Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Investigation of the Impact of the Massachusetts Health Care Reform on Hospital Costs and Quality of Care

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 2006, the Massachusetts legislature passed a landmark health care reform bill (the Reform) that has served as a model for the national health care reform. By aiming to provide “access to affordable, quality, accountable health care,” the goals of this reform were to reduce the number of uninsured Massachusetts residents while containing the growth of health care costs and improving the quality of health care services. The current paper examines the impact of the Reform on the quality of care in addition to hospital costs simultaneously from a perspective of efficiency analysis. We develop an integer-valued non-radial Russell data envelopment analysis (DEA) model, which is unit variant and calculate the hospitals’ efficiency directly. However, the proposed integer-valued model is non-linear. The current paper thus transforms this model into a parametric integer linear programming. We develop a method to derive its optimal solutions. We then use the new DEA model to calculate and compare the efficiency scores of hospitals in Massachusetts and Connecticut pre- and post-Reform. The analysis shows that the Reform has achieved its cost containment and quality improvement goals at the same time. These analyses provide potentially useful information to hospital regulators and government regulators, especially in light of the national interest on health care legislation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Massachusetts rate of uninsured has decreased from 7.4 % in 2004 to 1.9 % in 2010 and Massachusetts had the lowest rate of uninsured in the country in 2009 (2.7 % in 2009 compare to a national average of 16.7  %) according to a report from the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts Foundation (2011).

  2. We do not include administrative salaries because we expect that these costs are largely fixed and not affected by changes in patient volume.

  3. All costs are measured in thousands of dollars.

  4. The average HRTATTACK is the average of mean of HRTAttack_ACE_C, HRTAttack_ASPIRIN_ARRIVAL, HRTAttack_ASPIRIN_DISCH, HRTAttack_BETA and HRTAttack_SMKG_COUNSEL_C. The same for HRTFAIL and PNEU.

References

  • Balakrishnan, R., Eldenburg, L., Krishnan, R., & Soderstrom, N. (2010). The influence of institutional constraints on outsourcing. Journal of Accounting Research, 48(4), 767–794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, W. D., Tone, K., & Zhu, J. (2014). Data envelopment analysis: Prior to choosing a model. OMEGA, 44, 1–4.

  • Du, J., Wang, J., Chen, Y., Chou, S.-Y., & Zhu, J. (2014). Incorporating health outcomes in Pennsylvania hospital efficiency: An additive super-efficiency DEA approach. Annals of Operations Research, 221(1), 161–172.

  • Ferrier, G. D., & Valdmanis, V. (2004). Do mergers improve hospital productivity? Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55(10), 1071–1080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosskopf, S., Margaritis, D., & Valdmanis, V. (2001). The effects of teaching on hospital productivity. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 35(3), 189–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosskopf, S., Margaritis, D., & Valdmanis, V. (2004). Competitive effects on teaching hospitals. European Journal of Operational Research, 154(2), 515–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. M., Ozgen, H., & Ozcan, Y. A. (2000). Do mergers enhance the performance of hospital efficiency? Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51, 801–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J. P., Coppola, M. N., & Wakefield, M. (2004). Efficiency of federal hospitals in the United States. Journal of Medical Systems, 28(5), 411–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J. P., & Sexton, C. (2006). The improving efficiency frontier of religious not-for-profit hospitals. Hospital Topics, 84(1), 2–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, M., Martin, A., Nuccio, O., Catlin, A., & Team, N. H. E. A. (2010). Health spending growth at historic low in 2008. Health Affairs, 29(1), 147–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HCQCC (2009a). Measuring healthcare quality and costs in Massachusetts. Health Care Cost and Quality Council.

  • Hollingsworth, B., Dawson, P. J., & Maniadakis, N. (1999). Efficiency measurement of health care: A review of non-parametric methods and applications. Health Care Management Science, 2(3), 161–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jha, A., Orav, J., Dobson, A., Book, R., & Epstein, A. (2009). Measuring efficiency: The association of hospital costs and quality of care. Health Affairs, 28(3), 897–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuosmanen, T., & Kazemi Matin, R. (2009). Theory of integer-valued data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 192, 658–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., & Wan, T. T. H. (2004). Information system integration and technical efficiency in urban hospitals. International Journal of Healthcare Technology and Management, 1(3/4), 452.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDorman, M. F., & Mathews, T. J. (2008). Recent trends in infant mortality in the United States. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mensah, Y. M. (2000). Accounting issues in health care. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 19(1), 3–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2011). Health expenditure and financing. OECD Publishing.

  • O’Neill, L. (1998). Multifactor efficiency in data envelopment analysis with an application to urban hospitals. Health Care Management Science, 1(1), 19–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor, J. T., Ruiz, J. L., & Sirvent, I. (1999). An enhanced DEA Russell graph efficiency measure. European Journal of Operational Research, 115, 596–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegrist, R., & Kane, N. (2003). Exploring the relationship between inpatient hospital costs and quality of care. The American Journal of Managed Care, 9(Special Issue), 43–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, H. D. (1984). Hospital efficiency measurement and evaluation: Empirical test of a new technique. Medical Care, 22(10), 922–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, H. D., & Zhu, J. (2006). Service productivity management. New York, NY: Springer Science Business Media, LLC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joe Zhu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miller, F., Wang, J., Zhu, J. et al. Investigation of the Impact of the Massachusetts Health Care Reform on Hospital Costs and Quality of Care. Ann Oper Res 250, 129–146 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-1856-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-1856-y

Keywords

Navigation