Skip to main content
Log in

Mitigating supply risk: an approach with quantity flexibility procurement

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper considers a buyer that procures from its major supplier whose production is subject to random yield risk. To mitigate supply risk, the buyer can procure from another reliable supplier who provides quantity flexibility (QF) contract. Under both deterministic and stochastic demand, we study the buyer’s optimal procurement decisions. We analyze the structural properties of optimal solutions and identify the conditions under which the quantity flexibility procurement policy should be used. We also examine the effect of supply risk, flexibility, wholesale price and demand risk on the procurement decisions. We find that the higher supply risk and demand risk reduce the buyer’s profit but have different impact on the buyer’s order policy. For the QF supplier, it may not obtain more orders by providing larger flexibility to the buyer, on the contrary, doing this may benefit the risky supplier. For the QF supplier or risky supplier, given its competitor’s wholesale price, it can increase its order share by lower wholesale price.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://appleinsider.com/articles/13/05/29/apple-reportedly-looking-to-pegatron-in-supply-chain-shift-away-from-foxconn.

References

  • Agrawal, N., & Nahmias, S. (1997). Rationalization of the supplier base in the presence of yield uncertainty. Production and Operations Management, 6(3), 291–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cachon, G. P. (2003). Supply chain coordination with contracts. In S. Graves & T. de Kok (Eds.), Handbooks in operations research and management science: Supply chain management (p. 6). North-Holland: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao, X., Gong, X., & Zheng, S. (2016). Optimal pricing and inventory policies with reliable and random-yield suppliers: Characterization and comparison. Annals of Operations Research, 241(1–2), 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W., Feng, Q., & Seshadri, S. (2013). Sourcing from suppliers with random yield for price-dependent demand. Annals of Operations Research, 208, 557–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K. B., & Yang, L. (2014). Random yield and coordination mechanisms of a supply chain with emergency backup sourcing. International Journal of Production Research, 52(16), 4747–4767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, W., Talluri, S., & Narasimhan, R. (2010). Flexibility or cost saving? Sourcing decisions with two suppliers. Decision Sciences, 41, 623–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dada, M., Petruzzi, N. C., & Schwarz, L. B. (2007). A newsvendor’s procurement problem when suppliers are unreliable. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 9(1), 9–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federgruen, A., & Yang, N. (2008). Selecting a portfolio of suppliers under demand and supply risks. Operations Research, 56(4), 916–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, S., Zhao, L., & Xu, X. (2016). Impact of supply risks on procurement decisions. Annals of Operations Research, 241(1–2), 411–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurnani, H., & Gerchak, Y. (2007). Coordination in decentralized assembly systems with uncertain component yields. European Journal of Operational Research, 176, 1559–1576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, B., Huang, H., & Yuan, K. (2015). The comparison of two procurement strategies in the presence of supply disruption. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 85, 296–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, B., Li, G., & Liu, M. (2016). Impacts of decision sequences on a random yield supply chain with a service level requirement. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2275-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, Y., & Zhang, J. (2008). Random yield risk sharing in a two-level supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 112(2), 769–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, F., Lim, C., & Lu, Z. (2013). Coordination of supply chains with a flexible ordering policy under yield and demand uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, 146(2), 686–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keren, B. (2009). The single-period inventory problem: Extension to random yield from the perspective of the supply chain. Omega, 37(4), 801–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X. (2017). Optimal procurement strategies from suppliers with random yield and all-or-nothing risks. Annals of Operations Research, 257(1–2), 167–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okyay, H. K., Karaesmen, F., & Zekici, S. (2014). Newsvendor models with dependent random supply and demand. Optimization Letters, 8(3), 983–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porteus, E. L. (2002). Foundations of stochastic inventory theory. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, S. P., Yan, H., & Zhang, H. (2004). Quantity flexibility contracts: Optimal decisions with information updates. Decision Sciences, 35(4), 691–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sting, F. J., & Huchzermeier, A. (2010). Ensuring responsive capacity: How to contract with backup suppliers. European Journal of Operational Research, 207(2), 725–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, S. Y., & Kouvelis, P. (2014). Pay-back-revenue-sharing contract in coordinating supply chains with random yield. Production and Operations Management, 23, 2089–2102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlin, B. (2006). On the value of mitigation and contingency strategies for managing supply chain disruption risk. Management Science, 52(5), 639–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsay, A. T. (1999). The quantity flexibility contract and supplier-customer incentives. Management Science, 45(10), 1339–1358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsay, A. T., & Lovejoy, W. S. (1999). Quantity flexibility contracts and supply chain performance. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 1(2), 89–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, M., Zhu, S. X., & Teunter, R. H. (2013). The risk-averse newsvendor problem with random capacity. European Journal of Operational Research, 231(2), 328–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia, Y., Ramachandran, K., & Gurnani, H. (2011). Sharing demand and supply risk in a supply chain. IIE Transactions, 43(6), 451–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, H. (2010). Managing production and procurement through option contracts in supply chains with random yield. International Journal of Production Economics, 126(2), 306–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, X., Ji, Y., & Wang, Y. (2012). Supplier diversification under random yield. International Journal of Production Economics, 139(1), 302–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, W., & Wu, E. (2008). Manufacturing a brand. http://www.amcham-shanghai.org/.

  • Yano, C. A., & Lee, H. L. (1995). Lot-sizing with random yields: A review. Operations Research, 43(3), 311–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate for the referee’s comments on this paper, which significantly improved this paper. The authors acknowledge Xia Zhang for her assistance with the computational work in this paper. This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71572021).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bo He.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, B., Yang, Y. Mitigating supply risk: an approach with quantity flexibility procurement. Ann Oper Res 271, 599–617 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2840-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2840-0

Keywords

Navigation