Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Vision-based rock-type classification of limestone using multi-class support vector machine

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rock-type classification is a challenging and difficult job due to the heterogeneous properties of rocks. In this paper, an image-based rock-type analysis and classification method is proposed. The study was conducted at a limestone mine in western India using stratified random sampling from a case study mine. The analysis of collected sample images was performed in laboratory. Color, morphology, and textural features were extracted from the captured image and a total of 189 features were recorded. The multi-class support vector machine (SVM) algorithm was then applied for rock-type classification. The hyper-parameters and the number of input features of the SVM model were selected by genetic algorithm. The results revealed that the SVM model performed best when 40 features were selected out of the 189 extracted features. The results demonstrated that the overall accuracy of the proposed technique for rock type classification is 96.2 %. A comparative study shows that the proposed SVM model performed better than a competing neural network model in this case study mine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Donskoi E, Suthers S, Fradd S, Young J, Campbell J, Raynlyn T, Clout J (2007) Utilization of optical image analysis and automatic texture classification for iron ore particle characterization. Miner Eng 20(5):461–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Perez CA, Estévez PA, Vera PA, Castillo LE, Aravena CM, Schulz DA, Medina LE (2011) Ore grade estimation by feature selection and voting using boundary detection in digital image analysis. Int J Miner Process 101(1–4):28–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kulatilake PHSW, Hudaverdi T, Wu Q (2012) New prediction models for mean particle size in rock blast fragmentation. Geotech Geolog Eng 30(3):665–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Singh N, Singh TN, Tiwary A, Sarkar KM (2010) Textural identification of basaltic rock mass using image processing and neural network. Comput Geosci 14(2):301–310

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Tessier J, Duchesne C, Bartolacci G (2007) A machine vision approach to on-line estimation of run-of-mine ore composition on conveyor belts. Miner Eng 20(12):1129–1144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Remy N, Boucher A, Wu J (2009) Applied geostatistics with SGeMs: a users’s guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Perez C, Casali A, Gonzalez G, Vallebuona G, Vargas R (1999) Lithological composition sensor based on digital image feature extraction, genetic selection of features and neural classification. In: International conference on information intelligence and systems (ICIIS’99), p 236

    Google Scholar 

  8. Casali G, Vallebuona C, Pérez G, Vargas R (2000) Lithological composition and ore grindability sensors, based on image analysis. In: Proc. of the XXI IMPC, Rome, p A1(9-16)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Singh V, Rao SM (2005) Application of image processing and radial basis neural network techniques for ore sorting and ore classification. Miner Eng 18:1412–1420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lepisto L, Kunttu I, Visa A (2005) Rock image classification using color features in Gabor space. J Electron Imaging 14(4):28–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hunter GC, McDermott C, Miles NJ, Singh A, Scoble MJ (1990) A review of image analysis techniques for measuring blast fragmentation. Min Sci Technol 11:19–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang W (2008) Rock particle image segmentation and systems in pattern recognition. In: Yin P-Y (ed) Pattern recognition techniques, technology and applications. InTech, Rijeka, pp 197–226

    Google Scholar 

  13. Salinas RA, Raff U, Farfan C (2005) Automated estimation of rock fragment distributions using computer vision and its application in mining. IEE Proc, Vis Image Signal Process 152(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Petersen K, Aldrich C, Vandeventer JSJ (1998) Analysis of ore particles based on textural pattern recognition. Miner Eng 11:959–977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kachanubal T, Udomhunsakul S (2008) Rock textures classification based on textural and spectral features. Int J Comput Intell 4:240–246

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lin CL, Yen YK, Miller JD (1993) Evaluation of a pc image- based on-line coarse particle size analyzer. In: Emerging computer techniques for the minerals industry, society for mining, metallurgy, and exploration, inc, Littleton, Colorado, pp 201–210

    Google Scholar 

  17. Steppe JM, Bauer KW, Rogers SK (1996) Integrated feature and architecture selection. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 7:1007–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Duda RO, Hart PE (2000) Pattern classification. Wiley-Interscience, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chatterjee S, Bhattacherjee A, Samanta B, Pal SK (2008) Rock-type classification of an iron ore deposit using digital image analysis technique. Int J Min Miner Eng 1:22–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chatterjee S, Bhattacherjee A, Samanta B, Pal SK (2009) Image-based quality monitoring system of limestone ore grades. Comput Ind 61:391–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen X (2003) An improved branch and bound algorithm for feature selection. Pattern Recognit Lett 24(12):1925–1933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Somol P, Pudil P, Kittler J (2004) Fast branch & bound algorithms for optimal feature selection. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 26(7):900–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hong J, Cho S (2006) Efficient huge-scale feature selection with speciated genetic algorithm. Pattern Recognit Lett 27:143–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Osma-Ruiz V, Godino-Llorente JI, Sáenz-Lechón N, Gómez-Vilda P (2007) An improved watershed algorithm based on efficient computation of shortest paths. Pattern Recognit 40(3):1078–1090

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Gonzalez RC, Woods RE, Eddins SL (2004) Segmentation using the watershed transform. In: Digital image processing using MATLAB. Pearson Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ng HF (2006) Automatic thresholding for defect detection. Pattern Recognit Lett 27(14):1644–1649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Solomon C, Breckon T (2011) Fundamentals of digital image processing: a practical approach with examples in Matlab, E-book. Willey, New York

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cuisenaire O (2006) Locally adaptable mathematical morphology using distance transformations. Pattern Recognit 39(3):405–416

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Otsu N (1979) A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 9:62–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cuevas E, Sención F, Zaldivar D, Pérez-Cisneros M, Sossa H (2012) A multi-threshold segmentation approach based on artificial bee colony optimization. Appl Intell 37(3):321–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Saha S, Bandyopadhyay S (2011) Automatic MR brain image segmentation using a multiseed based multiobjective clustering approach. Appl Intell 35(3):411–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Haralick RM, Shapiro LG (1992) Computer and robot vision 1 & 2. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  33. Chatterjee S, Bhattacherjee A (2011) Genetic Algorithms for feature selection of image analysis-based quality monitoring model: an application to an iron mine. Eng Appl Artif Intell 24(5):786–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Huang YL, Chen DR, Jiang YR, Kuo SJ, Wu HK, Moon WK (2008) Computer-aided diagnosis using morphological features for classifying breast lesions on ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 32:565–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lefkaditis D, Tsirigotis G (2009) Morphological feature selection and neural classification for electronic components. J Eng Sci Technol Rev 2(1):151–156

    Google Scholar 

  36. McNitt-Gray MF, Huang HK, Sayre JW (1995) Feature selection in the pattern classification problem of digital chest radiograph segmentation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 14(3):537–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zucker SW, Terzopoulos D (1980) Finding structure in co-occurrence matrices for texture analysis. Comput Graph Image Process 12:286–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Haralick RM (1979) Statistical and structural approaches to texture. Proc IEEE 67(5):786–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Galloway MM (1975) Texture analysis using gray level run lengths. Comput Graph Image Process 4:172–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Chu A, Sehgal CM, Greenleaf JF (1990) Use of gray value distribution of run lengths for texture analysis. Pattern Recognit Lett 11(6):415–420

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Dasarathy BR, Holder EB (1991) Image characterizations based on joint gray-level run-length distributions. Pattern Recognit Lett 12:497–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Vapnik VN (1995) The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Dioşan L, Rogozan A, Pecuchet JP (2012) Improving classification performance of Support Vector Machine by genetically optimising kernel shape and hyper-parameters. Appl Intell 36(2):280–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lee LH, Wan CH, Rajkumar R, Isa D (2012) An enhanced Support Vector Machine classification framework by using Euclidean distance function for text document categorization. Appl Intell 37(1):80–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Rifkin R, Mukherjee S, Tamayo P, Ramaswamy S, Yeang CH, Angelo M, Reich M, Poggio T, Lander ES, Golub TR, Mesirov JP (2003) An analytical method for multi-class molecular cancer classification. SIAM Rev 45:706–723

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Li Y, Zeng X (2010) Sequential multi-criteria feature selection algorithm based on agent genetic algorithm. Appl Intell 33(2):117–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Vinh LT, Lee S, Park YT, d’Auriol BJ (2012) A novel feature selection method based on normalized mutual information. Appl Intell 37(1):100–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. Congdon CB (1995) A comparison of genetic algorithm and other machine learning systems on a complex classification task from common disease research. PhD thesis, Computer Science and Engineering Division, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

  50. Ranawana R, Palade V (2005) MVGen—ensemble learning for MCS majority voting with a genetic algorithm. Internal Report, Oxford University Computing Laboratory

  51. Chatterjee S (2006) Geostatistical and image-based quality control models for indian mineral industry. Unpublished PhD Thesis dissertation, IIT Kharagpur, India

  52. Haykin S (1999) Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation. Prentice Hall, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. Kim K, Ahn H (2012) Simultaneous optimization of artificial neural networks for financial forecasting. Appl Intell 36(4):887–898

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  54. Nekoukar V, Beheshti MTH (2010) A local linear radial basis function neural network for financial time-series forecasting. Appl Intell 33(3):352–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Mining Engineering, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Orissa, 769008, India

    Snehamoy Chatterjee

Authors
  1. Snehamoy Chatterjee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Snehamoy Chatterjee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chatterjee, S. Vision-based rock-type classification of limestone using multi-class support vector machine. Appl Intell 39, 14–27 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-012-0391-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-012-0391-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation