Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An evolutionary approach for obnoxious cooperative maximum covering location problem

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a steady state genetic algorithm based approach for solving the obnoxious cooperative maximum covering location problem (OCMCLP) on a network. In cooperative coverage models, it is assumed that each facility emits a signal that decays over distance. At each demand point the cumulative signal strength received from all the facilities is calculated. A demand point is deemed to be covered if the total signal strength received by it is not less than a given threshold. All facilities contribute to the coverage of each demand point. Such models are different from the individual coverage models where the coverage of a demand point is decided by the single facility closest to that demand point. Given a graph with the set of demand points, the set of edges between these demand points, and the non-negative real weights associated with each demand point indicating the total demand at each point, the OCMCLP is concerned with locating p obnoxious (undesirable) facilities either at the demand points or along the edges in such a manner that maximizes the uncovered demand. The proposed genetic algorithm based approach makes use of crossover and mutation operators designed as per the characteristics of the OCMCLP. Solutions obtained through these genetic operators are improved further by a local search strategy. The performance of the proposed approach has been evaluated on the standard benchmark instances available in the literature. Computational results clearly show our proposed approach to be better in comparison to the existing state-of-the-art approaches for the OCMCLP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Averbakh I, Berman O, Krass D, Kalcsics J, Nickel S (2014) Cooperative covering problems on networks. Networks 63(4):334–349

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Berman O, Drezner Z, Krass D (2009) Cooperative cover location problems: The planar case. IIE Transactions 42(3):232–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carrizosa E, Plastria F (1998) Locating an undesirable facility by generalized cutting planes. Mathematics of Operations Research 23(3):680–694

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Chaurasia SN, Singh A (2017) Hybrid evolutionary approaches for the single machine order acceptance and scheduling problem. Applied Soft Computing 52:725–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Church R, ReVelle C (1974) The maximal covering location problem. Papers of the Regional Science Association 32(1):101–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Church RL (2019) Understanding the Weber location paradigm. In: Contributions to location analysis. Springer, pp 69–88

  7. Church RL, Garfinkel RS (1978) Locating an obnoxious facility on a network. Transportation Science 12(2):107–118

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Colmenar JM, Greistorfer P, Martí R, Duarte A (2016) Advanced greedy randomized adaptive search procedure for the obnoxious p-median problem. European Journal of Operational Research 252(2):432–442

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Davis L (1991) Handbook of genetic algorithms. Van Nostrand Reinhold

  10. Dokeroglu T, Sevinc E, Kucukyilmaz T, Cosar A (2019) A survey on new generation metaheuristic algorithms. Computers & Industrial Engineering 137:106040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Drezner T, Drezner Z, Kalczynski P (2020) Multiple obnoxious facilities location: A cooperative model. IISE Transactions 52(12):1403–1412

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Drezner T, Drezner Z, Schöbel A (2018) The Weber obnoxious facility location model: A big arc small arc approach. Computers & Operations Research 98:240–250

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Drezner T, Drezner Z, Scott CH (2009) Location of a facility minimizing nuisance to or from a planar network. Computers & Operations Research 36(1):135–148

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Drezner Z (1986) The p-cover problem. European Journal of Operational Research 26(2):312–313

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Drezner Z, Kalczynski P, Salhi S (2019) The planar multiple obnoxious facilities location problem: A voronoi based heuristic. Omega 87:105–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Drezner Z, Scott CH, Turner J (2016) Mixed planar and network single-facility location problems. Networks 68(4):271–282

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Drezner Z, Suzuki A (2004) The big triangle small triangle method for the solution of nonconvex facility location problems. Operations Research 52(1):128–135

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Drezner Z, Wesolowsky GO (1983) The location of an obnoxious facility with rectangular distances. Journal of Regional Science 23(2):241–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Drezner Z, Wesolowsky GO (1995) Obnoxious facility location in the interior of a planar network. Journal of Regional Science 35(4):675–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Erkut E, Neuman S (1989) Analytical models for locating undesirable facilities. European Journal of Operational Research 40(3):275–291

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Goldberg DE, Deb K (1991) A comparative analysis of selection schemes used in genetic algorithms. In: Foundations of genetic algorithms, Morgan Kaufmann, pp 69–93

  22. Hansen P, Cohon J (1981) On the location of an obnoxious facility. Sistemi urbani Napoli 3:299–317

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jayalakshmi B, Singh A (2017) A hybrid artificial bee colony algorithm for the cooperative maximum covering location problem. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics 8(2):691–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kaiser M, Morin T (1992) Locating an obnoxious facility. Applied Mathematics Letters 5(3):25–26

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim HY (2014) Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Nonparametric statistical methods: 2. nonparametric methods for comparing three or more groups and repeated measures. Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics 39(4):329–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Li W, Wang GG, Gandomi AH (2021) A survey of learning-based intelligent optimization algorithms. Arch Computat Methods Eng 28:3781–3799

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. McDonald JH (2009) Handbook of biological statistics. Sparky House Publishing Baltimore, MD, vol 2

  28. Melachrinoudis E (2011) The location of undesirable facilities. In: Foundations of location analysis, Springer, pp 207–239

  29. Pandiri V, Singh A, Rossi A (2020) Two hybrid metaheuristic approaches for the covering salesman problem. Neural Computing and Applications 32(19):15643–15663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Plastria F (1996) Optimal location of undesirable facilities: a selective overview. JORBEL-Belgian Journal of Operations Research, Statistics, and Computer Science 36(2–3):109–127

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Rossi A, Singh A, Sevaux M (2021) Focus distance-aware lifetime maximization of video camera-based wireless sensor networks. Journal of Heuristics 27(1–2):5–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Shamos MI, Hoey D (1975) Closest-point problems. In: 16th Annual symposium on foundations of computer science (SFCS 1975), IEEE, pp 151–162

  33. Singh A, Rossi A, Sevaux M (2013) Matheuristic approaches for Q-coverage problem versions in wireless sensor networks. Engineering Optimization 45(5):609–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Singh K, Sundar S (2019) A hybrid steady-state genetic algorithm for the min-degree constrained minimum spanning tree problem. European Journal of Operational Research 276(1):88–105

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Singh K, Sundar S (2020) A hybrid genetic algorithm for the degree-constrained minimum spanning tree problem. Soft Computing 24(3):2169–2186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Weber A, Friedrich C (1929) Alfred Weber’s theory of the location of industries

  37. Wesolowsky GO (1993) The Weber problem: History and perspectives. Computers & Operations Research

  38. Wilcoxon F, Katti S, Wilcox RA (1970) Critical values and probability levels for the wilcoxon rank sum test and the wilcoxon signed rank test. Selected Tables in Mathematical Statistics 1:171–259

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to thank three anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions which helped in improving the quality of this manuscript. Authors are grateful to Dr. Jörg Kalcsics for supplying the OCMCLP benchmark instances along with the solution values for these instances yielded by various heuristics presented in [1]. The second author is thankful to the Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), Government of India for supporting his research work via research grant no. MTR/2017/000391 under MATRICS scheme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alok Singh.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chappidi, E., Singh, A. An evolutionary approach for obnoxious cooperative maximum covering location problem. Appl Intell 52, 16651–16666 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-03239-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-03239-3

Keywords