Skip to main content
Log in

Fuzzy testing model for the lifetime performance of products under consideration with exponential distribution

  • S.I.: Statistical Reliability Modeling and Optimization
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With intense competition in industry today, product quality has become a crucial factor influencing whether a firm can achieve sustainable operations and maintain competitiveness. Process capability indices are effective tools often used in manufacturing to determine whether products meets requirements, and most assume that the quality characteristics of products follow normal distributions. However, not all quality characteristics necessarily follow normal distributions; for example, product lifetime, a time-oriented quality characteristic, generally follows an exponential distribution or other associated non-normal distributions. The lifetime performance index \( C_{L} \) was thus developed to gauge the lifetime performance of products, and most related studies use the precise values of time data to evaluate product lifetime. However, in practice, measurement errors may hinder the accuracy of the observed values of quality characteristics, and the time at which the lifetime of a product ends becomes imprecise, which may result in uncertainty in the evaluation method and lead to errors in judgment. For this reason, this study thus proposes a triangular shaped fuzzy number for \( C_{L}^{*} \) to deal with imprecise data, and further develops a fuzzy testing model for lifetime performance index \( C_{L} \), to assist manufacturers in evaluating product lifetime performance more cautiously and precisely. Finally, we provide an illustration of how the proposed approach can be implemented through a numerical example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Besseris, G. J. (2019). Evaluation of robust scale estimators for modified Weibull process capability indices and their bootstrap confidence intervals. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 128, 135–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, J. J. (2005). Fuzzy statistics: hypothesis testing. Soft Computing, 9(7), 512–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, T. C., Wang, K. J., & Chen, K. S. (2014). Sputtering process assessment of ITO film for multiple quality characteristics with one-sided and two-sided specifications. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 42(1), 196–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K. S. (2019). Fuzzy testing of operating performance index based on confidence intervals. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03242-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K. S., Chang, T. C., & Lin, Y. T. (2019). Developing an outsourcing partner selection model for process with two-sided specification using capability index and manufacturing time performance index. International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering, 26(3), 1950015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K. S., Chen, S. C., & Li, R. K. (2002). Process quality analysis of products. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 19(8), 623–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K. S., Wang, K. J., & Chang, T. C. (2017). A novel approach to deriving the lower confidence limit of indices Cpu, Cpl, and Cpk in assessing process capability. International Journal of Production Research, 55(17), 4963–4981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K. S., & Yang, C. M. (2018). Developing a performance index with a Poisson process and an exponential distribution for operations management and continuous improvement. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 343, 737–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, L. K., Cheng, S. W., & Spiring, F. A. (1988). A new measure of process capability Cpm. Journal of Quality Technology, 20(3), 162–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Felipe, D., & Benedito, E. (2017). Monitoring high complex production processes using process capability indices. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 93(1–4), 1257–1267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García, V., Sánchez, J. S., Rodríguez-Picón, L. A., Méndez-González, L. C., & Ochoa-Domínguez, H. J. (2019). Using regression models for predicting the product quality in a tubing extrusion process. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 30(6), 2535–2544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, K., Jia, X., Liu, H., & You, H. (2015). Yield-based capability index for evaluating the performance of multivariate manufacturing process. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 31(3), 419–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J., Liu, H. C., Duan, C. Y., & Song, M. S. (2019). An improved reliability model for FMEA using probabilistic linguistic term sets and TODIM method. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03447-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, V. E. (1986). Process capability indices. Journal of Quality Technology, 18(1), 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, J. F. (2003). Statistical models and methods for lifetime data (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakhal, L. (2009). Impact of quality on competitive advantage and organizational performance. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 60(5), 637–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A. H. I., Wu, C. W., & Chen, Y. W. (2016). A modified variables repetitive group sampling plan with the consideration of preceding lots information. Annals of Operations Research, 238(1–2), 355–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. M., Wu, J. W., & Lei, C. L. (2013a). Assessing the lifetime performance index of exponential products with step-stress accelerated life-testing data. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 62(1), 296–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, W. C., Hong, C. W., & Wu, J. W. (2015). Computational procedure of performance assessment of lifetime index of normal products with fuzzy data under the type II right censored sampling plan. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 28(4), 1755–1773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, W. C., Wu, J. W., Hong, C. W., Ho, K. C., & Lin, Y. C. (2013b). Performance evaluation for lifetime performance index of products for the generalized exponential distribution with upper record values. Journal of Quality, 20(3), 275–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepore, A., Palumbo, B., & Castagliola, P. (2018). A note on decision making method for product acceptance based on process capability indices Cpk and Cpmk. European Journal of Operational Research, 267(1), 393–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D. C. (1985). Introduction to statistical quality control. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, Y., Li, Y., Zhang, H., & Xu, Y. (2019). Lifetime-aware FTL to improve the lifetime and performance of solid-state drives. Future Generation Computer Systems, 93, 58–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearn, W. L., Kotz, S., & Johnson, N. L. (1992). Distributional and inferential properties of process capability indices. Journal of Quality Technology, 24(4), 216–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proschan, F. (1963). Theoretical explanation of observed decreasing failure rate. Technometrics, 15(3), 375–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tong, L. I., Chen, K. S., & Chen, H. T. (2002). Statistical testing for assessing the performance of lifetime index of electronic components with exponential distribution. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 19(7), 812–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C. C., Chen, L. C., & Chen, Y. J. (2016). Statistical inferences for the lifetime performance index of the products with the Gompertz distribution under censored samples. Communications in Statistics: Simulation and Computation, 45(4), 1318–1336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C. W., Shu, M. H., & Chang, Y. N. (2018). Variable-sampling plans based on lifetime-performance index under exponential distribution with censoring and its extensions. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 55, 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, M. F., Chen, H. Y., Chang, T. C., & Wu, C. F. (2019). Quality evaluation of internal cylindrical grinding process with multiple quality characteristics for gear products. International Journal of Production Research, 57(21), 6687–6701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S. F., & Chiu, C. J. (2014). Computational testing algorithmic procedure of assessment for lifetime performance index of products with two-parameter exponential distribution based on the multiply type II censored sample. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 84(10), 2106–2122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S. F., & Hsieh, Y. T. (2019). The assessment on the lifetime performance index of products with Gompertz distribution based on the progressive type I interval censored sample. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 351, 66–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S. F., & Lin, Y. P. (2016). Computational testing algorithmic procedure of assessment for lifetime performance index of products with one-parameter exponential distribution under progressive type I interval censoring. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 120, 79–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J., Huang, H. Z., Li, Y. F., & Guo, J. (2019). A framework for fatigue reliability analysis of high-pressure turbine blades. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03203-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Editor and four anonymous referees for their constructive comments and careful reading, which significantly improved the presentation of this paper. The earlier version of this paper was presented at the 25th ISSAT International Conference on Reliability and Quality in Design (RQD), August 1-3, 2019, held in Las Vegas, USA. This work was partially supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology Taiwan [Grant Number MOST 108-2218-E-025-003-].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tsang-Chuan Chang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: Triangular shaped fuzzy number of \( C_{L}^{*} \)

Appendix: Triangular shaped fuzzy number of \( C_{L}^{*} \)

From Eq. (13), we can know that \( W = {{V\left( Z \right)} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{V\left( Z \right)} \lambda }} \right. \kern-0pt} \lambda } \) is distributed as \( Gamma\left( {n,1} \right) \). In view of this, we can further derive the following:

$$ \begin{aligned} 1 - \alpha & = p\left\{ {Gamma_{{{\alpha \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {\alpha 2}} \right. \kern-0pt} 2}}} \left( {n,1} \right) \le W \le Gamma_{{1 - \left( {{\alpha \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {\alpha 2}} \right. \kern-0pt} 2}} \right)}} \left( {n,1} \right)} \right\} \\ & = p\left\{ {1 - \frac{L}{V\left( Z \right)}Gamma_{{1 - \left( {{\alpha \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {\alpha 2}} \right. \kern-0pt} 2}} \right)}} \left( {n,1} \right) \le 1 - \frac{L}{\lambda } \le 1 - \frac{L}{V\left( Z \right)}Gamma_{{{\alpha \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {\alpha 2}} \right. \kern-0pt} 2}}} \left( {n,1} \right)} \right\} \\ & = p\left\{ {1 - \left( {1 - C_{L}^{*} } \right)\frac{{Gamma_{{1 - \left( {{\alpha \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {\alpha 2}} \right. \kern-0pt} 2}} \right)}} \left( {n,1} \right)}}{n - 1} \le C_{L} \le 1 - \left( {1 - C_{L}^{*} } \right)\frac{{Gamma_{{{\alpha \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {\alpha 2}} \right. \kern-0pt} 2}}} \left( {n,1} \right)}}{n - 1}} \right\} \\ \end{aligned} $$
(29)

Thus, the \( 100\left( {1 - \alpha } \right)\% \) confidence interval of \( C_{L} \) is \( \left[ {LC_{L} ,UC_{L} } \right] \), where

$$ LC_{L} = 1 - \left( {1 - C_{L}^{*} } \right)\frac{{Gamma_{{1 - \left( {{\alpha \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {\alpha 2}} \right. \kern-0pt} 2}} \right)}} \left( {n,1} \right)}}{n - 1} $$
(30)
$$ UC_{L} = 1 - \left( {1 - C_{L}^{*} } \right)\frac{{Gamma_{{{\alpha \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {\alpha 2}} \right. \kern-0pt} 2}}} \left( {n,1} \right)}}{n - 1} $$
(31)

In adopting Buckley’s approach (Buckley 2005), the α-cuts of the triangular shaped fuzzy number \( \tilde{C}_{L}^{*} \) are \( \tilde{C}_{L}^{*} \left[ \alpha \right] = \left[ {C_{L1}^{*} \left( \alpha \right),C_{L2}^{*} \left( \alpha \right)} \right] \), as shown below:

$$ \tilde{C}_{L}^{*} \left[ \alpha \right] = \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}lll} {\left[ {C_{L1}^{*} \left( \alpha \right),C_{L2}^{*} \left( \alpha \right)} \right],\quad { 0} . 0 1\le \alpha \le 1} \hfill \\ {\left[ {C_{L1}^{*} 0.01),C_{L2}^{*} \left( {0.01} \right)} \right],\quad { 0} \le \alpha \le 0.01} \hfill \\ \end{array} } \right. $$
(32)

where

$$ C_{L1}^{*} \left( \alpha \right) = 1 - \left( {1 - C_{L}^{*} } \right)\frac{{Gamma_{{1 - \left( {{\alpha \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {\alpha 2}} \right. \kern-0pt} 2}} \right)}} \left( {n,1} \right)}}{n - 1},C_{L2}^{*} \left( \alpha \right) = 1 - \left( {1 - C_{L}^{*} } \right)\frac{{Gamma_{{{\alpha \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {\alpha 2}} \right. \kern-0pt} 2}}} \left( {n,1} \right)}}{n - 1}. $$

Furthermore, for \( 0. 0 1\le \alpha \le 1 \), starting at 0.01 is arbitrary. It is worth noting that \( C_{L1}^{*} \left( 1 \right) = C_{L2}^{*} \left( 1 \right) \ne C_{L}^{*} \) when \( \alpha = 1 \). This leads to considerable inconvenience for management in evaluation of lifetime performance. To resolve this, let \( C_{L}^{\prime *} \) be defined as follows:

$$ C_{L}^{\prime *} = 1 - \left( {1 - C_{L}^{*} } \right)\frac{n - 1}{{Gamma_{0.5} \left( {n,1} \right)}} $$
(33)

Thus, the \( \alpha {\text{ - cuts}} \) of the triangular shaped fuzzy number \( \tilde{C}_{L}^{*} \) after transforming variable can be expressed as follows:

$$\begin{aligned} \tilde{C}_{L}^{\prime *} \left[ \alpha \right] = \left\{ \begin{array}{llll} \left[ {C_{L1}^{\prime *} \left( \alpha \right),C_{L2}^{\prime *} \left( \alpha \right)} \right], \quad 0.01 \le \alpha \le 1 \hfill \\ \left[ {C_{L1}^{\prime *} 0.01),C_{L2}^{\prime *} \left( {0.01} \right)} \right], \quad 0 \le \alpha \le 0.01 \hfill \\ \end{array} \right.\end{aligned} $$
(34)

where

$$ C_{L1}^{\prime *} \left( \alpha \right) = 1 - \left( {1 - C_{L}^{*} } \right)\frac{{Gamma_{{1 - \left( {{\alpha \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {\alpha 2}} \right. \kern-0pt} 2}} \right)}} \left( {n,1} \right)}}{{Gamma_{0.5} \left( {n,1} \right)}},C_{L2}^{\prime *} \left( \alpha \right) = 1 - \left( {1 - C_{L}^{*} } \right)\frac{{Gamma_{{{\alpha \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {\alpha 2}} \right. \kern-0pt} 2}}} \left( {n,1} \right)}}{{Gamma_{0.5} \left( {n,1} \right)}} $$

From the above equation, we can see that \( C_{L1}^{\prime *} \left( 1 \right) = C_{L2}^{\prime *} \left( 1 \right) = C_{L}^{*} \) when \( \alpha = 1 \). Obviously, the triangular shaped fuzzy number of \( C_{L}^{*} \) after transforming variable can further be expressed as follows:

$$ \tilde{C}_{L}^{\prime *} = \left( {C_{L}^{\prime L} ,C_{L}^{\prime M} ,C_{L}^{\prime R} } \right) $$
(35)

where

$$ \begin{aligned} & C_{L}^{\prime L} = C_{L1}^{\prime *} \left( {0.01} \right) = 1 - \left( {1 - C_{L}^{*} } \right)\frac{{Gamma_{0.995} \left( {n,1} \right)}}{{Gamma_{0.5} \left( {n,1} \right)}} \\ & C_{L}^{\prime M} = C_{L1}^{\prime *} \left( 1 \right) = C_{L2}^{\prime *} \left( 1 \right) = C_{L}^{*} \\ & C_{L}^{\prime R} = C_{L2}^{\prime *} \left( {0.01} \right) = 1 - \left( {1 - C_{L}^{*} } \right)\frac{{Gamma_{0.005} \left( {n,1} \right)}}{{Gamma_{0.5} \left( {n,1} \right)}}. \\ \end{aligned} $$

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, KS., Chang, TC. Fuzzy testing model for the lifetime performance of products under consideration with exponential distribution. Ann Oper Res 312, 87–98 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03578-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03578-9

Keywords

Navigation