Skip to main content
Log in

Developing a new stochastic model considering bi-directional relations in a natural disaster: a possible earthquake in Tehran (the Capital of Islamic Republic of Iran)

  • RAOTA-2016
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Timely, effective delivery of relief resources to the sufferers in a natural disaster is quite crucial. All governments especially those having high risk of natural disasters must have a comprehensive and implementable plan to suitably manage humanitarian issues after a natural disaster occurs. They should construct sufficient facilities and prepare and store enough relief items (e.g., tents, medical packages, and meals) to be able to quickly respond to necessary needs of injured and homeless people; otherwise, it might lead to humanitarian crises with high numbers of casualties. In this study, we extend the mathematical two-stage stochastic optimization model proposed by Mete and Zabinsky (Int J Prod Econ 126:76–84, 2010) simultaneously considering two phases: pre- and post-disaster. All decisions pertinent to the pre-disaster phase, such as the locations of warehouse and pre-positioned relief items, should be taken in the first stage; however, other decisions pertinent to the post-disaster phase, such as the allocations of warehouses to the demanding points are taken in the second stage. In this study, we consider bi-directional relations between warehouses, which can increase the flexibility of the constructed network to handle the needs of injured people in a shorter time interval. Furthermore, whereas the relief process should be implemented within a specific time interval (e.g., 3 days), our extended optimization model is constructed for a multi-period and multi-product situation. We construct the extended model based on a professional report prepared by the Japanese International Cooperation Agency in a study of the seismic micro zoning of Tehran on April 13, 1999. The respective data in this report has also been updated based on the reports of Tehran Municipality to be matched with the current situation of Tehran. The results of our extended multi-period model for the respective real case study in this paper verify suitable responses and better services to the affected areas compared to what are provided through the respective single-period optimization model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Tehran Institution of Crisis Prevention and Management.

  2. Expected value of perfect information.

  3. Value of stochastic solution.

References

  • Afshar, A., & Haghani, A. (2012). Modeling integrated supply chain logistics in real-time large-scale disaster relief operations. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 46, 327–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akkihal, A. R. (2006). Inventory pre-positioning for humanitarian operations. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Balcik, B., & Beamon, B. M. (2008). Facility location in humanitarian relief. International Journal of Logistics, 11, 101–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birge, J. R., & Louveaux, F. (2011). Introduction to stochastic programming. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brotcorne, L., Laporte, G., & Semet, F. (2003). Ambulance location and relocation models. European Journal of Operational Research, 147, 451–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunn, S. W. A. (2003). The language of disasters: A brief terminology of disaster management and humanitarian action. In Basics of international humanitarian missions (pp. 35–46). New York: Fordham University Press/Center for International Health and Cooperation.

  • Hu, C. L., Liu, X., & Hua, Y. K. (2016). A bi-objective robust model for emergency resource allocation under uncertainty. International Journal of Production Research, 54, 7421–7438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, K., Jiang, Y., Yuan, Y., & Zhao, L. (2015). Modeling multiple humanitarian objectives in emergency response to large-scale disasters. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 75, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, X., & Song, L. (2016). An emergency logistics distribution routing model for unexpected events. Annals of Operations Research, 1–17.

  • JICA (Japan International Cooperation Agency). (2000). The Study on Seismic Microzoning of the Greater Tehran Area in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Center for Earthquake and Environmental Studies of Tehran (CEST), Pacific Consultants International OYO Corporation, Tehran, Municipality

  • Liberatore, F., Scaparra, S., & Daskin, M. (2011). Hedging against disruptions with ripple effects in location analysis. Omega, 40, 21–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mete, H. O., & Zabinskyl, Z. B. (2010). Stochastic optimization of medical supply location and distribution in disaster management. International Journal of Production Economics, 126, 76–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Najafi, M., Eshghi, K., & Dullaert, W. (2013). A multi-objective robust optimization model for logistics planning in the earthquake response phase. Transportation Research Part E, 49, 217–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naji-Azimi, Z., Renaud, J., Ruiz, A., & Salari, M. (2012). A covering tour approach to the location of satellite distribution centers to supply humanitarian aid. European Journal of Operational Research, 222, 596–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozdamar, L., Ekinci, E., & Kucukyazici, B. (2004). Emergency logistics planning in natural disasters. Annals of Operations Research, 129, 217–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, J. A., & Hariharan, G. (2012). Location–allocation planning of stockpiles for effective disaster mitigation. Annals of Operations Research, 196, 469–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, C. G., & Turnquist, M. A. (2010). Pre-positioning of emergency supplies for disaster response. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 44, 521–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, C.G., & Turnquist, M.A. (2012). Pre-positioning and dynamic delivery planning for short-term response following a natural disaster. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 46, 46–54.

  • Sheu, J. B. (2007). An emergency logistics distribution approach for quick response to urgent relief demand in disasters. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 43, 687–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng, G. H., Cheng, H. J., & Huang, T. D. (2007). Multi-objective optimal planning for designing relief delivery systems. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 43, 673–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, F., Yuan, Q., Du, S., & Liang, L. (2014). Reserving relief supplies for earthquake: A multi-attribute decision making of China Red Cross. Annals of Operations Research, 247, 759–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanjirani Farahani, R. Z., Asgari, N., & Davarzani, H. (2009). Supply chain and logistics in national, international and governmental environment: Concepts and models. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, Y. J., & Ling, H. F. (2013). Emergency transportation planning in disaster relief supply chain management: A cooperative fuzzy optimization approach. Soft Computing, 17, 1301–1314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masoud Mahootchi.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 and 26.

Table 19 Estimation demand for relief items based on Ray Fault scenario—regions 1–6
Table 20 Estimation demand for relief items based on North Tehran Fault scenario—regions 1–6
Table 21 Estimation demand for relief items based on Mosha Fault scenario—regions 1–6
Table 22 Estimation demand for relief items based on Floating Fault scenario—regions 1 to 6
Table 23 Estimation of injuries based on Ray Fault model
Table 24 Estimation of injuries based on N.Tehran Fault model
Table 25 Estimation of injuries based on Mosha Fault model
Table 26 Estimation of injuries based on Floating Fault model

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mahootchi, M., Golmohammadi, S. Developing a new stochastic model considering bi-directional relations in a natural disaster: a possible earthquake in Tehran (the Capital of Islamic Republic of Iran). Ann Oper Res 269, 439–473 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2596-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2596-y

Keywords

Navigation