Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Integrated data envelopment analysis and cooperative game for evaluating energy efficiency of transportation sector: a case of Iran

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Transportation sector with the consumption of 25% of energy play a major role in Iranian economy. This sector produces 27% of total undesirable greenhouse gases in Iran which has directly harmful effects on the environment. Hence, performance assessment of energy efficiency of transportation sector is one of the most important issues for policy makers. In this paper, energy efficiency of transportation sector of 20 provinces in Iran is evaluated based on data envelopment analysis (DEA)—cooperative game approach. First, selected inputs and outputs are categorized into energy and non-energy inputs and desirable and undesirable outputs. Then, classical DEA model is applied to evaluate and rank the provinces. Since, the classical DEA model can’t distinguish between efficient provinces, so, this paper ranks the provinces based on combination of cross-efficiency DEA and cooperative game approaches. In the cooperative game theory, each province is considered as a player and the suitable characteristic function is defined for players. Finally, by calculating the Shapley value for each player, the final ranks of transportation sectors in provinces are concluded. The results indicate that some smaller provinces have better energy efficiency in transportation sector in comparison with big provinces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. www.epa.gov.

References

  • Andersen, P., & Petersen, N. C. (1993). A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 39(10), 1261–1264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avkiran, N. K. (2011). Association of DEA super-efficiency estimates with financial ratios: Investigating the case for Chinese banks. Omega., 39(3), 323–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barros, C. P., Wanke, P., Dumbo, S., & Manso, J. P. (2017). Efficiency in angolan hydro-electric power station: A two-stage virtual frontier dynamic DEA and simplex regression approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 78, 588–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bi, G., Wang, P., Yang, F., & Liang, L. (2014). Energy and environmental efficiency of China’s transportation sector: A multidirectional analysis approach. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/539596.

  • Bian, Y. W., & Xu, H. (2013). DEA ranking method based upon virtual envelopment frontier and TOPSIS. Systems of Engineering, Theory Practice, 33(2), 482–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y. T., Zhang, N., Danao, D., & Zhang, N. (2013). Environmental efficiency analysis of transportation system in China: A non-radial DEA approach. Energy Policy, 58, 277–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, J. F., Wu, J., & Song, M. L. (2016). An SBM-DEA model with parallel computing design for environmental efficiency evaluation in the big data context: A transportation system application. Annals of Operations Research, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2264-7.

  • Cui, Q., & Li, Y. (2014). The evaluation of transportation energy efficiency: An application of three-stage virtual frontier DEA. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 29, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui, Q., & Li, Y. (2015). An empirical study on the influencing factors of transportation carbon efficiency: Evidences from fifteen countries. Applied Energy, 141, 209–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui, Q., Li, Y., Yu, C. L., & Wei, Y. M. (2016). Evaluating energy efficiency for airlines: An application of virtual frontier dynamic slacks based measure. Energy, 113, 1231–1240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dotoli, M., Epicoco, N., Falagario, M., & Sciancalepore, F. (2015). A cross-efficiency fuzzy data envelopment analysis technique for performance evaluation of decision making units under uncertainty. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 79, 103–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatami-Marbini, A., Agrell, P. J., Tavana, M., & Khoshnevis, P. (2017). A flexible cross-efficiency fuzzy data envelopment analysis model for sustainable sourcing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 2761–2779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaber, J. O., Al-Ghandoor, A., & Sawalha, S. A. (2008). Energy analysis and exergy utilization in the transportation sector of Jordan. Energy Policy, 36(8), 2995–3000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, K. F. (2010). In the determination of weight sets to compute cross-efficiency ratios in DEA. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 61(1), 134–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Wang, Y. Z., & Cui, Q. (2015). Evaluating airline efficiency: An application of virtual frontier network SBM. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 81, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Wang, Y. Z., & Cui, Q. (2016a). Energy efficiency measures for airlines: An application of virtual frontier dynamic range adjusted measure. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 8(1), 015901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Xie, J., Wang, M., & Liang, L. (2016b). Super efficiency evaluation using a common platform on a cooperative game. European Journal of Operational Research, 255(3), 884–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Yang, F., Liang, L., & Hua, Z. (2009). Allocating the fixed cost as a complement of other cost inputs: A DEA approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 197(1), 389–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, T., Yang, W., Zhang, H., & Cao, X. (2016c). Evaluating the impact of transport investment on the efficiency of regional integrated transport systems in China. Transport Policy, 45, 66–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, L., Wu, J., Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2008). Alternative secondary goals in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation. International Journal of Production Economics, 113(2), 1025–1030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, S., Oh, K. W., & Zhu, J. (2014). Use of DEA cross-efficiency evaluation in portfolio selection: An application to Korean stock market. European Journal of Operational Research, 236(1), 361–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipscy, P. Y., & Schipper, L. (2013). Energy efficiency in the Japanese transport sector. Energy Policy, 56, 248–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., Chu, J., Yin, P., & Sun, J. (2017a). DEA cross-efficiency evaluation considering undesirable output and ranking priority: A case study of eco-efficiency analysis of coal-fired power plants. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 877–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W. B., Meng, W., Li, X. X., & Zhang, D. Q. (2010). DEA models with undesirable inputs and outputs. Annals of Operations Research, 173(1), 177–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H., Zhang, Y., Zhu, Q., & Chu, J. (2017b). Environmental efficiency of land transportation in China: A parallel slack-based measure for regional and temporal analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 867–876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llorca, M., & Jamasb, T. (2017). Energy efficiency and rebound effect in European road freight transport. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 101, 98–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mashayekhi, Z., & Omrani, H. (2016). An integrated multi-objective Markowitz DEA cross-efficiency model with fuzzy returns for portfolio selection problem. Applied Soft Computing, 38, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng, F., Liu, G., Yang, Z., Casazza, M., Cui, S., & Ulgiati, S. (2017). Energy efficiency of urban transportation system in Xiamen China. An integrated approach. Applied Energy, 186, 234–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakabayashi, K., & Tone, K. (2006). Egoist’s dilemma: a DEA game. Omega., 34(2), 135–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omrani, H., Beiragh, R. G., & Kaleibari, S. S. (2015). Performance assessment of Iranian electricity distribution companies by an integrated cooperative game data envelopment analysis principal component analysis approach. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 64, 617–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oral, M., Amin, G. R., & Oukil, A. (2015). Cross-efficiency in DEA: A maximum resonated appreciative model. Measurement, 63, 159–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oukil, A., & Amin, G. R. (2015). Maximum appreciative cross-efficiency in DEA: A new ranking method. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 81, 14–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan, R. (2000). A holistic approach to compare energy efficiencies of different transport modes. Energy Policy, 28(11), 743–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramón, N., Ruiz, J. L., & Sirvent, I. (2010). On the choice of weights profiles in cross-efficiency evaluations. European Journal of Operational Research, 207(3), 1564–1572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaee, M. J., Izadbakhsh, H., & Yousefi, S. (2016). An improvement approach based on DEA-game theory for comparison of operational and spatial efficiencies in urban transportation systems. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 20(4), 1526–1531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaee, M. J., Moini, A., & Asgari, F. H. A. (2012). Unified performance evaluation of health centers with integrated model of data envelopment analysis and bargaining game. Journal of Medical Systems, 36(6), 3805–3815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roboredo, M. C., Aizemberg, L., & Meza, L. A. (2015). The DEA game cross-efficiency model applied to the Brazilian football championship. Procedia Computer Science, 55, 758–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, J. L. (2013). Cross-efficiency evaluation with directional distance functions. European Journal of Operational Research, 228(1), 181–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadjadi, S. J., Omrani, H., Abdollahzadeh, S., Alinaghian, M., & Mohammadi, H. (2011). A robust super-efficiency data envelopment analysis model for ranking of provincial gas companies in Iran. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(9), 10875–10881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saidur, R., Sattar, M. A., Masjuki, H. H., Ahmed, S., & Hashim, U. (2007). An estimation of the energy and exergy efficiencies for the energy resources consumption in the transportation sector in Malaysia. Energy Policy, 35(8), 4018–4026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (2002). Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 142(1), 16–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sexton, T. R., Silkman, R. H., & Hogan, A. J. (1986). Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions. New Directions for Program Evaluation., 1986(32), 73–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, M., Zheng, W., & Wang, Z. (2016). Environmental efficiency and energy consumption of highway transportation systems in China. International Journal of Production Economics, 181, 441–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanke, P., & Barros, C. P. (2016). Efficiency in Latin American airlines: a two-stage approach combining Virtual Frontier Dynamic DEA and Simplex Regression. Journal of Air Transport Management, 54, 93–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., Chu, J., Sun, J., & Zhu, Q. (2016a). DEA cross-efficiency evaluation based on Pareto improvement. European Journal of Operational Research, 248(2), 571–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., & Liang, L. (2012). A multiple criteria ranking method based on game cross-evaluation approach. Annals of Operations Research, 197(1), 191–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., Liang, L., & Yang, F. (2009). Determination of the weights for the ultimate cross-efficiency using Shapley value in cooperative game. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(1), 872–876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., Sun, J., Liang, L., & Zha, Y. (2011). Determination of weights for ultimate cross-efficiency using Shannon entropy. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(5), 5162–5165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., Zhu, Q., Chu, J., Liu, H., & Liang, L. (2016b). Measuring energy and environmental efficiency of transportation systems in China based on a parallel DEA approach. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 48, 460–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, M. M., Ting, S. C., & Chen, M. C. (2010). Evaluating the cross-efficiency of information sharing in supply chains. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(4), 2891–2897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, M., Li, G., Mu, H. L., & Ning, Y. D. (2011). Energy and exergy efficiencies in the Chinese transportation sector, 1980–2009. Energy, 36(2), 770–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, G., Chung, W., & Zhang, Y. (2014). Measuring energy efficiency performance of China’s transport sector: A data envelopment analysis approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(2), 709–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors are grateful for the valuable comments and suggestion from the respected reviewers. Their valuable comments and suggestions have enhanced the strength and significance of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Industrial Engineering, Urmia University of Technology, Urmia, Iran

    Hashem Omrani, Khatereh Shafaat & Arash Alizadeh

Authors
  1. Hashem Omrani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Khatereh Shafaat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Arash Alizadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hashem Omrani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Omrani, H., Shafaat, K. & Alizadeh, A. Integrated data envelopment analysis and cooperative game for evaluating energy efficiency of transportation sector: a case of Iran. Ann Oper Res 274, 471–499 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2803-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2803-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation