Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Solving a bi-objective unmanned aircraft system location-allocation problem

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we introduce a bi-objective location-allocation problem for Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UASs) operating in a hostile environment. The objective is to find the locations to deploy UASs and assign Unmanned Aerial Vehicles to regions for surveillance. One of the objectives is to maximize search effectiveness, while the second is the minimization of the threats posed to the UASs. These two objectives are in conflict, because they are affected differently by the proximity between the UAS locations and the target regions. First, we have formulated this problem as a mixed integer nonlinear program. Next, we have developed its linearization which can be solved by a commercial optimizer for small-scale problem instances. To solve large-scale problems, we have adopted a well-known metaheuristic for multi-objective problems, namely the elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm. We have also developed a hybrid approach, which has proven to be more effective than each approach alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, S. M., & Friedland, C. J. (2011). A survey of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) usage for imagery collection in disaster research and management. In 9th International workshop on remote sensing for disaster response, vol. 8.

  • Alkanat, O. (2008). Determining the surface-to-air missile requirement for western and southern part of the Turkish air defense system. Tech. rep., Air Force Institute of Tech Wright-Patterson AFB OH Graduate School of Engineering and Management.

  • Ands, H. (2020). Emerging technology trends for defence and security. Norwegian Defence Research Establishment (FFI) Project No: 1521, FFI-RAPPORT 20/01050.

  • Arnold, T., De Biasio, M., Fritz, A., & Leitner, R. (2013). UAV-based measurement of vegetation indices for environmental monitoring. In 2013 Seventh international conference on sensing technology (ICST), IEEE, pp. 704–707.

  • Arnold, T., De Biasio, M., Fritz, A., & Leitner, R. (2015). UAV-based multispectral environmental monitoring. In Proceedings of Austrian robotics workshop 2015, IEEE, pp. 995–998.

  • Arslan, O. (2009). Developing a tool for the location optimization of the alert aircraft with changing threat anticipation. Tech. rep., Air Force Institute of Tech Wright-Patterson AFB OH Graduate School of Engineering and Management.

  • Ayöperken, E., & Ermiş, M. (2011). Modeling and optimizing the bases of unmanned aerial vehicles as a set-coverage problem. Journal of Aeronautics and Space Technologies, 5(1), 61–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barros, C. P., & Proença, I. (2005). Mixed logit estimation of radical Islamic terrorism in Europe and North America: A comparative study. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(2), 298–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, J. E., & Griffis, S. E. (2015). Military applications of location analysis. In Applications of location analysis, Berlin: Springer, pp. 403–433.

  • Bell, J. E., Griffis, S. E., Cunningham, W. A, I. I. I., & Eberlan, J. A. (2011). Location optimization of strategic alert sites for homeland defense. Omega, 39(2), 151–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Akiva, M. E., Lerman, S. R., & Lerman, S. R. (1985). Discrete choice analysis: Theory and application to travel demand, vol. 9. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  • Benati, S., & Hansen, P. (2002). The maximum capture problem with random utilities: Problem formulation and algorithms. European Journal of Operational Research, 143(3), 518–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buyurgan, N., & Lehlou, N. (2015). A terrain risk assessment method for military surveillance applications for mobile assets. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 88, 88–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow, J. Y. (2016). Dynamic UAV-based traffic monitoring under uncertainty as a stochastic arc-inventory routing policy. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 5(3), 167–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, D. C., Frost, J. R., & Robe, R. Q. (2003). Compatibility of land sar procedures with search theory. Tech. Rep. DTCG32-02-F-000032, Potomac Management Group Alexandria VA, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States Coast Guard Operations (G-OPR).

  • Craparo, E. M., & Karatas, M. (2018). A method for placing sources in multistatic sonar networks. Naval Postgraduate School Monterey United States: Tech. rep.

  • Craparo, E. M., Fügenschuh, A., Hof, C., & Karatas, M. (2019). Optimizing source and receiver placement in multistatic sonar networks to monitor fixed targets. European Journal of Operational Research, 272(3), 816–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craparo, E. M., Karatas, M., & Kuhn, T. U. (2017). Sensor placement in active multistatic sonar networks. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 64(4), 287–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalamagkidis, K. (2015). Classification of UAVs. In Handbook of unmanned aerial vehicles, pp. 83–91.

  • Dalamagkidis, K., Valavanis, K. P., & Piegl, L. A. (2011). On integrating unmanned aircraft systems into the national airspace system: Issues, challenges, operational restrictions, certification, and recommendations, vol. 54. Berlin: Springer.

  • Dawson, M. C., Bell, J. E., & Weir, J. D. (2007). A hybrid location method for missile security team positioning. Air Force Logistics Management Agency Gunter AFB AL: Tech. rep.

  • Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., & Meyarivan, T. (2002). A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6(2), 182–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, C., Wang, S., Huang, Z., Tan, Z., & Liu, J. (2014). Unmanned aerial vehicles for power line inspection: A cooperative way in platforms and communications. Journal of Communication, 9(9), 687–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • d’Oleire-Oltmanns, S., Marzolff, I., Peter, K., & Ries, J. (2012). Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) for monitoring soil erosion in Morocco. Remote Sensing, 4(11), 3390–3416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrgott, M. (2005). Multicriteria optimization, vol. 491. Berlin: Springer.

  • Everaerts, J., et al. (2008). The use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for remote sensing and mapping. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 37(2008), 1187–1192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ezequiel, C. A. F., Cua, M., Libatique, N. C., Tangonan, G. L., Alampay, R., Labuguen, R. T., Favila, C. M., Honrado, J. L. E., Canos, V., Devaney, C., et al. (2014). UAV aerial imaging applications for post-disaster assessment, environmental management and infrastructure development. In 2014 International conference on unmanned aircraft systems (ICUAS), IEEE, pp. 274–283.

  • Fahlstrom, P., & Gleason, T. (2012). Introduction to UAV systems. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischer, M. (2003). The measure of pareto optima applications to multi-objective metaheuristics. In International conference on evolutionary multi-criterion optimization, Berlin: Springer, pp. 519–533.

  • Fügenschuh, A. R., Craparo, E. M., Karatas, M., & Buttrey, S. E. (2019). Solving multistatic sonar location problems with mixed-integer programming. Optimization and Engineering, pp. 1–31.

  • Gupta, S. G., Ghonge, M. M., & Jawandhiya, P. (2013). Review of unmanned aircraft system (UAS). International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Engineering & Technology (IJARCET), 2(4), 1646–1658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausken, K. (2011). Protecting complex infrastructures against multiple strategic attackers. International Journal of Systems Science, 42(1), 11–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinkkainen, K., & Pickering, S. (2013) .Strategic risk of terrorist targets in urban vs. rural locations. In Working paper delivered at the peace science society workshop in disaggregation in terrorism studies, vol. 9, Philadelphia, USA, pp. 379–399.

  • IAMSAR, I. (2007). International aeronautical and maritime search and rescue manual. Mission Coordination 2.

  • Jenelius, E., Westin, J., & Holmgren, Å. J. (2010). Critical infrastructure protection under imperfect attacker perception. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 3(1), 16–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jourdan, D. B., & de Weck, O. L. (2004). Multi-objective genetic algorithm for the automated planning of a wireless sensor network to monitor a critical facility. In Sensors, and command, control, communications, and intelligence (C3I) Technologies for Homeland Security and Homeland Defense III, International Society for Optics and Photonics, vol. 5403, pp. 565–576.

  • Kanistras, K., Martins, G., Rutherford, M. J., & Valavanis, K. P. (2015). Survey of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for traffic monitoring. In Handbook of unmanned aerial vehicles, pp. 2643–2666.

  • Karatas, M., Yakıcı, E., & Razi, N. (2019). Military facility location problems: A brief survey. In Operations Research for Military Organizations, IGI Global, pp. 1–27.

  • Karatas, M. (2012). An analytical comparison of random and exhaustive search of an expanding area with binary sensors. Machinery Engineering Journal, 635, 2–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koester, R. J., Cooper, D. C., Frost, J., & Robe, R. (2004). Sweep width estimation for ground search and rescue. Tech. rep. Potomac Management Group Alexandria VA.

  • Koopman, B. (1946). Search and screening (OEG Report No.56, The Summary Reports Group of the Columbia University Division of War Research). Alexandria, VA: Center for Naval Analyses.

  • Kujawski, E. (2015). Accounting for terrorist behavior in allocating defensive counterterrorism resources. Systems Engineering, 18(4), 365–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurban, Ö. F., & Tuncay, C. (2016). Allocation of mini unmanned aerial vehicles for urgent intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance request. Marmara University Öneri Journal, 12(45), 35–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larrauri, J. I., Sorrosal, G., & González, M. (2013). Automatic system for overhead power line inspection using an unmanned aerial vehicle–RELIFO project. In 2013 International conference on unmanned aircraft systems (ICUAS), IEEE, pp. 244–252.

  • Laumanns, M., Zitzler, E., & Thiele, L. (2000). A unified model for multi-objective evolutionary algorithms with elitism. In Proceedings of the 2000 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC00 (Cat. No. 00TH8512), IEEE, vol. 1, pp. 46–53.

  • Leftwich, J. A., Knopman, D., Fischback, J. R., Vermeer, M. J., Van Abel, K., & Kalra, N. (2019). Air force capability development planning: Analytical methods to support investment decisions. Tech. rep. RAND ARROYO CENTER SANTA MONICA CA SANTA MONICA United States.

  • Lim, G. J., Kim, S., Cho, J., Gong, Y., & Khodaei, A. (2018). Multi-UAV pre-positioning and routing for power network damage assessment. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 9(4), 3643–3651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunday, B. J., Sherali, H. D., & Glickman, T. S. (2010). The nested event tree model with application to combating terrorism. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 22(4), 620–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melita, C. D., Longo, D., Muscato, G., & Giudice, G. (2015). Measurement and exploration in volcanic environments. In Handbook of unmanned aerial vehicles, pp. 2667–2692.

  • NATO. (2020). Science & technology trends 2020–2040, exploring the s&t edge. NATO Science & Technology Organization.

  • Ollero, A., & Merino, L. (2006). Unmanned aerial vehicles as tools for forest-fire fighting. Forest Ecology and Management, 234(1), S263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onggo, B. S., & Karatas, M. (2016). Test-driven simulation modelling: A case study using agent-based maritime search-operation simulation. European Journal of Operational Research, 254(2), 517–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otto, A., Agatz, N., Campbell, J., Golden, B., & Pesch, E. (2018). Optimization approaches for civil applications of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) or aerial drones: A survey. Networks, 72(4), 411–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ploeger, F. (2010). Strategic concept of employment for unmanned aircraft systems in NATO. Joint Air Power Competence Centre.

  • Roemer, M. J., & Tang, L. (2015). Integrated vehicle health and fault contingency management for UAVs. In Handbook of unmanned aerial vehicles, pp. 999–1025.

  • Sadraey, M. (2017). Unmanned aircraft design: A review of fundamentals. Synthesis Lectures on Mechanical Engineering, 1(2), i–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sankarasrinivasan, S., Balasubramanian, E., Karthik, K., Chandrasekar, U., & Gupta, R. (2015). Health monitoring of civil structures with integrated UAV and image processing system. Procedia Computer Science, 54, 508–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarıçiçek, & Akkuş, Y. (2015). Unmanned aerial vehicle hub-location and routing for monitoring geographic borders. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 39(14), 3939–3953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherali, H. D., Dalkiran, E., & Glickman, T. S. (2011). Selecting optimal alternatives and risk reduction strategies in decision trees. Operations Research, 59(3), 631–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherali, H. D., Desai, J., & Glickman, T. S. (2008). Optimal allocation of risk-reduction resources in event trees. Management Science, 54(7), 1313–1321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siebert, S., & Teizer, J. (2014). Mobile 3D mapping for surveying earthwork projects using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) system. Automation in Construction, 41, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unmanned Aircraft Systems Center of Excellence. (2010). US Army unmanned aircraft systems roadmap 2010–2035: Eyes of the army. Tech. rep., Defense Technical Information Center.

  • Vachtsevanos, G. J., & Valavanis, K. P. (2015). Military and civilian unmanned aircraft. In Handbook of unmanned aerial vehicles, pp. 93–103.

  • Valavanis, K. P., & Vachtsevanos, G. J. (2015). Handbook of unmanned aerial vehicles. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vural, D., Dell, R. F., & Kose, E. (2019). Locating unmanned aircraft systems for multiple missions under different weather conditions. Operational Research, pp. 1–20.

  • Washburn, A. R. (2002). Search and detection. Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences.

  • Yakıcı, E., Karatas, M., & Yılmaz, O. (2019). The problem of locating and routing unmanned aerial vehicles. In Operations Research for Military Organizations, IGI Global, pp. 28–53.

  • Yakıcı, E. (2016). Solving location and routing problem for UAVs. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 102, 294–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yildirim, M. F. (2016). Optimization of hub locations of UAVs for border monitoring as coverage problem. State University of New York at Binghamton.

  • Yılmaz, O., Yakıcı, E., & Karatas, M. (2018). A UAV location and routing problem with spatio-temporal synchronization constraints solved by ant colony optimization. Journal of Heuristics, pp. 1–29.

  • Yuan, C., Liu, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2015). UAV-based forest fire detection and tracking using image processing techniques. In 2015 International conference on unmanned aircraft systems (ICUAS), IEEE, pp. 639–643.

  • Zhang, C., & Kovacs, J. M. (2012). The application of small unmanned aerial systems for precision agriculture: A review. Precision Agriculture, 13(6), 693–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the anonymous referees for their careful and insightful reviews which helped us improve the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Defence University, Naval Academy, Istanbul, 34940, Turkey

    Mumtaz Karatas & Ertan Yakıcı

  2. Sabanci Business School, Sabanci University, Istanbul, 34956, Turkey

    Abdullah Dasci

Authors
  1. Mumtaz Karatas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ertan Yakıcı
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Abdullah Dasci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mumtaz Karatas.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Disclaimer

Conclusions contained herein are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies or endorsements, either expressed or implied, of any affiliated organization or government.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karatas, M., Yakıcı, E. & Dasci, A. Solving a bi-objective unmanned aircraft system location-allocation problem. Ann Oper Res 319, 1631–1654 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03892-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03892-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation