Abstract
E mpathy is the ability to spontaneously or purposefully place oneself in another’s situation. Under the continuous effect of empathy, an individual’s preference for things will inevitably be affected by the local and non-local social environment. Inspired by neuropsychology, this paper constructs an extended empathy model to compensate for the shortcomings of previous models in describing the global preference (utility) coupling between individuals, and analyzes how to make efficient decisions based on this model in a large-scale multiagent system. Empathy is abstracted as a random experience process in the form of nonstationary Markov chains, and empathetic utility is defined as the expectation of preference experienced under the corresponding transition probability distribution. By structurally introducing the self-other separation mechanism and energy attenuation mechanism, the model can exhibit social attributes, including absorbency, inhibition, and anisotropy. An extended iterative candidate elimination (EICE) algorithm is designed for the decision problem defined by the proposed model. This algorithm correlates the error upper bound of the objective function with that of the empathy utility to perform the iterative estimation of the candidate strategies. For a polynomial objective function, the EICE under affective empathy can reduce the algorithm complexity from \(O\left (n^{x}\right )\) to \(O\left (n^{y}\right )\) (1 ≤ y ≤ 2 ≤ x ≤ 3). In terms of application prospects, the model and the corresponding decision algorithm are proved to be not only suitable for human society but also able to match the engineering application scenarios such as human-machine interaction and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) formation under specific requirements.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Kleiman-Weiner M (2018) Computational foundations of human social intelligence. Phd thesis Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Sanfey AG (2007) Social decision-making: insights from game theory and neuroscience. Science 318(5850):598–602
Ruff CC, Fehr E (2014) The neurobiology of rewards and values in social decision making. Nat Rev Neurosci 15(8):549–562
Juhl J, Wildschut T, Sedikides C, Diebel T, Cheung W-Y, Ad JJM Vingerhoets (2020) Nostalgia proneness and empathy: Generality, underlying mechanism, and implications for prosocial behavior. J Pers 88(3):485–500
Stegmann S, Roberge MÉ, van Dick R (2012) Getting tuned in to those who are different: The role of empathy as mediator between diversity and performance. In: Managing Diversity in Organizations. Springer, pp 19–44
Sorensen NA (2010) The road to empathy: Dialogic pathways for engaging diversity and improving intergroup relations University of Michigan
Fowler Z, Law KF, Gaesser B (2021) Against empathy bias: the moral value of equitable empathy. Psychol Sci 32(5):766–779
De Coster L, Wiersema JR, Deschrijver E, Brass M (2018) The effect of being imitated on empathy for pain in adults with high-functioning autism: Disturbed self–other distinction leads to altered empathic responding. Autism 22(6):712–727
Brewer R, Cook R, Cardi V, Treasure J, Catmur C, Bird G (2019) Alexithymia explains increased empathic personal distress in individuals with and without eating disorders. Q J Exp Psychol 72(7):1827–1836
Bukowski H, Tik M, Silani G, Ruff CC, Windischberger C, Lamm C (2020) When differences matter: rtms/fmri reveals how differences in dispositional empathy translate to distinct neural underpinnings of self-other distinction in empathy. Cortex 128:143–161
Yang H-X, Hu HX, Zhang Y-J, Yi W, Lui SSY, Chan RCK (2021) A network analysis of interoception, self-awareness, empathy, alexithymia, and autistic traits. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, p 1–11
Rosenblatt J (2019) Symmetry, entropy, diversity and (why not?) quantum statistics in society. Entropy 21(2):144
Chen J, Zhang D, Qu Z, Wang C (2020) Artificial empathy: A new perspective for analyzing and designing multi-agent systems, vol 8
Zhang C, Li X, Hao J, Chen S, Tuyls K, Xue W, Feng Z (2019) Sa-iga: a multiagent reinforcement learning method towards socially optimal outcomes. Auton Agent Multi-Agent Syst 33(4):403–429
Kleiman-Weiner M, Saxe R, Tenenbaum JB (2017) Learning a commonsense moral theory. Cognition 167:107–123
Salehi-Abari A, Boutilier C, Larson K (2019) Empathetic decision making in social networks. Artif Intell 275:174–203
Levine DK (1998) Modeling altruism and spitefulness in experiments. Review of economic dynamics 1(3):593–622
Sethi R, Somanathan E (2001) Preference evolution and reciprocity. J Econ Theory 97 (2):273–297
Martinez-Vaquero LA, Han TA, Pereira LM (2015) Apology and forgiveness evolve to resolve failures in cooperative agreements. Sci Rep 5(1):1–12
Hughes E, Leibo JZ, Phillips M, Tuyls K, Duenez-Guzman E, Garcia Castaneda A, Dunning I, Zhu T, McKee K, Koster R et al (2018) Inequity aversion improves cooperation in intertemporal social dilemmas. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 31(NIPS 2018):31
Peysakhovich A, Lerer A (2018) Prosocial learning agents solve generalized stag hunts better than selfish ones. In: Proceedings of the 17th International conference on autonomous agents and MultiAgent systems, pp 2043–2044
James J, Watson CI, MacDonald B (2018) Artificial empathy in social robots: An analysis of emotions in speech. In: 2018 27th IEEE International symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, pp 632–637
Buono P, Castellano G, De Carolis B, Macchiarulo N (2020) Social assistive robots in elderly care: Exploring the role of empathy. In: EMPATHY@ AVI, pp 12–19
Rogers CR (1975) Empathic: An unappreciated way of being. Couns Psychol 5(2):2–10
Batson CD, Batson JG, Slingsby JK, Harrell KL, Peekna HM, Todd RM (1991) Empathic joy and the empathy-altruism hypothesis. J Pers Soc Psychol 61(3):413
Cialdini RB, Brown SL, Lewis BP, Luce C, Neuberg SL (1997) Reinterpreting the empathy–altruism relationship: When one into one equals oneness. J Pers Soc Psychol 73(3):481
Molenberghs P, Cunnington R, Mattingley JB (2012) Brain regions with mirror properties: a meta-analysis of 125 human fmri studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 36(1):341–349
Ferrari PF, Coudé G (2018) Mirror neurons, embodied emotions, and empathy. In: Neuronal correlates of empathy. Elsevier, pp 67–77
Walter H (2012) Social cognitive neuroscience of empathy: concepts, circuits, and genes. Emot Rev 4(1):9–17
Frith CD, Singer T (2008) The role of social cognition in decision making. Philos Trans R Soc: B, Biol Sci 363(1511):3875–3886
Stephan A (2015) Empathy for artificial agents. Int J Soc Robot 7(1):111–116
Rossi PG, Fedeli L (2015) Empathy, education and ai. Int J Soc Robot 7(1):103–109
De Carolis B, Ferilli S, Palestra G (2017) Simulating empathic behavior in a social assistive robot. Multimed Tools Appl 76(4):5073–5094
Chen J, Zuo Y, Zhang D, Qu Z, Wang C (2019) Promoting constructive interaction and moral behaviors using adaptive empathetic learning. In: International conference on intelligent robotics and applications. Springer, pp 3–14
Saxe Rebecca, Wexler Anna (2005) Making sense of another mind: the role of the right temporo-parietal junction. Neuropsychologia 43(10):1391–1399
Decety J, Lamm C (2007) The role of the right temporoparietal junction in social interaction: how low-level computational processes contribute to meta-cognition. Neuroscientist 13(6):580–593
Lamm C, Bukowski H, Silani G (2016) From shared to distinct self–other representations in empathy: evidence from neurotypical function and socio-cognitive disorders. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 371(1686):20150083
FeldmanHall O, Dalgleish T, Mobbs D (2013) Alexithymia decreases altruism in real social decisions. Cortex 49(3):899–904
Saito N, Yokoyama T, Ohira H (2016) Self-other distinction enhanced empathic responses in individuals with alexithymia. Sci Rep 6(1):1–7
Bloom P (2017) Empathy and its discontents. Trends Cogn Sci 21(1):24–31
Matsangidou M, Otterbacher J, Ang CS, Zaphiris P (2018) Can the crowd tell how i feel? trait empathy and ethnic background in a visual pain judgment task. Univ Access Inf Soc 17(3):649–661
Particle Data Group et al (2020) Review of particle physics. Prog Theor Exp Phys 2020(8):1–2093
Orey S (1971) Lecture notes on limit theorems for markov chain transition probabilities
Horn RA, Johnson CR (2012) Matrix analysis Cambridge university press
Meyer CD (2000) Matrix analysis and applied linear algebra, vol 71 Siam
Hörmander L (2007) The analysis of linear partial differential operators i: Distribution theory and fourier analysis. Springer
Cormen TH, Leiserson CE, Rivest RL, Stein C (2001) Introduction to algorithms second edition. The Knuth-Morris-Pratt Algorithm
Barabási AL, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286 (5439):509–512
Tisseron S, Tordo F, Baddoura R (2015) Testing empathy with robots: a model in four dimensions and sixteen ítems. Int J Soc Robot 7(1):97–102
Rodrigues SH, Mascarenhas S, Dias J, Paiva A (2015) A process model of empathy for virtual agents. Interact Comput 27(4):371–391
Grady L (2006) Random walks for image segmentation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 28(11):1768–1783
Zhao S (2018) Affine formation maneuver control of multiagent systems. IEEE Trans Autom Control 63(12):4140–4155
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by a grant from Touyan Project of Heilongjiang Province.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, J., Liu, B., Zhang, D. et al. Social decision-making in a large-scale MultiAgent system considering the influence of empathy. Appl Intell 53, 10068–10095 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-03933-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-03933-2