Skip to main content
Log in

Information sharing in a transparent supply chain with transportation disruptions and supplier competition

  • S.I.: Information- Transparent Supply Chains
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Currently, highly complex supply networks are vulnerable to various kinds of disruptions, which may greatly affect the operational efficiency of supply chains. This calls for the development of management approaches to build a resilient supply chain under disruptions. In this work, we are mainly interested in transportation disruptions that affect shipments along a supply chain and study the decision problem of suppliers in regards to acquiring and sharing transportation disruption information in a competitive setting. In particular, we investigate a two-echelon supply chain consisting of one buyer and two competing suppliers where the buyer places an order for a single product with the two suppliers. During the product transportation process, a disruption may occur and damage the shipments in transit. In the face of such a transportation disruption, each supplier can either have its shipment inspected and reveal information to the buyer or continue without taking any action. We study this problem by formulating it as a non-cooperative game and derive equilibrium results for the two suppliers on whether or not to share information considering competition. We find that the timing and severity of the transportation disruption affect a supplier’s decision on whether to acquire and share private information. By adopting an incentive mechanism, the buyer can raise the probability that a supplier shares its information, which could eventually enhance the performance of the disrupted supply chain. The supplier in a stronger market position usually acts passively towards the disruption, while the competing supplier tends to use information sharing as a way to win market share from its competitor. In addition, a sensitivity analysis is conducted on some important parameters of our model to show the impact of information sharing on supply chain performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Choi, T. M., Ma, C., Shen, B., & Sun, Q. (2019). Optimal pricing in mass customization supply chains with risk-averse agents and retail competition. Omega: The International Journal of Management Science, 88, 150–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, C. W., Shen, B., Chow, P. S., Yang, L., & Ng, C. T. (2016). Sustainability investment under cap-and-trade regulation. Annals of Operations Research, 240(2), 509–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, L., & Tomlin, B. (2012). Managing disruption risk: The interplay between operations and insurance. Management Science, 58, 1898–1915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks, K. B., & Singhal, V. R. (2005). Association between supply chain glitches and operating performance. Management Science, 51, 695–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hishamuddin, H., Sarker, R. A., & Essam, D. (2013). A recovery model for a two-echelon serial supply chain with consideration of transportation disruption. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 64, 552–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, S., Guan, X., & Xiao, B. (2018). Incentive provision for demand information acquisition in a dual-channel supply chain. Transportation Research Part E, 116, 42–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, S., & Yang, J. (2016). Information acquisition and transparency in a supply chain with asymmetric production cost information. International Journal of Production Economics, 182, 449–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., Sokolov, B., & Ivanova, M. (2017). Literature review on disruption recovery in the supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, 55, 6158–6174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, R. S., & Pugazhendhi, S. (2012). Information sharing in supply chains: An overview. Procedia Engineering, 38, 2147–2154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, X., Tao, Y., Wang, F., & Zou, Z. (2019). Sustainability investment in maritime supply chain with risk behavior and information sharing. International Journal of Production Economics, 218, 16–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H., So, K., & Tang, C. (2000). The value of information sharing in a two-level supply chain. Management Science, 46, 626–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, S., He, Y., & Chen, L. (2017). Dynamic strategies for supply disruptions in production-inventory systems. International Journal of Production Economics, 194, 88–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, T., Tong, S., & Zhang, H. (2014). Transparency of information acquisition in a supply chain. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 16(3), 412–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, G., Zhang, L., Guan, X., & Zheng, J. (2016). Impact of decision sequence on reliability enhancement with supply disruption risks. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Research, 90, 25–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, G., Zheng, H., Sethi, S. P., & Guan, X. (2018). Inducing downstream information sharing via manufacturer information acquisition and retailer subsidy. Decision Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C., Shu, T., Chen, S., Wang, S., Lai, K. K., & Gan, L. (2016). An improved grey neural network model for predicting transportation disruptions. Expert Systems with Applications, 45, 331–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, S. K., Asian, S., Goh, M., & Torabi, S. A. (2017a). Managing sudden transportation disruptions in supply chains under delivery delay and quantity loss. Annals of Operations Research, 1, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, S. K., Sarker, R., & Essam, D. (2017b). A quantitative model for disruption mitigation in a supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 257, 881–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saghafian, S., & Van Oyen, M. P. (2012). The value of flexible backup suppliers and disruption risk information: Newsvendor analysis with recourse. IIE Transactions, 44, 834–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samvedi, A., & Jain, V. (2012). Effect of sharing forecast information on the performance of a supply chain experiencing disruptions. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 13, 126–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, B., & Chan, H. L. (2017). Forecast information sharing for managing supply chains in the big data era: Recent development and future research. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 34(1), 1740001–1–1740001–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, B., Choi, T. M., & Chan, H. L. (2019a). Selling green first or not? A Bayesian analysis with service levels and environmental impact considerations in the big data era. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144, 412–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, B., Choi, T. M., & Minner, S. (2019b). A review on supply chain contracting with information considerations: Information updating and information asymmetry. International Journal of Production Research, 57, 4898–4936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, B., Xu, X., & Choi, T. M. (2019c). Simplicity is beauty: Pricing coordination in two-product supply chains with simplest contracts under voluntary compliance. International Journal of Production Research, 57(9), 2769–2787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, X., & Shen, B. (2019). Product upgrading or not: R&D tax credit, consumer switch and information updating. International Journal of Production Economics, 213, 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, N., Zhou, S., Wang, F., Xu, S., & Xiong, S. (2014). Horizontal cooperation and information sharing between suppliers in the buyer–supplier triad. International Journal of Production Research, 52, 4526–4547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, L. V., Atan, Z., Peng, P., Rong, Y., Schmitt, A. J., & Sinsoysal, B. (2016). OR/MS models for supply chain disruptions: A review. IIE Transactions, 48, 89–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivathsan, S., & Kamath, M. (2018). Understanding the value of upstream inventory information sharing in supply chain networks. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 54, 393–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao, Y., Lee, L. H., & Chew, E. P. (2016). Quantifying the effect of sharing information in a supply chain facing supply disruptions. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 33, 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlin, B. (2006). On the value of mitigation and contingency strategies for managing supply chain disruption risks. Management Science, 52, 639–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. C. (2007). The impact of transportation disruptions on supply chain performance. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Research, 43, 295–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., Zhai, X., & Huang, Z. (2008). Incentives for information sharing in duopoly with capacity constraints. Omega: International Journal of Management Science, 36, 963–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., Zhai, X., Zhang, C., & Liu, X. (2011). Sharing quality information in a dual-supplier network: A game theoretic perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 49, 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Z., Aydın, G., Babich, V., & Beil, D. R. (2008). Supply disruptions, asymmetric information, and a backup production option. Management Science, 55, 192–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H., Nagarajan, M., & Sošic, G. (2010). Dynamic supplier contracts under asymmetric inventory information. Operations Research, 58(5), 1380–1397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, C., Tan, G. W., Robb, D. J., & Zheng, X. (2006). Sharing shipment quantity information in the supply chain. Omega: International Journal of Management Science, 34, 427–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, Y., Shu, J., Xie, W., & Zhou, Y. (2018). Optimal trade credit and replenishment policies for supply chain network design. Omega: The International Journal of Management Science, 81, 26–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partially funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grants 71431007, 71601054, 71701221, 71701222 and 71991461, the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province under Grants 2016A030313719 and 2019A1515010492, Guangdong Province Soft Science Research Project under Grant 2019A101002074, Guangdong Province Universities and Colleges Pearl River Young Scholar Funded Scheme (2017), and the Ministry of Education in China (MOE) Project of Humanities and Social Sciences under Grant 17YJC630235.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaofan Lai.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tao, Y., Lai, X. & Zhou, S. Information sharing in a transparent supply chain with transportation disruptions and supplier competition. Ann Oper Res 329, 307–329 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03724-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03724-3

Keywords

Navigation