Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of individual and combined ANN models for prediction of air and dew point temperature

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Predicted air and dew point temperatures can be valuable in decision making in many areas including protecting crops from damage, avoiding heat stress on animals and humans, and in planning related to energy management. Current web-based artificial neural network (ANN) models on the Automated Environment Monitoring Network (AEMN) in Georgia predict hourly air and dew point temperature for twelve prediction horizons, using 24 models. The observed air temperature may approach the observed dew point temperature, but never goes below it. Current web based ANN models have prediction errors which, when the air and dew point temperatures are close, may cause air temperature to be predicted below the dew point temperature. Herein this error is referred to as a prediction anomaly. The goal of this research was to improve the prediction accuracy of existing air and dew point temperature ANN models by combining the two weather variables into a single ANN model for each prediction horizon. The objectives of this study were to reduce the mean absolute error (MAE) of prediction and to reduce the number of prediction anomalies. The combined models produced a reduction in the air temperature MAE for ten of twelve prediction horizons with an average reduction in MAE of 1.93 %. The combined models produced a reduction in the dew point temperature MAE for only six of twelve prediction horizons with essentially no average decrease in MAE. However, the combined models showed a marked reduction in prediction anomalies for all twelve prediction horizons with an average reduction of 34.1 %. The reduction in prediction anomalies ranged from 4.6 % at the one-hour horizon to 60.5 % at the eleven-hour horizon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anastasiadis AD, Magoulas GD, Vrahatis MN (2005) New globally convergent training scheme based on the resilient propagation algorithm. Neurocomputing 64:253–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Attaway JA (1997) A history of Florida Citrus freezes. Florida Science Source, Inc, Lake Alfred

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boatright SR, McKissick JC (2008) 2007 Georgia farm gate value report. Center for Agribusiness and Economic Development. The University of Georgia. AR-08-01

  4. Chevalier R, Hoogenboom G, McClendon R, Paz J (2011) Support vector regression with reduced training sets for air temperature prediction: a comparison with artificial neural networks. Neural Comput Appl 20:151–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chevalier R, Hoogenboom G, McClendon R, Paz J (2012) A web-based fuzzy expert system for frost warnings in horticultural crops. Environ Model Softw 35:84–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cooper WC, Young RH, Turrell FM (1964) Microclimate and physiology of citrus: their relation to cold protection. Agric Sci Rev 2(1):38–50

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fauci A (2008) Harrison’s principles of internal medicine. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fonsah EG, Taylor KC, Funderburk F (2007) Enterprise cost analysis for middle. Technical report, AGECON-06-118

  9. Gevrey M, Dimopoulos I, Lek S (2003) Review and comparison of methods to study the contribution of variables in artificial neural network models. Ecol Model 160:249–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Grundstein A, Ramseyer C, Zhao F, Pesses J, Akers P, Qureshi A et al (2012) A retrospective analysis of American football hyperthermia deaths in the United States. Int J Biometeorol 56:11–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Haykin S (1999) Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Hochmuth GJ, Kostewicz S, Martin F (1993) Irrigation method and Rowcover use for strawberry freeze protection. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 118:575–579

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hoogenboom G (1993) The Georgia automated environmental monitoring network. In: Hatcher K (ed) Proceedings of the 1993 Georgia water resources conference, The University of Georgia, Athens, pp 398–402

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hoogenboom G (2000) The Georgia automated environmental monitoring network. In: Preprints of the 24th conference on agricultural and forest meteorology, pp 24–25. American Meteorological Society, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hoogenboom G (2005) The Georgia automated environmental monitoring network: experiences with the development of a state-wide automated weather station network. In: Proceedings of the 13th symposium on meteorological observations and instrumentation & 15th conference on applied climatology. American Society of Meteorology, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hoogenboom G, Coker DD, Edenfield JM, Evans DM, Fang C (2003) The Georgia automated environmental monitoring network: ten years of weather information for water resources management. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Georgia water resources conference

    Google Scholar 

  17. Igel C, Hüsken M (2003) Empirical evaluation of the improved RPROP learning algorithms. Neurocomputing 50:105–123

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Jain A (2003) Frost prediction using artificial neural networks: a temperature prediction approach. M.S. thesis

  19. Jain A, McClendon RW, Hoogenboom G, Ramyaa R (2003) Prediction of frost for fruit protection using artificial neural networks. Am Soc Agric Eng 03:3075

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jones GM, Stallings CC (1999) Reducing heat stress for dairy cattle. Virginia Cooperative Extension, Blacksburg

    Google Scholar 

  21. Martsolf JD, Gerber JF, Chen EY, Jackson HL, Rose AJ (1984) What do satellite and other data suggest about past and future Florida freezes. In: Proceedings of the Florida state horticultural society, pp 17–21

    Google Scholar 

  22. Narendra KS, Mukhopadhyay S (1994) Adaptive control of nonlinear multivariable systems using neural networks. Decis Control 7(5):737–752

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Perry KB (1994) Frost/freeze protection for horticultural crops. North Carolina cooperative extension service. Leaflet No: 705-A

  24. Perry KB (1998) Basics of frost and freeze protection for horticultural crops, 8th edn. HortTechnology, Alexandria

    Google Scholar 

  25. Riedmiller M, Braun H (1993) A direct adaptive method for faster backpropagation learning: the RPROP algorithm. In: IEEE international conference on neural networks, pp 586–591

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Robinson PJ (2000) Temporal trends in United States dew point temperatures. Int J Climatol 20(9):985–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rodrigo J (2000) Spring frosts in deciduous fruit trees—morphological damage and flower hardiness. Sci Hortic 85:155–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sandstrom MA, Lauritsen RG, Changnon D (2004) A Central-US summer extreme dew-point climatology (1949–2000). Phys Geogr 25(3):191–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shank DB, McClendon RW, Paz JA (2008) Ensemble artificial neural networks for prediction of dew point temperature. Appl Artif Intell 22(6):523–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Shank D, Hoogenboom G, McClendon R (2008) Dewpoint temperature prediction using artificial neural networks. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 47:1757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Smith BA, Hoogenboom G, McClendon RW (2009) Artificial neural networks for automated year-round temperature prediction. Comput Electron Agric 68:52–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Smith BA, McClendon RW, Hoogenboom G (2008) Improving air temperature prediction with artificial neural networks. Int J Comput Intell 3(3):179–186

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ward System Group (1993) Manual of NeuroShell 2. Ward System Group, Frederick

    Google Scholar 

  34. Warmund MR, Guinan P, Fernandez G (2008) Temperatures and cold damage to small fruit crops across the Eastern United States associated with the April 2007 freeze. HortScience 43(6):1643–1647

    Google Scholar 

  35. White GF, Haas HE (1975) Assessment of research on natural hazards. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by a partnership between the USDA-Federal Crop Insurance Corporation through the Risk Management Agency and the University of Georgia and by state and federal funds allocated to Georgia Agricultural Experiment Stations Hatch projects GEO00877 and GEO01654.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karthik Nadig.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nadig, K., Potter, W., Hoogenboom, G. et al. Comparison of individual and combined ANN models for prediction of air and dew point temperature. Appl Intell 39, 354–366 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-012-0417-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-012-0417-1

Keywords

Navigation