Abstract
Employing a probabilistic student model in a scientific inquiry learning environment often presents two challenges. First, what constitute the appropriate variables for modeling scientific inquiry skills in such a learning environment, considering the fact that it practices exploratory learning approach? Following exploratory learning approach, students are granted the freedom to navigate from one GUI to another. Second, do causal dependencies exist between the identified variables, and if they do, how should they be defined? To tackle the challenges, this research work attempted the Bayesian Networks framework. Leveraging on the framework, two student models were constructed to predict the acquisition of scientific inquiry skills for INQPRO, a scientific inquiry learning environment developed in this research work. The student models can be differentiated by the variables they modeled and the causal dependencies they encoded. An on-field evaluation involving 101 students was performed to assess the most appropriate structure of the INQPRO’s student model. To ensure fairness in model comparison, the same Dynamic Bayesian Network (DBN) construction approach was employed. Lastly, this paper highlights the properties of the student model that provide optimal results for modeling scientific inquiry skill acquisition in INQPRO.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Horvitz E, Breese J, Heckerman D, Hovel D, Rommelse K (1998) The Lumiere project: Bayesian user modeling for inferring the goals and needs of software users. In: Proceedings of 14th conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence
Horvitz E, Jacobs A, Hovel D (1999) Attention-sensitive alerting. In: Proceedings of UAI 1999. pp 305–313
Ardissono L, Goy A (2000) Tailoring the interaction with users in web stores. J User Model User-Adapt Int 10(4): 251–303
Bunt A, Conati C (2003) Probabilistic student modelling to improve exploratory behaviour. J User Model User-Adapt Int 13(3): 269–309
Conati C (2002) Probabilistic assessment of user’s emotions in educational games. J Appl Artif Intell 16(7–8): 555–575
Ting CY, Phon-Amnuaisuk S, Chong YK (2008) Modeling and intervening across time in scientific inquiry exploratory learning environment. J Educ Tech Soc 11(3): 239–258
Murray RC, VanLehn K, Mostow J (2004) Looking ahead to select tutorial actions: a decision-theoretic approach. J Artif Intell Educ 14(3–4): 235–278
Pek P, Poh KL (2005) Making decisions in an intelligent tutoring system. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 4(2): 207–233
Paolucci M, Suthers D, Weiner A (1996) Automated advice giving strategies for scientific inquiry. In: Frasson C, Gauthier G, Lesgold A (eds) Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on intelligent tutoring systems
Linn MC (2000) Designing the knowledge integration environment. Int J Sci Educ 22(8): 781–796
Reiser BJ, Tabak I, Sandoval WA, Smith B, Steinmuller F, Leone TJ (2001) BGuILE: strategic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry in biology classrooms. In: Carver SM, Klahr D (eds) Cognition and instruction: twenty five years of progress. Erlbaum, Mahvah
Veermans KH, Van Joolingen WR (2004) Combining heuristics and formal methods in a tool for supporting simulation-based discovery learning. Lect Notes Comput Sci 3220:217–226
Pryor A, Soloway E (1997) Foundation of science: using technology to support authentic science learning. http://hi-ce.eecs.umich.edu/papers/
Dragon T, Woolf BP, Marshall D, Murray T (2006) Coaching within a domain independent inquiry environment. Lect Notes Comput Sci 4053:144–153
Shute J V, Glaser R (1990) A large-scale evaluation of an intelligent discovery world: Smithtown. Interact Learn Environ 1:51–77
Jitnah N (1993) Bayesian poker. Honours thesis, Dept. of Computer Science. Monash University
Kennett R, Korb K, Nicholson A (2001) Seabreeze prediction using Bayesian networks. In: Proceedings of PAKDD 2001, pp 148–153
Spirtes P, Glymour C, Scheines, R (1993) Causation, Prediction and search. In: Lecture notes in statistics. Springer, Heidelberg
Wallace CS, Korb KB (1999) Learning linear causal models by MML sampling. In: Gammerman A (ed) Causal models and intelligent data management. Springer, Heidelberg
Kjaerulff U, Madsen A (2007) Bayesian networks and influence diagrams: a guide to construction and analysis. Springer, New York
Pearl J (1988) Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo
Ting CY, Arshad MY (2000) Penggunaan simulasi komputer bagi merealisasikan fenomena tidak sahih: Satu alternative mewujudkan konflik kognitif dalam pembelajaran sains. J Pendidik Univ Teknol Malays 6(1):1–21
Chi MT, Roscoe RD (2002) The processes and challenges of conceptual change. In: Limon M, Mason L (eds) Reconsidering conceptual change: issues in theory and practice. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 3–27
Van der Gaag LC, Renooij S, Witteman CLM, Aleman BMP, Taal BG (1999) How to elicit many probabilities. In: Proceedings of the fifteenth conference on uncertainties in artificial intelligence, pp 647–654
Druzdel MJ, Van der Gaag LC (2000) Building Bayesian networks: where do the numbers come from? IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 12:481–486
VanLehn K (1996) Conceptual and meta learning during coached problem solving. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference intelligent tutoring systems, Montreal, Canada
Schafer R, Weyrath T (1997) Assessing temporally variable user properties with dynamic Bayesian networks. In: Proceedings of the sixth international conference UM97, pp 377–388
Ting CY, Phon-Amnuaisuk S (2009) Optimal dynamic decision network model for scientific inquiry learning environment. Appl Intell, doi: 10.1007/s10489-009-0174-y
Ting CY, Phon-Amnuaisuk S (2009) Log data approach to acquisition of optimal Bayesian learner model. Am J Appl Sci 6(5):913–921
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ting, CY., Phon-Amnuaisuk, S. Properties of Bayesian student model for INQPRO. Appl Intell 36, 391–406 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-010-0267-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-010-0267-7