Skip to main content
Log in

The promotion strategy of supply chain flexibility based on deep belief network

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Supply chain flexibility is the processing ability of the enterprize to deal with the uncertain environment of supply and demand. In this paper, we consider the supply side (node interrupt) and demand side (demand fluctuations) under uncertain environment. By using the deep belief network (DBN), which is composed of multilayer Restricted Boltzmann Machine (RBM), it establishes the supply chain flexibility network with optimization of the transfer node and flow. The deep belief network is trained by the data of large manufacturing enterprize, compared with the traditional neural network (MLR, BP and GA). The results show that the deep belief network model overcomes the shortcomings of the traditional neural networks, such as easy to fall into local optimum, long training time and low function fitting degree, and it has higher prediction accuracy. This network model based on the deep belief network can promote the supply chain flexibility more, when supply and demand fluctuations occur.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Slack N (1987) The flexibility of manufacturing systems. Int J Oper Prod Manag 25(4):1190–1200

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sun Y, Song H, Jara AJ et al (2016) Internet of things and big data analytics for smart and connected communities. IEEE Access 4:1–1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee H, Grosse R, Ranganath R et al (2009) Convolutional deep belief networks for scalable unsupervised learning of hierarchical representations. In: International conference on machine learning, ICML 2009. DBLP, Montreal, pp 609–616

  4. Ding G, Wang L, Wu Q (2013) Big data analytics in future internet of things. Comput Sci 9:430–434

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lummus RR, Duclos LK, Vokurka RJ (2003) Supply chain flexibility: building a new model. Glob J Flex Syst Manag 4(4):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ji NN, Zhang JS, Zhang CX (2014) A sparse-response deep belief network based on rate distortion theory. Pattern Recogn 47(9):3179–3191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nagarajan V, Savitskie K, Ranganathan S et al (2013) The effect of environmental uncertainty, information quality, and collaborative logistics on supply chain flexibility of small manufacturing firms in India. Asia Pac J Mark Logist 25(5):784–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ruekert RW, Churchill GA (1984) Reliability and validity of alternative measures of channel member satisfaction. J Mark Res 21(2):226–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mohamed AR, Sainath TN, Dahl G et al (2011) Deep belief networks using discriminative features for phone recognition. In: IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech, and signal processing, ICASSP 2011, Prague Congress Center, Prague, Czech Republic. DBLP, pp 5060–5063

  10. Vickery SN, Calantone R, Droge C (1999) Supply chain flexibility: an empirical study. J Supply Chain Manag 35(2):16–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. El FR, Saliba W, Mortada R (2011) The impact of yield-dependent trading costs on pricing and production planning under supply and demand uncertainty. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 13(3):404–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ghahabi O, Hernando J (2014) Deep belief networks for i-vector based speaker recognition. In: IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing. IEEE, pp 1700–1704

  13. Kuremoto T, Kimura S, Kobayashi K et al (2014) Time series forecasting using a deep belief network with restricted Boltzmann machines. Neurocomputing 137(15):47C56

    Google Scholar 

  14. Liu B (2010) Uncertain risk analysis and uncertain reliability analysis. J Uncertain Syst 4(4):163–170

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brosch T, Tam R (2015) Efficient training of convolutional deep belief networks in the frequency domain for application to high-resolution 2d and 3d images. Neural Comput 27(1):211–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Snyder LV, Daskin MS (2005) Reliability models for facility location: the expected failure cost case. Transp Sci 39(3):400–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chanta S, Mayorga ME, Mclay LA (2014) Improving emergency service in rural areas: a biobjective covering location model for EMS systems. Ann Oper Res 221(1):133–159

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Hatefi SM, Jolai F (2014) Robust and reliable forwardCreverse logistics network design under demand uncertainty and facility disruptions. Appl Math Modell 38(9C10):2630–2647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Amin-Naseri MR, Khojasteh MA (2015) Price competition between two leaderCfollower supply chains with risk-averse retailers under demand uncertainty. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 79(1):377–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Song JS, Yano CA, Lerssrisuriya P (2000) Contract assembly: dealing with combined supply lead time and demand quantity uncertainty. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 2(3):287–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kazaz B, Webster S (2015) Technical noteprice-setting newsvendor problems with uncertain supply and risk aversion. Oper Res 63(4)

  22. Sanchez AM, Perez MP (2005) Supply chain flexibility and firm performance. Int J Oper Prod Manag 25 (7):681–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tsay AA, Lovejoy WS (1999) Quantity flexibility contracts and supply chain performance. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 1(2):89–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Prater E, Biehl M, Smith MA (2001) International supply chain agility tradeoffs between flexibility and uncertainty. Int J Oper Prod Manag 21(5/6):823–839(17)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Swafford PM, Ghosh S, Murthy N (2008) Achieving supply chain agility through IT integration and flexibility. Int J Prod Econ 116(2):288–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Stevenson M, Spring M (2007) Flexibility from a supply chain perspective: definition and review. Int J Oper Prod Manag 27(7):685–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gosain S, Malhotra A, El Sawy OA (2005) Coordinating for flexibility in e-business supply chains. J Manag Inf Syst 21(3):7–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tang C, Tomlin B (2008) The power of flexibility for mitigating supply chain risks. Int J Prod Econ 116 (1):12–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hinton G, Osindero S, Teh YW (2006) A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural Comput 18(7):1527–1554

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Mohamed AR, Dahl GE, Hinton G (2012) Acoustic modeling using deep belief networks. IEEE Trans Audio Speech Lang Process 20(1):14–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ranzato M, Boureau YL, Lecun Y (2007) Sparse feature learning for deep belief networks. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, pp 1185–1192

  32. Roux NL, Bengio Y (1989) Representational power of restricted boltzmann machines and deep belief networks. Neural Comput 20(6):1631–1649

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Sainath TN, Kingsbury B, Ramabhadran B et al (2011) Making deep belief networks effective for large vocabulary continuous speech recognition. In: Automatic speech recognition and understanding. IEEE, pp 30–35

  34. Niggemann O, Biswas G, Kinnebrew JS et al (2015) Data-driven monitoring of cyberPhysical systems leveraging on big data and the Internet-of-Things for diagnosis and control. International Workshop on the Principles of Diagnosis

  35. Pahlavan K, Krishnamurthy P, Geng Y (2015) Localization challenges for the emergence of the smart world. Access IEEE 3:3058–3067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Immonen A, Palviainen M, Ovaska E (2014) Requirements of an open data based business ecosystem. IEEE Access 2:88–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Fatemi M, Haykin S (2014) Cognitive control: theory and application. IEEE Access 2:698–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Anderson JW, Kennedy KE, Ngo LB et al (2014) Synthetic data generation for the internet of things. In: IEEE international conference on big data. IEEE, pp 171–176

  39. Niyato D, Alsheikh MA, Wang P et al (2016) Market model and optimal pricing scheme of big data and Internet of Things (IoT)

  40. Duclos LK, Vokurka RJ, Lummus RR (2003) A conceptual model of supply chain flexibility. Ind Manag Data Syst 103(6):446–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sang S (2016) Revenue sharing contract in a multi-echelon supply chain with fuzzy demand and asymmetric information. Int J Comput Intell Syst 9(6):1028–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Mashinchi MR, Selamat A, Ibrahim S (2015) Evaluating extant uranium: linguistic reasoning by fuzzy artificial neural networks, pp 296–307

  43. Mashinchi MR, Selamat A (2009) An improvement on genetic-based learning method for fuzzy artificial neural networks. Appl Soft Comput 9(4):1208–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Acharya UR, Fujita H, Lih OS et al (2017) Automated detection of arrhythmias using different intervals of Tachycardia ECG segments with convolutional neural network. Inf Sci 405:81–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wu J, Chiclana F, Fujita H et al (2017) A visual interaction consensus model for social network group decision making with trust propagation. Knowl-Based Syst 122:39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by Key projects for the Chinese Ministry of Education (No. 15JZD021), and Tianjin higher education innovation team training program (No. TD12-5013).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fanhui Kong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kong, F., Li, J. The promotion strategy of supply chain flexibility based on deep belief network. Appl Intell 48, 1394–1405 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-018-1138-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-018-1138-x

Keywords

Navigation