Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Malmquist productivity index for network production systems in the energy sector

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a method based on network data envelopment analysis (DEA) is proposed to measure the efficiency and effectiveness of decision making units (DMUs). In this regard, a version of the Malmquist productivity index is designed to accommodate network DEA structures. In this type of environments, sub-DMUs are considered when assessing the efficiency of the main DMU, which helps evaluating the internal structure of the DMUs. The proposed method is applied to measure the productivity of several Iranian oil refineries. After identifying the main factors determining the productivity of these refineries, the operation of nine of them is analyzed using data from the 2015–2016 period. The results show that the management of resource utilization, particularly capital and energy, is inappropriate and investment insufficient. In particular, investment does not aim at upgrading the technology level, despite the fact that the depreciation rate of capital facilities is particularly high in this industry. This particular feature highlights the need to increase the rate of investment in order to replace the depreciated capital.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alhajji, M., & Demirel, Y. (2015). Energy and environmental sustainability assessment of a crude oil refinery by thermodynamic analysis. International Journal of Energy Research,39, 1925–1941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Muslim, H., & Dincer, I. (2005). Thermodynamic analysis of crude oil distillation systems. International Journal of Energy Research,29, 637–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Najjar, S. M., & Al-Jaybajy, M. A. (2012). Application of data envelopment analysis to measure the technical efficiency of oil refineries: A case study. International Journal of Business Administration,3(5), 64–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arronofsky, J. S., Dutton, J. M., & Tayyabkhan, M. T. (1978). Managerial programming with linear programming in process industry operations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevilacqua, M., & Braglia, M. (2002). Environmental efficiency analysis for ENI oil refineries. Journal of Cleaner Production,10(1), 85–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rohdes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research,2(6), 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chau, L., Liau, K., Chung, T., Yang, K., & Tsai, M.-T. (2004). Expert system of a crude oil distillation unit for process optimization using neural networks. Expert Systems with Applications,26(2), 247–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chufu, L., Xiaorong, H. E., Bingzhen, C., Qiang, X., & Chaowei, L. (2008). A hybrid programming model for optimal production planning under demand uncertainty in refinery. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering,16(2), 241–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eller, S. L., Hartley, P. R., & Medlock, K. B., III. (2011). Empirical evidence on the operational efficiency of National Oil Companies. Empirical Economics,40(3), 623–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emrouznejad, A., & Yang, G. L. (2018). A survey and analysis of the first 40 years of scholarly literature in DEA: 1978–2016. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences,61, 4–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esfandiari, M., Hafezalkotob, A., Khalili-Damghani, K., & Amirkhan, M. (2017). Robust two-stage DEA models under discrete uncertain data. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management,12(3), 216–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Göthe-Lundgren, M., Lundgren, J. T., & Persson, J. A. (2002). An optimization model for refinery production scheduling. International Journal of Production Economics, 78(3), 255—270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadley, G. (1962). Linear programming. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanani, Kh. (2014). How energy efficiency of iranian oil refining firms change in time: An empirical test based on RSDEA and FSDEA models together with sensitivity analysis. Journal of Contemporary Management Science,3(1), 46–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao, C. (2009). Efficiency decomposition in network data envelopment analysis: A relational model. European Journal of Operation Research,192(3), 949–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao, C. (2014). Network data envelopment analysis: A review. European Journal of Operational Research,239, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao, C. (2017). Measurement and decomposition of the Malmquist productivity index for parallel production systems. Omega,67, 54–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao, C., & Hwang, S. N. (2014). Multi-period efficiency and Malmquist productivity index in two-stage production systems. European Journal of Operational Research,232, 512–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khalili-Damghani, K., & Shahmir, Z. (2015). Uncertain network data envelopment analysis with undesirable outputs to evaluate the efficiency of electricity power production and distribution processes. Computers & Industrial Engineering,88, 131–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khalili-Damghani, K., Sadi-Nezhad, S., & Hosseinzadeh-Lotfi, F. (2014). Imprecise DEA models to assess the agility of supply chains. Supply Chain Management under Fuzziness, 167–198.

  • Khalili-Damghani, K., Taghavi-Fard, M., & Karbaschi, K. (2015a). A hybrid approach based on Multi-Criteria Satisfaction Analysis (MUSA) and a Network Data Envelopment Analysis (NDEA) to evaluate efficiency of customer services in bank branches. Industrial Engineering & Management Systems,14(4), 347–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khalili-Damghani, K., Tavana, M., & Haji-Saami, E. (2015b). A data envelopment analysis model with interval data and undesirable output for combined cycle power plant performance assessment. Expert Systems with Applications,42(2), 760–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kordrostami, S., & Jahani Sayyad Noveiri, M. (2017). Evaluating the multi-period systems efficiency in the presence of fuzzy data. Fuzzy Information and Engineering,9, 281–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima, R. S., & Schaeffer, R. (2011). The energy efficiency of crude oil refining in Brazil: A Brazilian refinery plant case. Energy,36(5), 3101–3112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mekaroonreung, M., & Johnson, A. (2009). Estimating efficiency of U.S. oil refineries under varying assumptions regarding disposability of bad outputs. International Journal of Energy Sector Management,4(3), 356–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neiro, M. S. N., & Pinto, J. M. (2004). A general modeling framework for the operational planning of petroleum supply chains. Computers & Chemical Engineering,28, 871–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, L., Cristina, T., & Carlos, J. (2007). Data envelopment analysis applied to evaluate the usage of oil and natural gas: South America case. In International conference on operations research for development, pp. 487–495.

  • Petrick, M., & Pellegrino, J. (1999). The potential for reducing energy utilisation in the refining industry. Argonne National Laboratory, University of Chicago.

  • Prawiraatmadja, W. (2002). An investigation of economic efficiency in Indonesian petroleum refineries: A non-parametric approach. Dissertation: Ph.D. University of Hawaii at Manoa. http://www.worldcat.org/title/investigation-of-economic-efficiency-in-indonesian-petroleum-refineries-a-nonparametric-approach/oclc/156838123.

  • Rocha, B., & Netto, M. A. C. (2002). A data envelopment analysis model for rank ordering suppliers in the oil industry. Pesquisa Operational,22(2), 23–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sueyoshi, T., & Goto, M. (2012). Data envelopment analysis for environmental assessment: Comparison between public and private ownership in petroleum industry. European Journal of Operational Research,216(3), 668–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavana, M., & Khalili-Damghani, K. (2014). A new two-stage Stackelberg fuzzy data envelopment analysis model. Measurement,53, 277–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavana, M., Khalili-Damghani, K., & Rahmatian, R. (2015). A hybrid fuzzy MCDM method for measuring the performance of publicly held pharmaceutical companies. Annals of Operations Research,226(1), 589–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R. G., Dharmapala, P. S., Rothenberg, L. J., & Thrall, R. M. (1996). DEA/AR efficiency and profitability of 14 major oil companies in U.S. exploration and production. Computers and Operations Research,23(4), 357–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vijayakumar, A., & Gomathi, P. (2013). Productivity growth in Indian oil refineries: Efficiency improvement or technical improvement. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS),9(2), 103–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waheed, M. A., & Oni, A. O. (2015). Performance improvement of a crude oil distillation unit. Applied Thermal Engineering,75, 315–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. M., & Chin, K. S. (2010). Some alternative DEA models for two-stage process. Expert Systems with Applications,37(12), 8799–8808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Y., & Shi, Q. (2014). Two-stage DEA model with additional input in the second stage and part of intermediate products as final output. Expert Systems with Applications,41(15), 6570–6574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Business Systems and Analytics Department, Distinguished Chair of Business Analytics, La Salle University, Philadelphia, PA, 19141, USA

    Madjid Tavana

  2. Business Information Systems Department, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, University of Paderborn, 33098, Paderborn, Germany

    Madjid Tavana

  3. Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Engineering, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

    Kaveh Khalili-Damghani & Arousha Hashemi

  4. Faculty of Economics and Management, Free University of Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy

    Francisco J. Santos Arteaga

Authors
  1. Madjid Tavana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kaveh Khalili-Damghani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Francisco J. Santos Arteaga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Arousha Hashemi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Madjid Tavana.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table 5.

Table 5 Input–output data (2015)
Full size table

Appendix 2

See Table 6.

Table 6 Input–output data (2016)
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tavana, M., Khalili-Damghani, K., Santos Arteaga, F.J. et al. A Malmquist productivity index for network production systems in the energy sector. Ann Oper Res 284, 415–445 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03173-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03173-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation