Skip to main content
Log in

Credible nodes selection in mobile crowdsensing based on GAN

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High-quality perception data is the basis of the operation of mobile crowdsensing platform. False data has a negative impact on the perception platform to draw wrong conclusions and cannot provide valuable help to service requesters. In order to solve this problem, we propose a trusted user selection framework based on generative adversarial network to select perceived users from the perspective of providing data, named PnGAN. The framework requires users to provide evaluation opinions on the current environment when uploading data, the evaluation opinion can not only reflect the current situation of the perceived environment, it can also be used as one of the data for user credibility evaluation. The analysis module in the framework processes the data uploaded by users, and apply the trust matrix to calculate the reputation value, determine user credibility based on reputation value. Experiments show that, compared with other algorithms for selecting trusted users, the average error rate of our method decreased by 30.62%, and the data quality improved by 15.32%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Algorithm 1
Algorithm 2
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Restuccia F, Ghosh N, Bhattacharjee S (2017) Quality of information in mobile crowdsensing: Survey and research challenges. ACM Trans Sensor Netw (TOSN) 13(4):1–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Capponi A, Fiandrino C, Kantarci B (2019) A survey on mobile crowdsensing systems. Challenges, Solutions, Opportu 21(3):2419–2465

    Google Scholar 

  3. Guo B, Wang Z, Yu Z (2015) Mobile crowd sensing and computing: The review of an emerging human-powered sensing paradigm. ACM Comput Surv (CSUR) 48(1):1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Corradi A, Foschini L, Gioia L (2016) Leveraging communities to boost participation and data collection in mobile crowd sensing 2016: 1–6

  5. Cortellazzi J, Foschini L, De Rolt C R (2016) Crowdsensing and proximity services for impaired mobility 2016: 44–49

  6. Guo B, Chen C, Zhang D (2016) Mobile crowd sensing and computing: when participatory sensing meets participatory social media. IEEE Commun Mag 54(2):131–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Guo B, Yu Z, Zhou X (2014) From participatory sensing to mobile crowd sensing 2014: 593–598

  8. Habibzadeh H, Qin Z, Soyata T (2017) Large-scale distributed dedicated-and non-dedicated smart city sensing systems. IEEE Sensors J 17(23):7649–7658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu J, Shen H, Narman HS (2018) A survey of mobile crowdsensing techniques: A critical component for the internet of things. ACM Trans Cyber-Phys Syst 2(3):1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Truong NB, Lee GM, Um TW (2019) Trust evaluation mechanism for user recruitment in mobile crowd-sensing in the Internet of Things. IEEE Trans Inform Forensic Sec 14(10):2705–2719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Goodfellow I, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M (2014) Generative adversarial nets 2014, pp. 2672–2680

  12. Wang L, Zhang D, Yan Z (2015) effSense: A Novel Mobile Crowd-Sensing Framework for Energy-Efficient and Cost-Effective Data Uploading. IEEE Trans Syst, Man, Cybern: Syst 45(12):1549–1563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. An J, Gui X, Yang J (2015) Mobile crowd sensing for internet of things: A credible crowdsourcing model in mobile-sense service 2015, pp. 92–99

  14. Huang KL, Kanhere SS, Hu W (2014) On the need for a reputation system in mobile phone based sensing. Ad Hoc Netw 12:130–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zupančič E, Žalik B (2019) Data trustworthiness evaluation in mobile crowdsensing systems with users’ trust dispositions’ consideration, Sensors 19(6): 1326

  16. Amintoosi H, Kanhere SS (2014) A reputation framework for social participatory sensing systems. Mobile Netwo Appli 19(1):88–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Su K, Xiao B, Liu B (2017) TAP: A personalized trust-aware QoS prediction approach for web service recommendation. Knowl-Based Syst 115:55–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Goncslves J, Feldman M, Hu S (2017) Task Routing and Assignment in Crowdsourcing Based on Cognitive Abilities 2017: 1023–1031

  19. Liu T, Zhu Y, Huang L (2019) TGBA: A two-phase group buying based auction mechanism for recruiting workers in mobile crowd sensing 149: 56–75

  20. Xiong J, Liu H, Jin B (2021) A lightweight privacy protection scheme based on user preference in mobile crowdsensing. Trans Emerg Telecommun Technol 32(5):e4000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Duan Z, Li W, Zheng X (2019) Mutual-preference driven truthful auction mechanism in mobile crowdsensing 2019: 1233–1242

  22. Yang S, Han K, Zheng Z (2018) Towards personalized task matching in mobile crowdsensing via fine-grained user profiling 2018: 2411–2419

  23. Wang E, Yang Y, Lou K (2019) User selection utilizing data properties in mobile crowdsensing 490, pp. 210-226.1

  24. Sun P, Wang Z, Wu L (2020) Towards personalized privacy-preserving incentive for truth discovery in mobile crowdsensing systems. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 21(1):352–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang Y, Liu W, Wang E (2019) A prediction-based user selection framework for heterogeneous mobile crowdsensing. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 18(11):2460–2473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dai M, Su Z, Xu Q (2021) A Trust-Driven Contract Incentive Scheme for Mobile Crowd-Sensing Networks. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol 71(2):1794–1806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang E, Yang Y, Wu J (2017) An efficient prediction-based user recruitment for mobile crowdsensing. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 17(1):16–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jin H, He B, Su L (2019) Data-Driven Pricing for Sensing Effort Elicitation in Mobile Crowd Sensing Systems. IEEE/ACM Trans Network 27(6):2208–2221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhou T , Cai Z , Wu K (2017) FIDC: A framework for improving data credibility in mobile crowdsensing 120: 157–169

  30. Yang D (2020) Research on data collection and data filtering technology for crowdsensing 2020: 1–118

  31. Yang S, Wu F, Tang S (2017) On designing data quality-aware truth estimation and surplus sharing method for mobile crowdsensing, IEEE J Select Areas Commun 35(4): 832–847

  32. An J, Yang H, Gui X (2019) TCNS: node selection with privacy protection in crowdsensing based on twice consensuses of blockchain. IEEE Trans Netw Serv Manag 16(3):1255–1267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Dering M L, Tucker C S (2017) Generative adversarial networks for increasing the veracity of big data 2017: 2595–2602

  34. Xie T, Yiming D U, Wang T (2020) Structure Improved Conditional Spectral Normalization Generative Adversarial Networks for Image Recognition 2020: 842–846

  35. Jiang T, Li Y, Xie W (2020) Discriminative reconstruction constrained generative adversarial network for hyperspectral anomaly detection. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sensing 58(7):4666–4679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Shi Y, Davaslioglu K, Sagduyu YE (2020) Generative adversarial network in the air: Deep adversarial learning for wireless signal spoofing. IEEE Trans Cognitive Commun Network 7(1):294–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang J, Yang Z, Zhang J (2019) AdaBalGAN: An improved generative adversarial network with imbalanced learning for wafer defective pattern recognition, IEEE Trans Semiconduct Manufact. 32(3):310–319

  38. Jin H, Su L, Chen D (2018) Thanos: Incentive mechanism with quality awareness for mobile crowd sensing. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 18(8):1951–1964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang P, Yu Z, Lin C (2020) D2D-enabled reliable data collection for mobile crowd sensing 2020: 180-187

Download references

Acknowledgements

This present research work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61403109, 61202458), the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (20112303120007) and the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (LH2020F034).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication. I would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. All the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, J., Liu, J., Chen, J. et al. Credible nodes selection in mobile crowdsensing based on GAN. Appl Intell 53, 22715–22727 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-023-04815-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-023-04815-x

Keywords

Navigation