Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Regularized multi-view least squares twin support vector machines

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Regularized least squares twin support vector machines are a new nonparallel hyperplane classifier, which can lead to simple and fast algorithms for generating binary classifiers by replacing inequality constraints with equality constraints and implementing the structural risk minimization principle in twin support vector machines. Multi-view learning is an emerging direction in machine learning which aims to exploit distinct views to improve generalization performance from multiple distinct feature sets. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed methods are effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shawe-Taylor J, Sun S (2011) A review of optimization methodologies in support vector machines. Neurocomputing 74(17):3609–3618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vapnik V (1995) The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Christianini N, Shawe-Taylor J (2002) An introduction to support vector machines. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burges C (1998) A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Min Knowl Discov 2:121–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ripley B (1996) Pattern recognition and neural networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Scholkopf B, Smola A. (2003) Learning with Kernels. MIT Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Ghorai S, Mukherjee A, Dutta P (2009) Nonparallel plane proximal classifier. Signal Process 89 (4):510–522

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Mangasarian O, Wild E (2006) Multisurface proximal support vector machine classification via generalized eigenvalues. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 28(1):69–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jayadeva K, Khemchandani R, Chandra S (2007) Twin support vector machines for pattern classification. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 29(5):905–910

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Kumar M, Gopal M (2009) Least squares twin support vector machines for pattern classification. Expert Syst Appl 36:7535–7543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Xu Y, Xi W, Lv X, Guo R (2012) An improved least squares twin support vector machine. J Inf Comput Sci 9:1063–1071

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhao J, Xie X, Xin X, Sun S (2017) Multi-view learning over- view: Recent progress and new challenges. Information Fusion. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2017.02.007

  13. Blum A, Mitchell T (1998) Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training. In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory, pp 92–100

  14. Nigam K, Ghani R (2000) Analyzing the effectiveness and applicability of co-training. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp 86–93

  15. Muslea I, Minton S, Knoblock C (2006) Active learning with multiple views. J Artif Intell Res 27:203–233

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Sun S, Jin F (2011) Robust co-training. Int J Pattern Recogn Artif Intell 25:1113–1126

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Farquhar J, Hardoon D, Shawe-Taylor J, Szedmak S (2006) Two view learning: SVM-2K, theory and practice. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 18:355–362

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sun S, Shawe-Taylor J (2010) Sparse semi-supervised learning using conjugate functions. J Mach Learn Res 11:2423–2455

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Xie X, Sun S (2015) Multi-view twin support vector machines. Intell Data Anal 19:701–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bartlett P, Mendelson S (2002) Rademacher and Gaussian complexities: risk bounds and structural results. J Mach Learn Res 3:463–482

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Sun S, Shawe-Taylor J, Mao L (2017) PAC-Bayes analysis of multi-view learning. Inf Fusion 35:117–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sun S, Chao G (2013) Multi-view maximum entropy discrimination. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp 1706–1712

  23. Chao G, Sun S (2016) Alternative multi-view maximum entropy discrimination. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 27:1445–1456

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Mao L, Sun S (2016) Soft margin consistency based scalable multi-view maximum entropy discrimination. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp 1839–1845

  25. Chao G, Sun S (2016) Consensus and complementarity based maximun entropy discrimination for multi-view classification. Inf Sci 367:296–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by Ningbo University talent project 421703670 as well as programs sponsored by K.C. Wong Magna Fund in Ningbo University. It is also supported by the Zhejiang Provincial Department of Education under Projects 801700472. It is also supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province under Projects LQ18F020001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xijiong Xie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xie, X. Regularized multi-view least squares twin support vector machines. Appl Intell 48, 3108–3115 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-017-1129-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-017-1129-3

Keywords

Navigation