Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Tail dependence network of new energy vehicle industry in mainland China

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The emerging new energy vehicles (NEV) industry is strategically important for China. How to capture its operating characteristics is a challenging but meaningful work. Considering that physical network (e.g. buyer–supplier) or correlation network (e.g. financial contagion) can provide the effective market information for enterprises in the operations management, we first construct the stock returns-based tail dependence network of the NEV industry by combining the Delta conditional value-at-risk (CoVaR) measure and the triangulated maximally filtered graph (TMFG) algorithm. We then explore the topological structure of the constructed network and obtain the operating characteristics for each enterprise in the whole industrial supply chain and at different levels. The empirical results show that the dependence and influence of different enterprises in the whole industrial supply chain are heterogeneous. In particular, upstream enterprises have closer dependence and faster influence power at all levels. These findings from the NEV industry with 71 listed enterprises would not only help regulators identify enterprises that affect the industry stability, but also help investors reduce risk across different enterprises, and managers can adjust operation strategies to reduce operating risks. On the theoretical side, we extend the network theory to the NEV industry. On the practical side, it is the first to capture the operating characteristics of the NEV industry in mainland China. In addition, on the methodological side, it constructs a new TMFG-CoVaR network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adrian, T., & Brunnermeier, M. K. (2016). CoVaR. American Economic Review, 106(7), 1705–1741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Affinito, M., & Franco Pozzolo, A. (2017). The interbank network across the global financial crisis: Evidence from Italy. Journal of Banking & Finance, 80, 90–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben Daya, M., Hassini, E., & Bahroun, Z. (2019). Internet of things and supply chain management: A literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 57(15), 4719–4742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunetti, C., Harris, J. H., Mankad, S., & Michailidis, G. (2019). Interconnectedness in the interbank market. Journal of Financial Economics, 133(2), 520–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, A. S., & Pearson, J. N. (1999). Strategically managed buyer–supplier relationships and performance outcomes. Journal of Operations Management, 17(5), 497–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H. L. (2018). Supply chain risk’s impact on corporate financial performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(3), 713–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K., Luo, P., Sun, B., & Wang, H. (2015). Which stocks are profitable? A network method to investigate the effects of network structure on stock returns. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 436, 224–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Q., & Weng, X. (2018). Information flows between the US and China’s agricultural commodity futures markets-based on VAR-BEKK-Skew-t model. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 54(1), 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colacito, R., Engle, R. F., & Ghysels, E. (2011). A component model for dynamic correlations. Journal of Econometrics, 164(1), 45–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. F., Ghysels, E., & Sohn, B. (2013). Stock market volatility and macroeconomic fundamentals. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(3), 776–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, C. T., & Zhou, X. H. (2016). Forecasting VaR and ES using dynamic conditional score models and skew Student distribution. Economic Modelling, 53, 216–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girardi, G., & Ergn, A. T. (2013). Systemic risk measurement: Multivariate GARCH estimation of CoVaR. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(8), 3169–3180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giudici, P., & Polinesi, G. (2019). Crypto price discovery through correlation networks. Annals of Operations Research (in press)

  • Gnyawali, D. R., & Madhavan, R. (2001). Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: A structural embeddedness perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 431–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R., Nohria, N., & Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 203–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, X., Ieromonachou, P., & Zhou, L. (2019). Subsidising an electric vehicle supply chain with imperfect information. International Journal of Production Economics, 21(1), 82–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C., Wen, S., Li, M., Wen, F., & Yang, X. (2020). An empirical evaluation of the influential nodes for stock market network: Chinese A-shares case. Finance Research Letters (in press).

  • Isogai, T. (2017). Analysis of dynamic correlation of Japanese stock returns with network clustering. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 24(3), 193–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji, Q., Geng, J. B., & Tiwari, A. K. (2018). Information spillovers and connectedness networks in the oil and gas markets. Energy Economics, 75(3), 71–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen, T. E., Mikkelsen, O. S., & Wong, C. Y. (2019). Strategies for complex supply networks: Findings from the offshore wind power industry. Supply Chain Management, 24(6), 872–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. (1988). Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 9(4), 319–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koka, B. R., & Prescott, J. E. (2008). Designing alliance networks: The influence of network position, environmental change, and strategy on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(6), 639–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, D. (2018). Strategic response to Industry 4.0: An empirical investigation on the Chinese automotive industry. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 118(3), 589–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, E. M., Sun, E. W., & Yu, M. T. (2018). Systemic risk, financial markets, and performance of financial institutions. Annals of Operations Research, 262(2), 579–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mantegna, R. N. (1999). Hierarchical structure in financial markets. The European Physical Journal B, 11(1), 193–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massara, G. P., Di Matteo, T., & Aste, T. (2016). Network filtering for big data: Triangulated maximally filtered graph. Journal of Complex Networks, 5(2), 161–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie, C. X., & Song, F. T. (2018). Constructing financial network based on PMFG and threshold method. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 495, 104–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orskaug, E. (2009). Multivariate DCC-GARCH model: With various error distributions. Master’s thesis, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.

  • Porter, M. E. (1979). The structure within industries and companies’ performance. Review of Economics and Statistics, 61(2), 214–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren Jifan, S., Fosso Wamba, S., Akter, S., Dubey, R., & Childe, S. J. (2017). Modelling quality dynamics, business value and firm performance in a big data analytics environment. International Journal of Production Research, 55(17), 5011–5026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubinov, M., & Sporns, O. (2010). Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations. Neuroimage, 52(3), 1059–1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, H. (2019). How do knowledge spillover and access in supply chain network enhance SMEs’ credit quality? Industrial Management & Data Systems, 119(2), 274–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolbov, M. (2017). Assessing systemic risk and its determinants for advanced and major emerging economies: The case of \(\Delta \) CoVaR. International Economics and Economic Policy, 14(1), 119–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Y., Xiong, J. J., Luo, Y., & Zhang, Y. C. (2019). How do the global stock markets influence one another? Evidence from finance big data and granger causality directed network. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 23(1), 85–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tibshirani, R. (1996). Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 58(1), 267–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolbert, P. S. (1985). Resource dependence and institutional environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 229–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tumminello, M., Aste, T., Di Matteo, T., & Mantegna, R. N. (2005). A tool for filtering information in complex systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(30), 10421–10426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargas, R., Waldron, A., Sharma, A., Flórez, R., & Narayan, D. A. (2017). A graph theoretic analysis of leverage centrality. AKCE International Journal of Graphs and Combinatorics, 14, 295–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volberda, H. W., & Lewin, A. Y. (2003). Co-evolutionary dynamics within and between firms: From evolution to co-evolution. Journal of Management Studies, 40(8), 2111–2136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, G. J., Xie, C., He, K., & Stanley, H. E. (2017). Extreme risk spillover network: Application to financial institutions. Quantitative Finance, 17(9), 1417–1433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, G. J., Xie, C., & Stanley, H. E. (2018). Correlation structure and evolution of world stock markets: Evidence from Pearson and partial correlation-based networks. Computational Economics, 51(3), 607–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen, F., Yang, X., & Zhou, W. X. (2019). Tail dependence networks of global stock markets. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 24(1), 558–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Z., & Jia, F. (2018). Toward a theory of supply chain fields-understanding the institutional process of supply chain localization. Journal of Operations Management, 58, 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Q., Chen, L., Jiang, C., & Yuan, J. (2018). Measuring systemic risk of the banking industry in China: A DCC-MIDAS-t approach. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 51, 13–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Q., Li, M., Jiang, C., & He, Y. (2019). Interconnectedness and systemic risk network of Chinese financial institutions: A LASSO-CoVaR approach. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 534, 122173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, F., Chen, K., Hao, H., Wang, S., & Liu, Z. (2019). Technology development for electric vehicles under new energy vehicle credit regulation in China: Scenarios through 2030. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 21(2), 275–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., & Bai, X. (2017). Incentive policies from 2006 to 2016 and new energy vehicle adoption in 2010–2020 in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70, 24–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, X., Ren, M., Wu, G., Pei, J., & Pardalos, P. M. (2019). Promoting new energy vehicles consumption: The effect of implementing carbon regulation on automobile industry in China. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 135, 211–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Y., Yang, F., & Ye, W. (2018). Financial contagion behavior analysis based on complex network approach. Annals of Operations Research, 268(1), 93–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (72171070, 71671056), the Humanity and Social Science Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (19YJA790035), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M700380), and the National Statistical Science Research Projects of China (2019LD05).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, 230009, Anhui, People’s Republic of China

    Qifa Xu & Cuixia Jiang

  2. Key Laboratory of Process Optimization and Intelligent Decision-making, Ministry of Education, Hefei, 230009, Anhui, People’s Republic of China

    Qifa Xu

  3. School of Economics & Management, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

    Liukai Wang

  4. York Management School, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK

    Fu Jia

  5. International Business School, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, 215123, People’s Republic of China

    Lujie Chen

Authors
  1. Qifa Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Liukai Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cuixia Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fu Jia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lujie Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cuixia Jiang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 11.

Table 11 List of enterprises in NEVs industry
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, Q., Wang, L., Jiang, C. et al. Tail dependence network of new energy vehicle industry in mainland China. Ann Oper Res 315, 565–590 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04729-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04729-w

Keywords