Skip to main content

Advertisement

A self-calibration algorithm for soil moisture sensors using deep learning

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the current era of smart agriculture, accurately measuring soil moisture has become crucial for optimising irrigation systems, significantly improving water use efficiency and crop yields. However, existing soil moisture sensor technologies often suffer from accuracy issues, leading to inefficient irrigation practices. The calibration of these sensors is limited by conventional methods that rely on extensive ground reference data, making the process both costly and impractical. This study introduces an innovative self-calibration method for soil moisture sensors using deep learning. The proposed method focuses on a novel strategy requiring only two characteristic points for calibration: saturation and field capacity. Deep learning algorithms enable effective and accurate in-situ self-calibration of sensors. This method was tested using a large dataset of simulated erroneous sensor readings generated with simulation software. The results demonstrate that the method significantly improves soil moisture measurement accuracy, with 84.83% of sensors showing improvement, offering a more agile and cost-effective implementation compared to traditional approaches. This advance represents a significant step towards more efficient and sustainable agriculture, offering farmers a valuable tool for optimal water and crop management, while highlighting the potential of deep learning in solving complex engineering challenges.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Data Availability

The datasets used in this work are publicly available in the Zenodo repository: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10897580. Upon request, any other specific fold used can be provided by the corresponding author.

References

  1. Mukhlisin M, Astuti HW, Wardihani ED et al (2021) Techniques for ground-based soil moisture measurement: a detailed overview. Arab J Geosci 14(2032):172–176

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gantiva-Osorio M, Pérez-Ruiz A, Chaparro JA (2023) Comparison of moisture controllers for blueberries based on hydrodynamic parameters of the substrate, pp 172–176

  3. Pandey J, Chamoli V, Prakash R (2020) A review: Soil moisture estimation using different techniques, pp 105–111

  4. Le MT, Pham CD, Nguyen TPT (2023) Wireless powered moisture sensors for smart agriculture and pollution prevention: Opportunities, challenges, and future outlook. Current Pollution Reports 9

  5. González-Teruel JD, Torres-Sánchez R, Blaya-Ros P.J, Toledo-Moreo A.B, Jiménez-Buendía M, Soto-Valles F (2019) Design and calibration of a low-cost sdi-12 soil moisture sensor. Sensors 19(3)

  6. Pahuja R (2022) Development of semi-automatic recalibration sytem and curve-fit models for smart soil moisture sensor. Measurement 203

  7. Adla S, Rai NK, Karumanchi SH, Tripathi S, Disse M, Pande S (2020) Laboratory calibration and performance evaluation of low-cost capacitive and very low-cost resistive soil moisture sensors. Sensors 20(2)

  8. Nagahage EAAD, Nagahage ISP, Fujino T (2019) Calibration and validation of a low-cost capacitive moisture sensor to integrate the automated soil moisture monitoring system. Agriculture 9(7)

  9. Chen L, Zhangzhong L, Zheng W, Yu J, Wang Z, Wang L, Huang C (2019) Data-driven calibration of soil moisture sensor considering impacts of temperature: A case study on fdr sensors. Sensors 19(20)

  10. Barcelo-Ordinas JM, Doudou M, Garcia-Vidal J (2019) Self-calibration methods for uncontrolled environments in sensor networks: A reference survey. Ad Hoc Netw 88:142–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen L, Zhangzhong L, Zheng W (2019) Data-driven calibration of soil moisture sensor considering impacts of temperature: A case study on fdr sensors. Sensors 19

  12. Si M, Xiong Y, Du S (2020) Evaluation and calibration of a low-cost particle sensor in ambient conditions using machine-learning methods. Atmos Meas Tech 13:1693–1707

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Verma S, Pahuja R (2021) Recalibration and performance comparison of soil moisture sensors using regression and neural network characteristic models. Mater Today Proc J 45:4852–4861

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Y, Wang G, Hu P (2022) Root-zone soil moisture estimation based on remote sensing data and deep learning. Environmental Research 212

  15. Ahmed AAM, Deo RC, Raj N, Ghahramani A, Feng Q, Yin Z, Yang L (2021) Deep learning forecasts of soil moisture: Convolutional neural network and gated recurrent unit models coupled with satellite-derived modis, observations and synoptic-scale climate index data. Remote Sensing 13(4)

  16. Lee C, Sohn E, Park JD (2019) Estimation of soil moisture using deep learning based on satellite data: a case study of south korea. GIScience and Remote Sensing 56:43–67

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Delaine F, Lebental B, Rivano H (2019) In situ calibration algorithms for environmental sensor networks: A review. IEEE Sensors Journal 19(15):5968–5978

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee B-T, Son S-C, Kang K (2020) A blind calibration scheme exploiting mutual calibration relationships for a dense mobile sensor network. IEEE Sensors Journal 14

  19. Veiga T, Ljunggren E, Bach K, Akselsen S (2021) Blind calibration of air quality wireless sensor networks using deep neural networks. 2021 IEEE International Conference on Omni-Layer Intelligent Systems (COINS), pp 1–6

  20. Wang Y, Yang A, Chen X (2017) A deep learning approach for blind drift calibration of sensor networks. IEEE Sensors Journal 17(Number):4158–4171

  21. Li X, Shao M, Zhao C (2019) Estimating the field capacity and permanent wilting point at the regional scale for the hexi corridor in china using a state-space modeling approach. J Soils Sediments 19:3805–3816

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Rai RK, Singh VP, Upadhyay A (2017) Soil analysis. Planning and evaluation of irrigation projects 505

  23. Šimůnek J, Genuchten MT, Šejna M (2008) Development and applications of the hydrus and stanmod software packages and related codes. Vadose Zone J 7:587–600

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Maan C, Veldhuis M-C, Wiel BJH (2023) Dynamic root growth in response to depth-varying soil moisture availability: a rhizobox study. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 27(12):2341–2355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bhatti S, Heeren DM, O’Shaughnessy SA et al (2023) Toward automated irrigation management with integrated crop water stress index and spatial soil water balance. Precis Agric 24:2223–2247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pandey A, Ojha R (2024) Macropore flow and its characteristics. Sustainable management of land, water and pollution of built-up area. Springer, Cham, pp 111–133

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organisation for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diego Alberto Aranda Britez.

Ethics declarations

Competing of interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aranda Britez, D., Tapia, A. & Millán Gata, P. A self-calibration algorithm for soil moisture sensors using deep learning. Appl Intell 55, 276 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-024-05921-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-024-05921-0

Keywords