Skip to main content
Log in

A chance constrained recourse approach for the portfolio selection problem

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with the stochastic portfolio selection problem when the loss in the portfolio return is considered as a recourse cost. We suppose that the investor would penalize infeasible solutions for uncertain constraints with the most probable highest recourse cost rather than with the expected recourse cost as in the traditional recourse approach. This novel approach which is mixed with a goal programming approach is used to solve a multi-objective stochastic portfolio selection model. We illustrate the paper results by an empirical example using the weekly returns of the Standard & Poor’s 100 securities between January 2001 and November 2011.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ben Abdelaziz, F. (2012). Solution approaches for the multiobjective stochastic programming. European Journal of Operational Research, 216(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben Abdelaziz, F., Aouni, B., & El Fayedh, R. (2007). Multi-objective stochastic programming for portfolio selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 177, 1811–1823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben Tal, A., & Teboulle, M. (1991). Portfolio theory for the recourse certainty equivalent maximizing investor. Annals of Operations Research, 31(1), 479–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birge, J. R., & Louveaux, F. (1997). Introduction to stochastic programming. Berlin: Springer.

  • Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1963). Deterministic equivalents for optimizing and satisfying under chance constraints. Operations Research, 11, 18–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kall, P., & Wallace, S. (1995). Stochastic programming. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H. (1956). The optimization of a quadratic function subject to linear constraints. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 3, 111–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masmoudi, M., & Ben Abdelaziz, F. (2012). A recourse goal programming approach for the portfolio selection problem. INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research, 50(3), 134–139.

  • Prékopa, A. (1995). Stochastic programming. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Steuer, R. E., Qi, Y., & Hirschberger, M. (2007). Suitable-portfolio investors, nondominated frontier sensitivity, and the effect of multiple objectives on standard portfolio selection. Annals of Operations Research, 152(1), 297–317.

  • Walkup, D., & Wets, R. J.-B. (1967). Stochastic programs with recourse. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 15, 1299–1314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meryem Masmoudi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Masmoudi, M., Ben Abdelaziz, F. A chance constrained recourse approach for the portfolio selection problem. Ann Oper Res 251, 243–254 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-1844-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-1844-2

Keywords

Navigation