Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Decision analysis on sustainable manufacturing practices: cross country perspective

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increasing concerns about climate change and waste management pressure manufacturers to innovate their practices, focusing on the environment and society without impacting the economic returns. Such concerns brought a new realm to manufacturing, sustainable manufacturing, which is a combination of economy, environment and society. Though several studies have attempted to integrate sustainability in manufacturing successfully, very few studies have been reported on sustainable manufacturing practices. Even these existing studies failed to explore the difference between implementing sustainable manufacturing in different geographical contexts. To fill this gap, this study considers four different geographical context Saudi Arabia, India, Peru and China to understand their preferences of achieving sustainable development in manufacturing through sustainable manufacturing practices. At first, common sustainable manufacturing practices were collected from literature and the same has been evaluated with case industries from Saudi Arabia, India, Peru and China. Totally 15 practices under three different dimensions have been considered in this study. From the obtained results, it can be confounded that “Integrate efficient technologies into core manufacturing system” (SP4) has been identified as key influential practices irrespective of the considered geographies. With the enlighten of these obtained results, practitioners and researchers can understood various in-depth insights on how different nations following different strategies for implementing sustainable development in manufacturing sector. Such clarity improves inhouse policy making which leads to better decision making for faster transition towards sustainable manufacturing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdul Rashid, S. H., Evans, S., & Longhurst, P. (2008). A comparison of four sustainable manufacturing strategies. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 1(3), 214–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal, A., Gupta, S., Jamwal, A., Agrawal, R., Sharma, M., & Dangayach, G. S. (2022). Adoption of smart and sustainable manufacturing practices: An exploratory study of Indian manufacturing companies. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part b: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 236(5), 586–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, S., Wong, K. Y., & Butt, S. I. (2023). Status of sustainable manufacturing practices: Literature review and trends of triple bottom-line-based sustainability assessment methodologies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(15), 43068–43095.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Hakimi, M. A., Al-Swidi, A. K., Gelaidan, H. M., & Mohammed, A. (2022). The influence of green manufacturing practices on the corporate sustainable performance of SMEs under the effect of green organizational culture: A moderated mediation analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 376, 134346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alharbi, S. S. (2024). Gear up for development: The automation advantage for sustainability in manufacturing in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 16(11), 4386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali, S., Kaur, R., Persis, R., Saha, R., Pattusamy, M., & Sreedharan, V. (2023), “Developing a hybrid evaluation approach for the low carbon performance on sustainable manufacturing environment”. Annals of Operation Research, 324(1–2), 249-281.

  • Aljuaid, A. A., Masood, S. A., & Tipu, J. A. (2024). Integrating industry 4.0 for sustainable localized manufacturing to support Saudi vision 2030: An assessment of the Saudi Arabian automotive industry model. Sustainability, 16(12), 5096.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alshehri, S. M. A., Jun, W. X., Shah, S. A. A., & Solangi, Y. A. (2022). Analysis of core risk factors and potential policy options for sustainable supply chain: An MCDM analysis of Saudi Arabia’s manufacturing industry. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(17), 25360–25390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alyahya, M., Aliedan, M., Agag, G., & Abdelmoety, Z. H. (2022). Exploring the link between sustainable development practices, institutional pressures, and green innovation. Sustainability, 14(21), 14312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Zabidi, A., Rehman, A. U., & Alkahtani, M. (2021). An approach to assess sustainable supply chain agility for a manufacturing organization. Sustainability, 13(4), 1752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Zamil, A., & Saudagar, A. K. J. (2020). Drivers and challenges of applying green computing for sustainable agriculture: A case study. Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems, 28, 100264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baeshen, Y., Soomro, Y. A., & Bhutto, M. Y. (2021). Determinants of green innovation to achieve sustainable business performance: Evidence from SMEs. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 767968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barakat, B., Milhem, M., Naji, G. M. A., Alzoraiki, M., Muda, H. B., Ateeq, A., & Abro, Z. (2023). Assessing the impact of green training on sustainable business advantage: Exploring the mediating role of green supply chain practices. Sustainability, 15(19), 14144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhanot, N., Rao, P. V., & Deshmukh, S. G. (2017). An integrated approach for analysing the enablers and barriers of sustainable manufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 4412–4439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ching, N. T., Ghobakhloo, M., Iranmanesh, M., Maroufkhani, P., & Asadi, S. (2022). Industry 4.0 applications for sustainable manufacturing: A systematic literature review and a roadmap to sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 334, 130133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Córdova-Aguirre, L. J., & Ramón-Jerónimo, J. M. (2024). Designing a sustainability assessment framework for Peruvian manufacturing small and medium enterprises applying the stakeholder theory approach. Sustainability, 16(5), 1853.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duan, W., Khurshid, A., Khan, K., & Calin, A. C. (2024). Transforming industry: Investigating 4.0 technologies for sustainable product evolution in china through a novel fuzzy three-way decision-making process. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 200, 123125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, Y., Hu, J., Afshan, S., Irfan, M., Hu, M., & Abbas, S. (2023). Bridging resource disparities for sustainable development: A comparative analysis of resource-rich and resource-scarce countries. Resources Policy, 85, 103981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabus, A., & Fontela, E. (1972). World problems, an invitation to further thought within the framework of DEMATEL. Switzerland, Geneva: Battelle Geneva Research Centre.

  • Gedam, V. V., Raut, R. D., de Sousa, L., Jabbour, A. B., Narkhede, B. E., & Grebinevych, O. (2021). Sustainable manufacturing and green human resources: Critical success factors in the automotive sector. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 1296–1313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghaithan, A., Khan, M., Mohammed, A., & Hadidi, L. (2021). Impact of industry 4.0 and lean manufacturing on the sustainability performance of plastic and petrochemical organizations in Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 13(20), 11252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouda, S. K., & Saranga, H. (2020). Pressure or premium: What works best where? Antecedents and outcomes of sustainable manufacturing practices. International Journal of Production Research, 58(23), 7201–7217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindan, K. (2024). Unlocking the potential of quality as a core marketing strategy in remanufactured circular products: A machine learning enabled multi-theoretical perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 269, 109123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haider, H., AlMarshod, S. Y., AlSaleem, S. S., Ali, A. A. M., Alinizzi, M., Alresheedi, M. T., & Shafiquzzaman, M. (2022). Life cycle assessment of construction and demolition waste management in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(12), 7382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harikannan, N., Vinodh, S., & Antony, J. (2023). Analysis of the relationship among Industry 4.0 technologies, sustainable manufacturing practices and organizational sustainable performance using structural equation modelling. The TQM Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-02-2023-0044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, X., Ping, Q., & Hu, W. (2022). Does digital technology promote the sustainable development of the marine equipment manufacturing industry in China? Marine Policy, 136, 104868.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermundsdottir, F., & Aspelund, A. (2022). Competitive sustainable manufacturing-sustainability strategies, environmental and social innovations, and their effects on firm performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 370, 133474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, K. H. (2023). An exploration of the key determinants for the application of AI-enabled higher education based on a hybrid Soft-computing technique and a DEMATEL approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 212, 118762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam, M. M., Turki, A., Murad, M. W., & Karim, A. (2017). Do sustainable procurement practices improve organizational performance? Sustainability, 9(12), 2281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayaraman, V., Singh, R., & Anandnarayan, A. (2012). Impact of sustainable manufacturing practices on consumer perception and revenue growth: An emerging economy perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 50(5), 1395–1410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ji, K., Liu, X., & Xu, J. (2023). Digital economy and the sustainable development of China’s manufacturing industry: From the perspective of industry performance and green development. Sustainability, 15(6), 5121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiao, Y., Su, M., Ji, C., Yang, S., Zhang, P., Li, C., & Liu, L. (2019). Cleaner production instruments assisting sustainable transition at urban scale: A case study of Dongguan, a typical manufacturing city in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 210, 1449–1461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kannan, D., Gholipour, P., & Bai, C. (2023). Smart manufacturing as a strategic tool to mitigate sustainable manufacturing challenges: A case approach. Annals of Operations Research, 331(1), 543–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kannan, D., Khademolqorani, S., Janatyan, N., & Alavi, S. (2024). Smart waste management 4.0: The transition from a systematic review to an integrated framework. Waste Management, 174, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith, M., Birch, E., Buchoud, N. J., Cardama, M., Cobbett, W., Cohen, M., Elmqvist, T., Espey, J., Hajer, M., Hartmann, G., & Matsumoto, T. (2023). A new urban narrative for sustainable development. Nature Sustainability, 6(2), 115–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, I., Hou, F., Le, H. P., & Ali, S. A. (2021). Do natural resources, urbanization, and value-adding manufacturing affect environmental quality? Evidence from the top ten manufacturing countries. Resources Policy, 72, 102109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppiahraj, K., Bathrinath, S., Venkatesh, V. G., Mani, V., & Shi, Y. (2021). Optimal sustainability assessment method selection: A practitioner perspective. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-03946-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, T., Wang, J., Zhu, Y., & Qu, Z. (2021). Linking economic performance and sustainable operations of China’s manufacturing firms: What role does the government involvement play? Sustainable Cities and Society, 67, 102717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malek, J., & Desai, T. N. (2019a). Interpretive structural modelling based analysis of sustainable manufacturing enablers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 238, 117996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malek, J., & Desai, T. N. (2019b). Prioritization of sustainable manufacturing barriers using best worst method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 226, 589–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mao, Q., Chen, J., Lv, J., Guo, M., & Xie, P. (2023). Selection of plastic solid waste treatment technology based on cumulative prospect theory and fuzzy DEMATEL. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(14), 41505–41536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathiyazhagan, K., Sengupta, S., & Poovazhagan, L. (2018). A decision making trial and evaluation laboratory approach to analyse the challenges to environmentally sustainable manufacturing in Indian automobile industry. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 16, 58–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moldavska, A., & Welo, T. (2019). A Holistic approach to corporate sustainability assessment: Incorporating sustainable development goals into sustainable manufacturing performance evaluation. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 50, 53–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasyiah, T., Masudin, I., Zulfikarijah, F., Kannan, D., Rumijati, A., & Wijaya, R. (2024). Explaining sustainable performance with SEM–FsQCA: The role of traceability systems, knowledge management, Halal SCM practices, and spiritual leadership in small-medium enterprises (SMEs). IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 5691–5705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negash, Y. T., & Filketu, S. A. (2022). A hierarchical framework for the transition to sustainable manufacturing practices: Technical and social developments drive eco-friendly tanning in Ethiopia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 368, 133208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opoku, R. K., Nyamah, E. Y., Nyamah, E. Y., Agyapong, G., & Frimpong, S. E. (2023). Sustainable manufacturing practices and sustainable performance: Evidence from Ghana’s food manufacturing sector. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 9, 100120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pata, U. K., Erdogan, S., & Ozcan, B. (2023). Evaluating the role of the share and intensity of renewable energy for sustainable development in Germany. Journal of Cleaner Production, 421, 138482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimenov, D. Y., Mia, M., Gupta, M. K., Machado, Á. R., Pintaude, G., Unune, D. R., Khanna, N., Khan, A. M., Tomaz, Í., Wojciechowski, S., & Kuntoğlu, M. (2022). Resource saving by optimization and machining environments for sustainable manufacturing: A review and future prospects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 166, 112660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, B. M., Ferreira, F. A., Spahr, R. W., Sunderman, M. A., & Pereira, L. F. (2023). Analyzing causes of urban blight using cognitive mapping and DEMATEL. Annals of Operations Research, 325(2), 1083–1110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porras, J. E. O., Erquínigo, A. M. B., Chávez, T. C. C., Palma, L. M. H., Torres, R. K. M., & Gomez, O. R. T. (2023). Green Lean Six Sigma model for waste reduction of raw material in a nectar manufacturing company of Lima, Peru. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 16(2), 169–185.

  • Qi, Q., Xu, Z., & Rani, P. (2023). Big data analytics challenges to implementing the intelligent Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) systems in sustainable manufacturing operations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 190, 122401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasoolimanesh, S. M., Ramakrishna, S., Hall, C. M., Esfandiar, K., & Seyfi, S. (2023). A systematic scoping review of sustainable tourism indicators in relation to the sustainable development goals. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 31(7), 1497–1517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehman, A. U., Al-Zabidi, A., AlKahtani, M., Umer, U., & Usmani, Y. S. (2020). Assessment of supply chain agility to foster sustainability: Fuzzy-DSS for a Saudi manufacturing organization. Processes, 8(5), 577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seclen-Luna, J. P, Moya-Fernández, P., & Pereira, Á. (2021). Exploring the effects of innovation strategies and size on manufacturing firms’ productivity and environmental impact. Sustainability, 13(6), 3289.

  • Shankar, K. M., Kumar, P. U., & Kannan, D. (2016). Analyzing the drivers of advanced sustainable manufacturing system using AHP approach. Sustainability, 8(8), 824.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheng, X., Chen, L., Yuan, X., Tang, Y., Yuan, Q., Chen, R., Wang, Q., Ma, Q., Zuo, J., & Liu, H. (2023). Green supply chain management for a more sustainable manufacturing industry in China: A critical review. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(2), 1151–1183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shubham, Charan, P., & Murty, L. S. (2018). Organizational adoption of sustainable manufacturing practices in India: Integrating institutional theory and corporate environmental responsibility. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 25(1), 23–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thirupathi, R. M., & Vinodh, S. (2016). Application of interpretive structural modelling and structural equation modelling for analysis of sustainable manufacturing factors in Indian automotive component sector. International Journal of Production Research, 54(22), 6661–6682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaz-Patto, C. M. R. P., Ferreira, F. A. F., Govindan, K., & Ferreira, N. C. (2024). Rethinking urban quality of life: Unveiling causality links using cognitive mapping, neutrosophic logic and dematel. European Journal of Operational Research., 316, 310–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinodh, S., & Joy, D. (2012). Structural equation modeling of sustainable manufacturing practices. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 14, 79–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Wen, Y., & Long, H. (2024). Evaluating the mechanism of AI contribution to decarbonization for sustainable manufacturing in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 472, 143505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, W. W., & Lee, Y. T. (2007). Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(2), 499–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, S., Alsaleh, N., Palaniappan, M., Elfar, A. A., & Ataya, S. (2024a). Enabling customer participation for the implementation of sustainable manufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 440, 140803.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, S., Murugesan, T. M., Elfar, A. A. A., & Durairaj, M. P. R. (2024b). Evaluation of sustainable manufacturing performance–A case illustration with multistakeholder perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 458, 142368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz, I., Erdebilli, B., Naji, M. A., & Mousrij, A. (2023). A Fuzzy DEMATEL framework for maintenance performance improvement: A case of Moroccan chemical industry. Journal of Engineering Research, 11(1), 100019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, H., Qu, Y., & Guo, L. (2023). Critical factors for implementing collection target responsibility in e-waste collection in China: A DEMATEL-ISM analysis. Waste Management, 172, 278–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, S., Geng, X., He, J., & Sun, Y. (2023). Evolution analysis of product service ecosystem based on interval Pythagorean fuzzy DEMATEL-ISM-SD combination model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 421, 138501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahedi, J., Salehi, M., & Moradi, M. (2023). Identifying and classifying the financial resilience measurement indices using intuitive fuzzy DEMATEL. Benchmarking: an International Journal, 30(4), 1300–1321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., & Liu, M. (2024). How to leverage digital sustainability orientation to promote environmentally sustainable practices of manufacturing enterprises in China. Sustainability, 16(12), 5112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, N., & Zhang, W. (2020). Can sustainable operations achieve economic benefit and energy saving for manufacturing industries in China? Annals of Operations Research, 290, 145–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, Q., Liu, X., Wang, W., & Han, S. (2024). A hybrid HFACS model using DEMATEL-ORESTE method with linguistic Z-number for risk analysis of human error factors in the healthcare system. Expert Systems with Applications, 235, 121237.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported and funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU) (grant number IMSIU-RG23063).

Funding

There is no funding for this research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Economics and Management, China University of Petroleum (Huadong), Qingdao, 266431, Shandong, People’s Republic of China

    Yongbo Li

  2. Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), 11432, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    Murugesan Palaniappan, Naser Alsaleh & Abdullah A. Elfar

  3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, PTR Engineering College, Madurai, India

    D. Thresh Kumar

  4. Faculty of Engineering, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt

    Abdullah A. Elfar

  5. School of Business, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC), 15023, Lima, Peru

    Mark Christhian Barrueta Pinto & Adriana Montenegro Torres

Authors
  1. Yongbo Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Murugesan Palaniappan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Naser Alsaleh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. D. Thresh Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Abdullah A. Elfar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mark Christhian Barrueta Pinto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  7. Adriana Montenegro Torres
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Christhian Barrueta Pinto.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Palaniappan, M., Alsaleh, N. et al. Decision analysis on sustainable manufacturing practices: cross country perspective. Ann Oper Res 345, 277–315 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-024-06416-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-024-06416-4

Keywords