Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Three-way decision: a unification of two-universe models of rough sets

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The note concerns two-universe rough sets. First, we discuss the name of two-universe model. Second, we outline two lines of the development of two-universe rough sets and affirm that three-way decision unifies models of two-universe rough sets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In [19], it exactly cited [31, 32] and Yao et al., 1995 as the references of two-universe rough sets. Unfortunately, the list of references missed the paper Yao et al., 1995, which obviously was [42]. Besides, [36] said the first study on the rough set model over two universes was done in 1995, but no references were presented. I think that it means [32], or [42], or both of them.

References

  1. Chakraborty MK (2016) On some issues in the foundation of rough sets: the problem of definition. Fund Inform 148:123–132

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen DG (2013) Fuzzy rough sets. Science press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ciucci D (2017) Back to the beginnings: Pawlak’s definitions of the terms information system and rough set. In: G Wang, A Skowron, Y Yao, D Slezak, L Polkowski (eds), Thriving Rough Sets. Stud Comput Intell, vol 708, Springer, pp 225–235

  4. Dai JH, Han HF, Zhang XH et al (2017) Catoptrical rough set model on two universes using granule-based definition and its variable precision extensions. Inf Sci 390:70–81

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Davvaz B (2008) A short note on algebraic T-rough sets. Inf Sci 178:3247–3252

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Diker M, Uğur AA (2021) Fuzzy rough set models over two universes using textures. Fuzzy Sets Syst 165–114

  7. Dubois D, Prade H (1990) Rough fuzzy sets and fuzzy rough sets, International Journal Of General. System 17(2–3):191–209

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hu J, Li Tr, Lu C, Fujita H, Li SY (2017) Incremental fuzzy probabilistic rough sets over two universes. Int J Approx Reason 81:28–48

  9. Li XN, Sun QQ, Chen HM, Yi HJ (2020) Three-way decision on two universes. Inf Sci 515:263–279

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Li XN, Wang X, Sun BZ, She YH, Zhao L (2021) Three-way decision on information tables. Inf Sci 545:25–43

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Li TJ (2008) Rough approximation operators on two universes of discourse and their fuzzy extensions. Fuzzy Sets Syst 159:3033–3050

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Li TJ, Zhang WX (2008) Rough fuzzy approximation on two universes of discourse. Inf Sci 118:892–906

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu CH, Miao DQ, Zhang N (2012) Graded rough set based on two universes and its properties. Knowl-Based Syst 33:65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu GL (2010) Rough set theory based on two universal sets and its applications. Knowl-Based Syst 23:110–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ma WM, Sun BZ (2012) Probalilistic rough set over two universes. Int J Approximate Reasoning 53:608–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Morsi NN, Yakout MM (1998) Axiomatics for fuzzy rough sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 100:327–342

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Pawlak Z (1982) Rough sets. Int J Comput Inform Sci 11:341–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pawlak Z (1991) Rough Sets: theoretical aspects of reasoning about data, system theory, knowledge engineering and problem solving, vol 9. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands

  19. Pei DW, Xu ZB, (2014) Rough set models on two universes. Int J Gen Syst 33(5):569–581

  20. Radzikowska AM, kerre EE (2002) A comparative study of fuzzy rough sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 126:137–155

  21. Shakiba A, Hooshmandasl MR (2015) S-approximation Spaces: a Three-way decision approach. Fundam Inform 139:307–328

  22. Shakiba A, Hooshmandasl MR, Davvaz B, Shahzadeh Fazeli SA (2016) An intuitionistic fuzzy approach to S-approximation spaces. J Intell & Fuzzy Syst 30(6): 3385–3397

  23. Shao MW, Guo L, Wang CZ (2018) Connections between two-universe rough sets and formal concepts. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 9:1869–1877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sun BZ, Ma WM (2011) Fuzzy rough set model on two different universes and its application. Appl Math Model 35(4):1798–1809

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Sun BZ, Ma WM, Qian YH (2017) Multigranulation fuzzy rough set over two universes and its application to decision making. Knowl-Based Syst 123:61–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sun BZ, Ma WM, Chen XT, Zhang X (2019) Multigranulation vague rough set over two universes and its application to group decision making. Soft Comput 23:8927–8956

  27. Sun BZ, Zhou XM, Lin NN (2020) Diversified binary relation-based fuzzy multigranulation rough set over two universes and application to multiple attribute group decision making. Information Fusion 55:91–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tan AH, Wu WZ, Shi SW, Zhao SM (2019) Granulation selection and decision making with multigranulation rough set over two universes. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 10:2501–2513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Uğur AA, Diker M (2020) Generalized textural rough sets: Rough set models over two universes. Inf Sci 521:398–421

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang GY, Skowron A, Yao YY, Ślȩzak D, Polkowski L (Eds) (2017) Thriving Rough Sets: 10th Anniversary- Honoring Professor Z. Pawlak’s Life and Legacy and 35 Years of Rough Sets, Springer, Cham

  31. Wong SKM, Wang LS, Yao YY, (1992) Interval structure: a framework for representing uncertain information. Uncertain Artif Intell Proc 8th Conf pp 336–343

  32. Wong SKM, Wang LS, Yao YY (1995) On modeling uncertainty with interval structures. Comput Intell 11:406–426

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Wu WZ, Mi JS, Zhang WX (2003) Generalized fuzzy rough sets. Inf Sci 15:263–282

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Pedrycz W, Gomide F (2007) Fuzzy systems engineering toward human-centric computing. John Wiley & Sons Inc, Hoboken, New Jersey

  35. Wu WZ, Zhang WX (2004) Constructive and axiomatic approaches of fuzzy approximation operators. Inf Sci 159:233–254

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Xu WH, Sun WX, Liu YF, Zhang WX (2013) Fuzzy rough set models over two universes. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 4:631–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Xu WY, Jia B, Li XN (2021) A two-universe model of three-way decision with ranking and reference tuple. Inf Sci 581:808–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Xu WY, Jia B, Li XN (2022) A generalized model of three-way decision with ranking and reference tuple. Int J Approximate Reasoning 144:51–68

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Yan RX, Zheng J, Liu J, Zhai Y (2010) Researh on the model of rough set over dual-universes. Knowl-Based Syst 23:817–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Yang D, Cai MJ, Li QG, Xu F (2022) Multigranulation fuzzy probabilistic rough set model on two universes. Int J Approximate Reasoning 145:18–35

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. Yang HL, Liao XW, Wang SY, Wang J (2013) Fuzzy probalistic rough set model on two universes and its applications. Int J Approximate Reasoning 54:1410–1420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Yao YY, Wong SKM, Wang LS (1995) A non-numeric approach to uncertain reasoning. Int J Gen Syst 23(4):343–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Yao YY, Wong SKM, Lin TY (1997) A review of rough set models, in rough sets and data mining: analysis for imprecise data, Lin TY, Cercone N (Eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp 47–75

  44. Yao YY (2012) An outline of a theory of three-way decisions. In: Yao JT et al (eds) RSCTC 2012, LNAI, vol 7413. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang C, Li DY, Liang JY (2020) Multi-granularity three-way decisions with adjustable hesitant fuzzy linguistic multigranulation decision-theoretic rough sets over two universes. Inf Sci 507:665–683

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 61772019, 61976244, 61906154).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mathematics and Statistics, Xidian University, 710071, Xi’an, China

    Xiaonan Li & Yucong Yan

Authors
  1. Xiaonan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yucong Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaonan Li.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, X., Yan, Y. Three-way decision: a unification of two-universe models of rough sets. Appl Intell 54, 460–469 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-023-05209-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-023-05209-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation