Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Sustainability-based selection decisions for e-waste recycling operations

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Selecting operation alternatives for processing a recycling job is an important decision in managing e-waste recycling operations. This paper develops a novel approach to making selection decisions for e-waste recycling operations based on their sustainability performance under environmental, economic, and social dimensions. This approach addresses two new and important issues under a new selection problem structure. A job-oriented assessment method with a fuzzy knowledge base is constructed to address the first issue of how to consistently assess the performance of operation alternatives for a given recycling job with the precise or imprecise specification of the job attributes. A sustainability-based optimal weighting model is developed to address the second issue of how to determine optimal weighting for the three sustainability dimensions to reflect the company’s sustainability concerns and priorities under specific operational settings. With the assessment method and the optimal weighting model, the overall sustainability performance of each operation alternative for a given recycling job can be obtained, on which the selection decision can be made. To examine the effectiveness of the approach, an empirical study on an e-waste operation alternatives selection problem of an Australian e-recycler is conducted. The job-oriented sustainability-based selection approach significantly enhances the efficiency, consistency, and sustainability of processing e-waste recycling jobs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atlee, J., & Kirchain, R. (2006). Operational sustainability metrics assessing metric effectiveness in the context of electronics-recycling systems. Environmental Science & Technology, 40(14), 4506–4513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, J. J. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17(3), 233–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y.-H., Yeh, C.-H., & Cheng, J.-H. (1998). Decision support for bus operations under uncertainty: A fuzzy expert system approach. Omega, 26(3), 367–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y.-H., Yeh, C.-H., & Wang, S.-Y. (2007). A survey and optimization-based evaluation of development strategies for the air cargo industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 106(2), 550–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y.-H., & Yeh, C.-H. (2001). Evaluating airline competitiveness using multiattribute decision making. Omega, 29(5), 405–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Feo, G., & De Gisi, S. (2014). Using MCDA and GIS for hazardous waste landfill siting considering land scarcity for waste disposal. Waste Management, 34(11), 2225–2238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, H. P. (1999). Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparison. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 21(3), 215–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with Forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foulds, L. R., & Partovi, F. Y. (1998). Integrating the analytic hierarchy process and graph theory to model facilities layout. Annals of Operations Research, 82(1–4), 435–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao, C., & Liu, S.-T. (2003). A mathematical programming approach to fuzzy efficiency ranking. International Journal of Production Economics, 86(2), 145–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, A., & Gupta, M. M. (1991). Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic, theory and applications. Boston: International Thomson Computer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleindorfer, P. R., Singhal, K., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2005). Sustainable operations management. Production and Operations Management, 14(4), 482–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klir, G. R., & Yuan, B. (1995). Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic theory and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., & Zhang, Q. (2015). AHP-based resources and environment efficiency evaluation index system construction about the west side of Taiwan Straits. Annals of Operations Research, 228(1), 97–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Duan, Y.-P., Huang, F., Yang, J., Xiang, N., Meng, X.-Z., et al. (2014). Polybrominated diphenyl ethers in e-waste: Level and transfer in a typical e-waste recycling site in Shanghai, Eastern China. Waste Management, 34(6), 1059–1065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mamdani, E. H., & Assilian, S. (1975). An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 7(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negoita, C. (1985). Expert systems and fuzzy systems. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin-Cummings Pub. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ongondo, F. O., Williams, I. D., & Cherrett, T. J. (2011). How are WEEE doing? A global review of the management of electrical and electronic wastes. Waste Management, 31(4), 714–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez, J. C., Carrillo, M. H., & Montoya-Torres, J. R. (2015). Multi-criteria approaches for urban passenger transport systems: A literature review. Annals of Operations Research, 226(1), 69–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, V. N. (2008). E-waste hazard: The impending challenge. Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 12(2), 65–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahinski, C., & Kocabasoglu, C. (2006). Empirical research opportunities in reverse supply chain. Omega, 34(6), 519–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, S., & Subramanian, N. (2012). Factors for implementing end-of-life computer recycling operations in reverse supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 239–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rakhshan, S., Kamyad, A., & Effati, S. (2015). Ranking decision-making units by using combination of analytical hierarchical process method and Tchebycheff model in data envelopment analysis. Annals of Operations Research, 226(1), 505–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei, J., & Dowlatshahi, S. (2010). A rule-based multi-criteria approach to inventory classification. International Journal of Production Research, 48(23), 7107–7126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, T. J. (2010). Fuzzy logic with engineering applications (3rd ed.). United Kingdom: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roychowdhury, S., & Pedrycz, W. (2001). A survey of defuzzification strategies. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 16(6), 679–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Lopez, R., Bana e Costa, C., & Baets, B. (2012). The MACBETH approach for multi-criteria evaluation of development projects on cross-cutting issues. Annals of Operations Research, 199(1), 393–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, R. K., Murty, H. R., Gupta, S. K., & Dikshit, A. K. (2012). An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Economical Indicators, 15(1), 281–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavana, M., Sodenkamp, M., & Suhl, L. (2010). A soft multi-criteria decision analysis model with application to the European Union enlargement. Annals of Operations Research, 181(1), 393–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavana, M., Khalili-Damghani, K., & Rahmatian, R. (2014). A hybrid fuzzy MCDM method for measuring the performance of publicly held pharmaceutical companies. Annals of Operations Research, 226(1), 589–621.

  • Uricchio, V. F., Giordano, R., & Lopez, N. (2004). A fuzzy knowledge-based decision support system for groundwater pollution risk evaluation. Journal of Environmental Management, 73, 189–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vreeker, R., Nijkamp, P., & Welle, C. T. (2002). A multicriteria decision support methodology for evaluating airport expansion plans. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 7(1), 27–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallenius, J., Dyer, J. S., Fishburn, P. C., Steuer, R. E., Zionts, S., & Deb, K. (2008). Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: Recent accomplishments and what lies ahead. Management Science, 54(7), 1336–1349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widmer, R., Oswald-Krapf, H., Sinha-Khetriwal, D., Schnellmann, M., & Boni, H. (2005). Global perspectives on e-waste. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25(5), 436–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E., Kahhat, R., Allenby, B., Kavazanjian, E., Kim, J., & Xu, M. (2008). Environmental, social, and economic implications of global reuse and recycling of personal computers. Environmental Science & Technology, 42(17), 6446–6454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Y., & Yeh, C.-H. (2012). An integrated approach to evaluation and planning of best practices. Omega, 40(1), 65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, C.-H., Willis, R. J., Deng, H., & Pan, H. (1999). Task oriented weighting in multi-criteria analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 119, 130–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, C.-H., & Kuo, Y.-L. (2003). Evaluating passenger services of Asia-Pacific international airports. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 39(1), 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, C.-H., & Xu, Y. (2013a). Managing critical success strategies for an enterprise resource planning project. European Journal of Operational Research, 230, 604–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, C.-H., & Xu, Y. (2013b). Sustainable planning of e-waste recycling activities using fuzzy multicriteria decision making. Journal of Cleaner Production, 52, 194–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1975a). Fuzzy logic and approximate reasoning. Synthese, 30, 407–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1975b). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Information Sciences, 8, 199–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Australian Government’s Enterprise Connect—Researchers in Business Project. We are grateful to the editor and the anonymous referees for their valuable comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Shaanxi, 710072, China

    Yan Xu

  2. Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne, Victoria, 3800, Australia

    Yan Xu & Chung-Hsing Yeh

Authors
  1. Yan Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chung-Hsing Yeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yan Xu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, Y., Yeh, CH. Sustainability-based selection decisions for e-waste recycling operations. Ann Oper Res 248, 531–552 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2269-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2269-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation