Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Uncertain fault diagnosis problem using neuro-fuzzy approach and probabilistic model for manufacturing systems

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is concerned with fault detection and diagnosis problem in manufacturing systems. In such industrial environment, production systems are subject to several faults caused by a number of factors including the environment, the accumulated wearing, usage, etc. However, due to the lack of accuracy or fluctuation of data, it is oftentimes impossible to evaluate precisely the correct classification rate of faults. In order to classify each type of fault, neural networks and fuzzy logic are two different intelligent diagnosis methods that are more applied now, and each has its own advantages and disadvantages. A new hybrid fault diagnosis approach is introduced in this paper that considers the combined learning algorithm and knowledge base (Fuzzy rules) to handle ambiguous and even erroneous information. Therefore, to enhance the classification accuracy, three perceptron models including: linear perceptron (LP), multilayer perceptron (MLP) and fuzzy perceptron (FP) have been respectively established and compared. The conditional risk function “PDF” that measures the expectation of loss when taking an action is presented at the same time. We evaluate the proposed hybrid approach “Variable Learning Rate Gradient Descent with Bayes’ Maximum Likelihood formula” VLRGD-BML on dataset of milk pasteurization process and compare our approach with other similar published works for fault diagnosis in the literature. Comparative results indicate the higher efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed approach with fuzzy perceptron for uncertain fault diagnosis problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee J, Ni J, Dragan D, Qiu H, Liao H (2006) Intelligent prognostics tools and e-maintenance. Comput Ind 57:476– 489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Severson K, Chaiwatanodom P, Braatz DR (2016) Perspectives on process monitoring of industrial systems. Annu Rev Control 42:190–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Russell EL, Chiang LH, Braatz RD (2000) Data-driven techniques for fault detection and diagnosis in chemical processes. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Gertler JJ (1998) Fault detection and diagnosis in engineering system, vol 504. CRC Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stamatis DH (2003) Failure mode and effect analysis: FMEA from theory to execution. ASQ Quality Press, Milwaukee

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dhillon B (2005) Reliability, quality, and safety for engineers. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Sayed-Mouchaweh M (2012) Decentralized fault free model approach for fault detection and isolation of discrete event systems. Eur J Control 18:82–93

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee CC (1990) Fuzzy logic in control systems: fuzzy logic controller. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B Cybern 20:419–435

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Ghosh N, Ravi YB, Patra A, Mukhopadhyay S, Paul S, Mohanty AR, Chattopadhyay AB (2007) Estimation of tool wear during CNC milling using neural network-based sensor fusion. Mech Syst Signal Process 21:466–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Risbood KA, Dixit US, Sahasrabudhe AD (2003) Prediction of surface roughness and dimensional deviation by measuring cutting forces and vibrations in turning process. J Mater Process Technol 132:203–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kohli A, Dixit US (2005) A neural-network-based methodology for the prediction of surface roughness in a turning process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 25:118–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Abburi NR, Dixit US (2006) A knowledge-based system for the prediction of surface roughness in turning process. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 22:363–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dweiri F, Al-Jarrah M, Al-Wedyan H (2003) Fuzzy surface roughness modeling of CNC down milling of alumic-79. J Mater Process Technol 133:266–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lo SP (2003) An adaptive-network based fuzzy inference system for prediction of workpiece surface roughness in end milling. J Mater Process Technol 142:665–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vallejo AG, Nolazco-Flores JA, Morales-Menendez R, Sucar LE, Rodriguez CA (2005) Tool-wear monitoring based on continuous hidden Markov models. JLect Notes Comput Sci 3773:880– 890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang LT, Mehrabi MG, Kannatey-Asibu E (2002) Hidden markov model-based tool wear monitoring in turning. J Manuf Sci E-T ASME 124:651–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Colak O, Kurbanoglu C, Kayacan MC (2007) Milling surface roughness prediction using evolutionary programming methods. Mater Des 28:657–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Brezocnik M, Kovacic M, Ficko M (2004) Prediction of surface roughness with genetic programming. J Mater Process Technol 157-158:28–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cho S, Asfour S, Onar A, Kaundinya N (2005) Tool breakage detection using support vector machine learning in a milling process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45:241–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chiang LH, Jiang B, Zhu X, Huang D, Braatz RD (2015) Diagnosis of multiple and unknown faults using the causal map and multivariate statistics. J Process Control 28:27–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jiang B, Huang D, Zhu X, Yang F, Braatz RD (2015) Canonical variate analysis-based contributions for fault identification. J Process Control 26:17–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jiang B, Zhu X, Huang D, Braatz RD (2015) Canonical variate analysis-based monitoring of process correlation structure using casual feature representation. J Process Control 52:109– 116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Djelloul I, Souier M, Sari Z (2015) Fault diagnosis problem integrated with condition based maintenance strategy. Electrotehnica, Electronica, Automatica (EEA) 63:102–109. ISSN 1582-5175

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bouaziz MF, Zamai E, Duvivier F, Hubac S (2011) Dependability of complex semiconductor systems: Learning Bayesian networks for decision support. In: 3rd international workshop on dependable control of discrete systems (DCDS), pp 7–12

  25. Weber P, Medina-Oliva G, Simon C, Iung B (2012) Overview on Bayesian networks applications for dependability, risk analysis and maintenance areas. Eng Appl Artif Intell 25:671–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Aït-Kadi D, Simeu-Abazi Z, Arous A (2015) Fault isolation by test scheduling for embedded systems using a probabilistic approach. J Intell Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-015-1088-7

  27. Djelloul I, Sari Z, Souier M (2017) Fault isolation in manufacturing systems based on learning algorithm and fuzzy rule selection. Neural Comput & Applic. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-3169-3 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-3169-3

  28. Kadri O, Mouss LH, Mouss MD (2011) La sélection de paramètres d’un système industriel par les colonies de fourmis. Annals Computer Science Series, 9th Tome 1st Fasc 9:155–168

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kadri O, Mouss LH, Mouss MD (2012) Fault diagnosis of rotary kiln using SVM and binary ACO. J Mech Sci Technol 26:601– 608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kadri O, Mouss LH, Mouss MD, Abdelhadi A (2013) Reconnaissance des Formes par SVM pour le diagnostic du système de pasteurisation d’une usine de lait. Revue des Sciences et de la Technologie -RST- 4:35–52

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kadri O, Mouss LH, Mouss MD, Abdelhadi A (2013) Contribution au diagnostic des systèmes industriels par des approches basées sur des algorithmes de colonie de fourmis. CPI’13. accepted

  32. Barani F, Mirhosseini M, Nezamabadi-pour H (2017) Application of binary quantum-inspired gravitational search algorithm in feature subset selection. Appl Intell. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-017-0894-3

  33. Brown G, Pocock A, Zhao M, Lujan M (2012) Conditional likelihood maximisation: a unifying framework for information theoretic feature selection. J Mach Learn Res 13:27–66

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Djelloul I, Souier M, Sari Z (2013) Neuro-fuzzy genetic algorithms for monitoring in a production system. In: IEEE international conference on systems and control, pp 12–17

  35. Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1986) Learning internal representations by error propagation. In: Rumenhart DE, McCelland JL (eds) Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition. MIT, Cambridge, pp 318– 362

  36. Liu TI, Chen WY, Anantharaman KS (1998) Intelligent detection of drill wear. Mech Syst Signal Process 12:863–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. da Silva IN, Hernane Spatti D, Andrade Flauzino R, Liboni LHB, dos Reis Alves SF (2017) Artificial neural network architectures and training processes. In: Artificial neural networks. Springer, Cham

  38. Lee S, Li L, Ni J (2010) Online degradation assessment and adaptive fault detection using modified hidden Markov model. ASME J Manuf Sci Eng 132:021010–1–021010-11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Liu TI, Ordukhani F, Jani D (2005) Monitoring and diagnosis of roller bearing conditions using neural networks and soft computing. Int J Knowl-Based Intell Eng Syst 9:149–158

    Google Scholar 

  40. Nagata F, Kusumoto Y, Watanabe K (2009) Intelligent machining system for the artistic design of wooden paint rollers. Int J Robot Comput Integr Manuf 25:680–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Li G. y., Yang QF (2007) FNN-Based intelligent fault diagnosis system for vehicle engine. Journal of System Simulation 19:1033–1037

    Google Scholar 

  42. Sanghamitra B, Sankar KP (2007) Classification and learning using genetic algorithms: application in bioinformatics and web intelligence. Natural Computing Series, India

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Mihaljevic B, Larranaga P, Bielza C (2013) Augmented semi-naive bayes classifier. Springer, Berlin, pp 159–167

    Google Scholar 

  44. Nelles O (2001) Nonlinear system identification. Springer, Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Higher School of Applied Sciences of Algiers (ESSAA), Place of Martyrs, N8, Larbaa, Algiers, Algeria

    Imene Djelloul

  2. Manufacturing Engineering Laboratory of Tlemcen (MELT), Abou bekr Belkaid University of Tlemcen, PoBox 230, Tlemcen, 13000, Algeria

    Imene Djelloul & Zaki Sari

  3. Laboratoire d’Automatique et Productique, University of Batna 2,, Batna, 05000, Algeria

    Khaled Latreche

Authors
  1. Imene Djelloul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zaki Sari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Khaled Latreche
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Imene Djelloul.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Djelloul, I., Sari, Z. & Latreche, K. Uncertain fault diagnosis problem using neuro-fuzzy approach and probabilistic model for manufacturing systems. Appl Intell 48, 3143–3160 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-017-1132-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-017-1132-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation