Skip to main content
Log in

Sparse data augmentation based on encoderforest for brain network classification

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Brain network classification has attracted increasing attention with the widespread application in the automatic diagnosis of brain diseases. However, limited by the higher cost of detecting and marking for medical imaging, the amount of brain network data is usually small, which largely restricts the performance of current brain network classification models. In this paper, we propose a new sparse data augmentation model (SDAM) based on EncoderForest to effectively enhance the brain network data and improve the classification performance. The EncoderForest based SDAM uses a generator which innovatively encodes the rules of a set of parallel decision trees to generate sparse data with only discriminative connections. The generated data expands the original data set effectively by utilizing the advantages of EncoderForest in learning data feature sparsely and constructing a feature association generation model compactly. In addition, the SDAM is flexible to combine with different classification models, such as random forest, support vector machine, deep neural network, etc. The experimental results on three common brain disease data sets show that our model is able to reasonably augment the brain network data and remarkably improve the performance of various classifiers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://adni.loni.usc.edu/data-samples/access-data/

  2. http://fcon_1000.projects.nitrc.org/indi/adhd200/

References

  1. Glasser MF, Smith SM, Marcus DS, Andersson JL, Auerbach EJ, Behrens TE, Coalson TS, Harms MP, Jenkinson M, Moeller S et al (2016) The human connectome project’s neuroimaging approach. Nature Neurosci 19(9):1175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. LIANG X, WANG J (2010) Human connectome: Structural and functional brain networks. Chin Sci Bull 55(16):1565– 1583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim J, Calhoun VD, Shim E, Lee JH (2016) Deep neural network with weight sparsity control and pre-training extracts hierarchical features and enhances classification performance: Evidence from whole-brain resting-state functional connectivity patterns of schizophrenia. Neuroimage 124:127–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhu D, Li X, Jiang X, Chen H, Shen D, Liu T (2013) Exploring high-order functional interactions via structurally-weighted lasso models. In: International conference on information processing in medical imaging. Springer, pp 13–24

  5. Xiao X, Fang H, Wu J, Xiao C, Xiao T, Qian L, Liang F, Xiao Z, Chu KK, Ke X (2017) Diagnostic model generated by mri-derived brain features in toddlers with autism spectrum disorder. Autism Res 10(4):620–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Heinsfeld AS, Franco AR, Craddock RC, Buchweitz A, Meneguzzi F (2018) Identification of autism spectrum disorder using deep learning and the abide dataset. NeuroImage Clin 17:16–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kawahara J, Brown CJ, Miller SP, Booth BG, Chau V, Grunau RE, Zwicker JG, Hamarneh G (2017) Brainnetcnn: Convolutional neural networks for brain networks; towards predicting neurodevelopment. NeuroImage 146:1038–1049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Xing X, Ji J, Yao Y (2018) Convolutional neural network with element-wise filters to extract hierarchical topological features for brain networks. In: 2018 IEEE international conference on bioinformatics and biomedicine (BIBM). IEEE, pp 780– 783

  9. Frid-Adar M, Klang E, Amitai M, Goldberger J, Greenspan H (2018) Synthetic data augmentation using gan for improved liver lesion classification. In: 2018 IEEE 15th international symposium on biomedical imaging (ISBI 2018), IEEE, pp 289–293

  10. Zhuang P, Schwing AG, Koyejo O (2019) Fmri data augmentation via synthesis. In: 2019 IEEE 16th International symposium on biomedical imaging (ISBI 2019). IEEE, pp 1783–1787

  11. Gao R, Peng J, Nguyen L, Liang Y, Thng S, Lin Z (2019) Classification of non-tumorous facial pigmentation disorders using deep learning and smote. In: 2019 IEEE International symposium on circuits and systems (ISCAS). IEEE, pp 1–5

  12. Meszlényi R J, Buza K, Vidnyánszky Z (2017) Resting state fmri functional connectivity-based classification using a convolutional neural network architecture. Front Neuroinform 11:61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wee CY, Yap PT, Zhang D, Wang L, Shen D (2014) Group-constrained sparse fmri connectivity modeling for mild cognitive impairment identification. Brain Struct Funct 219(2):641–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rasmussen PM, Hansen LK, Madsen KH, Churchill NW, Strother SC (2012) Model sparsity and brain pattern interpretation of classification models in neuroimaging. Pattern Recogn 45(6):2085–2100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Feng J, Zhou ZH (2018) Autoencoder by forest. In: Thirty-Second AAAI conference on artificial intelligence

  16. Steinberg D, Colla P (2009) Cart: classification and regression trees. Top Ten Alg Data Mining 9:179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Di Martino A, Yan CG, Li Q, Denio E, Castellanos FX, Alaerts K, Anderson JS, Assaf M, Bookheimer SY, Dapretto M et al (2014) The autism brain imaging data exchange: towards a large-scale evaluation of the intrinsic brain architecture in autism. Mol Psychiatry 19(6):659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Craddock C, Benhajali Y, Chu C, Chouinard F, Evans A, Jakab A, Khundrakpam BS, Lewis JD, Li Q, Milham M et al (2013) The neuro bureau preprocessing initiative: open sharing of preprocessed neuroimaging data and derivatives. Front Neuroinform 7

  19. Jilka SR, Scott G, Ham T, Pickering A, Bonnelle V, Braga RM, Leech R, Sharp DJ (2014) Damage to the salience network and interactions with the default mode network. J Neurosci 34(33):10798–10807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen T, Cai W, Ryali S, Supekar K, Menon V (2016) Distinct global brain dynamics and spatiotemporal organization of the salience network. PLoS Biol 14(6):e1002469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Beaty RE, Benedek M, Silvia PJ, Schacter DL (2016) Creative cognition and brain network dynamics. Trends Cognit Sci 20(2):87–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Raichle ME (2015) The brain’s default mode network. Ann Rev Neurosci 38:433–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Elton A, Di Martino A, Hazlett HC, Gao W (2016) Neural connectivity evidence for a categorical-dimensional hybrid model of autism spectrum disorder. Biol Psychiatry 80(2):120–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yamada T, Itahashi T, Nakamura M, Watanabe H, Kuroda M, Ohta H, Kanai C, Kato N, Ri H (2016) Altered functional organization within the insular cortex in adult males with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder: evidence from connectivity-based parcellation. Mol Autism 7(1):41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bigler ED, Mortensen S, Neeley ES, Ozonoff S, Krasny L, Johnson M, Lu J, Provencal SL, McMahon W, Lainhart JE (2007) Superior temporal gyrus, language function, and autism. Dev Neuropsychol 31(2):217–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gebauer L, Skewes J, Hørlyck L, Vuust P (2014) Atypical perception of affective prosody in autism spectrum disorder. Neuroimage Clin 6:370–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work is partly supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China Research Program 61672065.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junzhong Ji.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ji, J., Wang, Z., Zhang, X. et al. Sparse data augmentation based on encoderforest for brain network classification. Appl Intell 52, 4317–4329 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021-02579-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021-02579-w

Keywords

Navigation