Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Online crowd-funding strategy: a game-theoretical approach to a Kickstarter case study

  • S.I.: Business Analytics and Operations Research
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are many factors that can inhibit the potential of promising projects from being completely funded in crowd-funding campaigns. In order to study this, a game-theoretical model is constructed to display irrational fear and help creators maximize their chances of facilitating a successful campaign. This research shows that once irrational fear is modeled along with the strategies associated with the design of the reward system, the total pledged amount for a project can be predicted in order to scheme their strategies based on the situation. For simplicity and consistency, the model is based on Kickstarter funding campaigns of physical products that are used as rewards for support. This paper discusses the influence of potential strategies for increasing the total pledge, such as modeling irrational fear and limiting rewards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • An, J., Quercia, D., & Crowcroft, J. (2014). Recommending investors for crowdfunding projects. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on world wide web (pp. 261–270).

  • Arieli, I., Koren, M., & Smorodinsky, R. (2017). The crowdfunding game. Available at SSRN 3046106.

  • Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Akert, R. M. (2005). Social Psychology, fifth international edition.

  • Azevedo, N., Pinheiro, D., & Weber, G. W. (2014). Dynamic programming for a Markov-switching jump–diffusion. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 267, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çevik, A., Weber, G. W., Eyüboğlu, B. M., Oğuz, K. K., & Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. (2017). Voxel-MARS: a method for early detection of Alzheimer’s disease by classification of structural brain MRI. Annals of Operations Research, 258(1), 31–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., Chen, L., Qian, C., & Xie, K. (2018). Decision making in crowdfunding under risk analysis. In Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii international conference on system sciences.

  • Cheng, C., Tan, F., Hou, X., & Wei, Z. (2019). Success Prediction on Crowdfunding with Multimodal Deep Learning. In IJCAI (pp. 2158–2164).

  • Colton, M. (2015). PSDR pocket HF SDR transceiver with VNA and GPS. https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1703258614/psdr-pocket-hf-sdr-transceiver-with-vna-and-gps.

  • Etter, V., Grossglauser, M., & Thiran, P. (2013). Launch hard or go home! Predicting the success of Kickstarter campaigns. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on online social networks (pp. 177–182).

  • Gao, Q., Lin, M., & Sias, R. W. (2018). Words matter: The role of texts in online credit markets. Available at SSRN 2446114.

  • Gear, A. E., & Lockett, A. G. (1973). A dynamic model of some multistage aspects of research and development portfolios. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1, 22–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, E. M., & Hui, J. (2013). Crowdfunding: Motivations and deterrents for participation. ACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interaction (TOCHI), 20(6), 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodie, A. S., Doshi, P., & Young, D. L. (2012). Levels of theory-of-mind reasoning in competitive games. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25(1), 95–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatchdreams. (2014). Hatchdreams glider the wallet of the future. https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/193042615/hatchdreams-glider-the-wallet-of-the-future.

  • He, F., Zhuang, J., & Rao, N. S. (2019). Discrete game-theoretic analysis of defense in correlated cyber-physical systems. Annals of Operations Research, 1–27.

  • Hossain, M., & Oparaocha, G. O. (2017). Crowdfunding: Motives, definitions, typology and ethical challenges. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 7(2), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, M., Li, X., & Shi, M. (2015). Product and pricing decisions in crowdfunding. Marketing Science, 34(3), 331–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, C., Wang, Z., Wang, R., & Ding, Y. (2018). Loan default prediction by combining soft information extracted from descriptive text in online peer-to-peer lending. Annals of Operations Research, 266(1–2), 511–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Josefy, M., Dean, T. J., Albert, L. S., & Fitza, M. A. (2017). The role of community in crowdfunding success: Evidence on cultural attributes in funding campaigns to “save the local theater”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(2), 161–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalaycı, B., Özmen, A., & Weber, G. W. (2020). Mutual relevance of investor sentiment and finance by modeling coupled stochastic systems with MARS. Annals of Operations Research, 1–24.

  • Kang, M., Gao, Y., Wang, T., & Zheng, H. (2016). Understanding the determinants of funders’ investment intentions on crowdfunding platforms. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116, 1800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kickstarter. (2016). https://www.kickstarter.com/.

  • Kickstarter. (2016). https://www.kickstarter.com/.

  • Kyriakou, I., Mousavi, P., Nielsen, J. P., & Scholz, M. (2019). Forecasting benchmarks of long-term stock returns via machine learning. Annals of Operations Research, 1–20.

  • Lambert, T., & Schwienbacher, A. (2010). An empirical analysis of crowdfunding. Social Science Research Network, 1578175, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., Lee, K., & Kim, H. C. (2018). Content-based success prediction of crowdfunding campaigns: A deep learning approach. In Companion of the 2018 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing (pp. 193–196).

  • Li, M. (2017). A signaling game analysis of project investment on equity crowdfunding platform. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 5(03), 276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Rakesh, V., & Reddy, C. K. (2016). Project success prediction in crowdfunding environments. In Proceedings of the ninth ACM international conference on web search and data mining (pp. 247–256).

  • Li, C., & Zhang, F. (2013). Advance demand information, price discrimination, and preorder strategies. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 15(1), 57–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, Y., Tran, T., Lee, D., & Lee, K. (2017). Understanding temporal backing patterns in online crowdfunding communities. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on web science conference (pp. 369–378).

  • Linares, L. I. R., & Muñoz, S. M. (2011). Revisiting validation theory: Theoretical foundations, applications, and extensions. Enrollment Management Journal, 2(1), 12–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukkarinen, A., Teich, J. E., Wallenius, H., & Wallenius, J. (2016). Success drivers of online equity crowdfunding campaigns. Decision Support Systems, 87, 26–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, G., & Li, Y. (2018). The evolution game analysis of crowdfunding market financing supervision. International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 5(3).

  • Macht, S. A., & Weatherston, J. (2014). The benefits of online crowdfunding for fund-seeking business ventures. Strategic Change, 23(1–2), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, T., & Gilbert, E. (2014). The language that gets people to give: Phrases that predict success on kickstarter. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work and social computing (pp. 49–61).

  • Nalcaci, G., Özmen, A., & Weber, G. W. (2019). Long-term load forecasting: models based on MARS, ANN and LR methods. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 27(4), 1033–1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie, T., Wang, X., Zhu, Y., & Du, S. (2018). Crowdfunding mechanism comparison when product quality is uncertain. International Transactions in Operational Research, 27, 2616–2657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raiffa, H. (2007). Negotiation analysis: The science and art of collaborative decision making. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rakesh, V., Choo, J., & Reddy, C. K. (2015). Project recommendation using heterogeneous traits in crowdfunding. In ICWSM (pp. 337–346).

  • Rakesh, V., Lee, W. C., & Reddy, C. K. (2016). Probabilistic group recommendation model for crowdfunding domains. In Proceedings of the ninth ACM international conference on web search and data mining (pp. 257–266).

  • Savku, E., & Weber, G. W. (2020). Stochastic differential games for optimal investment problems in a Markov regime-switching jump-diffusion market. Annals of Operations Research, 1–26.

  • Strausz, R. (2017). A theory of crowdfunding: A mechanism design approach with demand uncertainty and moral hazard. American Economic Review, 107(6), 1430–1476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temoçin, B. Z., & Weber, G. W. (2014). Optimal control of stochastic hybrid system with jumps: a numerical approximation. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 259, 443–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanguard, J. M. (2014). https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/vanguard-v#/.

  • Wang, X., & Wang, L. (2018). What makes charitable crowdfunding projects successful: a research based on data mining and social capital theory. In International conference on parallel and distributed computing: Applications and technologies (pp. 250–260). Springer, Singapore.

  • Wang, W., Zheng, H., & Wu, Y. J. (2020). Prediction of fundraising outcomes for crowdfunding projects based on deep learning: a multimodel comparative study. Soft Computing, 1–19.

  • Weber, G. W., Batmaz, İ., Köksal, G., Taylan, P., & Yerlikaya-Özkurt, F. (2012). CMARS: a new contribution to nonparametric regression with multivariate adaptive regression splines supported by continuous optimization. Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering, 20(3), 371–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, M. M., & Zhang, F. (2018). Advance selling to strategic consumers: Preorder contingent production strategy with advance selling target. Production and Operations Management, 27(7), 1221–1235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, J., & Shugan, S. M. (2001). Electronic tickets, smart cards, and online prepayments: When and how to advance sell. Marketing Science, 20(3), 219–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J., Zhuang, J., & Liu, Z. (2016). Modeling and mitigating the effects of supply chain disruption in a defender–attacker game. Annals of Operations Research, 236(1), 255–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaraghi, N., Tabesh, P., Guan, P., & Zhuang, J. (2014). Comparison of AHP and Monte Carlo AHP under different levels of uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 62(1), 122–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, J. Y., & Chen, C. H. (2020). A machine learning approach to predict the success of crowdfunding fintech project. Journal of Enterprise Information Management.

  • Yu, Z., Hafeez, M., Liu, L., Mahmood, M. T., & Wu, H. (2019). Evaluating the minor coarse cereals product crowdfunding platform through evolutionary game analysis. Sustainability, 11(5), 1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, P. F., Huang, F. M., Yang, C., Liu, Y. H., Li, Z. Y., & Tsai, C. H. (2018). Prediction of crowdfunding project success with deep learning. In 2018 IEEE 15th international conference on e-business engineering (ICEBE) (pp. 1–8).

  • Yuan, H., Lau, R. Y., & Xu, W. (2016). The determinants of crowdfunding success: A semantic text analytics approach. Decision Support Systems, 91, 67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, R., Xu, Y., Chakraborty, N., & Sycara, K. P. (2015). A crowdfunding model for green energy investment. In IJCAI (pp. 2669–2676).

  • Zhu, L., Zhang, Q., Lu, H., Li, H., Li, Y., McLellan, B., et al. (2017). Study on crowdfunding’s promoting effect on the expansion of electric vehicle charging piles based on game theory analysis. Applied Energy, 196, 238–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang, J., Saxton, G. D., & Wu, H. (2014). Publicity vs. impact in nonprofit disclosures and donor preferences: A sequential game with one nonprofit organization and N donors. Annals of Operations Research, 221(1), 469–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo, 211 Putnam Way, Buffalo, NY, 14260, United States

    Nafisa Mahbub, Anh Le & Jun Zhuang

Authors
  1. Nafisa Mahbub
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anh Le
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jun Zhuang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nafisa Mahbub.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mahbub, N., Le, A. & Zhuang, J. Online crowd-funding strategy: a game-theoretical approach to a Kickstarter case study. Ann Oper Res 315, 1019–1036 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03857-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03857-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation