Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Combining emerging patterns with random forest for complex activity recognition in smart homes

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

New healthcare technologies are emerging with the increasing age of the society, where the development of smart homes for monitoring the elders’ activities is in the center of them. Identifying the resident’s activities in an apartment is an important module in such systems. Dense sensing approach aims to embed sensors in the environment to report the detected events continuously. The events are segmented and analyzed via classifiers to identify the corresponding activity. Although several methods were introduced in recent years for detecting simple activities, the recognition of complex ones requires more effort. Due to the different time duration and event density of each activity, finding the best size of the segments is one of the challenges in detecting the activity. Also, using appropriate classifiers that are capable of detecting simple and interleaved activities is the other issue. In this paper, we devised a two-phase approach called CARER (Complex Activity Recognition using Emerging patterns and Random forest). In the first phase, the emerging patterns are mined, and various features of the activities are extracted to build a model using the Random Forest technique. In the second phase, the sequences of events are segmented dynamically by considering their recency and sensor correlation. Then, the segments are analyzed by the generated model from the previous phase to recognize both simple and complex activities. We examined the performance of the devised approach using the CASAS dataset. To do this, first we investigated several classifiers. The outcome showed that the combination of emerging patterns and the random forest provide a higher degree of accuracy. Then, we compared CARER with the static window approach, which used Hidden Markov Model. To have a fair comparison, we replaced the dynamic segmentation module of CARER with the static one. The results showed more than 12% improvement in f-measure. Finally, we compared our work with Dynamic sensor segmentation for real-time activity recognition, which used dynamic segmentation. The f-measure metric demonstrated up to 12.73% improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McNicoll G (2002) World population ageing 1950–2050. Popul Dev Rev 28(4):814–816

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zilm F-A, Scharnweber C, Haux R (2014) Knowledge representations in ambient assisted living-context awareness in smart homes. In: MIE, pp 308–312

  3. Krishnan N C, Cook D J (2014) Activity recognition on streaming sensor data. Pervasive Mob Comput 10:138–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cook DJ, Krishnan NC (2015) Activity learning: discovering, recognizing, and predicting human behavior from sensor data. Wiley

  5. Chen L, Hoey J, Nugent CD, Cook DJ, Yu Z (2012) Sensor-based activity recognition. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev 42(6):790–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Queirós A, Silva A, Alvarelhão J, Rocha NP, Teixeira A (2015) Usability, accessibility and ambient-assisted living: a systematic literature review. Univ Access Inf Soc 14(1):57–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hu Y, Tilke D, Adams T, Crandall AS, Cook DJ, Schmitter-Edgecombe M (2016) Smart home in a box: usability study for a large scale self-installation of smart home technologies. Journal of Reliable Intelligent Environments 2(2):93–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pantelopoulos A, Bourbakis N G (2010) A survey on wearable sensor-based systems for health monitoring and prognosis. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev 40(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lara OD, Labrador MA (2013) A survey on human activity recognition using wearable sensors. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 15(3):1192–1209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mubashir M, Shao L, Seed L (2013) A survey on fall detection: principles and approaches. Neurocomputing 100:144–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jalal A, Uddin MZ, Kim T-S (2012) Depth video-based human activity recognition system using translation and scaling invariant features for life logging at smart home. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 58(3):863–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Song Y, Tang J, Liu F, Yan S (2014) Body surface context: a new robust feature for action recognition from depth videos. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 24(6):952–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen C, Jafari R, Kehtarnavaz N (2015) Improving human action recognition using fusion of depth camera and inertial sensors. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems 45(1):51– 61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Onofri L, Soda P, Pechenizkiy M, Iannello G (2016) A survey on using domain and contextual knowledge for human activity recognition in video streams. Expert Syst Appl 63:97–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sprint G, Cook DJ, Weeks DL (2016) Designing wearable sensor-based analytics for quantitative mobility assessment. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on smart computing (SMARTCOMP). IEEE, pp 1–8

  16. Kern N, Schiele B, Junker H, Lukowicz P, Tröster G (2003) Wearable sensing to annotate meeting recordings. Pers Ubiquit Comput 7(5):263–274

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sprint G, Cook D, Fritz R, Schmitter-Edgecombe M (2016) Detecting health and behavior change by analyzing smart home sensor data. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on smart computing (SMARTCOMP). IEEE, pp 1–3

  18. Thomas BL, Crandall AS, Cook DJ (2016) A genetic algorithm approach to motion sensor placement in smart environments. Journal of Reliable Intelligent Environments 2(1):3–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Benmansour A, Bouchachia A, Feham M (2016) Multioccupant activity recognition in pervasive smart home environments. ACM Comput Surv (CSUR) 48(3):34

    Google Scholar 

  20. Baig MM, Gholamhosseini H, Connolly MJ (2013) A comprehensive survey of wearable and wireless ecg monitoring systems for older adults. Med Biol Eng Comput 51(5):485–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sardini E, Serpelloni M (2014) T-shirt for vital parameter monitoring. In: Sensors. Springer, pp 201–205

  22. Singla G, Cook DJ (2009) Interleaved activity recognition for smart home residents. Intelligent Environments 9:145–152

    Google Scholar 

  23. Liu L, Peng Y, Liu M, Huang Z (2015) Sensor-based human activity recognition system with a multilayered model using time series shapelets. Knowl-Based Syst 90:138–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wan J, O’Grady MJ, O’Hare GMP (2015) Dynamic sensor event segmentation for real-time activity recognition in a smart home context. Pers Ubiquit Comput 19(2):287–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Abin AA (2016) Clustering with side information: further efforts to improve efficiency. Pattern Recogn Lett 84:252–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gu T, Wu Z, Tao X, Pung HK, Lu J (2009) epsicar: an emerging patterns based approach to sequential, interleaved and concurrent activity recognition. In: IEEE international conference on pervasive computing and communications, 2009. PerCom 2009. IEEE, pp 1–9

  27. Crandall A, Cook DJ (2010) Learning activity models for multiple agents in a smart space. In: Handbook of ambient intelligence and smart environments. Springer, pp 751–769

  28. Alemdar H, Ertan H, Incel OD, Ersoy C (2013) Aras human activity datasets in multiple homes with multiple residents. In: 2013 7th international conference on pervasive computing technologies for healthcare and workshops. IEEE, pp 232–235

  29. Chen R, Tong Y (2014) A two-stage method for solving multi-resident activity recognition in smart environments. Entropy 16(4):2184–2203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45(1):5–32

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang L, Gu T, Tao X, Lu J (2012) A hierarchical approach to real-time activity recognition in body sensor networks. Pervasive Mob Comput 8(1):115–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. De Maio C, Fenza G, Furno D, Loia V (2012) Swarm-based semantic fuzzy reasoning for situation awareness computing. In: 2012 IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems, pp 1–7

  33. De Maio C, Fenza G, Loia V, Orciuoli F (2017) Unfolding social content evolution along time and semantics. Futur Gener Comput Syst 66:146–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mabroukeh NR, Ezeife CI (2010) A taxonomy of sequential pattern mining algorithms. ACM Comput Surv (CSUR) 43(1):3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Dong G, Bailey J (2012) Contrast data mining: concepts, algorithms, and applications. CRC Press

  36. Han J, Pei J, Kamber M (2011) Data mining: concepts and techniques. Elsevier

  37. Gu T, Wang L, Chen H, Liu G, Tao X, Lu J (2010) Mining emerging sequential patterns for activity recognition in body sensor networks. In: International conference on mobile and ubiquitous systems: computing, networking, and services. Springer, pp 102–113

  38. Dong G, Li J (1999) Efficient mining of emerging patterns: Discovering trends and differences. In: Proceedings of the fifth ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, pp 43–52

  39. Fournier-Viger P, Gomariz A, Campos M, Thomas R (2014) Fast vertical mining of sequential patterns using co-occurrence information. In: Pacific-asia conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. Springer, pp 40–52

  40. Wemlinger Z (2012) Smart home activities. http://ailab.wsu.edu/casas/tools/adviz/

  41. Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2001) The elements of statistical learning. Springer series in statistics, vol 1. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Cook D, Schmitter-Edgecombe M, Crandall A, Sanders C, Thomas B (2009) Collecting and disseminating smart home sensor data in the casas project. In: Proceedings of the CHI workshop on developing shared home behavior datasets to advance HCI and ubiquitous computing research, pp 1–7

  43. Ye J, Stevenson G, Dobson S (2015) Kcar: a knowledge-driven approach for concurrent activity recognition. Pervasive Mob Comput 19:47–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Washington state university casas datasets, http://ailab.wsu.edu/casas/datasets.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, G.C, Tehran, Iran

    Hadi Tabatabaee Malazi & Mohammad Davari

Authors
  1. Hadi Tabatabaee Malazi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohammad Davari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hadi Tabatabaee Malazi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tabatabaee Malazi, H., Davari, M. Combining emerging patterns with random forest for complex activity recognition in smart homes. Appl Intell 48, 315–330 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-017-0976-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-017-0976-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation