Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

An overview of probabilistic preference decision-making based on bibliometric analysis

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Probabilistic preference decision-making (PPDM) is a branch of uncertain decision-making, which identifies decision-makers’ preferences with probability to deal with uncertain decision-making problems more comprehensively. In order to understand the status and development process of publications related to PPDM, this paper conducts a bibliometric study. Based on the Web of Science (WoS) core collection, a total of 487 publications are obtained. Firstly, this paper makes a general analysis of the basic characteristics of PPDM, including the type of articles, the number of annual publications and the research directions. Secondly, according to the information of the country/region/institution/author/journal regarding the publications, the publication structure is analyzed, the most productive items are explored, and the partnership of each item is detected with the VOSviewer. The paper then examines the citation structure of PPDM publications, uses the VOSviewer to visualize the citation network and discusses the most influential items. Finally, VOSviewer and Bibliometrix are used to analyze the keywords and study the work focus and current hot topics of PPDM. The keywords are divided into three stages in chronological order to analyze the development trend and theme evolution of the research topics. Based on a series of analyses, we further discuss the characteristics of PPDM publications, give some reasonable suggestions and draw some main conclusions. This research thoroughly analyzes and summarizes the essential features, research status and development trend of PPDM publications, which is helpful for the interested researchers to carry out further scientific research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Data availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  1. Pang Q, Wang H, Xu ZS (2016) Probabilistic linguistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making. Inf Sci 369:128–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen SJ, Hwang CL, Hwang FP (1992) Fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making-methods and applications. Lect Notes Econ Math Syst 375:1-531

  3. Xu ZS, Zhou W (2017) Consensus building with a group of decision makers under the hesitant probabilistic fuzzy environment. Special issue in the journal Fuzzy Optim Decis Making: Fuzzy Approaches in Intelligent Decision Making and Consensus 16(4):481–503

  4. Li J, Chen QX, Niu LL, Wang ZX (2020) An ORESTE approach for multi-criteria decision-making with probabilistic hesitant fuzzy information. Int J Mach Learn Cybernet 11:1591–1609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wu B, Ye Y, BSPR (2020) Basket-sensitive personalized ranking for product recommendation. Inf Sci 541:185–206

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Ramadass S, Krishankumar R, Ravichandran KS, Liao H, Kar S, Herrera-Viedma E. (2020) Evaluation of cloud vendors from probabilistic linguistic information with unknown/partial weight values. Applied Soft Comput 97

  7. Lin MV, Xu ZS, Zhai YL, Yao ZQ (2018) Multi-attribute group decision-making under probabilistic uncertain linguistic environment. J Oper Res Soc 69(2):157–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang YX, Xu ZS, Wang H, Liao HC (2016) Consistency-based risk assessment with probabilistic linguistic preference relation. Appl Soft Comput 49:817–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wu XL, Liao HC (2019) A consensus-based probabilistic linguistic gained and lost dominance score method. Eur J Oper Res 272:1017–1027

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Wu XL, Liao HC (2018) An approach to quality function deployment based on probabilistic linguistic term sets and ORESTE method for multi-expert multi-criteria decision making. Inf Fusion 43:13–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu XL, Liao HC, Xu ZS, Hafezalkotob A, Herrera F (2018) Probabilistic linguistic MULTIMOORA: a multicriteria decision making method based on the probabilistic linguistic expectation function and the improved Borda Rule. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 26:3688–3702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pritchard A (1969) Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. J Doc 25:348

    Google Scholar 

  13. He XR, Wu YY, Yu DJ, Merigo JM (2017) Exploring the ordered weighted averaging operator knowledge domain: a bibliometric analysis. Int J Intell Syst 32:1151–1166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen CM, CiteSpace II (2006) Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 57:359–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. van Eck NJ, Waltman L (2010) Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84:523–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Aria M, Cuccurullo C (2017) Bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informetr 11:959–975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. van Eck NJ, Waltman L, CitNetExplorer (2014) A new software tool for analyzing and visualizing citation networks. J Informetr 8:802–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cobo MJ, López-Herrera AG, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F (2012) SciMAT: A new science mapping analysis software tool. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 63:1609–1630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cancino CA, Merigo JM, Coronado F, Dessouky Y, Dessouky M (2017) Forty years of computers & industrial engineering: a bibliometric analysis. Comput Ind Eng 113:614–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Valenzuela L, Merigo JM, Johnston WJ, Nicolas C, Jaramillo JF (2017) Thirty years of the Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing: a bibliometric analysis. J Bus Ind Mark 32:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang XX, Chang YR, Xu ZS, Wang ZD, Kadirkamanathan V (2020) 50th anniversary of International Journal of Systems Science: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis. Int J Syst Sci. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207721.2020.1862937

  22. Yu DJ, Xu ZS, Fujita H (2019) Bibliometric analysis on the evolution of applied intelligence. Appl Intell 49(2):449–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shi YH, Wang SM, Ma YQ, Macleod J, Chen M, Yang HH (2019) Research on the hotspots and trends of learning analytics based on CiteSpace. In: Cheung SKS, Lee LK, Simonova I, Kozel T, Kwok LF (eds) Blended Learning: Educational Innovation for Personalized Learning, Icbl 2019. Springer International Publishing Ag, Cham, pp 239–248

  24. Yu DJ, Xu ZS, Wang XZ (2020) Bibliometric analysis of support vector machines research trend: a case study in China. Int J Mach Learn Cybernet 11:715–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gu DX, Li JJ, Li XG, Liang CY (2017) Visualizing the knowledge structure and evolution of big data research in healthcare informatics. Int J Med Inform 98:22–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang XX, Xu ZS, Su SF, Zhou W (2021) A comprehensive bibliometric analysis of uncertain group decision making from 1980 to 2019. Inf Sci 547:328–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Qin Y, Wang XX, Xu ZS, Skare M (2021) The impact of poverty cycles on economic research: evidence from econometric analysis. Econ Res-Ekonomska Istraživanja 34:152–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Xu ZS, Wang XD, Wang XX, Skare M (2021) A comprehensive bibliometric analysis of entrepreneurship and crisis. J Bus Res 135:304–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang K, Liang QM (2020) Recent progress of cooperation on climate mitigation: A bibliometric analysis. J Clean Prod 277

  30. Lopez-Robles JR, Cobo MJ, Gutierrez-Salcedo M, Martinez-Sanchez MA, Gamboa-Rosales NK, Herrera-Viedma E (2021) 30th Anniversary of Applied Intelligence: A combination of bibliometrics and thematic analysis using SciMAT. Appl Intell 51:6547–6568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hirsch JE (2007) Does the h index have predictive power? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:19193–19198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kohler J, Baravalle M (2019) Risk-based decision making and the calibration of structural design codes - prospects and challenges. Civ Eng Environ Syst 36:55–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Shahbaz M, Bashir MF, Bashir MA, Shahzad L (2021) A bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review of tourism-environmental degradation nexus. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int

  34. Liu J, Wu NQ, Qiao Y, Li ZW (2021) A scientometric review of research on traffic forecasting in transportation. IET Intel Transp Syst 15:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Marx SM, Weber EU, Orlove BS, Leiserowitz A, Krantz DH, Roncoli C et al (2007) Communication and mental processes: Experiential and analytic processing of uncertain climate information. Glob Environ 17:47–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Beer M, Ferson S, Kreinovich V (2013) Imprecise probabilities in engineering analyses. Mech Syst Signal Process 37:4–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Gou XJ, Xu ZS (2016) Novel basic operational laws for linguistic terms, hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and probabilistic linguistic term sets. Inf Sci 372:407–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Guo JJ, Pandey S, Doyle J, Bian BY, Lis Y, Raisch DW (2010) A review of quantitative risk-benefit methodologies for assessing drug safety and efficacy-report of the ISPOR risk-benefit management working group. Value Health 13:657–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Moeini-Aghtaie M, Abbaspour A, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M (2012) Incorporating large-scale distant wind farms in probabilistic transmission expansion planning-part I: theory and algorithm. IEEE Trans Power Syst 27:1585–1593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Liao HC, Jiang LS, Xu ZS, Xu JP, Herrera F (2017) A linear programming method for multiple criteria decision making with probabilistic linguistic information. Inf Sci 415:341–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang YX, Xu ZS, Liao HC (2017) A consensus process for group decision making with probabilistic linguistic preference relations. Inf Sci 414:260–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang J, Yu Q, Zheng FS, Long C, Lu ZX, Duan ZG (2016) Comparing keywords plus of WoS and author keywords: A case study of patient adherence research. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 67:967–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Linnenluecke MK, Marrone M, Singh AK (2020) Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses. Aust J Manag 45:175–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Tang M, Liao HC, Su SF (2018) A bibliometric overview and visualization of the International Journal of Fuzzy Systems Between 2007 and 2017. Int J Fuzzy Syst 20:1403–1422

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 72071135 and 71771155).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Business School, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610064, China

    Zeshui Xu, Tiantian Lei & Yong Qin

Authors
  1. Zeshui Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tiantian Lei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yong Qin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zeshui Xu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, Z., Lei, T. & Qin, Y. An overview of probabilistic preference decision-making based on bibliometric analysis. Appl Intell 52, 15368–15386 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-03189-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-03189-w

Keywords