Online shopping has become the main form of daily consumption, which contributes to the growing maturity of platform service supply chains (PSSCs). However, financial constraints of consumers and sellers have emerged as the key factors hindering their participation. To attract both sides on board and expand transaction volume, seller’s credit combined with buyer’s credit, or dual credit, has been launched by platforms. However, studies on whether this dual credit service is worth implementing remains to be an uncharted area. This paper aims to explore the e-commerce (EC) platform ecosystem with credit services, which is composed of a platform, a seller, and a group of consumers. By using game-theoretic approaches, our study finds that the dual credit drives down product price, which always profits consumers compared to the single buyer’s credit; platform charge, however, changes vaguely so that other agents are not always profited. For mid-to-high end products, platforms’ incentive in providing dual credit can be enhanced by raising seller’s capital or consumers’ dishonesty aversion coefficient, which also increases social welfare; while sellers engage in credit only when under severe shortage of capital. The effectiveness of raising consumers’ aversion coefficient in motivating the acceptance of financing services for sellers depends on the product type. Besides, for low-end products, the welfare of both the seller and the society always suffer, making the dual credit not worth promoting in this case.
PDD is an emerging, newly listed e-commerce platform in China, which attracts mostly price-sensitive consumers, and it has few brands on board.
References
Abhishek, V., Jerath, K., & Zhang, Z. J. (2016). Agency selling or reselling? Channel structures in electronic retailing. Management Science,62(8), 2259–2280.
An, S., Li, B., Song, D. P., & Chen, X. (2021). Green credit financing versus trade credit financing in a supply chain with carbon emission limits. European Journal of Operational Research,292(1), 125–142.
Babich, V., & Kouvelis, P. (2018). Introduction to the special Issue on research at the interface of finance, operations, and risk management (iFORM): Recent contributions and future directions. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management,20(1), 1–18.
Cai, Y. J., Wang, Y., & Zhang, J. (2020). Enhancing e-platform business by customer service systems: A multi-methodological case study on Ali Wangwang instant message’s impacts on TaoBao. Annals of Operations Research,291, 59–81.
Chan, Y. L., Hsu, S. M., & Liao, M. H. (2021). An inventory model for perishable items under upstream and downstream trade credit. In L. Barolli, A. Poniszewska-Maranda, & H. Park (Eds.), Innovative mobile and internet services in ubiquitous computing (pp. 552–560). Springer.
Chen, X., Li, B., Chen, W., & Wu, S. (2021). Influences of information sharing and online recommendations in a supply chain: Reselling versus agency selling. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-03968-7
Dong, L., Ren, L., & Zhang, D. (2019). Financing small and medium-size enterprises via retail platforms. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3257899
Fan, X., Zhao, W., Zhang, T., & Yan, E. D. (2020). Mobile payment, third-party payment platform entry and information sharing in supply chains. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03749-8
Gao, G. X., Fan, Z. P., Fang, X., & Lim, Y. F. (2018). Optimal Stackelberg strategies for financing a supply chain through online peer-to-peer lending. European Journal of Operational Research,267(2), 585–597.
Giri, B. C., & Maiti, T. (2013). Supply chain model with price- and trade credit-sensitive demand under two-level permissible delay in payments. International Journal of Systems Science,44(5), 937–948.
Gong, D. Q., Liu, S. F., Liu, J., & Ren, L. (2020). Who benefits from online financing? A sharing economy E-tailing platform perspective. International Journal of Production Economics,222, 107490.
Heydari, J., Rastegar, M., & Glock, C. H. (2017). A two-level delay in payments contract for supply chain coordination: The case of credit-dependent demand. International Journal of Production Economics,191, 26–36.
Huang, C. K., Tsai, D. M., Wu, J. C., & Chung, K. J. (2010). An integrated vendor-buyer inventory model with order-processing cost reduction and permissible delay in payments. European Journal of Operational Research,202(2), 473–478.
Huang, Y. F. (2003). Optimal retailer’s ordering policies in the EOQ model under trade credit financing. Journal of the Operational Research Society,54, 1011–1015.
Jaggi, C. K., Goyal, S. K., & Goel, S. K. (2008). Retailer’s optimal replenishment decisions with credit-linked demand under permissible delay in payments. European Journal of Operational Research,190, 130–135.
Jaggi, C. K., Kapur, P. K., Goyal, S. K., & Goel, S. K. (2012). Optimal replenishment and credit policy in EOQ model under two-levels of trade credit policy when demand is influenced by credit period. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering & Management,3(4), 352–359.
Jia, L., Xue, G., Fu, Y. W., & Xu, L. J. (2018). Factors affecting consumers’ acceptance of e-commerce consumer credit service. International Journal of Information Management,40, 103–110.
Kouvelis, P., & Zhao, W. H. (2012). Financing the newsvendor: Supplier vs. bank, and the structure of optimal trade credit contracts. Operations Research,60(3), 566–580.
Kouvelis, P., & Zhao, W. H. (2015). Supply chain contract design under financial constraints and bankruptcy costs. Management Science,62(8), 2341–2357.
Kwon, H. D., Lippman, S. A., McCardle, K. F., & Tang, C. S. (2010). Project management contracts with delayed payments. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management,12(4), 692–707.
Lai, Z., Lou, G., Zhang, T., & Fan, T. J. (2021). Financing and coordination strategies for a manufacturer with limited operating and green innovation capital: Bank credit financing versus supplier green investment. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04098-w
Lee, H. H., Zhou, J., & Wang, J. Q. (2018). Trade credit financing under competition and its impact on firm performance in supply chains. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management,20(1), 35–52.
Li, J., Wang, Y. J., Feng, G. Z., Wang, S. Y., & Song, Y. G. (2020). Supply chain finance review: Current situation and future trend. System Engineering Theory and Practice,40(8), 1977–1995.
Li, Y. Y., Li, Y., & Li, Y. (2019). What factors are influencing credit card customer’s default behavior in China? A study based on survival analysis. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications,526(15), 120861.
Liao, J. J. (2008). An EOQ model with non-instantaneous receipt and exponentially deteriorating items under two-level trade credit. International Journal of Production Economics,113, 852–861.
Lin, F., & Chan, Y. L. (2019). Joint pricing and production decisions for new products with learning curve effects under upstream and downstream trade credits. European Journal of Operational Research,278, 283–295.
Lin, M., Pan, X. A., & Zheng, Q. (2020). Platform pricing with strategic buyers: The impact of future production cost. Production and Operations Management,22(4), 645–867.
Liu, W. H., Yan, X. Y., Li, X., & Wei, W. Y. (2020). The impacts of market size and data-driven marketing on the sales mode selection in an internet platform based supply chain. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review,136, 101914.
Liu, W. H., Yan, X. Y., Wei, W. Y., & Xie, D. (2019). Pricing decisions for service platform with provider’s threshold participating quantity, value-added service and matching ability. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review,122, 410–432.
Liu, Z. K., Zhang, D. J., & Zhang, F. Q. (2021). Information sharing on retail platforms. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management,23(3), 547–730.
Mantin, B., Krishnan, H., & Dhar, T. (2014). The strategic role of third-party marketplaces in retailing. Production & Operations Management,23(11), 1937–1949.
Ni, J., Chu, L. K., & Li, Q. (2017). Capacity decisions with debt financing: The effects of agency problem. European Journal of Operational Research,261(3), 1158–1169.
Panja, S., & Mondal, S. K. (2019). Analyzing a four-layer green supply chain imperfect production inventory model for green products under type-2 fuzzy credit period. Computers & Industrial Engineering,129, 435–453.
Panja, S., & Mondal, S. K. (2020). Exploring a two-layer green supply chain game theoretic model with credit linked demand and mark-up under revenue sharing contract. Journal of Cleaner Production,250, 119491.
Papouskova, M., & Hajek, P. (2019). Two-stage consumer credit risk modelling using heterogeneous ensemble learning. Decision Support Systems,118, 33–45.
Parker, G. G., Van Alstyne, M. W., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Platform revolution: How networked markets are transforming the economy—And how to make them work for you (p. 46). W. W. Norton & Company.
Pei, Q., Chan, H., Zhang, T., & Li, Y. (2022). Benefits of the implementation of supply chain finance. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04566-x
Peura, H., Yang, S. A., & Lai, G. M. (2017). Trade credit in competition: A horizontal benefit. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management,19(2), 165–335.
Prelec, D., & Simester, D. (2001). Always leave home without it: A further investigation of the credit-card effect on willingness to pay. Marketing Letters,12(1), 5–12.
Sun, J., Yuan, P., & Hua, L. (2022). Pricing and financing strategies of a dual-channel supply chain with a capital-constrained manufacturer. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04602-w
Taleizadeh, A. A., Pentico, D. W., Jabalameli, M. S., & Aryanezhad, M. (2013). An EOQ model with partial delayed payment and partial backordering. Omega,41(2), 354–368.
Tan, B., Anderson, E. G., & Parker, G. G. (2020). Platform pricing and investment to drive third party value creation in two-sided networks. Information Systems Research,31(1), 217–239.
Tang, R. H., & Yang, L. (2020). Financing strategy in fresh product supply chains under e-commerce environment. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications,39, 100911.
Teng, J. T., & Goyal, S. K. (2007). Optimal ordering policies for a retailer in a supply chain with up-stream and down-stream trade credits. Journal of the Operational Research Society,58, 1252–1255.
Wang, C. F., Fan, X. J., & Yin, Z. (2020). Financing online retailers: Bank vs. electronic business platform, equilibrium, and coordinating strategy. European Journal of Operational Research,276(1), 343–356.
Wang, Y. Y., Yu, Z. Q., & Shen, L. (2019). Study on the decision-making and coordination of an e-commerce supply chain with manufacturer fairness concerns. International Journal of Production Research,57(9), 2788–2808.
Yan, N., Zhang, Y., Xu, X., & Gao, Y. (2021). Online finance with dual channels and bidirectional free-riding effect. International Journal of Production Economics,231, 107834.
Yong, L. A., Chen, A., Yin, Y. H., Li, H., Zhu, Q. N., & Luo, J. (2021). A framework for sustainable management of the platform service supply chain: An empirical study of the logistics sector in china. International Journal of Production Economics,235, 108112.
Yu, J. J., Tang, C. S., & Shen, Z. J. M. (2018). Improving consumer welfare and manufacturer profit via government subsidy programs: Subsidizing consumers or manufacturers? Manufacturing & Service Operations Management,20(4), 601–800.
Zha, Y., Zhang, J., Yue, X., & Hua, Z. S. (2015). Service supply chain coordination with platform effort-induced demand. Annals of Operations Research,235, 785–806.
Zhang, B. F., Wu, D. D., & Liang, L. (2018). Trade credit model with customer balking and asymmetric market information. Transportation Research Part E: Logs and Transportation Review,110, 31–46.
Zhang, D. J., Dai, H. C., Dong, L. X., Qi, F. F., Zhang, N. N., Liu, X. F., Liu, Z. Y., & Yang, J. (2019a). The long-term and spillover effects of price promotions on re- tailing platforms: Evidence from a large randomized experiment on Alibaba. Management Science,66(6), 2589–2609.
Zhang, D. J., Dai, H. C., Dong, L. X., Wu, Q., Guo, L. F., & Liu, X. F. (2019b). The value of pop-up stores on retailing platforms: Evidence from a field experiment with Alibaba. Management Science,65(11), 5142–5151.
Zhen, X. P., Shi, D., Li, Y. J., & Zhang, C. (2020). Manufacturer’s financing strategy in a dual-channel supply chain: Third-party platform, bank, and retailer credit financing. Transportation Research Part E: Logs and Transportation Review,133, 101820.
Zhou, L. Y., Wang, W. Q., Xu, J. J., Liu, T., & Gu, J. B. (2018). Perceived information transparency in B2C e-commerce: An empirical investigation. Inform & Management,55(7), 912–927.
Zhu, L., & Ou, Y. (2021). Enhance financing for small- and medium-sized suppliers with reverse factoring: A game theoretical analysis. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04361-0
Zhu, X., Yang, C., Liu, K., Zhang, R., & Jiang, Q. Q. (2021). Cooperation and decision making in a two-sided market motivated by the externality of a third-party social media platform. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04109-w
This work was supported by the Major Program of National Social Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 20&ZD060; the Key Program of National Social Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 20AJY008.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
International Business School, Shanghai University of International Business, Shanghai, 201620, China
Lihong Wei
College of Business, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, 200433, China
Jiaping Xie & Qinglin Li
School of Economics and Management, Shanghai Institute of Technology, Shanghai, 201418, China
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
1.1 Appendix A
We first perform a detailed analysis of consumers’ demand. Given the product price \(p_{s}\), consumers make product purchase decisions: purchase with buyer’s credit payment, purchase with personal income payment or no purchase. Obviously, the only source of return when consumers do not purchase products is the risk-free investment market, i.e., the reserved utility is \(U_{i}^{r} = \left( {1 + r_{F} } \right)x_{i}\). When the consumer chooses buyer’s credit payment, consumer \(i\) can use the credit payment to purchase a product at the beginning and repay the debt with the principal and interest gained from risk-free investment at the end of the period, thus the utility obtained by consumer \(i\) from purchasing the product is
First, the financial constraint is not considered. According to the demand function, the seller’s profit is a piecewise function of product price. When \(p_{s}^{Ns} \le v\), the seller’s pricing decision is \(p_{s}^{Ns} = v\); when \(v < p_{s}^{Ns} \le \frac{v}{{k_{A} }}\),
$$\begin{aligned}{p}_{s}^{Ns}\left({p}_{p}^{Ns}\right)&=\mathrm{max}\left[\mathrm{min}\left(\frac{v}{2{k}_{A}}+\frac{{p}_{p}^{Ns}+\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)c}{2},\frac{v}{{k}_{A}}\right),v\right]\\&=\left\{\begin{array}{ll}\frac{v}{{k}_{A}} ,& {p}_{p}^{Ns}>\frac{v}{{k}_{A}}-\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)c\\ \frac{v}{2{k}_{A}}+\frac{{p}_{p}^{Ns}+\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)c}{2},& \frac{\left(2{k}_{A}-1\right)v}{{k}_{A}}-\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)c<{p}_{p}^{Ns}\le \frac{v}{{k}_{A}}-\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)c\\ v , &{p}_{p}^{Ns}\le \frac{\left(2{k}_{A}-1\right)v}{{k}_{A}}-\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)c\end{array}\right.\end{aligned}.$$
Second, consider the financial constraint. When \(p_{s}^{Ns} = v\), the seller with limited capital cannot afford to satisfy all consumers and has to give up this price; when \(p_{s}^{Ns} > v\), the capital constraint is equivalent to \(p_{s}^{Ns} \ge \frac{{cv - a\left( {1 + r_{F} } \right)\left( {1 - k_{A} } \right)B}}{{ck_{A} }}\).
Thus, the seller’s price response function after considering the capital constraint is as follows.
(i) When \(B\le \frac{vc}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\), \(\frac{cv-a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(1-{k}_{A}\right)B}{c{k}_{A}}\ge v\) holds. The seller’s price response function can be further expressed as
(ii) When \(B>\frac{vc}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\), \(\frac{cv-a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(1-{k}_{A}\right)B}{c{k}_{A}}<v\). The seller’s price response function can be expressed as.
$${p}_{s}^{Ns}\left({p}_{p}^{Ns}\right)=\left\{\begin{array}{ll}\frac{v}{{k}_{A}} ,& {p}_{p}^{Ns}>\frac{v}{{k}_{A}}-\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)c\\ \frac{v}{2{k}_{A}}+\frac{{p}_{p}^{Ns}+\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)c}{2},& \frac{\left(2{k}_{A}-1\right)v}{{k}_{A}}-\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)c<{p}_{p}^{Ns}\le \frac{v}{{k}_{A}}-\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)c\\ v ,& {p}_{p}^{Ns}\le \frac{\left(2{k}_{A}-1\right)v}{{k}_{A}}-\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)c\end{array}\right..$$
Since the seller’s response function is related not only to the platform charge but also to the seller’s capital, platform’s profit is likewise related to these two parameters. (1.1) \(\le \frac{vc}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\). We first determine the best choice of platform in different charging intervals. When\({p}_{p}^{Ns}>\frac{v}{{k}_{A}}-\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)c\), \({\Pi }_{p}^{Ns}\left({p}_{p}^{Ns}\right)=0\), and any charge that not lower than \(\frac{v}{{k}_{A}}-\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)c\) has no effect on equilibrium strategies, which can be set to \({p}_{p}^{Ns}=\frac{v}{{k}_{A}}\), namely consumers’ reservation price, and the seller’s profit is \(\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)B\). When \({p}_{p}^{Ns}\le \frac{cv-2aB\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(1-{k}_{A}\right)}{c{k}_{A}}-\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)c\), \(D=\frac{B}{c}\).
and \({\Pi }_{p}^{Ns}\left({p}_{p}^{Ns}\right)\) is an increasing function of \({p}_{p}^{Ns}\), so we have \({p}_{p}^{Ns}=\frac{cv-2aB\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(1-{k}_{A}\right)}{c{k}_{A}}-\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)c\). When \(\frac{cv-2aB\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(1-{k}_{A}\right)}{c{k}_{A}}-\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)c<{p}_{p}^{Ns}\le \frac{v}{{k}_{A}}-\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)c\), \(D=\frac{v-{k}_{A}(\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)c+{p}_{p}^{Ns})}{2a(1-{k}_{A})(1+{r}_{F})}\),
(1.1.1) When \({k}_{A}<\frac{2(1-{r}_{F})}{3-2{r}_{F}}\), \(\frac{{\partial }^{2}{\Pi }_{p}^{Ns}\left({p}_{p}^{Ns}\right)}{\partial {\left({p}_{p}^{Ns}\right)}^{2}}<0\), and at the point
the optimal charge of the platform is \(\frac{v}{{k}_{A}}-\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)c\). (1.1.2) when \({k}_{A}=\frac{2(1-{r}_{F})}{3-2{r}_{F}}\), \(\frac{\partial {\Pi }_{p}^{Ns}\left({p}_{p}^{Ns}\right)}{\partial {p}_{p}^{Ns}}=\frac{2c+3v{r}_{F}-2(c+v){r}_{F}^{2}}{2a(1+{r}_{F})}>0\). In the interval of
(1.1.3) When \({k}_{A}>\frac{2(1-{r}_{F})}{3-2{r}_{F}}\), \(\frac{{\partial }^{2}{\Pi }_{p}^{Ns}\left({p}_{p}^{Ns}\right)}{\partial {\left({p}_{p}^{Ns}\right)}^{2}}>0\), and thus the optimal charge is
in the interval of \(\frac{cv-2aB\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(1-{k}_{A}\right)}{c{k}_{A}}-\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)c<{p}_{p}^{Ns}\le \frac{v}{{k}_{A}}-\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)c\), the globally optimal decision is also
and denote that \(G\left({k}_{A}\right)=-2aB-2cv{r}_{F}+2aB{r}_{F}^{2}+{k}_{A}\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(3aB-2{c}^{2}-2aB{r}_{F}\right)\). For \(B\le \frac{2{c}^{2}}{a\left(3-2{r}_{F}\right)}\), \(\frac{\partial G\left({k}_{A}\right)}{\partial {k}_{A}}\le 0\), thus \(G\left({k}_{A}\right)\le G\left(0\right)=-2aB-2cv{r}_{F}+2aB{r}_{F}^{2}<0\). The optimal charge of the platform over the entire definition domain is \({p}_{p}^{Ns*}=\frac{v}{{k}_{A}}-\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)c\). When \(B>\frac{2{c}^{2}}{a\left(3-2{r}_{F}\right)}\), \(\frac{\partial G\left({k}_{A}\right)}{\partial {k}_{A}}>0\) and \(G\left(1\right)=\left(aB-2{c}^{2}\right)\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)-2vc{r}_{F}\). If \(B\le \frac{2({c}^{2}(1+{r}_{F})+cv{r}_{F})}{a(1+{r}_{F})}\), \(G\left({k}_{A}\right)<G\left(1\right)<0\) and \({p}_{p}^{Ns*}=\frac{v}{{k}_{A}}-\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)c\), moreover, \(\frac{2({c}^{2}(1+{r}_{F})+cv{r}_{F})}{a(1+{r}_{F})}>\frac{2{c}^{2}}{a\left(3-2{r}_{F}\right)}\) obviously holds. If \(B>\frac{2({c}^{2}(1+{r}_{F})+cv{r}_{F})}{a(1+{r}_{F})}\), there exists a threshold \(\frac{2aB+2cv{r}_{F}-2aB{r}_{F}^{2}}{(1+{r}_{F})(3aB-2{c}^{2}-2aB{r}_{F})}\), and \(\frac{2aB+2cv{r}_{F}-2aB{r}_{F}^{2}}{(1+{r}_{F})(3aB-2{c}^{2}-2aB{r}_{F})}\in \left(0,1\right)\). For \({k}_{A}\le \frac{2aB+2cv{r}_{F}-2aB{r}_{F}^{2}}{(1+{r}_{F})(3aB-2{c}^{2}-2aB{r}_{F})}\), \(G\left({k}_{A}\right)\le 0\), and \(G\left({k}_{A}\right)>0\) if \({k}_{A}>\frac{2aB+2cv{r}_{F}-2aB{r}_{F}^{2}}{(1+{r}_{F})(3aB-2{c}^{2}-2aB{r}_{F})}\). What’s more \(\frac{2aB+2cv{r}_{F}-2aB{r}_{F}^{2}}{(1+{r}_{F})(3aB-2{c}^{2}-2aB{r}_{F})}\) is derived with respect to \(B\) to obtain \(\frac{2ac(-2c-3v{r}_{F}+2(c+v){r}_{F}^{2})}{(1+{r}_{F}){(-3aB+2{c}^{2}+2aB{r}_{F})}^{2}}\), thus \(\frac{2aB+2cv{r}_{F}-2aB{r}_{F}^{2}}{(1+{r}_{F})(3aB-2{c}^{2}-2aB{r}_{F})}\) is a decreasing function of \(B\).
(1.2)\(B>\frac{vc}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\). Similar to (1.1), the best choice of the platform on each interval is as follows: when \({p}_{p}^{Ns}>\frac{v}{{k}_{A}}-\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)c\), \({\Pi }_{p}^{Ns}\left({p}_{p}^{Ns}\right)=0\) and set \({p}_{p}^{Ns}=\frac{v}{{k}_{A}}\). When \({p}_{p}^{Ns}\le \frac{\left(2{k}_{A}-1\right)v}{{k}_{A}}-\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)c\), \(D=\frac{v}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\), \({\Pi }_{p}^{Ns}\left({p}_{p}^{Ns}\right)=\frac{v(2{p}_{p}^{Ns}-v-2v{r}_{F})}{2a(1+{r}_{F})}\), \({\Pi }_{p}^{Ns}\left({p}_{p}^{Ns}\right)\) is an increasing function of \({p}_{p}^{Ns}\), and thus the platform charge is \({p}_{p}^{Ns}=\frac{\left(2{k}_{A}-1\right)v}{{k}_{A}}-\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)c\), moreover \({\Pi }_{p}^{Ns}\left(\frac{\left(2{k}_{A}-1\right)v}{{k}_{A}}-\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)c\right)=\frac{v({k}_{A}(3v-2c(1+{r}_{F})-2v{r}_{F})-2v)}{2a{k}_{A}(1+{r}_{F})}\). When \(\frac{\left(2{k}_{A}-1\right)v}{{k}_{A}}-\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)c<{p}_{p}^{Ns}\le \frac{v}{{k}_{A}}-\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)c\), the solution process is similar to case (1.1), more specifically, (1.2.1) when \({k}_{A}\le \frac{2(1-{r}_{F})}{3-2{r}_{F}}\), the globally optimal decision is
If \({k}_{A}\le \frac{2(1-{r}_{F})}{3-2{r}_{F}}\), \(H\left(0\right)<0\) and \(H\left(\frac{2(1-{r}_{F})}{3-2{r}_{F}}\right)=\frac{2c(2c+3v{r}_{F}-2(c+v){r}_{F}^{2})}{-3+2{r}_{F}}<0\), thus \({p}_{p}^{As*}=\frac{v}{{k}_{A}}\). (1.2.2) When \({k}_{A}>\frac{2(1-{r}_{F})}{3-2{r}_{F}}\), \(\frac{{\partial }^{2}{\Pi }_{p}^{Ns}\left({p}_{p}^{Ns}\right)}{\partial {\left({p}_{p}^{Ns}\right)}^{2}}>0\), the globally optimal decision is likewise
\(H\left(1\right)=-c(2c-v+2(c+v){r}_{F})\), in general, \({r}_{F}\approx 0.05<0.5\), \(H\left(1\right)\) is an increasing function of \(v\). Moreover, if \(v\le \frac{2c(1+{r}_{F})}{1-2{r}_{F}}\), \(H\left(1\right)\le 0\), and thus \(H\left({k}_{A}\right)<0\) holds constantly,
If \(\frac{2c(1+{r}_{F})}{1-2{r}_{F}}<v<a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\), \(H\left(1\right)>0\), there exists a threshold \(\frac{2v}{v(3-2{r}_{F})-2c(1+{r}_{F})}\) such that \(H\left(\frac{2v}{v(3-2{r}_{F})-2c(1+{r}_{F})}\right)=0\). And in the case that \(\frac{2(1-{r}_{F})}{3-2{r}_{F}}<{k}_{A}<\frac{2v}{v(3-2{r}_{F})-2c(1+{r}_{F})}\), \(H\left({k}_{A}\right)\le 0\), therefore
Since \(\frac{2v}{v(3-2{r}_{F})-2c(1+{r}_{F})}\) is a decreasing function of \(v\), if \(v\le \frac{2c(1+{r}_{F})}{1-2{r}_{F}}\), we have \(\frac{2v}{v(3-2{r}_{F})-2c(1+{r}_{F})}\notin \left(\mathrm{0,1}\right)\).
In summary, the optimal charge for the platform over the entire defined domain is the following result.
(1.a) When \(B\le \mathrm{min}\left(\frac{cv}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)},\frac{2({c}^{2}(1+{r}_{F})+cv{r}_{F})}{a(1+{r}_{F})}\right)\), or both \(B>\frac{cv}{a(1+{r}_{F})}\) and \(v\le \frac{2c(1+{r}_{F})}{1-2{r}_{F}}\) are valid at the same time, \({p}_{p}^{Ns*}=\frac{v}{{k}_{A}}\), \({p}_{s}^{Ns*}=\frac{v}{{k}_{A}}\); \({\Pi }_{p}^{Ns*}={CS}^{Ns*}=0\); \({\Pi }_{s}^{Ns*}=\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)B\); \({SW}^{Ns*}=\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)B\).
(1.b) When \(\mathrm{min}\left(\frac{cv}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)},\frac{2({c}^{2}(1+{r}_{F})+cv{r}_{F})}{a(1+{r}_{F})}\right)<B\le \frac{cv}{a(1+{r}_{F})}\), the optimal strategies of PSSC, the equilibrium market demand and the equilibrium profits or utility of each subject are shown in Eqs. (B7)–(B13).
First, the financial constraint is not considered. According to the piecewise demand function, we consider the cases of \({p}_{s}^{As}\le v\), \(v<{p}_{s}^{As}\le \frac{v}{{k}_{A}}\), respectively. When\({p}_{s}^{As}\le v\), the seller’s pricing decision is\({p}_{s}^{As}=v\). When\(v<{p}_{s}^{As}\le \frac{v}{{k}_{A}}\), given the platform charge, the seller’s price response function is
$${p}_{s}^{As}\left({p}_{p}^{As}\right)=\mathrm{max}\left[\mathrm{min}\left(\frac{v}{2{k}_{A}}+\frac{{p}_{p}^{As}+\left(1+{r}_{s}\right)c}{2},\frac{v}{{k}_{A}}\right),v\right]=\left\{\begin{array}{ll}\frac{v}{{k}_{A}} , &{p}_{p}^{As}>\frac{v}{{k}_{A}}-\left(1+{r}_{s}\right)c\\ \frac{v}{2{k}_{A}}+\frac{{p}_{p}^{As}+\left(1+{r}_{s}\right)c}{2},& \frac{\left(2{k}_{A}-1\right)v}{{k}_{A}}-\left(1+{r}_{s}\right)c<{p}_{p}^{As}\le \frac{v}{{k}_{A}}-\left(1+{r}_{s}\right)c\\ v , &{p}_{p}^{As}\le \frac{\left(2{k}_{A}-1\right)v}{{k}_{A}}-\left(1+{r}_{s}\right)c\end{array}\right..$$
Second, consider the capital constraint. When \({p}_{s}^{As}=v\), the constraint is satisfied. When \({p}_{s}^{As}>v\), the constraint can be reduced to \({p}_{s}^{As}\le \frac{cv-a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(1-{k}_{A}\right)B}{c{k}_{A}}\).
Thus, the seller’s response function after considering the financial constraint is as follows.
(i) When \(B\le \frac{vc}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\), \(\frac{cv-a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(1-{k}_{A}\right)B}{c{k}_{A}}\ge v\). The seller’s price response function can be further expressed as
while \(c-\frac{c\sqrt{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(a-v+a{r}_{F}\right)}}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}<B\le \frac{vc}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\), there exists a point \({p}_{p}^{As{\ddag} }\) which satisfies
for \({p}_{p}^{As}>{p}_{p}^{As{\ddag} }\), \({\Pi }_{s}^{As}\left(\frac{cv-a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(1-{k}_{A}\right)B}{c{k}_{A}}\right)>{\Pi }_{s}^{As}\left({v}^{-}\right)\) is obtained. (c)
that is \({\Pi }_{s}^{As}\left(\frac{v}{2{k}_{A}}+\frac{{p}_{p}^{As}+\left(1+{r}_{s}\right)c}{2}\right)-{\Pi }_{s}^{As}\left({v}^{-}\right)\) is an increasing function of \({p}_{p}^{As}\). If \({p}_{p}^{As}=\frac{\left(2{k}_{A}-1\right)v}{{k}_{A}}-\left(1+{r}_{s}\right)c\), we have
If \(B\le c-\frac{c\sqrt{a(1+{r}_{F})(a-v+a{r}_{F})}}{a(1+{r}_{F})}\), \(\frac{\left(1-{k}_{A}\right)\left(aB\left(B-2c\right)\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)+{c}^{2}v\right)}{{c}^{2}{k}_{A}}\ge 0\) holds, by the Zero Theorem, there exists a unique point
is got; in case \(\frac{\left(2{k}_{A}-1\right)v}{{k}_{A}}-\left(1+{r}_{s}\right)c<{p}_{p}^{As}<{p}_{p}^{As{\dag}}\), \({\Pi }_{s}^{As}\left(\frac{v}{2{k}_{A}}+\frac{{p}_{p}^{As}+\left(1+{r}_{s}\right)c}{2}\right)-{\Pi }_{s}^{As}\left({v}^{-}\right)<0\). While \(c-\frac{c\sqrt{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(a-v+a{r}_{F}\right)}}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}<B\le \frac{vc}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\), then \(\frac{\left(1-{k}_{A}\right)\left(aB\left(B-2c\right)\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)+{c}^{2}v\right)}{{c}^{2}{k}_{A}}<0\), thus we have
When \(c-\frac{c\sqrt{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(a-v+a{r}_{F}\right)}}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}<B\le \frac{vc}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\), the seller’s optimal price response function is
Similar to Proposition 1, we first examine the optimal choice of the platform over different charging intervals, and then find its optimal charging decision over the entire defined domain.
(2.1) \(B\le c-\frac{c\sqrt{a(1+{r}_{F})(a-v+a{r}_{F})}}{a(1+{r}_{F})}\). If
i.e., \({p}_{p}^{As}\le \frac{cv-a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(1-{k}_{A}\right)B}{c{k}_{A}}\), and thus the charge is \(\frac{cv-a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(1-{k}_{A}\right)B}{c{k}_{A}}\); if
(2.1.1) When \({k}_{A}<\frac{2(1-{r}_{F})}{3-2{r}_{F}}\), \(\frac{{\partial }^{2}{\Pi }_{p}^{As}\left({p}_{p}^{As}\right)}{\partial {\left({p}_{p}^{As}\right)}^{2}}<0\), and at the point
and thus the optimal charge is \(\frac{cv-2aB\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(1-{k}_{A}\right)-{k}_{A}{c}^{2}(1+{r}_{s})}{c{k}_{A}}\); (2.1.2) when \({k}_{A}=\frac{2(1-{r}_{F})}{3-2{r}_{F}}\),
the optimal charge of the platform is likewise \(\frac{cv-2aB\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(1-{k}_{A}\right)-{k}_{A}{c}^{2}(1+{r}_{s})}{c{k}_{A}}\); (2.1.3) when \({k}_{A}>\frac{2(1-{r}_{F})}{3-2{r}_{F}}\), \(\frac{{\partial }^{2}{\Pi }_{p}^{As}\left({p}_{p}^{As}\right)}{\partial {\left({p}_{p}^{As}\right)}^{2}}>0\), the optimal charge is
has the same sign as \({\mathcalligra{l}}\left(B\right)\). \(\frac{\partial {\mathcalligra{l}}\left(B\right)}{\partial B}={r}_{F}\left(cv-2aB\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\right)\), \({\mathcalligra{l}}\left(B\right)\) is a concave function of \(B\). According to the discriminant of quadratic roots,
and thus \({\mathcalligra{l}}\left(B\right)\le 0\) holds constantly, i.e., \({\Pi }_{p}^{As}\left(\frac{cv-a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(1-{k}_{A}\right)B}{c{k}_{A}}\right)-{\Pi }_{p}^{As}\left({p}_{p}^{As{\dag}}\right)\) is a decreasing function of \({k}_{A}\). Since
to make the seller participate in the platform operation, the platform charge needs to satisfy the condition that \({\Pi }_{s}^{As}\left(\frac{cv-a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(1-{k}_{A}\right)B}{c{k}_{A}}\right)\ge 0\), i.e., \({p}_{p}^{As}\le \frac{cv-a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(1-{k}_{A}\right)B}{c{k}_{A}}\), and thus the platform’s charge is \(\frac{cv-a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(1-{k}_{A}\right)B}{c{k}_{A}}\). When \({p}_{p}^{As}\le {p}_{p}^{As{\ddag} }\), its charging strategy is \({p}_{p}^{As{\ddag} }\).
The optimal charge of the platform over the whole definition domain is
Therefore, when \(c-\frac{c\sqrt{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(a-v+a{r}_{F}\right)}}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}<B\le \frac{vc}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\), the equilibrium results of each subject are shown in Eqs (B35)–(B41).
The participation constraints of the seller is \({\Pi }_{s}^{As}\left({v}^{-}\right)=v-{p}_{p}^{As}-\left(1+{r}_{s}\right)\left(c-B\right)\ge 0\), that is \({p}_{p}^{As}\le v-\left(1+{r}_{s}\right)\left(c-B\right)\), and thus the optimal charge is \({p}_{p}^{As*}=v-\left(1+{r}_{s}\right)\left(c-B\right)\). The optimal strategy of the seller, the market equilibrium demand and the equilibrium profits or utility of each subject are \({p}_{s}^{As*}={v}^{-}\), \({D}^{As*}=1\), \({\Pi }_{p}^{As*}=B-c+v+(B-c-v){r}_{F}-\frac{{v}^{2}}{2a(1+{r}_{F})}\), \({\Pi }_{s}^{As*}=0\), \({CS}^{As*}=\frac{{v}^{2}(1-{k}_{A})}{2a(1+{r}_{F})}\), \({SW}^{As*}=B-c+v+(B-c-v){r}_{F}-\frac{{v}^{2}{k}_{A}}{2a(1+{r}_{F})}\), respectively.
The results of Proposition 2 can be obtained by further sorting.□
Single buyer’s credit: By collapsing, the equilibrium result of the platform and the seller in Proposition 1 can be further expressed as the following result.
When \(\frac{2v}{v(3-2{r}_{F})-2c(1+{r}_{F})}<{k}_{A}<1\) and \(\frac{2c(1+{r}_{F})}{1-2{r}_{F}}<v<a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\), the equilibrium strategies are
and \(\frac{2c(1+{r}_{F})}{1-2{r}_{F}}<v<a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\)) are all met, \(B\) has an effect on the equilibrium results and \(\frac{\partial {p}_{p}^{Ns*}}{\partial B}<0\); \(\frac{\partial {p}_{s}^{Ns*}}{\partial B}<0\).
Dual credit: \(\frac{\partial {p}_{s}^{As*}}{\partial B}\le 0\) obviously holds. When \(B\le c-\frac{c\sqrt{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(a-v+a{r}_{F}\right)}}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\), we have
when \(B=\frac{vc}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)},\)\({p}_{p}^{As{\ddag} }=v-\left(1+{r}_{s}\right)c<v-\left(1+{r}_{s}\right)\left(c-B\right)\), and thus \({p}_{p}^{As{\dag}}\le {p}_{p}^{As{\ddag} }<v-\left(1+{r}_{s}\right)\left(c-B\right)\).
By combining and organizing, we get Proposition 4.□
Single buyer’s credit: According to Proposition 1, when \({k}_{A}^{\varsigma }<{k}_{A}<1\), \({k}_{A}\) affects the equilibrium profits of the agents if
and \(\frac{\partial {SW}^{As*}}{\partial {k}_{A}}\ge 0\) when \(0<{k}_{A}\le \sqrt{\frac{2{r}_{F}\left(cv-aB\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\right)}{aB\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}}\); when
when \(0<{k}_{A}\le \sqrt{\frac{2{r}_{F}\left(cv-aB\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\right)}{aB\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}}\), \(\frac{\partial {SW}^{As*}}{\partial {k}_{A}}\ge 0\); when
Single buyer’s credit: According to Eqs. (B42) and (B43), we can obtain the equilibrium demand and the profits of each subject, and the results are as follows.
thus \(\frac{\partial {\Pi }_{p}^{Ns*}}{\partial B}\ge 0\). The first-order derivatives of seller’s profit and consumer surplus with respect to \(B\) are \(\frac{\partial {\Pi }_{s}^{Ns*}}{\partial B}=\frac{(2aB\left(1-{k}_{A}\right)+{c}^{2}{k}_{A})(1+{r}_{F})}{{c}^{2}{k}_{A}}>0\); \(\frac{\partial {CS}^{Ns*}}{\partial B}=\frac{aB\left(1-{k}_{A}\right)\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}{{c}^{2}}>0\), and at the point \(B=\frac{cv}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\), \(\frac{B\left(aB\left(1-{k}_{A}\right)+{c}^{2}{k}_{A}\right)\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}{{c}^{2}{k}_{A}}=\frac{{v}^{2}\left(1-{k}_{A}\right)}{a{k}_{A}\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}+(1+{r}_{F})B\); \(\frac{a{B}^{2}\left(1-{k}_{A}\right)\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}{2{c}^{2}}=\frac{{v}^{2}(1-{k}_{A})}{2a(1+{r}_{F})}\), therefore \(\frac{\partial {\Pi }_{s}^{Ns*}}{\partial B}>0\), \(\frac{\partial {CS}^{Ns*}}{\partial B}\ge 0\). The first-order derivative of social welfare with respect to \(B\) is
When \(B>\frac{cv}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\), \(B\) only has an effect on the seller’s profit as well as social welfare, and \(\frac{\partial {\Pi }_{s}^{Ns*}}{\partial B}=\frac{\partial {SW}^{Ns*}}{\partial B}=1+{r}_{F}>0\). When \(B=\frac{cv}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\), \({\Pi }_{p}^{Ns*}, {\Pi }_{s}^{Ns*}, {CS}^{Ns*}, {SW}^{Ns*}\) are all continuous functions, and thus for \(B>\frac{2c\left(v{r}_{F}+c{k}_{A}\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\right)}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left({k}_{A}\left(3-2{r}_{F}\right)-2\left(1-{r}_{F}\right)\right)}\), we have \(\frac{\partial {\Pi }_{s}^{Ns*}}{\partial B}>0\) and \(\frac{\partial {SW}^{Ns*}}{\partial B}>0\).
Dual credit: If \(B\le c-\frac{c\sqrt{a(1+{r}_{F})(a-v+a{r}_{F})}}{a(1+{r}_{F})}\), the first order derivative of the platform profit with respect to \(B\) is
When \(0<{k}_{A}<\mathrm{min}\left({\tilde{k}}_{A},1\right)\), there exists \(\frac{cv{r}_{F}}{a(1+{r}_{F})({k}_{A}+2{r}_{F}(1-{k}_{A}))}\), and \(\frac{cv{r}_{F}}{a(1+{r}_{F})({k}_{A}+2{r}_{F}(1-{k}_{A}))}<c-\frac{c\sqrt{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(a-v+a{r}_{F}\right)}}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\), if \(0<B<\frac{cv{r}_{F}}{a(1+{r}_{F})({k}_{A}+2{r}_{F}(1-{k}_{A}))}\), there is \(\frac{\partial {\Pi }_{p}^{As*}}{\partial B}<0\), if \(B>\frac{cv{r}_{F}}{a(1+{r}_{F})({k}_{A}+2{r}_{F}(1-{k}_{A}))}\), \(\frac{\partial {\Pi }_{p}^{As*}}{\partial B}>0\) holds. And given \(B\), \({\Pi }_{p}^{As}\left({p}_{p}^{As{\ddag} }\right)>{\Pi }_{p}^{As}\left({p}_{p}^{As{\dag}}\right)\). Further, since \({\Pi }_{p}^{As}\left({p}_{p}^{As{\dag}}\right)\) is a decreasing function of \(B\), we can get
\(\frac{\partial {\Pi }_{s}^{As*}}{\partial B}\ge 0\) clearly holds and \({p}_{p}^{As{\ddag} }={p}_{p}^{As{\dag}}\) when \(B=c-\frac{c\sqrt{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(a-v+a{r}_{F}\right)}}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\), and thus
if \(B>\frac{cv{r}_{F}}{a(1+{r}_{F})({k}_{A}\left(2-{k}_{A}-2{r}_{F}\right)+2{r}_{F})}\).
If \(c-\frac{c\sqrt{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(a-v+a{r}_{F}\right)}}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}<B\le \frac{vc}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\), then we have
and within the range of \(0<{k}_{A}<\mathrm{min}\left({\breve{k}},1\right)\), due to \(B>c-\frac{c\sqrt{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(a-v+a{r}_{F}\right)}}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}>\frac{cv{r}_{F}}{a(1+{r}_{F})({k}_{A}+2{r}_{F}(1-{k}_{A}))}\), we get \(\frac{\partial {\Pi }_{p}^{As*}}{\partial B}>0\). And in the range of \(\mathrm{min}\left({\breve{k}},1\right)\le {k}_{A}<\) 1, the sign of \(\frac{\partial {\Pi }_{p}^{As*}}{\partial B}\) is related to \(B\). Specifically, when
\(\frac{\partial {\Pi }_{p}^{As*}}{\partial B}=\frac{{r}_{F}\left(2aB-cv+2aB{r}_{F}\right)+aB{k}_{A}(1-{r}_{F}-2{r}_{F}^{2})}{{c}^{2}{k}_{A}}<0\); while
there is \(\frac{\partial {\Pi }_{p}^{As*}}{\partial B}>0\). Since \({p}_{p}^{As{\ddag} }<v-\left(1+{r}_{s}\right)\left(c-B\right)\), the seller’s price is \({v}^{-}\) and thus we have
\(\frac{\partial {\Pi }_{s}^{As*}}{\partial B}=-\frac{\partial {p}_{p}^{As{\ddag} }}{\partial B}+1+{r}_{s}<0\) holds. The first-order derivative of consumer surplus with respect to \(B\) is constant with \(\frac{\partial {CS}^{As*}}{\partial B}\ge 0\); while the first-order derivative of social welfare with respect to \(B\) is
and thus given \({k}_{A}\),\(\frac{\partial {SW}^{As*}}{\partial B}>0\).
If \(B>\frac{vc}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\), we have \(\frac{\partial {\Pi }_{p}^{As*}}{\partial B}>0;\frac{\partial {SW}^{As*}}{\partial B}>0;\frac{\partial {CS}^{As*}}{\partial B}\ge 0\).
By further simplifying and organizing, we get Proposition 6.□
and at points \(v=0=a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\), \(\frac{cv}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}-\left(c-\frac{c\sqrt{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(a-v+a{r}_{F}\right)}}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\right)=0\), and thus \(\frac{cv}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}>\left(c-\frac{c\sqrt{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(a-v+a{r}_{F}\right)}}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\right)\).
(3.2) \(\frac{cv}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\) and \(\frac{2({c}^{2}(1+{r}_{F})+cv{r}_{F})}{a(1+{r}_{F})}\)
in general \({r}_{F}\approx 0.05<0.5\), thus \(\frac{c\left(\left(1-2{r}_{F}\right)v-2c\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\right)}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\) is an increasing function of \(v\) and \(\frac{cv}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\le \frac{2\left({c}^{2}\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)+cv{r}_{F}\right)}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\) for \(v\le \frac{2c\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}{1-2{r}_{F}}\), otherwise, \(\frac{cv}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}>\frac{2\left({c}^{2}\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)+cv{r}_{F}\right)}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\).
(3.3) \(\frac{2({c}^{2}(1+{r}_{F})+cv{r}_{F})}{a(1+{r}_{F})}\) and \(c-\frac{c\sqrt{a(1+{r}_{F})(a-v+a{r}_{F})}}{a(1+{r}_{F})}\)
if the range of \(\frac{2c\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}{1-2{r}_{F}}<v\le \mathrm{max}\left({v}^{r{\dag}},\frac{2c\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}{1-2{r}_{F}}\right)\) is met; and if
We summarize the results of the above analysis in the following Table 2.
Then, we compare the equilibrium strategies.
(3.a) \(B>\frac{vc}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\). (3.a.1) When \(v\le \frac{2c\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}{1-2{r}_{F}}\), the equilibrium strategies of PSSC in buyer’s credit model are \({p}_{p}^{Ns*}={p}_{s}^{Ns*}=\frac{v}{{k}_{A}}\), respectively, while the equilibrium strategies of both parties in the dual credit model are \({p}_{p}^{As*}=v-\left(1+{r}_{s}\right)\left(c-B\right)\) and \({p}_{s}^{As*}={v}^{-}\). Clearly \({p}_{p}^{Ns*}>{p}_{p}^{As*}\); \({p}_{s}^{Ns*}\ge {p}_{s}^{As*}\). (3.a.2) When \(v>\frac{2c\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}{1-2{r}_{F}}\), the equilibrium strategies in the buyer’s credit model are
And both sides’ equilibrium strategies in dual credit model are then \({p}_{p}^{As*}=v-\left(1+{r}_{s}\right)\left(c-B\right)\) and \({p}_{s}^{As*}={v}^{-}\). Clearly \({p}_{s}^{Ns*}\ge {p}_{s}^{As*}\), and we focus on the comparison of platform charges. Since \(\frac{v}{{k}_{A}}>v-\left(1+{r}_{s}\right)\left(c-B\right)\) and \(\frac{\left(2{k}_{A}-1\right)v}{{k}_{A}}-\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)c-\left(v-\left(1+{r}_{s}\right)\left(c-B\right)\right)\) is an increasing function of \({k}_{A}\), and at the point \({k}_{A}=\frac{v}{v-\left(1+{r}_{s}\right)B+c\left({r}_{s}-{r}_{F}\right)}\),\(\frac{\left(2{k}_{A}-1\right)v}{{k}_{A}}-\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)c=v-\left(1+{r}_{s}\right)\left(c-B\right)\), the comparison of equilibrium charges in two credit models is.
(3.b) \(B\le \frac{vc}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\). (3.b.1) When \(v\le \frac{2c\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}{1-2{r}_{F}}\), according to Table 2, we can easily classify the equilibrium strategies in two credit models based on the size of seller’s capital. Specifically, if \(B\le c-\frac{c\sqrt{a(1+{r}_{F})(a-v+a{r}_{F})}}{a(1+{r}_{F})}\), \({p}_{p}^{Ns*}=\frac{v}{{k}_{A}}; {p}_{s}^{Ns*}=\frac{v}{{k}_{A}}\);
we can get \({p}_{p}^{Ns*}>{p}_{p}^{As*}\), while \({p}_{s}^{Ns*}>{p}_{s}^{As*}\) clearly holds. If \(c-\frac{c\sqrt{a(1+{r}_{F})(a-v+a{r}_{F})}}{a(1+{r}_{F})}<B\le \frac{vc}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\), \({p}_{p}^{Ns*}=\frac{v}{{k}_{A}}; {p}_{s}^{Ns*}=\frac{v}{{k}_{A}}\);
thus \({p}_{p}^{As{\ddag} }<\frac{v}{{k}_{A}}-\left(1+{r}_{s}\right)c<\frac{v}{{k}_{A}}\), and \({p}_{p}^{Ns*}>{p}_{p}^{As*}\) holds, \({p}_{s}^{Ns*}>{p}_{s}^{As*}\) still holds constant.
(3.b.2) When \(\frac{2c\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}{1-2{r}_{F}}<v\le \mathrm{max}\left({v}^{r{\dag}},\frac{2c\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}{1-2{r}_{F}}\right)\), if \(B\le c-\frac{c\sqrt{a(1+{r}_{F})(a-v+a{r}_{F})}}{a(1+{r}_{F})}\), \({p}_{p}^{Ns*}=\frac{v}{{k}_{A}}; {p}_{s}^{Ns*}=\frac{v}{{k}_{A}}\);
and similarly there are \({p}_{p}^{Ns*}>{p}_{p}^{As*}\) and \({p}_{s}^{Ns*}>{p}_{s}^{As*}\). If \(\frac{2\left({c}^{2}\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)+cv{r}_{F}\right)}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}<B\le \frac{cv}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\),
obviously \({p}_{s}^{Ns*}>{p}_{s}^{As*}\), \(\frac{cv-a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(1-{k}_{A}\right)B}{c{k}_{A}}>\frac{cv-2aB\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(1-{k}_{A}\right)}{c{k}_{A}}-\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)c\), and
since \(c-\frac{c\sqrt{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(a-v+a{r}_{F}\right)}}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}<\frac{2\left({c}^{2}\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)+cv{r}_{F}\right)}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\), \(aB\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(2c-B\right)-{c}^{2}v>0\) holds when
i.e., \({p}_{p}^{As{\ddag} }-\left[\frac{cv-2aB\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(1-{k}_{A}\right)}{c{k}_{A}}-\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)c\right]\) is a decreasing function of \({k}_{A}\), and at the point \({k}_{A}=\frac{aB\left(2c-B\right)\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)-{c}^{2}v}{aB\left(2c-B\right)\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)-{c}^{2}v+{c}^{2}(c-B)\left({r}_{s}-{r}_{F}\right)}\), \({p}_{p}^{As{\ddag} }=\frac{cv-2aB\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(1-{k}_{A}\right)}{c{k}_{A}}-\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)c\), therefore when \(\frac{2\left({c}^{2}\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)+cv{r}_{F}\right)}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}<B\le \frac{cv}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\), the comparison results of the equilibrium charges are
(3.b.3) When \(\mathrm{max}\left({v}^{r{\dag}},\frac{2c\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}{1-2{r}_{F}}\right)<v\le a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\), if \(B\le \frac{2\left({c}^{2}\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)+cv{r}_{F}\right)}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\), \({p}_{p}^{Ns*}=\frac{v}{{k}_{A}}; {p}_{s}^{Ns*}=\frac{v}{{k}_{A}}\);
If \(c-\frac{c\sqrt{a(1+{r}_{F})(a-v+a{r}_{F})}}{a(1+{r}_{F})}<B\le \frac{vc}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\), the result of such case is shown in Eq. (B51).
(4.a) \(B>\frac{vc}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\). (4.a.1) When \(v\le \frac{2c\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}{1-2{r}_{F}}\), \({\Pi }_{p}^{Ns*}=0\), \({\Pi }_{p}^{As*}=B-c+v+(B-c-v){r}_{F}-\frac{{v}^{2}}{2a(1+{r}_{F})}\), in the interval of
and \(Z\left(v\right)\) is a concave function of \(v\). \(Z\left(\frac{2c(1+{r}_{F})}{1-2{r}_{F}}\right)=\frac{c(1+{r}_{F})(a\left(1-2{r}_{F}\right)-4c{r}_{F})}{a{(1-2{r}_{F})}^{2}}\), \(Z\left(a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\right)=\frac{1}{2}a(1+{r}_{F})(1-2{r}_{F})\), if \({r}_{F}<0.5\), \(Z\left(\frac{2c(1+{r}_{F})}{1-2{r}_{F}}\right)>0, Z\left(a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\right)>0\), thus \(Z\left(v\right)>0\) holds, i.e., \({\Pi }_{p}^{As*}>0\), at which time \(\frac{{v}^{2}+2a(1+{r}_{F})(c-v+(c+v){r}_{F})}{2a{(1+{r}_{F})}^{2}}<\frac{vc}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\). Besides, \(\frac{\partial {\Pi }_{p}^{Ns*}}{\partial {k}_{A}}>0\) and \({\Pi }_{p}^{Ns*}=0\) at \({k}_{A}=\frac{2v}{3v-2c\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)-2v{r}_{F}}\), thus \({\Pi }_{p}^{Ns*}\ge 0\).
(4.b) \(B\le \frac{vc}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\). (4.b.1) When \(v\le \frac{2c\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}{1-2{r}_{F}}\), and further if \(B\le c-\frac{c\sqrt{a(1+{r}_{F})(a-v+a{r}_{F})}}{a(1+{r}_{F})}\), \({\Pi }_{p}^{Ns*}=0\);
thus there exists \({\hat{k}}_{A}^{{\dag}}=\frac{2{r}_{F}(cv-aB\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}{aB(1-{r}_{F}-2{r}_{F}^{2})}\) such that \({\Pi }_{p}^{As*}\left(\frac{cv-a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(1-{k}_{A}\right)B}{c{k}_{A}}\right)=0\), meanwhile, for \({k}_{A}<{\hat{k}}_{A}^{{\dag}}\), \({\Pi }_{p}^{As*}\left(\frac{cv-a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(1-{k}_{A}\right)B}{c{k}_{A}}\right)<0\), and \({\Pi }_{p}^{As*}\left(\frac{cv-a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(1-{k}_{A}\right)B}{c{k}_{A}}\right)>0\) for \({k}_{A}>{\hat{k}}_{A}^{{\dag}}\). On the other hand,
i.e., \({\Pi }_{p}^{As}\left({p}_{p}^{As{\dag}}\right)\) is an increasing function of \({k}_{A}\), and \(\underset{{k}_{A}\to 0}{\mathrm{lim}}{\Pi }_{p}^{As}\left({p}_{p}^{As{\dag}}\right)=-\infty \ll 0\), so there exists
such that \({\Pi }_{p}^{As}\left({p}_{p}^{As{\dag}}\right)=0\). And \({\Pi }_{p}^{As}\left({p}_{p}^{As{\dag}}\right)<0\) for \({k}_{A}<{\hat{k}}_{A}\), while \({\Pi }_{p}^{As}\left({p}_{p}^{As{\dag}}\right)>0\) if \({k}_{A}>{\hat{k}}_{A}\). Furthermore,
and since \(v+2a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\sqrt{1-\frac{v}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}}-2a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\le 0\), with the assumption \({r}_{s}>{r}_{F}\), \(\frac{\partial {\hat{k}}_{A}}{\partial B}\le 0\) holds, i.e., \({\hat{k}}_{A}\) is a decreasing function of\(B\).
According to the definition of \({\tilde{k}}_{A}\), \({\Pi }_{p}^{As*}\left(\frac{cv-a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(1-{k}_{A}\right)B}{c{k}_{A}}\right)={\Pi }_{p}^{As}\left({p}_{p}^{As{\dag}}\right)\) if \({k}_{A}={\tilde{k}}_{A}\), thus when
thus \({\Pi }_{p}^{As}\left({p}_{p}^{As{\ddag} }\right)\) is an increasing function of \({k}_{A}\) and \(\underset{{k}_{A}\to 0}{\mathrm{lim}}{\Pi }_{p}^{As}\left({p}_{p}^{As{\ddag} }\right)=-\infty \ll 0\), so there exists
such that \({\Pi }_{p}^{As}\left({p}_{p}^{As{\ddag} }\right)=0\), and \({\Pi }_{p}^{As}\left({p}_{p}^{As{\ddag} }\right)\le 0\) for\(0<{k}_{A}\le \mathrm{min}\left({\check{k}}_{A},1\right)\), while \({\Pi }_{p}^{As}\left({p}_{p}^{As{\ddag} }\right)>0\) for \(\mathrm{min}\left({\check{k}}_{A},1\right)<{k}_{A}<1\). And given \(B\), by the definition of the optimal platform charge at this point, we have \({\Pi }_{p}^{As}\left({p}_{p}^{As{\dag}}\right)<{\Pi }_{p}^{As}\left({p}_{p}^{As{\ddag} }\right)\) and thus
(4.b.2) \(\frac{2c\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}{1-2{r}_{F}}<v\le \mathrm{max}\left({v}^{r{\dag}},\frac{2c\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}{1-2{r}_{F}}\right)\). The first case is\(B\le c-\frac{c\sqrt{a(1+{r}_{F})(a-v+a{r}_{F})}}{a(1+{r}_{F})}\), which by the previous analysis yields
the comparison result is \(\left\{\begin{array}{ll}{\Pi }_{p}^{As*}<{\Pi }_{p}^{Ns*},& 0<{k}_{A}<\min\left({\check{k}}_{A},{\hat{k}}_{A}^{{\dag}},1\right)\\ {\Pi }_{p}^{As*}\ge {\Pi }_{p}^{Ns*}, &\min\left({\check{k}}_{A},{\hat{k}}_{A}^{{\dag}},1\right)\le {k}_{A}<1\end{array}\right.\). While \(\frac{2\left({c}^{2}\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)+cv{r}_{F}\right)}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}<B\le \frac{cv}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\),
(5.b) \(B\le \frac{vc}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\). (5.b.1) When \(v\le \frac{2c\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}{1-2{r}_{F}}\), if \(B\le c-\frac{c\sqrt{a(1+{r}_{F})(a-v+a{r}_{F})}}{a(1+{r}_{F})}\) holds, \({\Pi }_{s}^{Ns*}=(1+{r}_{F})B\) and
(5.b.2) When \(\frac{2c\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}{1-2{r}_{F}}<v\le \mathrm{max}\left({v}^{r{\dag}},\frac{2c\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}{1-2{r}_{F}}\right)\), if the seller’s capital satisfy \(B\le c-\frac{c\sqrt{a(1+{r}_{F})(a-v+a{r}_{F})}}{a(1+{r}_{F})}\), then we have
the comparison results are the same as in (5.b.1). And when the condition \(\frac{2\left({c}^{2}\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)+cv{r}_{F}\right)}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}<B\le \frac{cv}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\) holds,
there exists a cut-off point \({k}_{A}^{\iota }\in \left(\mathrm{0,1}\right)\), for \({k}_{A}>{k}_{A}^{\iota }\), \({\Pi }_{s}^{As*}\left({v}^{-}\right)>{\Pi }_{s}^{Ns*}\left(\frac{cv-a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(1-{k}_{A}\right)B}{c{k}_{A}}\right)\). And if \(B<\frac{1}{2}c\left[2+{r}_{F}-\sqrt{\frac{{a(2+{r}_{F})}^{2}-4v}{a}}\right]\),
(5.b.3) When \(\mathrm{max}\left({v}^{r{\dag}},\frac{2c\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}{1-2{r}_{F}}\right)<v\le a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\), if \(B\le \frac{2\left({c}^{2}\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)+cv{r}_{F}\right)}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\), \({\Pi }_{s}^{Ns*}=(1+{r}_{F})B\) and
we can conclude \({\Pi }_{s}^{As*}\left({v}^{-}\right)-{\Pi }_{s}^{Ns*}\left(\frac{cv-a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(1-{k}_{A}\right)B}{c{k}_{A}}\right)\) is a decreasing function of \({k}_{A}\). Since \({\Pi }_{s}^{As*}\left({v}^{-}\right)-{\Pi }_{s}^{Ns*}\left(\frac{cv-a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(1-{k}_{A}\right)B}{c{k}_{A}}\right)=B\left({r}_{s}-{r}_{F}\right)>0\) for \({k}_{A}=1\), \({\Pi }_{s}^{As*}\left({v}^{-}\right)-{\Pi }_{s}^{Ns*}\left(\frac{cv-a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(1-{k}_{A}\right)B}{c{k}_{A}}\right)>0\) is obtained. The comparison results are
when \(\frac{1}{2}c\left[2+{r}_{F}-\sqrt{\frac{{a(2+{r}_{F})}^{2}-4v}{a}}\right]<B\le \frac{cv}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\), the comparison results in Eq. (B58).
By rearranging all the above results, we get Proposition 9.□
When \({k}_{A}^{\varsigma }<{k}_{A}<1\), \({SW}^{As*}-{SW}^{Ns*}\)= \(\frac{(a(1+{r}_{F})-v)(v\left(1-{r}_{F}\right)-c(1+{r}_{F}))}{a(1+{r}_{F})}>0\); while \(0<{k}_{A}\le {k}_{A}^{\varsigma }\), \({SW}^{As*}-{SW}^{Ns*}=v\left(1-{r}_{F}\right)-c\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)-\frac{{v}^{2}{k}_{A}}{2a(1+{r}_{F})}\). Since \(v>\frac{2c(1+{r}_{F})}{1-2{r}_{F}}\), there exist \(a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\ge \frac{2c(1+{r}_{F})}{1-2{r}_{F}}\), i.e., \(a\left(1-2{r}_{F}\right)\ge 2c\), \({SW}^{As*}-{SW}^{Ns*}=v\left(1-{r}_{F}\right)-c\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)-\frac{{v}^{2}{k}_{A}}{2a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}>v\left(1-{r}_{F}\right)-c\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)-\frac{{v}^{2}}{2a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}>0\).
(7.b) When \(B\le \mathrm{min}\left(\frac{2\left({c}^{2}\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)+cv{r}_{F}\right)}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)},\frac{vc}{a\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}\right)\), \({SW}^{Ns*}=(1+{r}_{F})B\) and
If \(0<{k}_{A}<{k}_{A}^{\tau }\), \({SW}^{As*}-{SW}^{Ns*}=\frac{B\left[Ba\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(-{k}_{A}^{2}+2{k}_{A}\left(1-{r}_{F}\right)+2{r}_{F}\right)-2{c}^{2}{k}_{A}(1+{r}_{F})-2cv{r}_{F}\right]}{2{c}^{2}{k}_{A}}\), and \(-{k}_{A}^{2}+2{k}_{A}\left(1-{r}_{F}\right)+2{r}_{F}>0\). Let \(M\left({k}_{A}\right)=Ba\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)\left(-{k}_{A}^{2}+2{k}_{A}\left(1-{r}_{F}\right)+2{r}_{F}\right)-2{c}^{2}{k}_{A}(1+{r}_{F})-2cv{r}_{F}\), \(M\left({k}_{A}\right)\) is a concave function of \({k}_{A}\), and \(M\left(0\right)=2{r}_{F}\left(Ba\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)-cv\right)<0\), \(M\left(1\right)=Ba\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)-2{c}^{2}\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)-2cv{r}_{F}<2\left({c}^{2}\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)+cv{r}_{F}\right)-2{c}^{2}\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)-2cv{r}_{F}=0\), therefore, there exist two points \({k}_{A}^{{\mathcalligra{o}}1},{k}_{A}^{{\mathcalligra{o}}2}\),\(0<{k}_{A}^{{\mathcalligra{o}}1}<{k}_{A}^{{\mathcalligra{o}}2}<1\), such that \(M\left({k}_{A}\right)=0\) and if \(\mathrm{min}\left({k}_{A}^{\tau },{k}_{A}^{{\mathcalligra{o}}1}\right)<{k}_{A}<\mathrm{min}\left({k}_{A}^{\tau },{k}_{A}^{{\mathcalligra{o}}2}\right)\), \(M\left({k}_{A}\right)>0\) holds. Furthermore if \(v>\frac{2c(1+{r}_{F})}{1-2{r}_{F}}\), according to the analysis of (7.a), we can obtain the following results.
is a non-empty set if and only if \(v\ge \frac{2c\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)}{1-2{r}_{F}}\), and at this point there must be \(v>\frac{2c(1+{r}_{F})}{2\left(1-{r}_{F}\right)-{k}_{A}}\). Further, when
\(M\left(0\right)=2{r}_{F}\left(Ba\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)-cv\right)<0\) and \(M\left(1\right)=Ba\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)-2{c}^{2}\left(1+{r}_{F}\right)-2cv{r}_{F}>0\). There exists the unique point \({k}_{A}^{{\mathcalligra{o}}1}\) such that \(M\left({k}_{A}\right)=0\), and \(M\left({k}_{A}\right)<0\) if
According to the definition of the optimal solution of platform profit function, as well as the functions of seller’s profit and consumer surplus, we can get \(SW^{As*} > SW^{Ns*}\) in the range of
, by further sorting and simplification, Proposition 11 is proved.□
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Wei, L., Xie, J., Zhu, W. et al. Pricing of platform service supply chain with dual credit: Can you have the cake and eat it?.
Ann Oper Res321, 589–661 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04960-5