Skip to main content
Log in

A multi-objective competency-based decision support system for the assignment of internal auditors to multiple projects

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Internal audit is an independent function that provides objective assurance and advisory services to business partners in the form of projects. As the skilled human resources, internal auditors play a significant role in ensuring audit quality and thus should be managed properly. However, there are only very few studies on auditor-project assignment problems at the operational level. Also, many studies on general team formation problems neglect the real-life implications of simplifying mathematical models to enable practitioners to understand and implement. To bridge these gaps, this study presents a new integrated two-phase approach to assign internal auditors to multiple projects. In the designed decision support model, a harmonious level index is firstly proposed, measuring the suitability between auditor capability and project characteristics using a simplified fuzzy filter ranking method. Then, Min–Max multi-choice goal programming (MMCGP) model provides the assignment solution that balances internal auditors’ multi-dimensional fit to the projects and their preferences, and thus optimizes the productivity of internal audit projects and staff’s job satisfaction. A real case study is presented to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed model and its solution. The comparison results further show that the proposed model outperforms the manual operations and the exiting approaches in the literature. This research extends the existing literature on auditor assignment problem by developing a flexible decision support tool and a practical classification of auditor competency. The MMCGP approach also provides an ideal staff assignment solution by setting multiple aspiration levels for each goal and balancing the unwanted deviations among goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alizadeh, A., & Yousefi, S. (2019). An integrated Taguchi loss function–fuzzy cognitive map–MCGP with utility function approach for supplier selection problem. Neural Computing and Applications, 31(11), 7595–7614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrade, X. (2021). Tactical audit planning: A survey and classification of mathematical programming models. U. Porto Journal of Engineering, 7(3), 126–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antony, M. (2018). Paradigm shift in employee engagement–A critical analysis on the drivers of employee engagement. International Journal of Information, Business and Management, 10(2), 32–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arias, M., Saavedra, R., Marques, M., Munoz-Gama, J., & Sepúlveda, M. (2018). Human resource allocation in business process management and process mining. Management Decision, 56(2), 376–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, D., Stewart, K., & Anderson, E. (2001). Methods of assigning players to teams: A review and novel approach. Simulation and Gaming, 32(1), 6–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, J. (2010), Core Competencies for Today's Internal Auditors. The Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation.

  • Behrend, J., & Eulerich, M. (2019, July 16). Breaking the Barrier–On the Use of Joint Audits in the Internal Audit Profession. SSRN. Retrieved March 7, 2021, from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3422167

  • Bernroider, E., & Schmöllerl, P. (2013). A technological, organisational, and environmental analysis of decision making methodologies and satisfaction in the context of IT induced business transformations. European Journal of Operational Research, 224(1), 141–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betti, N., Sarens, G., & Poncin, I. (2021). Effects of digitalisation of organisations on internal audit activities and practices. Managerial Auditing Journal, 36(6), 872–888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouajaja, S., & Dridi, N. (2017). A survey on human resource allocation problem and its applications. Operational Research, 17(2), 339–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campêlo, M., & Figueiredo, T. (2021). Integer programming approaches to the multiple team formation problem. Computers & Operations Research, 133, 105354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çanakoğlu, E., & Muter, İ. (2021). Identical parallel machine scheduling with discrete additional resource and an application in audit scheduling. International Journal of Production Research, 59(17), 5321–5336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çanakoğlu, E., Muter, İ, & Adanur, O. (2018). Audit scheduling in banking sector. In A. Fink, A. Fügenschuh, & M. J. Geiger (Eds.), Operations Research Proceedings 2016 (pp. 499–505). Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavdur, F., Sebatli, A., Kose-Kucuk, M., & Rodoplu, C. (2019). A two-phase binary-goal programming-based approach for optimal project-team formation. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 70(4), 689–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. (2007). Multi-choice goal programming. Omega, 35(4), 389–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, T., & Ku, C. (2021). Fuzzy filtering ranking method for multi-criteria decision making. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 156, 107217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1961). Management model and industrial application of linear programming (Vol. 1). John Wiley & Sons Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, R., Huang, C., & Suen, S. (2012). On the optimization of auditor assignment. In X. Qu & Y. Yang (Eds.), Information and Business Intelligence (pp. 617–622). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiang, H. Y., & Lin, B. M. T. (2020). A decision model for human resource allocation in project management of software development. IEEE Access, 8, 38073–38081.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clune, R. R., & Gramling, A. A. (2012). Hiring recent university graduates into internal audit positions: Insights from practicing internal auditors. Current Issues in Auditing, 6(2), A1–A14. https://doi.org/10.2308/ciia-50235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coetzee, P., Erasmus, L. J., & Plant, K. (2015). Global assessment of internal audit competence: Does one size fi t all? Southern African Business Review, 19(2), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, A., Ramos, F., Perkusich, M., Dantas, E., Dilorenzo, E., Chagas, F., Meireles, A., Albuquerque, D., Silva, L., Almeida, H., & Perkusich, A. (2020). Team formation in software engineering: A systematic mapping study. IEEE Access, 8, 145687–145712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, A., Ramos, F., Perkusich, M., Freire, A., Almeida, H., & Perkusich, A. (2018). A search-based software engineering approach to support multiple team formation for scrum projects. The 30th International Conference on Software Engineering & Knowledge Engineering (SEKE 2018), San Francisco, California.

  • De Bruecker, P., Van den Bergh, J., Beliën, J., & Demeulemeester, E. (2015). Workforce planning incorporating skills: State of the art. European Journal of Operational Research, 243(1), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeZoort, T., Doxey, M., & Pollard, T. (2021). Root cause analysis and its effect on auditors’ judgments and decisions in an integrated audit. Contemporary Accounting Research, 38(2), 1204–1230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esgario, J. G., da Silva, I. E., & Krohling, R. A. (2019, March 8). Application of Genetic Algorithms to the Multiple Team Formation Problem. arXiv. Retrieved April 10, 2021, from https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.03523

  • Flavell, R. (1976). A new goal programming formulation. Omega, 4(6), 731–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamayuni, R. (2018). The effect of internal auditor competence and objectivity, and management support on effectiveness of internal audit function and financial reporting quality implications at local government. International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies, 11(3), 248–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamermann, R., Ferreira, L., & Borenstein, D. (2023). Long-term audit staff scheduling and planning: A case study of Brazilian civil aviation authority. Journal of Air Transport Management, 106, 102318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganjavi, O., Aouni, B., & Wang, Z. (2002). Technical note on balanced solutions in goal programming, compromise programming and reference point method. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 53(8), 927–929.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garmendia, A., Elorza, U., Aritzeta, A., & Madinabeitia-Olabarria, D. (2021). High-involvement HRM, job satisfaction and productivity: A two wave longitudinal study of a Spanish retail company. Human Resource Management Journal, 31(1), 341–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenawalt, M. (1997). The internal auditor and the critical thinking process: A closer look. Managerial Auditing Journal, 12(2), 80–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez, J., Astudillo, C., Ballesteros-Pérez, P., Mora-Melià, D., & Candia-Véjar, A. (2016). The multiple team formation problem using sociometry. Computers & Operations Research, 75, 150–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajarolasvadi, H., & Shahhosseini, V. (2020). Assignment of engineers to constructions project teams based on Person-Team Fit. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(15), 2895–2904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, H. (2019). The supplier selection problem of a manufacturing company using the weighted multi-choice goal programming and MINMAX multi-choice goal programming. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 75, 819–836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holness, K., Drury, C., & Batta, R. (2006). A systems view of personnel assignment problems. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 16(3), 285–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosseini, S. M., & Akhavan, P. (2017). A model for project team formation in complex engineering projects under uncertainty: A knowledge-sharing approach. Kybernetes, 46(7), 1131–1157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huemann, M., Keegan, A., & Turner, J. R. (2007). Human resource management in the project-oriented company: A review. International Journal of Project Management, 25(3), 315–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • IIA. (1999). Competency Framework for Internal Auditing. Altamonte Springs, FL: The Institute of Internal Auditors.

  • IIA. (2020). Internal Audit Competency Framework. Lake Mary, FL: The Institute of Internal Auditors.

  • Ishizaka, A., & Siraj, S. (2018). Are multi-criteria decision-making tools useful? An experimental comparative study of three methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 264(2), 462–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jans, M., Alles, M., & Vasarhelyi, M. (2011). Process mining of event logs in internal auditing: a case study. In The 2nd International Symposium on Accounting Information Systems, Rome, Italy.

  • Jaturanonda, C., & Nanthavanij, S. (2011). Analytic-based decision analysis tool for employee-job assignments based on competency and job preference. International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 18(2), 58–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juárez, J., Santos, C., & Brizuela, C. A. (2021). A comprehensive review and a taxonomy proposal of team formation problems. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 54(7), 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karaöz, B. (2016). Redesigning the assignment of internal auditors based on auditor utility. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 4(3), 246–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotb, A., Sangster, A., & Henderson, D. (2014). E-business internal audit: The elephant is still in the room! Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 15(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-10-2012-0072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotb, A., Elbardan, H., & Halabi, H. (2020). Mapping of internal audit research: A post-Enron structured literature review. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33(8), 1969–1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinovi, N., & Savic, G. (2019). Staff assignment to multiple projects based on DEA efficiency. Engineering Economics, 30(2), 163–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Megawaty, M., Hamdat, A., & Aida, N. (2022). Examining linkage leadership style, employee commitment, work motivation, work climate on satisfaction and performance. Golden Ratio of Human Resource Management, 2(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narkchai, S., & Fadzil, F. H. B. (2017). The communication skill on the performance of internal auditors in Thailand public limited company. International Review of Management and Marketing, 7(4), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niknafs, A., Denzinger, J., & Ruhe, G. (2013). A systematic literature review of the personnel assignment problem. In International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, Hong Kong.

  • Nusran, N. (2021). Can leadership style, individual ablity and motivation improve banking internal auditor performance? Point of View Research Accounting and Auditing, 2(1), 100–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paais, M., & Pattiruhu, J. R. (2020). Effect of motivation, leadership, and organizational culture on satisfaction and employee performance. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(8), 577–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petridis, K., Drogalas, G., & Zografidou, E. (2021). Internal auditor selection using a TOPSIS/non-linear programming model. Annals of Operations Research, 296(1), 513–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahmanniyay, F., Yu, A. J., & Seif, J. (2019). A multi-objective multi-stage stochastic model for project team formation under uncertainty in time requirements. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 132, 153–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, J. (2016). The Top 7 Skills CAEs Want. Building the Right Mix of Talent for Your Organization. The Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation.

  • Roussy, M., & Perron, A. (2018). New perspectives in internal audit research: A structured literature review. Accounting Perspectives, 17(3), 345–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seol, I., Sarkis, J., & Lefley, F. (2011). Factor structure of the competency framework for internal auditing (CFIA) skills for entering level internal auditors. International Journal of Auditing, 15(3), 217–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seol, I., Sarkis, J., & Wang, Z. R. (2017). A cross-cultural comparative study of internal auditor skills: UK vs Korea. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 18(3), 341–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Setyaningrum, D., & Kuntadi, C. (2019). The effects of competence, independence, audit work, and communication on the effectiveness of internal audit. Journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy Ventura, 22(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.14414/jebav.v22i1.879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. (2005). Communication skills are critical for internal auditors. Managerial Auditing Journal, 20(5), 513–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Štilić, A., & Puška, A. (2023). Integrating multi-criteria decision-making methods with sustainable engineering: A comprehensive review of current practices. Eng, 4(2), 1536–1549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, F., Norman, C. S., & Vendrzyk, V. P. (2017). Exploring perceptions of data analytics in the internal audit function. Behaviour & Information Technology, 36(11), 1125–1136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., & Kong, S. (2012). Applying genetic algorithms for construction quality auditor assignment in public construction projects. Automation in Construction, 22, 459–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., Ferreira, F., & Chang, C. (2022). Multi-objective competency-based approach to project scheduling and staff assignment: Case study of an internal audit project. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 81, 101182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., Ferreira, F., & Yan, P. (2023). A multi-objective optimization approach for integrated risk-based internal audit planning. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05228-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, T., Huang, S., Huang, S., & Yen, D. (2017). The effect of competencies, team problem-solving ability, and computer audit activity on internal audit performance. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(5), 1133–1148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaghoobi, M., & Tamiz, M. (2007). A method for solving fuzzy goal programming problems based on MINMAX approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 177(3), 1580–1590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yildirim, V., Angün, M., & Öncan, T. (2018). An MILP Model for the Internal Audit Scheduling Problem. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM) (pp. 442–446). IEEE.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is an outcome of the doctoral thesis of the first author, undertaken at the University Institute of Lisbon (ISCTE-IUL), Portugal, and the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (UESTC), P. R. China.

Funding

This work was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71971044) and Major Program of National Social Science Foundation of China (No. 20&ZD084).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pengyu Yan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix A

See Table 

Table 11 Appendix A Auditor-capability matrix (\(M_{kij}\)) and weight corrector (\(w_{kj}^{o}\))

11.

Appendix B

See Table 

Table 12 The weighted and corrected decision matrix (\(N_{kij}\)) and auditor’s suitability (\(H_{ij}\))

12.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, X., Ferreira, F.A.F. & Yan, P. A multi-objective competency-based decision support system for the assignment of internal auditors to multiple projects. Ann Oper Res 338, 303–334 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-024-05855-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-024-05855-3

Keywords