Skip to main content
Log in

Locally Type \(\text {FP}_{{\varvec{n}}}\) and \({\varvec{n}}\)-Coherent Categories

  • Published:
Applied Categorical Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study finiteness conditions in Grothendieck categories by introducing the concepts of objects of type \(\textrm{FP}_n\) and studying their closure properties with respect to short exact sequences. This allows us to propose a notion of locally type \(\textrm{FP}_n\) categories as a generalization of locally finitely generated and locally finitely presented categories. We also define and study the injective objects that are Ext-orthogonal to the class of objects of type \(\textrm{FP}_n\), called \(\textrm{FP}_n\)-injective objects, which will be the right half of a complete cotorsion pair. As a generalization of the category of modules over an n-coherent ring, we present the concept of n-coherent categories, which also recovers the notions of locally noetherian and locally coherent categories for \(n = 0, 1\). Such categories will provide a setting in which the \(\textrm{FP}_n\)-injective cotorsion pair is hereditary, and where it is possible to construct (pre)covers by \(\textrm{FP}_n\)-injective objects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Modules over a ring R will be always left R-modules unless otherwise stated.

  2. With a particular exception in the category \({\mathcal {O}}_X\text{- }\textsf{Mod}\) of \({\mathcal {O}}_X\)-modules. Indeed, the notion of finitely generated \({\mathcal {O}}_X\)-modules may be different from that of \({\mathcal {O}}_X\)-modules of type \({{\mathcal {F}}}{{\mathcal {P}}}_0\). For example, in Ueno’s [35, Def. 4.18], an \({\mathcal {O}}_X\)-module \({\mathcal {F}}\) is called finitely generated if for every \(x \in X\) there exists an open set U containing x and a positive integer \(n > 0\) so that sequence of \({\mathcal {O}}_U\)-modules \({\mathcal {O}}^{\oplus n}_U \rightarrow {\mathcal {F}}|_U \rightarrow 0\) is exact. Other authors refer to such \({\mathcal {O}}_X\)-modules as locally finitely generated.

  3. The result is stated and proved for quasi-coherent sheaves of type \(\text {FP}_\infty \), but the arguments are also valid for objects of type \(\text {FP}_n\).

  4. The result is stated and proved for modules, but the arguments carry over to Grothendieck categories. It was recently proved in [7, Prop. 2.10] that the class of \(\text {FP}_n\)-injective objects in a Grothendieck category is closed under coproducts for \(n \ge 1\).

  5. See [40, Lem. 2.1.1] for a proof that works in any abelian category.

  6. Although the proofs given there are for R-modules, they carry over to Grothendieck categories.

  7. Although the argument uses standard techniques, we do not believe it has appeared before in the literature.

  8. As pointed out in [3, Rmk. 4.11], the meaning of “triangulated category” in the previous statement is the classical one (that is, in the sense of Verdier’s [37]), different from the approach to triangulated categories given in [24, Ch. 7], and mentioned in Remark 6.3.

  9. Here, the notation \(U_i \simeq \textrm{Spec}(A_i)\) means that \(U_i\) and \(\textrm{Spec}(A_i)\) are isomorphic as locally ringed spaces.

References

  1. Adámek, J., Rosický, J.: Locally Presentable and Accessible Categories. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 189. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511600579

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Auslander, M.: Coherent functors. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Categorical Algebra, (La Jolla, California, 1965), pp. 189–231. Springer, New York (1966)

  3. Becerril, V., Mendoza, O., Pérez, M., Santiago, V.: Frobenius pairs in abelian categories: Correspondences with cotorsion pairs, exact model categories, and Auslander–Buchweitz contexts. J. Homotopy Relat. Struct. 14(1), 1–50 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40062-018-0208-4

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bourbaki, N.: Elements of Mathematics. Commutative Algebra. Addison–Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, Mass, Hermann, Paris, (1972). Translated from the French

  5. Bravo, D., Estrada, S., Iacob, A.: \({\rm FP}_n\)-injective, \({\rm FP}_n\)-flat covers and preenvelopes, and Gorenstein AC-flat covers. Algebra Colloq. 25(2), 319–334 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1142/S1005386718000226

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Bravo, D., Gillespie, J., Hovey, M.: The Stable Module Category of a General Ring. Preprint (2014). arXiv:1405.5768

  7. Bravo, D., Odabaşı, S., Parra, C.E., Pérez, M.A.: Torsion and torsion-free classes from objects of finite type in Grothendieck categories. J. Algebra 608, 412–444 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalgebra.2022.05.029

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Bravo, D., Parra, C.: Torsion pairs over n-hereditary rings. Commun. Algebra 47(5), 1892–1907 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/00927872.2018.1524005

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Bravo, D., Pérez, M.: Finiteness conditions and cotorsion pairs. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 221(6), 1249–1267 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpaa.2016.09.008

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Christensen, L.W., Estrada, S., Iacob, A.: A Zariski-local notion of \({ F}\)-total acyclicity for complexes of sheaves. Quaest. Math. 40(2), 197–214 (2017). https://doi.org/10.2989/16073606.2017.1283545

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Costa, D.L.: Parameterizing families of non-Noetherian rings. Commun. Algebra 22(10), 3997–4011 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1080/00927879408825061

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Crivei, S., Prest, M., Torrecillas, B.: Covers in finitely accessible categories. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 138(4), 1213–1221 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-09-10178-8

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Enochs, E.E., Estrada, S., Odabaşı, S.: Pure injective and absolutely pure sheaves. Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc. 59(3), 623–640 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0013091515000462

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Estrada, S., Gillespie, J.: Notes on Absolutely Clean Quasi-Coherent Sheaves. Private Communication

  15. Estrada, S., Gillespie, J.: The projective stable category of a coherent scheme. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. Sect. A 149(1), 15–43 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0308210517000385

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Gillespie, J.: Kaplansky classes and derived categories. Math. Z. 257(4), 811–843 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00209-007-0148-x

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Gillespie, J.: Model structures on exact categories. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 215(12), 2892–2902 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpaa.2011.04.010

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Gillespie, J.: Models for homotopy categories of injectives and Gorenstein injectives. Commun. Algebra 45(6), 2520–2545 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/00927872.2016.1233215

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Glaz, S.: Commutative Coherent Rings. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1371. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1989)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Göbel, R., Trlifaj, J.: Approximations and Endomorphism Algebras of Modules, De Gruyter Expositions in Mathematics, vol. 41. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin (2006). https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199727

  21. Görtz, U., Wedhorn, T.: Algebraic Geometry I. Schemes with Examples and Exercises. Advanced Lectures in Mathematics. Vieweg + Teubner, Wiesbaden (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8348-9722-0

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Hartshorne, R.: Algebraic Geometry. Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg (1977) Graduate Texts in Mathematics, No. 52

  23. Herzog, I.: The Ziegler spectrum of a locally coherent Grothendieck category. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 74(3), 503–558 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1112/S002461159700018X

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Hovey, M.: Model Categories, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 63. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hovey, M.: Cotorsion pairs, model category structures, and representation theory. Math. Z. 241(3), 553–592 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00209-002-0431-9

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Jasso, G.: \(n\)-Abelian and \(n\)-exact categories. Math. Z. 283(3–4), 703–759 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00209-016-1619-8

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Lang, S.: Algebra, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 211, 3rd edn. Springer-Verlag, New York (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0041-0

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Mitchell, B.: Rings with several objects. Adv. Math. 8, 1–161 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8708(72)90002-3

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Parra, C.E., Saorín, M., Virili, S.: Locally Finitely Presented and Coherent Hearts. Rev. Mat. Iberoam. (2023). https://ems.press/journals/rmi/articles/9033113

  30. Saorín, M., Šťovíček, J.: On exact categories and applications to triangulated adjoints and model structures. Adv. Math. 228(2), 968–1007 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2011.05.025

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Skljarenko, E.G.: Pure and finitely presentable modules, duality homomorphisms and the coherence property of a ring. Math. USSR-Sbornik 34, 173 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1070/SM1978v034n02ABEH001155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Stenström, B.: Coherent rings and \(F\, P\)-injective modules. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 2(2), 323–329 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1112/jlms/s2-2.2.323

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Stenström, B.: Rings of Quotients. Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg (1975) Die Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, Band 217, An Introduction to Methods of Ring Theory

  34. Šťovíček, J.: On Purity and Applications to Coderived and Singularity Categories. Preprint (2014). arXiv:1412.1615

  35. Ueno, K.: Algebraic Geometry. 2, Translations of Mathematical Monographs, vol. 197. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI (2001) Sheaves and Cohomology, Translated from the 1997 Japanese Original by Goro Kato, Iwanami Series in Modern Mathematics

  36. Vasconcelos, W.V.: The Rings of Dimension Two. Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 22. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York-Basel (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Verdier, J.L.: Des catégories dérivées des catégories abéliennes. Astérisque (239), xii+253 pp.: 1996. With a preface by Luc Illusie, Edited and with a note by Georges Maltsiniotis (1997)

  38. Weibel, C.A.: An Introduction to Homological Algebra, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 38. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139644136

    Book  Google Scholar 

  39. Wisbauer, R.: Foundations of Module and Ring Theory: A Handbook for Study and Research. Revised and Updated Engl. Ed., Revised and Updated Engl. Ed. Edn. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Philadelphia etc. (1991)

  40. Xu, J.: Flat Covers of Modules. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1634. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Yang, G., Liu, Z., Liang, L.: Ding projective and Ding injective modules. Algebra Colloq. 20(4), 601–612 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1142/S1005386713000576

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhao, T., Pérez, M.A.: Relative FP-injective and FP-flat complexes and their model structures. Commun. Algebra 47(4), 1708–1730 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/00927872.2018.1514618

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors want to thank the anonymous referee for the thorough revision of the manuscript. Her/his suggestions have impacted favorably in the presentation of the current version of our work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco A. Pérez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by H. Krause.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The first author was partially funded by CONICYT/FONDECYT/REGULAR/1180888. The third author was partially supported by the following grants and institutions: postdoctoral fellowship (Comisión Académica de Posgrado - Universidad de la República), Fondo Vaz Ferreira # II/FVF/2019/135 (funds are given by the Dirección Nacional de Innovación, Ciencia y Tecnología - Ministerio de Educación y Cultura, and administered through Fundación Julio Ricaldoni), Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación (ANII), and Programa de Desarrollo de las Ciencias Básicas (PEDECIBA).

Appendix: A Some Finiteness Conditions for Quasi-Coherent Sheaves

Appendix: A Some Finiteness Conditions for Quasi-Coherent Sheaves

We now study some conditions for certain schemes X under which \(\mathfrak {Qcoh}(X)\) is an n-coherent category. We need X to be a semi-separated scheme, that is, X has an open affine covering \(\{ U_i \}_{i \in I}\) such that \(U_i \cap U_j\) is also an open affine for every \(i, j \in I\). It will be useful to consider for each open affine \(U \subseteq X\), the inclusion \(\iota ^U :U \hookrightarrow X\) and the induced direct image functor \(\iota ^U_*:\mathfrak {Qcoh}(U) \longrightarrow \mathfrak {Qcoh}(X)\). Notice that this functor preserves quasi-coherence since X is semi-separated. By [22, Coroll. 5.5], we have a natural isomorphism

$$\begin{aligned} \text {Hom}_{{\mathcal {O}}_X(U)}({\mathscr {H}}(U),E)&\cong \textrm{Hom}_{\mathfrak {Qcoh}(X)}({\mathscr {H}},\iota ^U_*(E)) \end{aligned}$$

for every \({\mathscr {H}} \in \mathfrak {Qcoh}(X)\) and \(E \in {\mathcal {O}}_X(U)\text{- }\textsf{Mod}\). From this, we can note that E is an injective module over \({\mathcal {O}}_X(U)\) if, and only if, \(\iota ^U_*(E)\) is an injective quasi-coherent sheaf over X. Thus, we can obtain the following natural isomorphism for every \(k \ge 0\):

$$\begin{aligned} \text {Ext}^k_{{\mathcal {O}}_X(U)}({\mathscr {H}}(U),E)&\cong \textrm{Ext}^k_{\mathfrak {Qcoh}(X)}({\mathscr {H}},\iota ^U_*(E)). \end{aligned}$$

Proposition 6.7

Let X be a quasi-compact and semi-separated scheme with a semi-separated affine open cover \(\{ U_1 \simeq \textrm{Spec}(A_1), \dots , U_m \simeq \textrm{Spec}(A_m) \}\)Footnote 9 such that each \(A_i\) is a commutative n-coherent ring. Then, every quasi-coherent sheaf over X of type \(\text {FP}_n\) is of type \(\text {FP}_\infty \). In particular, if X is a coherent scheme in the sense of [15, Def. 6.8], then \(\mathfrak {Qcoh}(X)\) is a coherent category.

Proof

Let \({\mathscr {F}} \in \mathfrak {Qcoh}(X)\) be of type \(\text {FP}_n\). We show that \(\text {Ext}^k_{\mathfrak {Qcoh}(X)}({\mathscr {F}},-)\) preserves direct limits for every \(k \ge 0\). Let \(1 \le i \le m\) and consider the inclusion \(\iota ^{U_i} :U_i \hookrightarrow X\). By Example 3.3, we know that \({\mathscr {F}}(U_i)\) is an \(A_i\)-module of type \(\text {FP}_n\). Since \(A_i\) is an n-coherent ring, \(A_i\text{- }\textsf{Mod}\) is an n-coherent category, and so \({\mathscr {F}}(U_i)\) is an \(A_i\)-module of type \(\text {FP}_\infty \), meaning that \(\text {Ext}^k_{A_i}({\mathscr {F}}(U_i),-)\) preserves direct limits for every \(k \ge 0\).

We now use the previous paragraph to show that \({\mathscr {F}}\) is of type \(\text {FP}_\infty \). From \(\{ U_1, \dots , U_m \}\), it is possible to construct a semi-separated affine basis \({\mathcal {B}} = \{ V_\alpha \}_{\alpha \in \Lambda }\) formed by those open affine subsets \(V_\alpha \subseteq X\) contained in some \(U_i\). We show that each \({\mathscr {F}}(V_\alpha )\) is an \({\mathcal {O}}_X(V_\alpha )\)-module of type \(\text {FP}_\infty \). Suppose \(V_\alpha \) is contained in some \(U_{i(\alpha )}\), and consider the inclusion \(j :V_\alpha \hookrightarrow U_{i(\alpha )}\). Since \(V_\alpha \) is affine, we have a natural isomorphism

$$\begin{aligned} \textrm{Ext}^k_{{\mathcal {O}}_X(V_\alpha )}({\mathscr {F}}(V_\alpha ),-) \cong \textrm{Ext}^k_{\mathfrak {Qcoh}(U_{i(\alpha )})}({\mathscr {F}}|_{U_{i(\alpha )}},j_*(-)) \end{aligned}$$

where \(j_*:\mathfrak {Qcoh}(V_\alpha ) \longrightarrow \mathfrak {Qcoh}(U_{i(\alpha )})\) preserves direct limits. Since \({\mathscr {F}}(U_{i(\alpha )})\) is an \({\mathcal {O}}_X(U_{i(\alpha )})\)-module of type \(\text {FP}_\infty \) and \({\mathcal {O}}_X(U_{i(\alpha )})\text{- }\textsf{Mod}\) is equivalent to \(\mathfrak {Qcoh}(U_{i(\alpha )})\), we have that \({\mathscr {F}}|_{U_{i(\alpha )}}\) is a quasi-coherent sheaf over \(U_{i(\alpha )}\) of type \(\text {FP}_\infty \), that is, \(\textrm{Ext}^k_{\mathfrak {Qcoh}(U_{i(\alpha )})}({\mathscr {F}}|_{U_{i(\alpha )}}, j_*(-))\) preserves direct limits for every \(k \ge 0\). It follows that \(\textrm{Ext}^k_{{\mathcal {O}}_X(V_\alpha )}({\mathscr {F}}(V_\alpha ),-)\) preserves direct limits for every \(k \ge 0\), and thus \({\mathscr {F}}(V_\alpha )\) is of type \(\text {FP}_\infty \) for every \(V_\alpha \) in the semi-separated affine basis \({\mathcal {B}}\). Applying [14, Prop. 2.3], we have that \({\mathscr {F}} \in \mathfrak {Qcoh}(X)\) is of type \(\text {FP}_\infty \).

For the last assertion, recall that a scheme X with structure sheaf \({\mathcal {O}}_X\) is coherent if it is quasi-compact and \({\mathcal {O}}_X(U)\) is a commutative coherent ring for every open affine \(U \subseteq X\). This implies that there exists an open affine finite cover \(\{ U_1, \dots , U_m \}\) of X such that \({\mathcal {O}}_X(U_i)\) is a coherent ring, since being locally coherent as a scheme is a Zariski-local notion due to Christensen et al. [10, Prop. 3.7]. \(\square \)

Corollary 6.8

Let A be a commutative ring and \(X = {\mathbb {P}}^1(A)\) be the projective line over A. If the polynomial ring A[x] is n-coherent, then \(\mathfrak {Qcoh}(X)\) is an n-coherent category.

Proof

By [14, Coroll. 2.5], we know that \(\mathfrak {Qcoh}(X)\) is a locally type \(\text {FP}_\infty \) category with semi-separated cover \(\{ U_0, U_1 \}\), where \(U_0 := D_+(x_0) = \textrm{Spec}(A[x_0 / x_1])\) and \(U_1 := D_+(x_1) = \textrm{Spec}(A[x_1 / x_0])\) (see [21, §3.6]). By hypothesis, we know that both \(A[x_0 / x_1]\) and \(A[x_1 / x_0]\) are n-coherent rings. So it follows by the previous proposition that the equality \({{\mathcal {F}}}{{\mathcal {P}}}_n = {{\mathcal {F}}}{{\mathcal {P}}}_\infty \) holds in \(\mathfrak {Qcoh}(X)\). The result then follows. \(\square \)

Example 6.9

The case \(n = 0\) in Corollary 6.8 yields a reformulation of Hilbert’s basis theorem in terms of locally noetherian categories. Namely, if A is a noetherian commutative ring, then so is A[x], and hence \(\mathfrak {Qcoh}({\mathbb {P}}^1(A))\) is a locally noetherian category.

For the case \(n \ge 1\), there is no guarantee that A[x] turns out to be an n-coherent ring if A is n-coherent. For instance, if we set \(n = 1\) we have the notion of stably coherent rings: those coherent rings A such that every polynomial ring \(A[x_1, \dots , x_m]\) is also coherent for \(m \ge 1\) (see for instance Glaz’s book [19, §7.3]). Not every coherent ring is stably coherent. In [19, §7.3.13] the author constructs a commutative coherent ring of weak dimension 2 which is not stably coherent, while in [19, Thm. 7.3.14] it is proved that every commutative coherent ring of global dimension 2 is stably coherent.

We bring from the literature another example of a ring satisfying the condition of Corollary 6.8. For, recall that a ring R is called an (nd)-ring (where n and d are nonnegative integers) if every R-module of type \(\text {FP}_n\) has projective dimension at most d. Consider the commutative ring A presented in Vasconcelos’ [36, Ex. 1.3 (b)]. This is a noncoherent ring with weak dimension 1, which is also (2, 1)-coherent. By Costa’s [11, Thm. 2.2], A is 2-coherent. On the other hand, in [36, Ex. 8.16] it is proven that A[x] is a (2, 2)-ring, and again by [11, Thm. 2.2] we have that A[x] is 2-coherent.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bravo, D., Gillespie, J. & Pérez, M.A. Locally Type \(\text {FP}_{{\varvec{n}}}\) and \({\varvec{n}}\)-Coherent Categories. Appl Categor Struct 31, 16 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10485-023-09709-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10485-023-09709-0

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation