Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optimal price-threshold control for battery operation with aging phenomenon: a quasiconvex optimization approach

  • Feinberg: Probability
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is concerned with grid-level battery storage operations, taking battery aging into consideration. Battery operations under price uncertainty are modeled as a Markov Decision Process with expected cumulated discounted rewards. The structure of the optimal policy is studied. An algorithm that takes advantage of the problem structure and works directly on the continuous state space is developed to maximize the objective over the life of the battery. The algorithm determines an optimal policy by solving a sequence of quasiconvex problems indexed by a battery-life state. Computational results are presented to compare the proposed approach to a standard dynamic programming method, and to evaluate the impact of refinements in the battery model. Error bounds for the proposed algorithm are established to demonstrate its accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akhil, A., Huff, G., Currier, A., Kaun, B., Rastler, D., Chen, S., Cotter, A., Bradshaw, D., & Gauntlett, W. (2015). DOE/EPRI electricity storage handbook in collaboration with NRECA. Tech. Rep. SAND2015-1002, Sandia National Laboratories

  • Bertsekas, D. (2005). Dynamic programming and optimal control (3rd ed.). Belmont, MA: Athena Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004). Convex optimization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dontchev, A., & Rockafellar, R. (2009). Implicit functions and solution mappings. New York, NY: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, B., Kamath, H., & Tarascon, J. M. (2011). Electrical energy storage for the grid: A battery of choices. Science, 334(6058), 928–935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, H., & Pierskalla, W. (1973). Quasi-conjugate functions and surrogate duality. Cahiers du Centre d’Etudes de Recherche Opérationnelle, 15, 437–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyman, D., & Sobel, M. (2003). Stochastic models in operations research, vol II: Stochastic optimization. Mineola, NY: Dover.

  • Hu, Y., & Defourny, B. (2014). Near-optimality bounds for greedy periodic policies with application to grid-level storage. In IEEE Symposium on Adaptive Dynamic Programming and Reinforcement Learning (ADPRL-2014), pp. 1–8

  • Kallenberg, L. (2002). Finite state and action MDPs. In E. Feinberg & A. Schwartz (Eds.), Handbook of Markov decision processes (pp. 21–87). Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiwiel, K. (2001). Convergence and efficiency of subgradient methods for quasiconvex minimization. Mathematical Programming, 90(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koller, M., Borsche, T., Ulbig, A., & Andersson, G. (2013). Defining a degradation cost function for optimal control of a battery energy storage system. In 2013 IEEE PowerTech, pp. 1–6

  • Lifshitz, D., & Weiss, G. (2015). Optimal energy management for grid-connected storage systems. Optimal Control Applications and Methods, 36(4), 447–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Löhndorf, N., & Minner, S. (2010). Optimal day-ahead trading and storage of renewable energies—An approximate dynamic programming approach. Energy Systems, 1(1), 61–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnus, J., & Neudecker, H. (1999). Matrix differential calculus (revised ed.). Chichester: Wiley.

  • Moazeni, S., Powell, W., & Hajimiragha, A. (2015). Mean-conditional value-at-risk optimal energy storage operation in the presence of transaction costs. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 30(3), 1222–1232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mount, T., Ning, Y., & Cai, X. (2006). Predicting price spikes in electricity markets using a regime-switching model with time-varying parameters. Energy Economics, 28(1), 62–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nocedal, J., & Wright, S. (2006). Numerical optimization (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrik, M., & Wu, X. (2015). Optimal threshold control for energy arbitrage with degradable battery storage. In Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Proc. 31st Conf. (pp. 692–701). Corvallis: AUAI Press.

  • Plemmons, R. (1977). M-matrix characterizations. I—Nonsingular M-matrices. Linear Algebra and its Applications, 18(2), 175–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puterman, M. (1994). Markov decision processes: Discrete stochastic dynamic programming. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Puterman, M., & Brumelle, S. (1979). On the convergence of policy iteration in stationary dynamic programming. Mathematics of Operations Research, 4(1), 60–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin, J., Sevlian, R., Varodayan, D., & Rajagopal, R. (2012). Optimal electric energy storage operation. In 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting (pp. 1–6) IEEE

  • Ross, S. M. (1983). Introduction to stochastic dynamic programming. New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, M., & Rust, J. (2004). Convergence properties of policy iteration. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 42(6), 2094–2115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherrer, B. (2013). Improved and generalized upper bounds on the complexity of policy iteration. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 386–394

  • Shu, Z., & Jirutitijaroen, P. (2014). Optimal operation strategy of energy storage system for grid-connected wind power plants. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 5(1), 190–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparacino, A., Reed, G., Kerestes, R., Grainger, B., & Smith, Z. (2012). Survey of battery energy storage systems and modeling techniques. In 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, pp. 1–8

  • Topkis, D. (1998). Supermodularity and complementarity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varah, J. (1975). A lower bound for the smallest singular value of a matrix. Linear Algebra and its Applications, 11, 3–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Ven, P., Hegde, N., Massoulié, L., & Salonidis, T. (2013). Optimal control of end-user energy storage. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 4(2), 789–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weron, R. (2014). Electricity price forecasting: A review of the state-of-the-art with a look into the future. International Journal of Forecasting, 30(4), 1030–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Boris Defourny.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, Y., Defourny, B. Optimal price-threshold control for battery operation with aging phenomenon: a quasiconvex optimization approach. Ann Oper Res 317, 623–650 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2505-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2505-4

Keywords