Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Selection of a solar water heater for large-scale group decision making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations based on the best-worst method

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to the promotion of sustainable development policies, solar water heaters have quickly occupied the market. Choosing the best-performing solar water heater has become a popular group decision-making problem. This paper presents a best-worst large-scale group decision making (LSGDM) approach based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations (HFLPRs) and applies it to the selection of solar water heaters. First, we establish an optimization model to normalize hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets (HFLTSs) with diverse lengths. Then, a satisfaction degree function based on the additive consistency of HFLPRs is proposed, and the fluctuation deviation level of HFLPRs is described. Next, we develop a clustering process combining the satisfaction degree and fluctuation deviation level to classify large-scale experts into several subgroups. The clustering algorithm not only improves the fusion of subgroups but also enhances the satisfaction of subgroups. Moreover, a best-worst model based on the credibility measure of subgroups is presented to determine the weights of the subgroups. Finally, a numerical example of a solar water heater which involves normalizing the HFLPRs given by 20 experts into HFLTSs with a length of 3, clustering the 20 experts into 7 subgroups with weights of 0.5153, 0.2125, 0.1332, 0.0155, 0.0854, 0.0287 and 0.0094, and selecting P1 as the most satisfactory alternative and a comparative analysis are utilized to demonstrate the availability of the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Lotfi R, Kargar B, Hoseini SH, Nazari S, Safavi S, Weber G-W (2021) Resilience and sustainable supply chain network design by considering renewable energy. Int J Energy Res 45(12):17749–17766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Boxwell M (2019) Solar electricity handbook 2019 edition : A simple practical guide to solar energy : designing and installing solar PV systems

  3. Burdick J, Schmidt P (2017) Install your own solar panels : Designing and installing a photovoltaic system to power your home. Storey Publishing

  4. Wang TC, Tsai SY (2018) Solar panel supplier selection for the photovoltaic system design by using fuzzy multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approaches. Energies 11(8):1989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Balo F, Şağbanş̧ua L (2016) The selection of the best solar panel for the photovoltaic system design by using AHP. Energy Procedia 100:50–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tirkolaee EB, Aydin NS (2022) Integrated design of sustainable supply chain and transportation network using a fuzzy bi-level decision support system for perishable products. Expert Syst with Appl 195:116628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tirkolaee EB, Dashtian Z, Weber G-W, Tomášková H, Soltani M, Mousavi NS (2021) An integrated decision-making approach for green supplier selection in an agri-food supply chain. Threshold of Robustness Worthiness Mathematics 9:1304

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tirkolaee EB, Mardani A, Dashtian Z, Soltani M, Weber G-W (2020) A novel hybrid method using fuzzy decision making and multi-objective programming for sustainable-reliable supplier selection in two-echelon supply chain design. J of Clean Prod 250:119517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Muravev D, Mijic N (2020) A novel integrated provider selection multicriteria model : the BWM-MABAC model. Decision Making : Applications in Management and Engineering 3(1):60–78

    Google Scholar 

  10. Riaz M, Çagman N, Wali N, Mushtaq A (2020) Certain properties of soft multi-set topology with applications in multi-criteria decision making. Decision Making : Applications in Management and Engineering 3(2):70–96

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dong YC, Zhao SH, Zhang HJ, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E (2018) A self-management mechanism for non-cooperative behaviors in large-scale group consensus reaching processes. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 26(6):3276–3288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Xu XH, Du ZJ, Chen XH (2015) Consensus model for multi-criteria large-group emergency decision making considering non-cooperative behaviors and minority opinions. Decis Support Syst 79:150–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu BS, Shen YH, Zhang W, Chen XH, Wang XQ (2015) An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy principal component analysis model-based method for complex multi-attribute large-group decision-making. Eur J Oper Res 245:209–225

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Pawlak Z (1982) Rough sets. Int J Comput Inform Sci 11:341–356

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Smarandache F (2010) Neutrosophic set : -a generalization of the intuitionistic fuzzy set. Journal of Defense Resources Management 1:107–116

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rodríguez RM, Martínez L, Herrera F (2012) Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 20:109–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou XY, Wang LQ, Liao HC, Wang SY, Lev B, Fujita H (2019) A prospect theory-based group decision approach considering consensus for portfolio selection with hesitant fuzzy information. Knowledge-Based Systems 168(15):28–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liao HC, Si GS, Xu ZS, Fujita H (2018) Hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference utility set and its application in selection of fire rescue plans. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15(4):664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lin MW, Chen ZY, Chen RQ, Fujita H (2021) Evaluation of startup companies using multicriteria decision making based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic information envelopment analysis models. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Wiley 36(5):2292–2322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tang J, Zhang YN, Fujita H, Zhang XD, Meng FY (2021) Analysis of acceptable additive consistency and consensus of group decision making with interval-valued hesitant fuzzy preference relations, neural computing and applications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05516-z

  21. Liu HB, Cai JF, Jiang L (2014) On improving the additive consistency of the fuzzy preference relations based on comparative linguistic expressions. Int J Intell Syst 29:544–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhu B, Xu ZS (2014) Consistency measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22:35–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu P, Zhou LG, Chen HY, Tao ZF (2019) Additive consistency of hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relation with a new expansion principle for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 27:716–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhong XY, Xu XH (2020) Clustering-based method for large group decision making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic information : Integrating correlation and consensus. Appl Soft Comput 87:105973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Xu XH, Chen XH (2005) Research on the group clustering method based on vector space. Syst. Systems Engineering and Electronics 27(6):1034–1037

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wan QF, Xu XH, Chen XH, Zhuang J (2020) A two-stage optimization model for large-scale group decision-making in disaster management : minimizing group conflict and maximizing individual satisfaction. Group Decis Negot 29:901–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tang M, Liao HC, Herrera-Viedma E, Philip Chen CL, Pedrycz W (2020) A dynamic adaptive subgroup-to-subgroup compatibility-based conflict detection and resolution model for Multicriteria large-scale group decision making. IEEE Trans on Cybern 99:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wu T, Liu XW, Qin QD (2017) A linguistic solution for double large-scale group decision-making in Ecommerce. Computer & Industrial Engineering 116:97–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ren RX, Tang M, Liao HC (2020) Managing minority opinions in micro-grid planning by a social network analysis-based large scale group decision making method with hesitant fuzzy linguistic information. Knowledge Based Systems 189:105060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ren P, Xu Z, Wang X, Zeng XJ (2021) Group decision making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations based on modified extent measurement. Expert Syst Appl 171:114235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Haseli G, Sheikh R Wang JQ, TomáÚsková H, Tirkolaee EB (2021) A novel approach for group decision making based on the best-worst method (G-bwm): Application to supply chain management, Mathematics. vol 9(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/math9161881

  32. Subotic M, Stevic B, Ristic B, Simic S (2020) The selection of a location for potential roundabout construction - a case study of Doboj. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences : Theory and Applications 3(1):41–56

    Google Scholar 

  33. Yager RR (1988) On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 18(1):183–190

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Wu P, Wu Q, Zhou LG, Chen HY (2020) Optimal group selection model for large-scale group decision making. Information Fusion 61:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yuan JH, Luo XG (2019) Approach for multi-attribute decision making based on novel intuitionistic fuzzy entropy and evidential reasoning. Comput Ind Eng 135:643–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pamucar D, Stević ž, Sremac S (2018) A new model for determining weight coefficients of criteria in MCDM models: full consistency method FUCOM. Symmetry 10:393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. žižović M, Pamucar D, Ćirović G, žižović M, M & D, Miljković B (2020) A Model for Determining Weight Coefficients by Forming a Non-Decreasing Series at Criteria Significance Levels (NDSL). Mathematics 8:745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. žižović M, Pamucar D (2019) New model for determining criteria weights : Level based weight assessment (LBWA) model. Decision Making : Applications in Management and Engineering 2(2):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang Z, Chen SM (2020) Group decision making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Inform Sci 514:354–368

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Xu ZS (2005) Deviation measures of linguistic preference relations in group decision making. Omega 33:249–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Xu ZS (2004) EOWG operators for aggregating linguistic labels based on linguistic preference relations EOWA international. Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 12:791–810

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Liao HC, Xu ZS, Zeng XJ, Merigó JM (2015) Qualitative decision making with correlation coefficients of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Knowledge Based Systems 76:127–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Liao HC, Xu ZS, Zeng XJ (2015) Hesitant fuzzy linguistic VIKOR method and its application in qualitative multiple criteria decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 23:1343–1355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Rezaei J (2015) Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega 53:49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Gong ZW, Lin Y, Yao TX (2013) Uncertain fuzzy preference relations and their applications. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Gou XJ, Xu ZS, Herrera F (2018) Consensus reaching process for large-scale group decision making with double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Knowledge Based Systems 157:20–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Liu BS, Zhou Q, Ding RX, Palomares I, Herrera F Large-scale group decision making model based on social network analysis : Trust relationship-based conflict detection and elimination. European Journal of Operational

  48. Wu T, Zhang K, Liu XW, Chao CY (2019) A two-stage social trust network partition model for large-scale group decision-making problems. Knowledge Based Systems 163:632–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Wu ZB, Xu JP (2018) A consensus model for large-scale group decision making with hesitant fuzzy information and changeable clusters. Inf Fusion 41:217–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Xiao J, Wang XL, Zhang HJ (2020) Managing personalized individual semantics and consensus in linguistic distribution large-scale group decision making. Inf Fusion 53:20–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Xu XH, Du ZJ, Chen XH, Cai CG (2019) Confidence consensus-based model for large-scale group decision making : a novel approach to managing non-cooperative behaviors. Inform Sci 477:410–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Zhang HJ, Dong YC, Herrera-Viedma E (2018) Consensus building for the heterogeneous large-scale GDM with the individual concerns and satisfactions. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 26(2):884–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Zhang Z, Yu WY, Martinez L, Gao Y (2019) Managing multigranular unbalanced hesitant fuzzy linguistic information in multiattribute large-scale group decision making : a linguistic distribution-based approach. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2019.2949758

  54. Liu PD, Mahmood T, Khan Q (2017) Multi-attribute decision-making based on prioritized aggregation operator under hesitant intuitionistic fuzzy linguistic environment. Symmetry 9(11):270

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  55. Zhang Z, Li ZL, Gao Y (2021) Consensus reaching for group decision making with multi-granular unbalanced linguistic information : a bounded confidence and minimum adjustment-based approach. Inf Fusion 74:96–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Liu PD, Wang P, Pedrycz W (2020) Consistency and consensus-based group decision-making method with incomplete probabilistic linguistic preference relations. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 99:1–1. Research, 275(2), 737-754(2019)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Gong ZW, Guo WW, Herrera-Viedma E, Gong ZJ, Wei G (2020) Consistency and consensus modeling of linear uncertain preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 283:290–307

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  58. Guo WW, Gong ZW, Xu XX, Krejcar O, Herrera-Viedma E (2021) Linear uncertain extensions of the minimum cost consensus model based on uncertain distance and consensus utility. Inf Fusion 70:12–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Li CC, Rodríguez RM, Herrera F, Martínez L, Dong YC (2018) Consistency of hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations: an interval consistency index. Inform Sci 432:347–361

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 72171002, 71771001, 71701001, 71871001, 71901001, 71901088, 72071001, 72001001), Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Anhui Province (No. 1908085J03), Research Funding Project of Academic and technical leaders and reserve candidates in Anhui Province (No.2018H179), Top Talent Academic Foundation for University Discipline of Anhui Province (No. gxbjZD2020056).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Economics Business Administration, Financial Engineering Research Center, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, 430079, China

    Yuanyuan Zhou & Chengli Zheng

  2. School of Mathematical Sciences, Anhui University, Hefei, 230601, China

    Ligang Zhou & Huayou Chen

  3. Anhui University Center for Applied Mathematics, Anhui University, Hefei, 230601, China

    Ligang Zhou

Authors
  1. Yuanyuan Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chengli Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ligang Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Huayou Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ligang Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

We declare that we have no financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that can inappropriately influence our work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, Y., Zheng, C., Zhou, L. et al. Selection of a solar water heater for large-scale group decision making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations based on the best-worst method. Appl Intell 53, 4462–4482 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-03688-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-03688-w

Keywords