Skip to main content
Log in

Exploring gait analysis and deep feature contributions to the screening of cervical spondylotic myelopathy

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the cervical region of middle-aged and elderly patients, cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is frequently recognized as the primary factor that contributes to spinal cord dysfunction. Numbness and gait disturbance are the main clinical manifestations of CSM, which exhibits as a stiff and spastic gait in comparison with that of healthy controls (HCs). Because it is difficult to screen CSM in the primary stage which easily leading to a delay in medication, the identification of CSM followed by treatment is urgent. The aim of this study is to develop an automated classification method for the screening of CSM, using fifty-four lower extremity kinematic parameters derived from three-dimensional gait analysis. The present study employs a deep neural network (DNN) model to automatically extract informative features from raw gait kinematic data. Hierarchically placed layers in the DNN produce deep feature maps that are used to screen CSM using multiple shallow classifiers. The proposed method is evaluated using a self-constructed gait database of patients diagnosed with CSM and HCs, both groups consisting of 45 individuals within a similar age range. Experimental results reveal that the combination of deep features and shallow classifiers yields remarkable accuracy rates for binary classification with twofold, tenfold, and leave-one-out cross-validation methods, all achieving an accuracy of 99.44 \(\mathrm{\%}\). The data suggest that our approach is efficient in detecting the early onset CSM and performs better than other cutting-edge techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Haddas R, Cox J, Belanger T, Ju KL, Derman PB (2019) Characterizing gait abnormalities in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a neuromuscular analysis. Spine J 19(11):1803–1808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zileli M, Borkar SA, Sinha S, Reinas R, Alves OL, Kim SH, Parthiban J (2019) Cervical Spondylotic myelopathy: natural course and the value of diagnostic techniques–WFNS Spine Committee recommendations. Neurospine 16(3):386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ghogawala Z, Terrin N, Dunbar MR, Breeze JL, Freund KM, Kanter AS, Benzel EC (2021) Effect of ventral vs dorsal spinal surgery on patient-reported physical functioning in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 325(10):942–951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Haddas R, Patel S, Arakal R, Boah A, Belanger T, Ju KL (2018) Spine and lower extremity kinematics during gait in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine J 18(9):1645–1652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brain WR, Northfield D, Wilkinson M (1952) The neurological manifestations of cervical spondylosis. Brain 75:187–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hopkins BS, Weber KA II, Kesavabhotla K, Paliwal M, Cantrell DR, Smith ZA (2019) Machine learning for the prediction of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a post hoc pilot study of 28 participants. World Neurosurg 127:e436–e442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Siasios ID, Spanos SL, Kanellopoulos AK, Fotiadou A, Pollina J, Schneider D, Fountas KN (2017) The role of gait analysis in the evaluation of patients with cervical myelopathy: a literature review study. World Neurosurg 101:275–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang N, Luo C, Huang X, Huang Y, Zhan J (2022) DeepCS: Training a deep learning model for cervical spondylosis recognition on small-labeled sensor data. Neurocomputing 472:24–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. McDermott A, Bolger C, Keating L, McEvoy L, Meldrum D (2010) Reliability of three-dimensional gait analysis in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Gait Posture 32(4):552–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Baucher G, Taskovic J, Troude L, Molliqaj G, Nouri A, Tessitore E (2022) Risk factors for the development of degenerative cervical myelopathy: a review of the literature. Neurosurg Rev 45:1675–1689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Malone A, Meldrum D, Bolger C (2012) Gait impairment in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: comparison with age- and gender-matched healthy controls. Eur Spine J 21(12):2456–2466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Malone A, Meldrum D, Bolger C (2015) Three-dimensional gait analysis outcomes at 1 year following decompressive surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J 24(1):48–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hassanzadeh H, Bell J, Dooley E, Puvanesarajah V, Kamalapathy P, Labaran L, Russell S (2022) Evaluation of gait and functional stability in preoperative cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients. Spine 47(4):317–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Moorthy RK, Bhattacharji S, Thayumanasamy G, Rajshekhar V (2005) Quantitative changes in gait parameters after central corpectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine 2(4):418–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Malone A, Meldrum D, Gleeson J, Bolger C (2013) Electromyographic characteristics of gait impairment in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J 22(11):2538–2544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Singh A, Crockard HA (1999) Quantitative assessment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy by a simple walking test. Lancet 354(9176):370–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nishimura H, Endo K, Suzuki H, Tanaka H, Shishido T, Yamamoto K (2015) Gait analysis in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Asian Spine J 9(3):321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yoo D, Kang KC, Lee JH, Lee KY, Hwang IU (2021) Diagnostic usefulness of 10-step tandem gait test for the patient with degenerative cervical myelopathy. Sci Rep 11(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Huo H, Chang Y, Tang Y (2022) Analysis of treatment effect of acupuncture on cervical spondylosis and neck pain with the data mining technology under deep learning. J Supercomput 78:5547–5564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Khan O, Badhiwala JH, Witiw CD, Wilson JR, Fehlings MG (2021) Machine learning algorithms for prediction of health-related quality-of-life after surgery for mild degenerative cervical myelopathy. Spine J 21(10):1659–1669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Stephens ME, O’Neal CM, Westrup AM, Muhammad FY, McKenzie DM, Fagg AH, Smith ZA (2021) Utility of machine learning algorithms in degenerative cervical and lumbar spine disease: a systematic review. Neurosurg Rev 45:965–978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Koyama T, Fujita K, Watanabe M, Kato K, Sasaki T, Yoshii T, Okawa A (2022) Cervical myelopathy screening with machine learning algorithm focusing on finger motion using noncontact sensor. Spine 47(2):163–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. [Murat et al., 2021] Murat F, Yildirim O, Talo M, Demir Y, Tan RS, Ciaccio EJ, Acharya UR (2021) Exploring deep features and ECG attributes to detect cardiac rhythm classes. Knowl-Based Syst 107473.

  24. Yu X, Xiang L (2014) Classifying cervical spondylosis based on fuzzy calculation. Abstr Appl Anal 2014:2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yu X, Liu M, Meng L, Xiang L (2015) Classifying cervical spondylosis based on x-ray quantitative diagnosis. Neurocomputing 165:222–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sreeraj M, Joy J, Jose M, Varghese M, Rejoice TJ (2022) Comparative analysis of machine learning approaches for early stage cervical spondylosis detection. J King Saud Univ-Comput Inf Sci 34(6):3301–3309

    Google Scholar 

  27. Merali Z, Wang JZ, Badhiwala JH, Witiw CD, Wilson JR, Fehlings MG (2021) A deep learning model for detection of cervical spinal cord compression in MRI scans. Sci Rep 11(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yonenobu K, Abumi K, Nagata K, Taketomi E, Ueyama K (2001) Interobserver and Intraobserver reliability of the Japanese Orthopaedic association scoring system for evaluation of cervical compression myelopathy. Spine 26(17):1890–1894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Genzel M, Macdonald J, Marz M (2022) Solving inverse problems with deep neural networks–robustness included? IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 45(1):1119–1134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Talo M (2019) Automated classification of histopathology images using transfer learning. Artif Intell Med 101:101743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Jager J, Krems RV (2023) Universal expressiveness of variational quantum classifiers and quantum kernels for support vector machines. Nat Commun 14(1):576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kramer O (2013) K-nearest neighbors. In Dimensionality reduction with unsupervised nearest neighbors (pp. 13–23). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  33. Biau G, Scornet E (2016) A random forest guided tour. TEST 25(2):197–227

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Natekin A, Knoll A (2013) Gradient boosting machines, a tutorial. Front Neurorobot 7:21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Safavian SR, Landgrebe D (1991) A survey of decision tree classifier methodology. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 21(3):660–674

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Hastie T, Rosset S, Zhu J, Zou H (2009) Multi-class adaboost. Statistics and its. Interface 2(3):349–360

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Srivastava S, Gupta MR, Frigyik BA (2007) Bayesian quadratic discriminant analysis. J Mach Learn Res 8(6):1277–1305

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Murtagh F (1991) Multilayer perceptrons for classification and regression. Neurocomputing 2(5–6):183–197

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Ye J, Janardan R, Li Q (2004) Two-dimensional linear discriminant analysis. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 17:1569–1576

    Google Scholar 

  40. McCormick JR, Sama AJ, Schiller NC, Butler AJ, Donnally CJ (2020) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a guide to diagnosis and management. J Am Board Fam Med 33(2):303–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ruiz AP, Flynn M, Large J, Middlehurst M, Bagnall A (2021) The great multivariate time series classification bake off: a review and experimental evaluation of recent algorithmic advances. Data Min Knowl Disc 35(2):401–449

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Ismail Fawaz H, Forestier G, Weber J, Idoumghar L, Muller PA (2019) Deep learning for time series classification: a review. Data Min Knowl Disc 33(4):917–963

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 62173212) and Taishan Scholars Program of Shandong Province (Grant no.tsqn202306017).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Bing Ji or Wei Zeng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The present study was approved by an ethical review board (KYLL-2020(KS)-743). Written informed consent was obtained from each participant before data collection began.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ji, B., Dai, Q., Ji, X. et al. Exploring gait analysis and deep feature contributions to the screening of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Appl Intell 53, 24587–24602 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-023-04829-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-023-04829-5

Keywords

Navigation