \mu _2=1.5\)), and Example 3 (\(\lambda _1=0.8, \mu _1=1.0, \mu _2=1.5\)). From Table 1 we observe that the comparison results are pretty good: the absolute errors are very small.

Table 1 Comparing analytical with approximating probabilities for each states and each queue

Further more, we study how such absolute errors change when the number of states \(C\) increases. For each of the three examples in Table 1, we extend to study \(C=5, 10, 15, 50\) as shown in Table 2. The results show that both the average and the standard deviation of the absolute errors (across states; it is not meaningful to report probabilities for each of the states \(i=1,C\) for each queue) decrease when \(C\) increases. This confirms that our approximation method is stable.

Table 2 Average and standard deviations for absolute errors between analytical and approximating probabilities when \(C\) changes

Appendix 2

To test the optimality of the Local Unimodal Sampling algorithm in Sect. 3.1, we randomly generate twelve instances of the medical resource allocation problem of our interest, and compare the results obtained from unimodal sampling algorithm against the direct grid-search method (exhaustive search). The grid-search method involves setting up a suitable grid in the design space, evaluating the objective function at all grid points, and finding the grid point corresponding to the lowest function value (Rao 2009). The reason for choosing the simple grid-search approach for comparison purpose is that it may not be safe to use approximation or heuristic methods that avoid doing an exhaustive parameter search. For the twelve problem instances we tested, the results (expected total death rate) from unimodal sampling algorithm are 0.18 % higher than those from the grid-search on average, and a more detailed comparison is shown in Fig. 9. The comparison results provide evidence that the Local Unimodal Sampling Algorithm is acceptable for the optimization problems studied in this paper.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Unimodal sampling algorithm versus direct grid-search

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiang, Y., Zhuang, J. A medical resource allocation model for serving emergency victims with deteriorating health conditions. Ann Oper Res 236, 177–196 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-014-1716-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-014-1716-1

Keywords

Navigation