Skip to main content
Log in

Identifying influential nodes in weighted complex networks using an improved WVoteRank approach

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Influence maximization is an important research problem in the field of network science because of its business value. It requires the strategic selection of seed nodes called “influential nodes,” such that information originating from these nodes can reach numerous nodes in the network. Many real-world networks, such as transportation, communication, and social networks, are weighted networks. Influence maximization in a weighted network is more challenging compared to that in an unweighted network. Many methods, such as weighted degree rank, weighted h-index, weighted betweenness, and weighted VoteRank techniques, have been used to order the nodes based on their spreading capabilities in weighted networks. The VoteRank method is a popular method for finding influential nodes in an unweighted network using the idea of a voting scheme. Recently, the WVoteRank method was proposed to find the seed nodes; it extends the idea of the VoteRank method by considering the edge weights. This method considers only 1-hop neighbors to calculate the voting score of every node. In this study, we propose an improved WVoteRank method based on an extended neighborhood concept, which takes the 1-hop neighbors as well as 2-hop neighbors into account for the voting process to decide influential nodes in a weighted network. We also extend our proposed approach to unweighted networks. We compare the performance of the proposed improved WVoteRank method against the popular centrality measures, weighted degree, weighted closeness, weighted betweenness, weighted h-index, and weighted VoteRank on several real-life and synthetic datasets of diverse sizes and properties. We utilize the widely used stochastic susceptible–infected–recovered information diffusion model to calculate the infection scale, the final infected scale as a function of time, and the average distance between spreaders. The simulation results reveal that the proposed method, improved WVoteRank, considerably outperforms the other methods described above, including the recent WVoteRank.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Newman M E J (2010) Networks: an introduction. Oxford University Press, New York

  2. Wang X F, Li X, Chen G R (2012) Network Science: An introduction, Higher Education Press, Beijing, pp 10–15

  3. Newman M E J (2004) Analysis of weighted networks. Phys Rev E 70(5):056131

  4. Kandhway K, Kuri J (2016) Using node centrality and optimal control to maximize information diffusion in social networks. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 47(7):1099–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li Y, Fan J, Wang Y, Tan K L (2018) Influence maximization on social graphs: a survey. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 30(10):1852–1872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ferguson R (2008) Word of mouth and viral marketing: taking the temperature of the hottest trends in marketing. J Consum Market 25(3):179–182

  7. Sun Y, Liu C, Zhang C X, Zhang Z K (2014) Epidemic spreading on weighted complex networks. Phys Lett A 378(7):635– 640

  8. Wang W, Tang M, Eugene Stanley H, Braunstein L A (2017) Unification of theoretical approaches for epidemic spreading on complex networks. Rep Progr Phys 80(3):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pastor -Satorras R, Castellano C, Van Mieghem P, Vespignani A (2015) Epidemic processes in complex networks. Rev Modern Phys 87(3):925–979

  10. Freeman L C (1978) Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc Netw 1(3):215–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lu L Y, Chen D B, Ren X L, Zhang Q M, Zhang Y C, Zhou T (2016) Vital nodes identification in complex networks. Phys Rep 650:1–63

  12. Opsahl T, Colizza V, Panzarasa P, Ramasco J J (2008) Prominence and control: the weighted rich-club effect. Phys Rev Lett 101(16):168702

  13. Freeman L C (1977) A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry 40(1):35–41

  14. Sabidussi G (1966) The centrality index of a graph. Psychometrika 31(4):581–603

  15. Hirsch J E (2005) An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sc 102(46):16569–16572

  16. Lu L, Zhou T, Zhang Q M, Stanley H E (2016) The H-index of a network node and its relation to degree and coreness. Nat Commun 7:10168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yu S, Gao L, Wang Y F, Gao G, Zhou C, Gao Z Y (2017) Weighted H-index for identifying influential spreaders. arXiv:1710.05272

  18. Kitsak M, Gallos L K, Havlin S, Liljeros F, Muchnik L, Stanley H E, Makse A (2010) Identification of influential spreaders in complex networks. Nat Phys 6(11):888–893

  19. Zeng A, Zhang C J (2013) Ranking spreaders by decomposing complex networks. Phys Lett A 377(14):1031–1035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bae J, Kim S (2014) Identifying and ranking influential spreaders in complex networks by neighborhood coreness. Physica A: Stat Mech Appl 395:549–559

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Garas A, Schweitzer F, Havlin S (2012) A k-shell decomposition method for weighted networks. J Phys 14(8):083030

  22. Yang F, Li X, Xu Y, Liu X, Wang J, Zhang Y, Zhang R, Yao Y (2018) Ranking the spreading influence of nodes in complex networks: an extended weighted degree centrality based on a remaining minimum degree decomposition. Phys Lett A 382(34):2361–2371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang F, Jiang W, Li X, Wang G (2018) Maximizing positive influence spread in online social networks via fluid dynamics. Futur Gener Comput Syst 86:1491–1502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Berahmand K, Bouyer A, Samadi N (2019) A new local and multidimensional ranking measure to detect spreaders in social networks. Computing 101(11):1711–33

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. De Souza R C, Figueiredo D R, Rocha A D A, Ziviani A (2020) Efficient network seeding under variable node cost ans limited budget for social networks. Inf Sci 514:369–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Newman M E J (2004) Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks. Phys Rev E 69(6):066133

  27. Huang H, Shen H, Meng Z, Chang H, He H (2019) Community-based influence maximization for viral marketing. Appl Intell 49(6):2137–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang J. X., Chen D B, Dong Q (2016) Identifying a set of influential spreaders in complex networks. Sci Rep 6(27823):p1–p9

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Sun H L, Chen D B, He J L, Cheng E (2019) A voting approach to uncover multiple influential spreaders on weighted networks. Phys A: Stat Mech Appl 519:303–312

  30. Kumar S, Panda B S (2020) Identifying influential nodes in Social Networks: Neighborhood Coreness based voting approach. Physica A: Stat Mech Appl:124215

  31. Pastor-Satorras R, Vespignani A (2001) Epidemic dynamics and endemic states in complex networks. Phys Rev E 63(6):066117

  32. Hethcote H W (2000) The mathematics of infectious diseases. SIAM Rev 42:599–653

  33. Leskovec J, Krevl A (2014) SNAP Datasets: Stanford Large Network Dataset Collection

  34. Watts D J, Strogatz S H (1998) Collective dynamics of small-world networks. Nature 393:440–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Opsahl T, Panzarasa P (2009)) Clustering in weighted networks. Soc Netw 31(2):155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.002

  36. Colizza V, Pastor-Satorras R, Vespignani A (2007) Reaction-diffusion processes and metapopulation models in heterogeneous networks. Nat Phys 3:276–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kumar S, Spezzano F, Subrahmanian VS, Faloutsos C (2016) Edge Weight Prediction in Weighted Signed Networks. IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM)

  38. ?ubelj L, Bajec M (2011) Robust network community detection using balanced propagation. Eur Phys J B 81(3):353–362

  39. Leskovec J, Kleinberg J, Faloutsos C (2007) Graph evolution: Densification and shrinking diameters. ACM Trans Knowl Discov Data (ACM TKDD) 1(1)

  40. Bible network dataset (2017) KONECT

  41. Leskovec J, Kleinberg J, Faloutsos C (2005) Graphs over time: Densification Laws, Shrinking Diameters and Possible Explanations. ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD)

  42. Barabási A L, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286 (5439):509–12

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Holme P, Kim B J (2002) Growing scale-free networks with tunable clustering. Phys Rev E 65(2):026107

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjay Kumar.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, S., Panda, A. Identifying influential nodes in weighted complex networks using an improved WVoteRank approach. Appl Intell 52, 1838–1852 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021-02403-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021-02403-5

Keywords

Navigation