Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Sea-horse optimizer: a novel nature-inspired meta-heuristic for global optimization problems

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel swarm intelligence-based metaheuristic called as sea-horse optimizer (SHO), which is inspired by the movement, predation and breeding behaviors of sea horses in nature. In the first two stages, SHO mimics different movements patterns and the probabilistic predation mechanism of sea horses, respectively. In detail, the movement modes of a sea horse are divided into floating spirally affected by the action of marine vortices or drifting along the current waves. For the predation strategy, it simulates the success or failure of the sea horse for capturing preys with a certain probability. Furthermore, due to the unique characteristic of the male pregnancy, in the third stage, the proposed algorithm is designed to breed offspring while maintaining the positive information of the male parent, which is conducive to increase the population diversity. These three intelligent behaviors are mathematically expressed and constructed to balance the local exploitation and global exploration of SHO. The performance of SHO is evaluated on 23 well-known functions and CEC2014 benchmark functions compared with six state-of-the-art metaheuristic algorithms. Finally, five real-world engineering problems are utilized to test the effectiveness of SHO. The experimental results demonstrate that SHO is a high-performance optimizer and positive adaptability to deal with constraint problems. SHO source code is available from: https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/115945-sea-horse-optimizer

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Saha C, Das S, Pal K, Mukherjee S (2014) A fuzzy rule-based penalty function approach for constrained evolutionary optimization. IEEE Trans Cybern 46(12):2953–2965

    Google Scholar 

  2. Spall JC (2005) Introduction to stochastic search and optimization: estimation, simulation, and control, vol. 65. Wiley, New York

  3. Hoos HH, Stützle T (2004) Stochastic local search: foundations and applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam

  4. Alweshah M (2021) Solving feature selection problems by combining mutation and crossover operations with the monarch butterfly optimization algorithm. Appl Intell 51(6):4058–4081

    Google Scholar 

  5. Prencipe LP, Marinelli M (2021) A novel mathematical formulation for solving the dynamic and discrete berth allocation problem by using the bee Colony optimisation algorithm. Appl Intell 51(7):4127–4142

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goodarzian F, Kumar V, Ghasemi P (2021) A set of efficient heuristics and meta-heuristics to solve a multi-objective pharmaceutical supply chain network. Comput Ind Eng 158:107389

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD Jr, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220(4598):671–680

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Glover F (1989) Tabu search—part I. ORSA J Comput 1(3):190–206

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Back T (1996) Evolutionary algorithms in theory and practice: evolution strategies, evolutionary programming, genetic algorithms. Oxford University Press, New York

  10. Fan Q, Huang H, Li Y, Han Z, Hu Y, Huang D (2021) Beetle antenna strategy based grey wolf optimization. Expert Syst Appl 165:113882

    Google Scholar 

  11. Holland JH (1992) Genetic algorithms. Sci Am 267(1):66–73

    Google Scholar 

  12. Price KV (2013) Differential evolution. In handbook of optimization (pp 187-214). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yao X, Liu Y, Lin G (1999) Evolutionary programming made faster. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 3(2):82–102

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tinkle DW, Wilbur HM, Tilley SG (1970) Evolutionary strategies in lizard reproduction. Evolution 24(1):55–74

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kumar A, Rathore PS, Díaz VG, Agrawal R (Eds.) (2020) Swarm intelligence optimization: algorithms and applications. Wiley, New York

  16. Kennedy J, Eberhart R (1995) Particle swarm optimization. In proceedings of ICNN'95-international conference on neural networks, vol 4. IEEE, pp 1942–1948

  17. Mirjalili S, Mirjalili SM, Lewis A (2014) Grey wolf optimizer. Adv Eng Softw 69:46–61

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mirjalili S (2015) The ant lion optimizer. Adv Eng Softw 83:80–98

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mirjalili S (2016) Dragonfly algorithm: a new meta-heuristic optimization technique for solving single-objective, discrete, and multi-objective problems. Neural Comput Appl 27(4):1053–1073

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Askarzadeh A (2016) A novel metaheuristic method for solving constrained engineering optimization problems: crow search algorithm. Comput Struct 169:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jain M, Singh V, Rani A (2019) A novel nature-inspired algorithm for optimization: squirrel search algorithm. Swarm Evol Comput 44:148–175

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dhiman G, Kumar V (2019) Seagull optimization algorithm: theory and its applications for large-scale industrial engineering problems. Knowl-Based Syst 165:169–196

    Google Scholar 

  23. Heidari AA, Mirjalili S, Faris H, Aljarah I, Mafarja M, Chen H (2019) Harris hawks optimization: algorithm and applications. Future Gener Comput Syst 97:849–872

    Google Scholar 

  24. Khishe M, Mosavi MR (2020) Chimp optimization algorithm. Expert Syst Appl 149:113338

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kaur S, Awasthi LK, Sangal AL, Dhiman G (2020) Tunicate swarm algorithm: a new bio-inspired based metaheuristic paradigm for global optimization. Eng Appl Artif Intell 90:103541

    Google Scholar 

  26. Faramarzi A, Heidarinejad M, Mirjalili S, Gandomi AH (2020) Marine predators algorithm: a nature-inspired metaheuristic. Expert Syst Appl 152:113377

    Google Scholar 

  27. Li S, Chen H, Wang M, Heidari AA, Mirjalili S (2020) Slime mould algorithm: a new method for stochastic optimization. Future Gener Comput Syst 111:300–323

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mohammadi-Balani A, Nayeri MD, Azar A, Taghizadeh-Yazdi M (2021) Golden eagle optimizer: a nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithm. Comput Ind Eng 152:107050

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yang X-S (2012) Flower pollination algorithm for global optimization. In international conference on unconventional computing and natural computation (pp 240-249). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gomes GF, da Cunha SS, Ancelotti AC (2019) A sunflower optimization (SFO) algorithm applied to damage identification on laminated composite plates. Eng Comput 35(2):619–626

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ahmadi SA (2017) Human behavior-based optimization: a novel metaheuristic approach to solve complex optimization problems. Neural Comput Appl 28(1):233–244

    Google Scholar 

  32. Chou J-S, Nguyen N-M (2020) FBI inspired meta-optimization. Appl Soft Comput 93:106339

    Google Scholar 

  33. Askari Q, Younas I, Saeed M (2020) Political optimizer: a novel socio-inspired meta-heuristic for global optimization. Knowl-Based Syst 195:105709

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang Y, Jin Z (2020) Group teaching optimization algorithm: a novel metaheuristic method for solving global optimization problems. Expert Syst Appl 148:113246

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mirjalili S, Mirjalili SM, Hatamlou A (2016) Multi-verse optimizer: a nature-inspired algorithm for global optimization. Neural Comput Appl 27(2):495–513

    Google Scholar 

  36. Yadav A (2019) AEFA: artificial electric field algorithm for global optimization. Swarm Evol Comput 48:93–108

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hashim FA, Houssein EH, Mabrouk MS, Al-Atabany W, Mirjalili S (2019) Henry gas solubility optimization: a novel physics-based algorithm. Future Gener Comput Syst 101:646–667

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hashim FA, Hussain K, Houssein EH, Mabrouk MS, Al-Atabany W (2021) Archimedes optimization algorithm: a new metaheuristic algorithm for solving optimization problems. Appl Intell 51(3):1531–1551

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Faramarzi A, Heidarinejad M, Stephens B, Mirjalili S (2020) Equilibrium optimizer: a novel optimization algorithm. Knowl-Based Syst 191:105190

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mirjalili S (2016) SCA: a sine cosine algorithm for solving optimization problems. Knowl-Based Syst 96:120–133

    Google Scholar 

  41. Cuevas E, Galvez J (2019) An optimization algorithm guided by a machine learning approach. Int J Mach Learn Cyb 10(11):2963–2991

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ahmadianfar I, Bozorg-Haddad O, Chu X (2020) Gradient-based optimizer: a new metaheuristic optimization algorithm. Inf Sci 540:131–159

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Ahmadianfar I, Heidari AA, Gandomi AH, Chu X, Chen H (2021) RUN beyond the metaphor: an efficient optimization algorithm based on Runge Kutta method. Expert Syst Appl 181:115079

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wolpert DH, Macready WG (1997) No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 1(1):67–82

    Google Scholar 

  45. Martin-Smith KM, Vincent AC (2006) Exploitation and trade of Australian seahorses, pipehorses, sea dragons and pipefishes (family Syngnathidae). Oryx 40(2):141–151

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kuiter RH (2000) Seahorses, pipefishes and their relatives: a comprehensive guide to Syngnathiformes. TMC Publishing, Chorleywood

  47. Kuiter RH (2001) Revision of the Australian seahorses of the genus Hippocampus (Syngnathiformes: Syngnathidae) with descriptions of nine new species. Rec Aust Mus 53(3):293–340

    Google Scholar 

  48. Leysen H, Roos G, Adriaens D (2011) Morphological variation in head shape of pipefishes and seahorses in relation to snout length and developmental growth. J Morphol 272(10):1259–1270

    Google Scholar 

  49. Roos G, Van Wassenbergh S, Herrel A, Adriaens D, Aerts P (2010) Snout allometry in seahorses: insights on optimisation of pivot feeding performance during ontogeny. J Exp Biol 213(13):2184–2193

    Google Scholar 

  50. Kendrick AJ, Hyndes GA (2005) Variations in the dietary compositions of morphologically diverse syngnathid fishes. Environ Biol Fish 72(4):415–427

    Google Scholar 

  51. Porter MM, Adriaens D, Hatton RL, Meyers MA, McKittrick J (2015) Why the seahorse tail is square. Sci 349(6243):aaa6683

    Google Scholar 

  52. Mantegna RN (1994) Fast, accurate algorithm for numerical simulation of levy stable stochastic processes. Phys Rev E 49(5):4677–4683

    Google Scholar 

  53. Einstein A (1956) Investigations on the theory of the Brownian movement. Dover, New York

  54. Liang J-J, Qu B-Y, Suganthan PN (2013) Problem definitions and evaluation criteria for the CEC 2014 special session and competition on single objective real-parameter numerical optimization. Computational Intelligence Laboratory, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou China and Technical Report, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 635:490

    Google Scholar 

  55. Wilcoxon F (1992) Individual comparisons by ranking methods. In breakthroughs in statistics (pp 196-202). Springer, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  56. Derrac J, García S, Molina D, Herrera F (2011) A practical tutorial on the use of nonparametric statistical tests as a methodology for comparing evolutionary and swarm intelligence algorithms. Swarm Evol Comput 1(1):3–18

    Google Scholar 

  57. Coello CAC (2000) Use of a self-adaptive penalty approach for engineering optimization problems. Comput Ind 41(2):113–127

    Google Scholar 

  58. Coello Coello CA, Becerra RL (2004) Efficient evolutionary optimization through the use of a cultural algorithm. Eng Optimiz 36(2):219–236

    Google Scholar 

  59. He Q, Wang L (2007) An effective co-evolutionary particle swarm optimization for constrained engineering design problems. Eng Appl Artif Intell 20(1):89–99

    Google Scholar 

  60. Dhiman G, Kumar V (2017) Spotted hyena optimizer: a novel bio-inspired based metaheuristic technique for engineering applications. Adv Eng Softw 114:48–70

    Google Scholar 

  61. Ray T, Liew KM (2003) Society and civilization: an optimization algorithm based on the simulation of social behavior. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 7(4):386–396

    Google Scholar 

  62. Zhao W, Wang L, Zhang Z (2020) Artificial ecosystem-based optimization: a novel nature-inspired meta-heuristic algorithm. Neural Comput Appl 32(13):9383–9425

    Google Scholar 

  63. Abualigah L, Yousri D, Abd Elaziz M, Ewees AA, Al-qaness MA, Gandomi AH (2021) Aquila optimizer: a novel meta-heuristic optimization algorithm. Comput Ind Eng 157:107250

    Google Scholar 

  64. Chickermane HEMIANT, Gea HC (1996) Structural optimization using a new local approximation method. Int J Numer Meth Eng 39(5):829–846

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  65. Mirjalili S (2015) Moth-flame optimization algorithm: a novel nature-inspired heuristic paradigm. Knowl-Based Syst 89:228–249

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the Basic Research Foundation of Liaoning Educational Committee (Grant No. LJ2019JL017), the Scientific Research Foundation for Doctors, the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2021 M701537), the Scientific Research Foundation for Doctors, Department of Science & Technology of Liaoning Province (Grant No. 2019-BS-118).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Intelligence Science and Optimization, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin, 123000, China

    Shijie Zhao, Tianran Zhang, Shilin Ma & Mengchen Wang

  2. Institute for Optimization and Decision Analytics, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin, 123000, China

    Shijie Zhao

Authors
  1. Shijie Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tianran Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shilin Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mengchen Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shijie Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, S., Zhang, T., Ma, S. et al. Sea-horse optimizer: a novel nature-inspired meta-heuristic for global optimization problems. Appl Intell 53, 11833–11860 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-03994-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-03994-3

Keywords