Skip to main content
Log in

An effective asynchronous framework for small scale reinforcement learning problems

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reinforcement learning is one of the research hotspots in the field of artificial intelligence in recent years. In the past few years, deep reinforcement learning has been widely used to solve various decision-making problems. However, due to the characteristics of neural networks, it is very easy to fall into local minima when facing small scale discrete space path planning problems. Traditional reinforcement learning uses continuous updating of a single agent when algorithm executes, which leads to a slow convergence speed. Although some scholars have done some improvement work to solve these problems, there are still many shortcomings to be overcome. In order to solve the above problems, we proposed a new asynchronous tabular reinforcement learning algorithms framework in this paper, and present four new variants of asynchronous reinforcement learning algorithms. We apply these algorithms on the standard reinforcement learning environments: frozen lake problem, cliff walking problem and windy gridworld problem, and the simulation results show that these methods can solve discrete space path planning problems efficiently and well balance the exploration and exploitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhang C, Bi J, Xu S et al (2019) Multi-Imbalance: An open-source software for multi-class imbalance learning. Knowl-Based Syst. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2019.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fujita H, Cimr D (2019) Computer Aided detection for fibrillations and flutters using deep convolutional neural network. Inf Sci 486:231–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang C, Liu C, Zhang X et al (2017) An up-to-date comparison of state-of-the-art classification algorithms. Expert Syst Appl 82:128–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Xiao Q, Dai J, Luo J et al (2019) Multi-view manifold regularized learning-based method for prioritizing candidate disease miRNAs. Knowl-Based Syst. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2019.03.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sutton R, Barto A (1998) Reinforcement learning: An introduction. MIT press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Silver D, Schrittwieser J, Simonyan K et al (2017) Mastering the game of Go without human knowledge. Nature 550(7676):354–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Silver D, Huang A, Maddison M et al (2016) Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature 529(7587):484–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mnih V, Kavukcuoglu K, Silver D et al (2015) Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature 518(7540):529–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mnih V, Kavukcuoglu K, Silver D et al (2013) Playing atari with deep reinforcement learning. Proceedings of Workshops at the 26th Neural Information Processing Systems, Lake Tahoe, pp 201–220

    Google Scholar 

  10. Levine S, Pastor P, Krizhevsky A et al (2016) Learning Hand-Eye Coordination for Robotic Grasping with Large-Scale Data Collection. International Symposium on Experimental Robotics. Springer, Cham, 173–184

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lenz I, Knepper R, Saxena A (2015) Deepmpc: learning deep latent features for model predictive control. In: Proceedings of the Robotics Science and Systems, Rome, pp 201–209

  12. Satija H, Pineau J (2016) Simultaneous machine translation using deep reinforcement learning. Proceedings of the Workshops of International Conference on Machine Learning, New York, pp 110–119

    Google Scholar 

  13. Guo H (2015) Generating text with deep reinforcement learning. Proceedings of the Workshops of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Montreal, pp 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  14. Li J, Monroe W, Ritter A et al (2016) Deep reinforcement learning for dialogue generation. Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Austin, pp 1192–1202

    Google Scholar 

  15. Caicedo J, Lazebnik S (2015) Active Object Localization with Deep Reinforcement Learning. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. IEEE, 2488–2496

  16. Sutton R (1988) Learning to predict by the methods of temporal differences. Mach Learn 3(1):9–44

    Google Scholar 

  17. Watkins C (1989) Learning from delayed rewards. King's College, Cambridge

  18. Rummery G, Niranjan M (1994) On-line Q-learning using connectionist systems. University of Cambridge, Department of Engineering, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  19. Singh S, Sutton R (1996) Reinforcement learning with replacing eligibility traces. Recent Advances in Reinforcement Learning, 123–158

  20. Tsitsiklis J (1994) Asynchronous stochastic approximation and Q-learning. Mach Learn 16(3):185–202

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Mnih V, Badia A, Mirza M et al (2016) Asynchronous methods for deep reinforcement learning. International Conference on Machine Learning, 1928–1937

  22. Zhao X, Ding S, An Y et al (2018) Asynchronous Reinforcement Learning Algorithms for Solving Discrete Space Path Planning Problems. Appl Intell 48(12):4889–4904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhao X, Ding S, An Y et al (2019) Applications of asynchronous deep reinforcement learning based on dynamic updating weights. Appl Intell 49(2):581–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhao X, Ding S, An Y (2018) A new asynchronous architecture for tabular reinforcement learning algorithms. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Extreme Learning Machines, 172–180

  25. Nair A, Srinivasan P, Blackwell S et al (2015) Massively parallel methods for deep reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1507.04296

  26. van Hasselt H (2010) Double Q-learning. Adv Neural Inf Proces Syst 23:2613–2621

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wang Y-H, Li T-H, Lin C-J (2013) Backward Q-learning: The combination of Sarsa algorithm and Q-learning. Eng Appl Artif Intell 26(9):2184–2193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tokic M, Palm G (2011) Value-difference based exploration: adaptive control between epsilon-greedy and softmax. Annual Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Berlin, pp 335–346

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No.2017XKZD03).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shifei Ding.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ding, S., Zhao, X., Xu, X. et al. An effective asynchronous framework for small scale reinforcement learning problems. Appl Intell 49, 4303–4318 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-019-01501-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-019-01501-9

Keywords

Navigation